Fed Gov’t Nuclear Research Lab Forces White Male Execs To Attend “White Privilege” Camp
Your tax dollars at work
I first heard of Critical Race Theory back in 2012 from Andrew Breitbart, and like all decent, law-abiding, fair-minded, non-racist Americans, I was appalled by it. As Breitbart warned at the time, this then-radical Marxism-based divisive, destructive theory is being mainstreamed. It has moved out of our universities and into our culture, society, and even our government.
Christopher Rufo appeared on Tucker this week to declare a “one-man war against critical race theory.” The impetus for his appearance is the revelation of documents that allegedly were leaked from the fed’s “premier” nuclear research lab’s “white privilege” indoctrination camp required for all white male executives.
Watch:
As I told @TuckerCarlson tonight: I am declaring a one-man war against critical race theory in the federal government and I will not stop my investigations until it is abolished from our public institutions. pic.twitter.com/NnYgB7s4zM
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 14, 2020
Rufo provided screenshots of the documents on Twitter:
The federal government's premier nuclear research lab hosted a 3-day reeducation camp for "white males," with the goal of exposing their "white privilege" and deconstructing "white male culture."
Here are the leaked documents from the race-segregated, taxpayer-funded session.?
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 12, 2020
In the opening thought-work session, the trainers demand that the men make a list of associations about white male culture. The trainers write "white supremacists," "KKK," "Aryan Nation," "MAGA hat," "privileged," and "mass killings." pic.twitter.com/TUKARqvoar
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 12, 2020
Next, the white male employees must expose the "roots of white male culture," which consists of "rugged individualism," "a can-do attitude," "hard work," and "striving towards success"—which sound good, but are in fact "devastating" to women and POCs. pic.twitter.com/saVYdG6bHJ
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 12, 2020
In a subsequent session, the white males must publicly recite a series of "white privilege statements" and "male privilege statements." They must accept their complicity in the white male system and their role in creating oppressions. pic.twitter.com/egIchSLwWd
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 12, 2020
Who is leading the struggle session? A company called "White Men As Full Diversity Partners." This is no joke—their company is literally called White Men As Full Diversity Partners and they specialize in confronting those who "typically hold all the power": namely, "white males." pic.twitter.com/dMNu8XHZYw
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 12, 2020
It's time to expose this taxpayer-funded pseudoscience and rally the White House and legislators to stop these deeply divisive training sessions. My goal is simple: we must pass legislation to "abolish critical race theory" in the federal government. Let's push as far as we can.
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) August 12, 2020
You can access the full documents here.
[Featured image via YouTube]
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
I am sure [s]Happy Camp[/s] White Privilege camp will be fun
I’d quit my job before I’d ever submit to that insulting sh*t.
Or attend and turn it around on them and accuse them of being bigots and making assumptions about you, your past, your background and personal experiences. Get all outraged and turn it right back on them.
Sue them for creating a “hostile work environment” for cis, white men. And then make them defend their bigoted, racial attitudes in open court.
Just wait till all us albino blacks start sueing DEM.
And I’d tell my boss that he could fuck off and that there would be no way in hell that I would attend such a “camp” and let them fire me. Then I would sue them for everything and the kitchen sink as well as collect unemployment.
There’s no point in being polite about it and quitting. They aren’t going to give you a good recommendation in any case so fuck ’em. Make them fire you. It’ll end the same way, you’re gone.
Sue them for what? In my state, and I suspect every other, insubordination (which refusal to take the course is) is a legally acceptable reason to fire somebody.
Good luck with the lawsuit if you work in a state with at-wull employment laws. I’m on your side, but you may not have a case.
I would be fired for telling them what I think of their sh*t
I did. It was not as explicit as a three day session. But it was every single day. It was in tech. A very large software company, the 4th largest – VMware. I call the company out by name so others can avoid entering that place of ‘woke’ work. On two different occasions, two separate female managers told me that a position I was going for was going to a woman. Not a particular woman, but the role was designated to be given to a woman. That is flat out descrimination. I was consistently a top producer. I was in sales with very objective goals that I met and exceeded – Not subjective soft skills that are designed not to be met. I was doing 8 figure deals – definitely in the deep end of the pool. But that didn’t matter, equality of outcome was most important.
The feminist tone of the organization was so bad that they did not spare females who did not comply. I had a junior peer come to me in tears because she had recently married and took her married name. The female manager speaking to her threatened her advancement if she did not use her maiden name. Equality, right! WTF?
The founder of the company was pushed out. I have my suspicions on why but I am not certain so I will keep my thoughts to myself. What I do know is that she went on to become the CEO of the second largest division of Google – Google Cloud. This is the same company that censoring conservative thought, interfering with the doctor patient dialog (HCQ) and fired Damron over an evidenced based post. I have followed Damron’s case closely as it echoes mine.
Diversity dogma denies individual dignity, denies individual conscience, normalizes affirmative discrimination, color quotas, color blocs. It advises to establish class-based taxonomic systems, processes, and beliefs.
Sounds like a hostile work environment to me.
George Yancey is a sociologist at Baylor and has an insightful article on Robin DiAngelo’s book “White Fragility” https://www.patheos.com/blogs/shatteringparadigms/2020/07/not-white-fragility-mutual-responsibility/
He explains some of the things that he agrees with about institutional racism, but also looks at errors he sees. He points out the book (huge bestseller) has very little empirical data to support her arguments.
He also points out that the book is also light on empirical results by those using these anti-racism techniques.
He includes links for articles examining implicit bias and other points that buttress his argument, and provides links also for other that are also questioning this movements arguments.
Maybe the cause of institutional racism is that most people can observe and draw their own conclusions from real world observations.
That book is a total fake then.
Seems like it’s colored privilege to allow that crap to be promoted without question / opposition.
agree on the ” turn it around “–would take those pissants to school on my ancestors, all the way back to the revolution, and how they all fought, sacrificed and(many of them)died to establish, preserve and protect our freedoms and our way of life and would challenge any of those ” white men as full diversity partners ” fvcks to tell me what any of them had EVER done worthy of comparison
This has nothing whatsoever to do with “White male privilege”; this is just another attempt to destroy American spirit by the same people who step on and burn our flag to demonstrate their disdain and hatred for our country.
And there are DEMS getting RICH off this SCAM.
I wonder what would happen at one of those guilt-fests if you refuse to be categorized. I mean something to the effect of “I don’t identify as white. I also don’t identify as male, although my preferred address is he/him. Any attempt to assign a gender or race to me is an insult, an assault upon my identity that you must apologize for or I’m going to leave and you’re to blame because of your abysmal troglodyte ways.”
I’m getting too old and cranky to bow along and cringe on cue. Besides, I don’t think the people who are pushing this are *able* to allow a white male to pretend they are anything other than a white male, and watching them tie themselves into knots would be entertaining.
My thoughts exactly.
Unbelievable that they actually went and stayed
This sounds like a perfect opportunity for Trump to make some (admittedly hate-filled) headlines by signing an executive order banning all such race-based “training” throughout the federal government AND any business with government contracts.
How about black training, why a member of the team needs to pull their own weight, why they need to speak clear english, parenting training, understanding and respecting property rights training, why they need to respect police and law.
Executive Orders are not magic wands nor are they royal.decrees.
If 2+2=4 is a white construct, then what is E=MC*2? (I love this one because any complaint can be described as anti-Semitic!)
I’f be taking an ounce of pot with me. You know, take the edge off.
I’d take my Kindle. I’d read Hack Teacher novels and Virgil Flowers whodunits.
^^^ JACK REACHER
Perhaps I missed it. There is a name — who made this happen? Somebody signed the contract. Somebody cut the check.
If we’re being honest, “mass killings” are much more a black culture thing than a white one.
How is a “diversity partner” anything but a servant with a high sounding name?