Image 01 Image 03

AP misleadingly claims Catholic Church used “unprecedented exemption … to amass at least $1.4 billion” from PPP

AP misleadingly claims Catholic Church used “unprecedented exemption … to amass at least $1.4 billion” from PPP

The church did not “amass” anything, the loans will be forgiven only if the funds are used to support employee payroll just like any other entity receiving Paycheck Protection Program funding.

Here’s an AP tweet from last Friday:

The U.S. Roman Catholic Church used a special and unprecedented exemption from federal rules to amass at least $1.4 billion in taxpayer-backed coronavirus aid, @AP exclusive finds.

And here are the two lead paragraphs of the linked article:

The U.S. Roman Catholic Church used a special and unprecedented exemption from federal rules to amass at least $1.4 billion in taxpayer-backed coronavirus aid, with many millions going to dioceses that have paid huge settlements or sought bankruptcy protection because of clergy sexual abuse cover-ups.

The church’s haul may have reached — or even exceeded — $3.5 billion, making a global religious institution with more than a billion followers among the biggest winners in the U.S. government’s pandemic relief efforts, an Associated Press analysis of federal data released this week found.

The AP suggests that the Catholic Church was engaged in nefarious schemes to pocket taxpayer money, highlighting, in particular, that loans went to the Archdiocese of Orange County, “where a sparkling glass cathedral estimated to cost over $70 million recently opened,” and “the diocese covering Wheeling-Charleston, West Virginia, where a church investigation revealed last year that then-Bishop Michael Bransfield embezzled funds and made sexual advances toward young priests.”

And their words produced the outrage they were designed to create, with such replies as:


On Facebook, namely, the Chicago Tribune Facebook page, sharing this report, readers were similarly outraged:

The church has closed schools, some of them in underserved neighborhoods, has merged and closed churches in order to resolve its financial issues that largely came from settlements paid to victims of abuse-now the church scores a big financial haul.

T.G., 10:27 AM Friday.


I was raised Catholic and this is a disgustingly massive scam. You want to defund something start here.

F.T., 1:16 PM Friday.

The reality is, of course, far different.

By the very nature of the PPP forgivable loan program, as clear by the very label of Paycheck Protection Program, the funds went not to “churches,” but to their employees.  In the same manner as any small business in which revenues have dropped due to pandemic-caused lockdowns, were given a lifeline to make payroll rather than sending their employees to the unemployment lines, so, too, church employees were given this same protection — and churches of all denominations made use of it.  In May, CBS reported that 40% of Protestant churches in the U.S. had applied for PPP loans, and 23% of churches ended up receiving loans.

The AP report has no particular interest in assessing whether Catholic churches were disproportionately likely to receive these loans — though, if this should happen to be the case, it would be easily enough explained, since it’s a matter of common sense that larger organizations have a greater ability to make sense of the complex process required to apply.

And the loophole?

The law that created the Paycheck Protection Program let nonprofits participate, as long as they abided by SBA’s “affiliation rule.” The rule typically says that only businesses with fewer than 500 employees, including at all subsidiaries, are eligible.

Lobbying by the church helped religious organizations get an exception.

But, again, the difference between Catholic and Protestant churches isn’t a matter of wealth or need.  It is merely a matter of organizational structure that, depending on the diocesan structure, the legal “employer” might be a bishop, and the diocese might have, in total, more than 500 employees, when all the priests, church secretaries, organists, and schoolteachers are added up.  Here is the “loophole” text about which the AP complains, straight from the Small Business Administration’s description of loans for faith-based organizations:

Is my faith-based organization disqualified from any SBA loan programs because it is affiliated with other faith-based organizations, such as a local diocese?

Not necessarily. Under SBA’s regulations, an affiliation may arise among entities in various ways, including from common ownership, common management, or identity of interest. 13 C.F.R. §§ 121.103 and 121.301. These regulations are applicable to applicants for PPP loans. (They also apply to the EIDL program when determining certain loan terms, although aggregating the number of employees of affiliated organizations does not affect eligibility for EIDL loans.) Some faith-based organizations likely would qualify as “affiliated” with other entities under the applicable affiliation rules. Entities that are affiliated according to SBA’s affiliation rules must add up their employee numbers in determining whether they have 500 or fewer employees.

But regulations must be applied consistent with constitutional and statutory religious freedom protections. If the connection between your organization and another entity that would constitute an affiliation is based on a religious teaching or belief or is otherwise a part of the exercise of religion, your organization qualifies for an exemption from the affiliation rules. For example, if your faith-based organization affiliates with another organization because of your organization’s religious beliefs about church authority or internal constitution, or because the legal, financial, or other structural relationships between your organization and other organizations reflect an expression of such beliefs, your organization would qualify for the exemption. If, however, your faith-based organization is affiliated with other organizations solely for non-religious reasons, such as administrative convenience, then your organization would be subject to the affiliation rules. SBA will not assess, and will not permit participating lenders to assess, the reasonableness of the faith-based organization’s good-faith determination that this exception applies.

That’s it.  A church which is deemed to be part of an entity with over 500 employees, solely because its religious beliefs prescribe it, when, absent these beliefs, they’d be independent of others and fall below the threshold, is deemed eligible.  There’s no outrage here — which means the only outrageous element of this is the AP’s bias against the Catholic Church.


Elizabeth Bauer is a Forbes contributor and actuary who lives in the Chicago area. She also writes as Jane the Actuary at, is an occasional contributor at The Federalist, and tweets at @janetheactuary.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


All these people complaining about this were the ones demanding non-profits get PPP. They just assumed it would go to the “good ones” like Planned Parenthood and not icky ones like churches.

Liars trying to call other people liars. Always hilarious.

So, by “misleading”, you mean “lying?”

    Milhouse in reply to tkdkerry. | July 12, 2020 at 5:09 pm

    No. It’s not a lie. Technically every word of it is true. It is true that Catholic churches between them got a total of over $1.4B, and it’s also true that under the normal rules they would be ineligible, but a special exception was made for them, so as not to put them at a disadvantage just because their religious beliefs don’t allow independent churches. So the report is not a lie as such, but it paints a very misleading picture. Someone who sees the headline is led to believe there is some scandal here, when there is not.

The JournoLists and lawyers also mischaracterize the problem of political congruence (“=”) that led to a pedophile progression, crimes that apparently cannot be judged and labeled on the facts of the case because they are acutely phobic that people will indulge diversitist (i.e. color judgment) thought and practice.

The Jewish Temple in my town also got PPP money. As noted, PPP was just an alternative to paying the people who would otherwise be laid off unemployment benefits (plus the extra $600 per week). It was an intelligent idea, because businesses could start right up again with existing employees when the time was right. Finally, there was about $130 billion of PPP money still available recently.

    Milhouse in reply to jb4. | July 12, 2020 at 11:38 am

    Yes, but if it were affiliated with a large organization such as Young Israel, it would not have been eligible, because nothing in Jewish doctrine requires such affiliation.

SpaceInvader | July 12, 2020 at 3:58 am

No one will ever pay this debt. The dollar is toast. The country is being looted and I don’t mean by the people in the streets.