“The Court will examine the options for rescheduling those cases in due course in light of the developing circumstances.”
The Supreme Court announced this morning it will postpone arguments during the March session.
It is common for the Court to postpone arguments during public health emergencies:
In keeping with public health precautions recommended in response to COVID-19, the Supreme Court is postponing the oral arguments currently scheduled for the March session (March 23-25 and March 30-April 1). The Court will examine the options for rescheduling those cases in due course in light of the developing circumstances.
The Court will hold its regularly scheduled Conference on Friday, March 20. Some Justices may participate remotely by telephone. The Court will issue its regularly scheduled Order List on Monday, March 23 at 9:30 a.m. The list will be posted on the Court’s Website at that time: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt/19.
The Building will continue to be open for official business, and filing deadlines are not extended under Rule 30.1. The Court is expanding remote working capabilities to reduce the number of employees in the Building, consistent with public health guidance. The Building will remain closed to the public until further notice.
The Court’s postponement of argument sessions in light of public health concerns is not unprecedented. The Court postponed scheduled arguments for October 1918 in response to the Spanish flu epidemic. The Court also shortened its argument calendars in August 1793 and August 1798 in response to yellow fever outbreaks.
We cannot report every closing, but as Axios pointed out, the Supreme Court is “a critical arm of the U.S. government.”
Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer are in their 80s. We all know Ginsburg has struggled with many health issues.DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.