Image 01 Image 03

Canada PM Trudeau Spoke to Hillary, But Not Biden, About Afghanistan

Canada PM Trudeau Spoke to Hillary, But Not Biden, About Afghanistan

It’s so embarrassing that Hillary is talking to leaders and not Biden. Who else did she call!?

The White House said President Joe Biden has not spoken to world leaders about Afghanistan.

Who have they spoken to from America?

It turns out Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau talked about Afghanistan with Hillary Clinton.

Trudeau said: “I spoke last night with former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who shares our concern for Afghan women and girls. She welcomed our efforts and urged Canada to continue our work.”

Hillary is supposedly a feminist, even though she approves of infanticide and tried to ruin any woman who accused her husband of abuse.

But still. Why speak to her at all?


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


How embarrassing to Biden and his Sec of State Blinken.

World leaders would rather talk to the Sec of State from 9 years ago.

Wow. Talk about a credibility gap.

So whatever happened to the Logan Act?
Or does it only apply in Republican administrations?

    Milhouse in reply to henrybowman. | August 18, 2021 at 4:06 pm

    How is the Logan Act relevant here? Even if it were a valid law, she’s not violating it.

    Even if we assume without evidence that she spoke to Trudeau “without authority of the United States”, she certainly had no “intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States”.

      This is Trudeau using Hillary, who is a private citizen but with pretty much universal name recognition in Canada (and trust me, plenty of Canadians were rooting for Hillary in 2016), as a means to score political points with women in the Canadian election, which was called on Sunday and will formally occur on September 20.

      “… she certainly had no “intent to …”

      How do you know that? Were you on the phone?

        Were you?

          p in reply to p. | August 18, 2021 at 5:13 pm

          Seriously, dude, in a parliamentary system once an election is called things change, unlike the US where things can keep going as usual right up to election day. Trudeau is putting on a show of “I’m still in charge even though I’m hamstrung in what I can actually do, and I’ll say all the right words while doing so.” Can he talk to Biden or Harris or Blinken while the campaign is going on? Yes, but there’s no way he could have publicly said any of them said what he claims Hillary told him without there being an implicit election endorsement from the Biden Administration.

          Yes, I was.

        FR, you’re an idiot. Worse than that, you’re dishonest. Yes, it is absolutely 100% certain that she had neither of the intentions required to violate the Act. It is blindingly obvious, and you know it too; there is no need for any of us to have been on the phone. Your pretense that there is some possible doubt about it is transparent and shows what a liar you are.

        Careful. Don’t disagree with milly too much or she’ll start spewing insults at you like a 4th grade school boy.

Is Hillary going to be VP when Biden goes to the rest home?
Then Harris will have to watch her back or she may be suicided…

Is this the plan?

Hillary in the WH at last?

Because women are the key to the Liberal Party winning this election. Seriously, the only reason he’s gotten to where he is is because of his last name and too many women (not all of them) think he’s a dreamboat.

This election got called less than 2 years after the last election and more than 3 years before they needed to have another one, as an attempt to gain some more seats to get themselves into a majority government instead of the minority government position they’re in.

He’s losing his luster, though; his personal popularity is declining but the party thinks that a combination of throwing money everywhere, the adoring media, weaknesses in support of the Conservative Party in parts of the country and the fact its leader is a dead bore, and that the other 3 left-wing parties could split enough of the anti-Liberal vote on that side, means they could get away with this.

Notice how he mentioned they spoke about mutual concerns for Afghani women and girls. I’m concerned about them too, but specifically saying that means he is pandering for the women’s vote.

For heaven’s sake, the other day he spoke about the importance of “she-covery” after the “she-cession”.

2smartforlibs | August 18, 2021 at 4:53 pm

Why not drop a dime to SOROS since it’s his call.

She still had dreams of running for President again.

Sissy boy Justin wants to speak another female, who is also powerless.

SeekingRationalThought | August 18, 2021 at 6:19 pm

The only difference between Trudeau and Creepy Joe is that the latter has caused more death and destruction than the former. They are both worthless, greedy careerists and embarrassments to their nations. On the other hand, they are both probably more smarter, more competent and more compassionate than Hilary Clinton.

“What difference at this point does it make?”

If I had to guess who is really running the White House,

Hillary wouldn’t be my 1,000,000 pick

Now we know who holds the strings and makes the Biden puppet dance.

Vile crone Clinton told Trudeau: “What difference at this point does it make?!”