Vandal Behind Anti-Black Racist Graffiti at Salisbury University is Black
“Four law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, had participated in the investigation.”
Sadly, we’ve seen this movie before. This is often done to justify making demands.
The College Fix reports:
CONFIRMED: Vandal behind racist graffiti at Salisbury University … is black
Salisbury University experienced massive racial unrest after a series of racist graffiti was discovered on campus over the course of the 2019-20 school year.
The public, Maryland-based university canceled classes for a “day of healing” and hired a new associate vice president for diversity and inclusion at a cost of $140,000 annually.
Authorities have had a suspect since February but refused comment to The College Fix on details. Turns out, the vandal is black.
The man who is scheduled to plead guilty to the vandalism has been charged under a hate-crime statute. His motives for the defacement remain unclear at this time.
Jerome Kevin Jackson, 54, is set to plead guilty June 12 to maliciously defacing school property “while exhibiting racial animosity,” according to a news release from the Office of the State’s Attorney for Wicomico County published Monday.
The release states Jackson is responsible for four incidents of “racist and sometimes gender discriminatory graffiti” on campus during the fall semester as well as another incident in February 2020 in which the words “it’s hang a [n-word] month” were scrawled on a wall with black marker.
Four law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, had participated in the investigation.
Jerome Jackson To Plead Guilty In Case Of Racist Graffiti Found At Salisbury University, State's Attorney's Office Says https://t.co/A8F9RIQAaX pic.twitter.com/EsMluwp0S9
— WJZ | CBS Baltimore (@wjz) June 9, 2020
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Of course.
Isn’t that a contradiction? If they don’t know his motive how can they lay a charge that depends on motive?
Perhaps they know more than they are willing to publicly disclose at this time.
Unclear to the prosecutors, or unclear to the alleged journalists?
Suppose the motive was racism.
A fact might be as clear as day, but if a reporter doesn’t want to broadcast the fact, “unclear” is a convenient weasel word. Especially if the honest statement is something like “this black guy committed these crimes because he’s a racist.”
Another day, another hoax.
“The man who is scheduled to plead guilty to the vandalism has been charged under a hate-crime statute. His motives for the defacement remain unclear at this time.”
I am reminded of the many times that a Muslim is arrested for some terrorist act where the media informs us that the Muslim’s “motives are unclear.” Or something like that.
Utterly shocked by this unexpected development. /sarc
Color us surprised.
The result will be, of coures…. (wait for it….) a surprise of color!
Not enough real racism so he has to manufacture pretend racism.
Does Jerome Jackson happen to be the new associate vice president for diversity and inclusion? That is a pretty good motive.
I’m not surprised at his race, I’m surprised at his age. You would think someone who is 54 would have more sense. If not more sense than to do something like this, then at least more sense than to think he could get away with it.