San Diego State to Add Diversity and Inclusion Monitors to Faculty Hiring Committees
“in an effort to ensure those making hiring decisions at the school keep diversity and equity in mind throughout the process”
Does this mean potential hires will now need the approval of a diversity administrator to be hired?
The College Fix reports:
Diversity and inclusion monitors to join faculty hiring committees at SDSU
San Diego State University has announced plans to train so-called Inclusion Representatives for faculty search committees in an effort to ensure those making hiring decisions at the school keep diversity and equity in mind throughout the process.
“IRs are non-voting members of search committees, from outside the searching department, who provide colleagues with information on equitable hiring practices and support in identifying and reducing the many ways that implicit biases can manifest in the hiring process,” Jennifer Imazeki, associate chief diversity officer for faculty and staff, told colleagues in a recent email.
The university’s Division of Diversity and Innovation’s Center for Inclusive Excellence will train and certify the Inclusion Representatives, who may serve on faculty search committees.
The diversity and inclusion monitors are expected to encourage their peers to “engage in self-reflection regarding potential biases that may compromise an objective assessment,” according to a three-page outline detailing more about the pilot program sent to faculty.
It adds monitors will be trained how to facilitate “potentially difficult dialogues with colleagues.”
The memo does not mention meritocracy as part of the hiring process.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
San Diego State College, as it was known back then, was already becoming a joke in 1969 when I dropped out.
Diversity commissars? Sure, why not? They are only there to help you make the right decision. Everyone could use a little guidance from time to time.
Guidance like “Vamos, gringo!” or “get da f… out, crackah!”
You are “potentially biased” if you don’t summarily reject male or white candidates. I’m not sure how black men fare under this system. Are they evil for being XY or saintly for being black?