Image 01 Image 03

Democrat Strategists: We Have Found Our “Change” Candidate For 2024

Democrat Strategists: We Have Found Our “Change” Candidate For 2024

“If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate” …. If Democrats want a fighting chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Mrs. Clinton is likely their best option.”

Please. Please. Pretty please. Pretty please with sugar on top. And a cherry, let’s not forget the cherry.

How much fun would it be, from a purely blogospheric perspective, for Hillary Clinton to mount a 2024 ‘comeback kid’ campaign as the ‘change’ candidate. I might need abdominal surgery either from laughing or puking so hard I hurt something.

Doug Shoen, longtime Democrat pollster, and Andrew Stein, longtime NYC politician, make the case in The Wall Street Journal, Hillary Clinton’s 2024 Election Comeback:

A perfect storm in the Democratic Party is making a once-unfathomable scenario plausible: a political comeback for Hillary Clinton in 2024.

Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Yup, nothing says “young[er]” and “change” quite like Hillary. But continue:

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again.

Of course she wants to run. The Russkie’s and Comey stole it from her in 2016:

Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.

Come on! Enough with this insurrectionist talk refusing to accept the legitimacy of an election.

Here’s the punch line:

Given the likelihood that Democrats will lose control of Congress in 2022, we can anticipate that Mrs. Clinton will begin shortly after the midterms to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a new and more successful path….

If Democrats want a fighting chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Mrs. Clinton is likely their best option.

Sure, go ahead and laugh. Laughing at the Clintons can be dangerous to one’s health.

On the plus side, though, maybe we’ll finally find those 30,000 deleted emails.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


She does have the advantage of not being motivated by feelings.

Holy freaking crap….this has been her strategy all along? Foisting Biden on us and presenting herself as the build back betterer candidate to boost her likeability?

Comanche Voter | January 11, 2022 at 7:12 pm

It will be a “change” from Slow Joe alright. She’s an even bigger crook than Joe and his grifting family.

The trouble with this approach is the candidate clearly has to be more likeable that Biden. That is not the case with Hillary….though Antonio Branco’s cartoons would be pure platinum if she did.

Colonel Travis | January 11, 2022 at 7:17 pm

“Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.”

Well darn. Since she was the one who instigated everything that started an investigation (Gee, I wonder why these writers didn’t mention that?), she should scold herself for making herself lose. Or maybe she’s just too smart for politics. Too many dumb people messing it up for her. Get out of the way of the smart lady! America needs her!

freespeechfanatic | January 11, 2022 at 7:19 pm

She will run. She’s psychotic, and so she can’t stop herself.

But don’t underestimate her. If our candidate is a RINO, she stands a good chance.

And Karl Rove insists she’ll have to beat Liz Cheney as the GOP change candidate.

Democrat Strategists: We Have Found Our “Cringe” Candidate For 2024


    henrybowman in reply to MrE. | January 11, 2022 at 9:14 pm

    When they say she’s the only one who could possibly win in 2024, the incredible thing is that they may very well be right. Who are all the other options? All younger, woker, and way more offensive to the mainstream voter. The old pharts know that, the kids themselves are totally oblivious to it.

She will have to take time off from her current job coaching Kamala on improving her popularity though. A popular Kamala could prove to be a formidable opponent for Hilary in 2024.

Don’t forget: She’s younger than The Donald. I think she’ll run if she can successfully hide the health issues.

The Clinton grift machine can’t run without one of them within spitting distance to the levers of power. So from an Clinton economic standpoint, and for donations to the Clinton Foundation. it makes sense for her to start making noises about running.

    That’s it right there. Contributions to the Clinton Family International Crime Syndicate have dried up lately. I really doubt she is running unless is to fend off subpoenas.

The sick old whore will never live that long.

Hillary, the face of PURE EEEEEEEEEEEEVIL.

“Doug Shoen, longtime Democrat pollster, and Andrew Stein, longtime NYC politician, make the case”

Did anyone bother to ask them what they were promised for making this case (or for refusing to do so)?

Possible Clinton v Trump rematch? Priceless!
Given that we have heard all of what both of them could possibly have to say; I vote that instead of debates they both be stripped naked, greased and tossed into a ring for a “rasslin” match. The pay per view could pay off the National Debt.

Barack Obama did one thing when he ran against her in the democrat primary that I never thought anyone could do. He made me want Hillary to win an election. Even the people who like Hillary hate her really. She would have lost even to John McCain.

However, she will not make the mistake she made in 2016. She couldn’t believe Trump could beat her so she didn’t do the maximum cheating. She will pursue levels of cheating above the Biden level. They will do even more mail in ballots and they will do more vote harvesting.

    Milhouse in reply to Martin. | January 12, 2022 at 2:02 am

    I think you’re committing a basic fallacy here. It’s not the candidate who does the cheating. I’m quite sure the candidate is kept well away from even knowing anything about the cheating. That’s simply not his job. He’s the public face of the campaign; the cheaters are its very private face, strictly back office. So the level of cheating wasn’t up to her the first time, and still won’t be if she runs again.

This is going to make the Squad, the Bernie Bros, and the violent kids in the party ultra super happy! Yet one more old white fogey standing between them and World Domination! They’ll be entirely out of Party control and burning down the Democratic convention in mobs. 1968 all over again!

With the entire Democrat/media machine working overtime to back her I think she could totally win. The plastic focus-group-targeted candidate the DNC runs may be a total lie but that is what most people will see.

Interesting (not doubting it can happen), but there is still a few obstacles in the way.

1) Biden is still POTUS and decides to run
2) Biden is gone and Kamala is now POTUS
3) Both Biden and Kamala are still around! Biden opts not to run – Hillary and Kamala will duke it out (no way Kamala will back out and defer)
4) 25th Amendment leaves us with a new pair in WH

IMO the party that will win in 2024 is the one that puts forth the most credible younger candidate. For example, Ron DeSantis is 43, Nikki Haley is 49. Tulsi Gabbard is 40 and AOC will be 35 in 2024 (and eligible). At this point, because Biden has made Covid a much bigger problem for the Dems than it had to be, my money is on DeSantis.

PLEASE DO THAT. We know every good way to attack that crooked old hag, plus a few more that were found after her loss.

Years from now President DJT will be recognized for his greatest achievements which were predominantly on foreign policy. He made the Russians, the CCP and the Norks blink. He raised the ire of western European socialists like no other president in recent history and earned the respect of many eastern European people who love freedom. He recognized Jerusalem as the true capitol of Israel, a can that prior presidents had been kicking down the street for decades. He recognized that energy independence was a national security issue which presidents had been ignoring for half a century and that independence brought the USA into a strong negotiating position with many corrupt nations in the Middle East, Africa and South America who are not friends of personal liberties. His security measures on the southern border were foreign policy in my mind: limiting the influx of drugs and criminal illegal aliens should be viewed as a renunciation of bad actors from foreign lands, encouraged by some freedom hating DemonRats hoping to create chaos within our own nation.
—I thinkPresident DJT has had his moment in the spotlight and hopefully DonJr can talk him out of a SECOND RUN.
—Ron DeSantis would beat Killary in a walk, something she is incapable of doing most days. Maybe he is just being coy, but I’m not sure he wants the job?
— Mike Pompeo didn’t lose 90 pounds of ugly fat for nothing and being a former Congressman, former Sec of State and graduating first in his class at West Point gives him the creds in my book. I believe he would be 61 in January 2025?
—After nearly 20 years in Congress and a long history at the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes knows where the bodies are buried and at 48 years old and a part of the Trump orbit now, he might be well placed. But I doubt if he has the stomach to wade back into the swamp? But we need a leader who has been there and done an honest days work. Kudos from me for a guy who knows how to drive a tractor and milk a cow.
—We need young firebrand conservatives, preferably not US senators but rather outsiders who might have succeeded in state government. Where are the John James of Michigan who can’t win a Senate seat but may be viable nationally?

    Philip in reply to WISteve. | January 12, 2022 at 9:47 am

    It could be that President Trump’s “moment in the spotlight” was cut short because of the coordinated 1,460 day-long campaign involving tech moguls, the media industrial propaganda complex, hollywood, and the elected democrats’ impeachment circus. That’s a whole lot of resistance to overcome, but Trump still received more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.
    Trump did the job we hired him to do in 2016 and he did it well. All the resistance noise (much of it manufactured for the purpose of character assassination) seems to be the focus when his name is mentioned. His many accomplishments that improved the lives of Americans rarely enters into the debate (and it is true that President Trump needs coaching when it comes to addressing the nation – but that can be adjusted).
    I’m sure the resistance movement would re-load and attack relentlessly should Trump become the nominee again (they’re willing and ready to lie for as long as it takes). We should all know by now, however, that the resistance apparatus will attempt to assassinate the character of ANY Republican nominee. During the primary, they’ll choose our candidate for us – how nice of them. For four years they even targeted Mike Pence for goodness’ sake. That’s what they’re trained to do. And they have very powerful accomplices.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair | January 12, 2022 at 2:53 am

Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity,

I keep hearing people say this as if it means anything. Biden was more unpopular than Kamala Kameleon when he was Vice-Precedent and he got less votes than Harris every time he ran in the primary. He was a total joke … but that didn’t make one difference, at all. Of course, the dead and the imaginary and the demented have no qualms about voting for any particular democrat (and we can only hope that the massive cheating and criminal acts that took place in 2020 do not happen again – I’m not so confident) so I don’t know why people keep trying to bring this up about Kamala Kameleon. If she is the candidate she will get the same votes that any other inanimate object gets as the democratic candidate.

As to Shrillary … shouldn’t she be dead at this point? I always heard people telling tales about how she was about to keel over (though to be fair she did actually keel over several times … but kept popping back up like a retarded Weeble) and she never goes away. Hell, even BJ is still puttering around, and he’s looked like death warmed over for nearly two decades, now.

In the end, the actual person, or thing, that is the democrat candidate doesn’t make one bit of difference.

    As to Shrillary … shouldn’t she be dead at this point?
    All those make-death-further-away drugs that Glenn Reynolds keeps saying “Faster, please!”?
    Who do you think they’re experimenting on?

If the Hildebeast is the nominee, it will be a severe test for the Democrat vote getting apparatus. The community organizers are starting to sign up life long Republicans at cemeteries throughout the United States.

    Philip in reply to Romey. | January 12, 2022 at 9:14 am

    And they are ordering several million $50 gift cards from Target and Wall Mart. Although, they might need to bump the vote-buying bribe to $100 gift cards if Bidenomics continues unabated.

She’s the worst person in the world. But, she’s probably the only hope they have of winning. That is how bad their bench is. Unless they can figure out a way of getting Michelle Obama to run, they have no one else.

Letting that pair of grifters back into the White House would be the same as burning it down. I think the absolute worst of Bill Clinton, and I still feel sorry for him because he is married to Hillary.

It would be sort of fun to see Hillary ;ose and pitch a big tantrum again.

I might need abdominal surgery either from laughing or puking so hard I hurt something.

Best line I have read in a blog article, ever. TY Professor!!!
Personally, I was leaning towards some porcelain worship.

Our first woman & first lesbian President. Two blocks checked.

Here must be another example of Mass Formation Psychosis.

2024, in political terms, is an eternity away. After all that has transpired in just the last 12 months – and the list is almost endless – it would be hard for even the most clairvoyant amongst us to fathom what our state of affairs will look like in the next 3-4 years.
The most significant and critical element of all of the diabolical events that have occurred was the election of 2020. The Dem machine managed to create a blueprint for cheating, that they will only work more feverishly over the next two cycles to improve upon. Let us not forget that Marc Elias, close consort and evil minion of HRC, was instrumental in bringing it to fruition and preventing it from being exposed.
The Dem machine has abandoned the Constitution and Rule of Law, and thus has no barriers, nor qualms, about doing absolutely whatever it takes to remain in, or seize power.
If we’ve learned ANYTHING these past 12-24 months, never underestimate the depths of evil these folks will sink to, and delight in so doing. Laugh at your own risk.

No, I think the Democrats should nominate Elizabeth Holmes as their 2024 presidential candidate.

So, will any potential R nominee be capable of enduring the certain, 180-day, bare-handed, media industrial complex rectal exam?
Asking for a friend.

The gift that keeps on giving…

This manifestly vile, miserable, noxious, lawless, corrupt, incompetent, entitled and imperially arrogant crone/harridan/shrew/termagant has disqualified herself for public office one million times over. Would that she would drown her wrinkled body in a vat of chardonnay and never be heard from, again.

Please, please, please!!!! The d/prog should absolutely anoint HRC as their standard bearer. I am certain the Bernie bro/AOC wing would absolutely accept this and wouldn’t be at all enraged by the establishment/Wall St wing kicking them to the curb again. /S

In a sense though what alternative do they have? Who is the heir apparent in 2024? The Wall St donor class have got to be getting a little unnerved after hitching their wagon to Biden and the d/prog in 2020 and seeing a midterm wipe out looming. Say what you will about HRC, she knows where her bread is buttered.

Hillary for Prez….doesn’t have the right ring to it. By the way, what is she going to do about all the deplorables??

Insufficiently Sensitive | January 12, 2022 at 12:27 pm

Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

And dead sure of Round 2 of Zuckerbucks buying up local elections at four times the rate of 2020. It’s a real threat.

The Dhimmi-crat “pundits” and cheerleaders are so incredibly stupid. “Hey, let’s nominate the most manifestly corrupt, insufferable, divisive, incompetent, whiny, entitled and lawless person in our stable! A woman who flippantly and callously insulted half the U.S. population as being allegedly “deplorable” and racist; a woman who, as U.S. Secretary of State, selfishly and illegally compromised national security, to suit her own desire for secrecy and control.”

I call “BS” on this, by the way. There is no way that crone Clinton possesses the physical stamina to campaign, even with the media whores dutifully propping her up, 24/7. These idiots managed to drag tottering, feeble-minded dotard, Xi-den’s cadaver across the finish line, only with the aid of ballot shenanigans and the Wuhan virus bioweapon. Crone Clinton won’t get the same assistance.

northerner777 | January 12, 2022 at 1:49 pm

That power crazed b*tch needs to be incarcerated along with her molester husband. How many dead bodies have they left in their wake over the years? Yes, we must not discount the potential of the DNC Crime Syndicate to actually pull off a run for President for her. They are capable of anything as they have proven with the November 3, 2020 election fraud and the faux impeachments. Nothing is impossible with the DNC. They have the will and the bucks. And far too many our our fellow citizens still support the Syndicate and their lies. Extreme awareness is a must on our part.

She still needs to answer for the dossier and all the evidence she destroyed. I don’t want to hear anything about her running. she should be disqualified off the bat. Everybody that wants to see her run again has a Short memory. God only knows what she would do to get a 2nd shot. How many operatives will work with her to sabotage ANOTHER election…lets get real. she needs to be prosecuted

Katie Weddington | January 13, 2022 at 9:50 am

What is it with these Beta Men and their public orgasms over Hilly? It truly is laughable and disgusting at the same time. But hey, she’s younger than Biden! Ugh.

Setting aside all else, I think Mr. Jacobson should have been more careful in this paragraph:

Quoting another source, he writes:
“Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.”

His reply:
“Come on! Enough with this insurrectionist talk refusing to accept the legitimacy of an election.”

Saying that she would have won without interference isn’t the same thing as refusing to accept the outcome of the election as legitimate. In this context, it’s especially clear that the interference is being cited to support the viability of her candidacy going forward, not to cast doubt on whether the last election was legitimate.

My point is primarily about the importance of accurate descriptions, not about Clinton et al.

Will the woke media ask her any Epstein questions?

Ohio Historian | January 15, 2022 at 5:29 pm

What change/ She is just like her former spokescritter, Jen Psaki; long on nasty, blaming others and arrogance, short on performance. She is like a Joek Biden that prefers vodka to ice cream.

She is no agent of change. She is the same failed bureaucracy in DC writ in a slightly different hand.