Image 01 Image 03

Psych Prof: Whiteness ‘a Malignant, Parasitic-Like Condition’

Psych Prof: Whiteness ‘a Malignant, Parasitic-Like Condition’

“Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples.”

The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association published a piece by Dr. Donald Moss describing Whiteness as a “malignant, parasitic-like condition to which ‘white’ people have a particular susceptibility.”

Moss, who teaches psychoanalysis at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute and the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis, insists Whiteness does not have a cure.

Excuse me? Critical race theory is off the rails. I don’t know about you, but I recognized racism in America’s history during my school years without critical race theory!

Psychoanalysis vs. Other Mental Doctors

First off, let me explain Moss’s profession. A psychoanalyst is not a psychologist or psychiatrist. They might have the same goals, but those goals become different session-to-session. Think Dr. Sigmeund Freud (emphasis mine):

Psychologists operate under the assumption that, given the right tools and strategies, people can learn to think about themselves and their lives differently. As a result, they can face fear, overcome depression and anxiety, manage the symptoms of a mental illness or post-traumatic stress disorder, or just enjoy life more. Some psychologists dig into patients’ pasts to look for the root causes of their issues, but in general, most employ a forward-thinking approach to problem-solving commonly known as cognitive behavioral therapy (or CBT). The governing idea is that our thoughts contribute a lot more to our feelings than our circumstances, so a shift in mindset can make us happier or less prone to depression and anxiety.

Psychoanalysts believe that patients (and their issues) are a lot more complicated. Understanding—not eliminating—the feelings underlying depression and anxiety is the better way to help people achieve mental health and emotional wellness. Psychoanalysts operate under the assumption that the conscious mind is only a tiny piece of who we are, and that the unconscious mind (which has been shaped by our early experiences and relationships) contributes a great deal to our issues and sometimes to our resistance to working on them.

Psychoanalysts prefer for their patients to “explore how they relate to themselves and why, so they can better understand their thoughts, feelings, and desires to move past psychological distress.”


Researching psychoanalysis helped me understand Moss’s view, especially when I saw the practice is based on Freud.

Here is the abstract (emphasis mine):

Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.

In other words, the Whiteness disease can affect anyone. Whiteness does not care about the color of your skin.

Moss noted a slight difference in his writing when he spoke to The Federalist:

Moss told The Federalist that there is a clear distinction between white people as a race and whiteness as an alleged pathology.

“I write about ‘Whiteness,’ a condition that generates racism and I explicitly distinguish it from ‘whiteness,’ a marker of racial identity. I write that white people are particularly susceptible to the pathology of ‘Whiteness.’”

But the recent CRT fad isn’t why Moss tackled this so-called Whiteness issue. Look at these articles he wrote for the journal in the past.

In August 2001, Moss somehow made first-person plural voice racist, homophobic, and misogynistic:

On the basis of personal, cultural, and clinical references, misogyny, homophobia, and racism are conceptualized as structured forms of hatred grounded in a defensive use of the first person plural voice. This use of hatred defends against dangers associated with desires linked to the first person singular. In these hatreds, “I want” is defensively transformed into “we hate.”

***I apologize for the error. I misidentified Dr. Donald Moss. The author of the article is not the Dr. Donald Moss at Saybrook University, but a professor at New York Psychoanalytic Institute and the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Halcyon Daze | June 9, 2021 at 6:49 pm

Saybrook University may be a malignant, parasitic environment.

    Brave Sir Robbin in reply to Halcyon Daze. | June 9, 2021 at 7:33 pm

    Strike “environment” and replace with ‘university.”

    These people are PROJECTING.

    THEY are malignant, parasitic-Like conditions.

      We’re watching the left/swamp/Islamic axis and their Chicomm masters build a cannon across the street, aimed at our house.

      If any of us thought the abstract of a civil war would never ‘happen here’ – man, do you have a surprise in store for you.

      The violence is coming, and on a scale unimaginable to ‘normal’ people. Most scary, it’s going to be coming from that moron Lloyd Austin’s ‘woke’ army. But the civil war will break out when enough soldiers refuse to fire on us, and turn their guns on the likes of Austin’s warped soldiers.

      That’s how it usually happens. Bone up on your history.

      Yes. If the left had an official sport it would be projection. Or writing 11 on their volume dial. And if 11 doesn’t work they’ll scream “eleventy plus!!”

      Amazingly, I just live my life.

    Bisley in reply to Halcyon Daze. | June 10, 2021 at 11:35 am

    It isn’t only Saybrook University. The Marxist ideology that dominates education industry, the news industry, and a substantial portion of everything else in the country is malignant and parasitic. The culture, economy, rule of law, and everything else that upholds the structure of individual and economic freedom that defines the USA is being intentionally destroyed from the inside. Unless the people driving this ideological revolution are removed from positions of influence and power, they will tear it all down, and replace it with some sort of socialist tyranny.

i’m not about to take medial advice from a mentally ill person…

especially one who apparently loathes themselves. might be time to put the good “Doctor” on suicide watch.

    Arminius in reply to redc1c4. | June 11, 2021 at 10:13 am

    Orwell is perhaps the closest thing atheists have produced as a prophet. Socialists are predominantly products of the middle class. He noticed that socialists are great at hating their own class. After first dividing people into classes so they can feel good about hating.

    I forget who it was. Maybe Aldous Huxley. It doesn’t matter. Like most truths it isn’t really profound. If you really want to popularize a cause first convince your followers that the cause is righteous. Then tell them they get to be cruel against any one else who isn’t down with the cause.

    It’s how you produce concentration camp guards.

    I’m a child of the ’70s, I’ve been observing this phenomenon for, what, 50 years?

      Arminius in reply to Arminius. | June 11, 2021 at 10:29 am

      I’m not talking about Nazi concentration camp guards. I’ve never met one. I have met NORK camp guards. They enjoyed their work. Until they realized the prisoners were people. That’s a category you have to create. Not people.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they take White out of the Crayola box. They’ve already taken away Indian Red.

    n.n in reply to rhhardin. | June 9, 2021 at 7:57 pm

    With gay glee, it has already passed. Black and brown, too, under the Rainbow banner of inclusive exclusion, diversity, and progress.

    henrybowman in reply to rhhardin. | June 9, 2021 at 10:32 pm

    And “Flesh.”

    “Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse.”

    At last, an explanation of why blacks murder each other at nearly seven times the rate that whites do (cite).

When do they start their final solution?

If Whiteness isn’t intended to refer to whiteness, then why is it called Whiteness?

    Brave Sir Robbin in reply to Dathurtz. | June 9, 2021 at 7:38 pm

    It’d laying an “intellectual” framework for re-education in its most sinister meaning of the word.

      Dathurtz in reply to Brave Sir Robbin. | June 9, 2021 at 7:40 pm

      It wasn’t Jewish people the Nazis had a problem with, it was Jewishness, which is totally unrelated to the Jewish faith or ethnic group except they are particularly prone to Jewishness.

        n.n in reply to Dathurtz. | June 9, 2021 at 7:58 pm

        Jew privilege. Been there, done that, again, and again, in progress.

          shrinkDave in reply to n.n. | June 10, 2021 at 1:19 pm

          Now that the psycho analyst has psycho analyzed whites, Id like to hear his psycho analysis of blacks.

        Eh, the Jews were a handy scapegoat. Always have been. Without Jews to hate as scapegoats in post-WW I Germany, Hitler would never have been heard of.

        Right now, the left is scapegoating Jew and whites.

        We have to push back and not accept anything from these people.

        Or, as Hunter Biden woudl say: “These n——s’.

    n.n in reply to Dathurtz. | June 9, 2021 at 8:01 pm

    Whiteness refers to affirmative, independent Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That said, it’s not personal, not always, but me, you, we are a competing interest, a “burden”, to the progress of the gray mortal gods and goddesses, alternatively the 1% in their diverse incarnations.

    henrybowman in reply to Dathurtz. | June 9, 2021 at 10:34 pm

    Don’t ask them, it’s above their pay grade.
    Take it up with their management — the Prince of Darkness.

    Oh wait, never mind, now I get why.

Diversity [dogma] (i.e. color judgment), including racism, sexism, ageism, and other class-based bigotry, inequity, and exclusion is a progressive path and grade: one step forward, two steps backward, a slippery slope. Woke and [morally] broke.

This guy is a racist, claiming that all white people are of a certain character.

A “malignant, parasitic-like condition”, eh? Sounds like liberalism to me.

Psychiatrists make money by convincing you that you have problems.

If they SOLVE your problems, you don’t need a psychiatrist anymore.

What a shock that going to psychiatrists doesn’t solve problems.

Whites, parasitic?
Let me tell you something, mot#&r fu{k€r…..white man built everything you see. It takes much more than labor to erect a city.
You may percieve that as offensive, and I cannot change your perception, but I can present you with facts.

stevewhitemd | June 9, 2021 at 10:47 pm

To make it clear: the author, Donald Moss, is not just another nutter, he’s a powerful nutter: he chairs the program committee of the American Psychoanalytic Association, which makes him a key person in deciding what will be presented (scientific sessions, reviews, programming) at their annual meeting. He’s a key person for that organization. He’s done plenary addresses for that organization’s meetings.

That organization green-lighted this article. It’s in their official journal. I suspect that he and the editor have a warm and cordial relationship developed over many years. He’s written other pieces for this journal, the kind of work you have to be a psychoanalyst to understand fully. So he’s known to them. He’s not an unknown and poorly-considered psychoanalyst in Fumbuck, Montana, he’s right there in NYC.

He’s a made member of the club. He’s a powerful man. The organization, the journal, and his peers are all behind him on this one.

    We know full well that every institution in our government, schools, media and the like have been COMPLETELY corrupted.

    This is actually a good thing, because it makes it easy to tell who is who: anyone in charge of anything now is suspect.

It’s good to know that I have a “malignant, parasitic-like condition” called whiteness……Boy am I ever glad I moved to a 99.999% white Country with my fellow “malignant, parasites” where we really do not need to have a “discussion” about “Race”.

I think this guy bumped his head…as they say down South, Bless his heart.
Crazy is apparently contagious.

Funny how The U.S. and Europe are overwhelmed with all those other folks who are not white…strange they all want to live in countries established by those horrible white people. Maybe they should all go bumrush China and the Congo. See how that works out for white haters. Are all other colors just plain sadistic and suicidal to love living in countries made by white people? Britain First just reported in a video, THOUSANDS of boats in Dover, where their “white Island” is being overwhelmed with thousands wanting to live in the island nation established by white people.

Here is a quotation from one of the spiritual fathers of critical race theory, modified slightly for adaptation to the current question:

“We use the term [whiteness] as a matter of convenience, for in reality and from the genetic point of view there is no such thing as the [white] race. There does, however, exist a community, to which, in fact, the term can be applied and the existence of which is admitted by [white people] themselves. It is the spiritually homogeneous group, to membership of which all [whites] throughout the world deliberately adhere, regardless of their whereabouts and of their country of domicile; and it to this group of human beings to which we give the title [white].”

This is from Heinrich Himmler, and, as you can see, I have substituted the word “white” for “Jewish.”

I think it is quite telling that this foul-mouthed “psychologist” refers to “white appetites” without specifying what they are other than “voracious, insatiable, and perverse.”

Watch out, everyone, all whitey wants to do rape a black woman . . . you know that yourself . . .

Are we in some sort of time warp? Is it 1939? Is this some sort of twisted historical tit-for-tat?

How long are we expected to put up with this racist garbage?

“Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility.”

Interesting. Sounds similar to “blackness” which one also first acquires and then suffers from a malignant, parasitic-like condition which “black” people have a particular susceptibility.

What jibberish! Whatever skin color you were born with makes you guilty of being that color? This guy is a doctor?

The guy simply does not understand Host-parasite relationships. The host is always the source of the energy which maintains the system. The parasite is the entity which drains away the energy. .gov is a parasite, and in the case of socialism, is an imperfect one because it ultimately kills the host. That is the direction that we are heading, as we lose manufacturing which is the source of wealth and energy in our economy. The marxists are always an imperfect host. They always drain energy out of a system, sort of a social entropy that is always increasing, though every once in awhile they appear to be building something, which always turns out to require the destruction of a greater degree to fuel it.

When white people demand reparations from blacks, he will be correct is his hypothesis, but trust me, that ain’t never gonna happen, and it will only become less likely as blacks are further entrenched as a parasitic class by the libtards, who doing it to scrape their 10% off the top as wealth is transferred.

TX_Caddisfly | June 10, 2021 at 5:11 pm

I have the entire research paper and will add the link below for all of you malignant, parasitic whites to read, lol!
I heard about the paper on TimcastIRL on You Tube (which all of you should check out) and decided to look it up. It’s difficut to get to but I managed it. It IS a disturbing bit of so-called research but, as a scientist myself, I don’t see how this was ever considered for publishment. I suppose the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association want to appear “woke”, “inclusive”, and not “white supremacist”. However, I am curious who wrote the paper – was he black or white????

A classic; the good doctor doesn’t know himself. At all. Doesn’t know cause and effect.

You have to know yourself to think for yourself and you have to know God a little to know yourself a little.

The soul is still a gift invisible immaterial COLORLESS poor eternal unique personal individual free male or female.
When called before God it does one no good to say “Whitey made me do it”!
Begging for Mercy is proper. He’s likely pandering, which reveals he’s describing himself by projection.
1. Every projection is the result of an unresolved rejection and
2. There’s no such thing as a superiority complex just a lot of insecurity and overcompensation!
Pray for the good doctor’s soul… He’s lost his way and the way back, too

Replace white with black and it is an international incident to publish racist bs but anti-white racism is what the liberal establishment is all about