Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Biden Promised to Pick a Female Vice President. But Why?

Biden Promised to Pick a Female Vice President. But Why?

It’s sexist to pick a female because she is a female.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/democratic-debate-july-31-2019/index.html

2020 Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden promised to pick a female vice president.

Great, but why? Because she is qualified or simply because of her chromosomes?

Biden said:

Number one, I committed that if I’m elected president and have an opportunity to appoint someone to the courts, I’ll appoint the first black woman of the courts. It’s required that they have representation now. It’s long overdue.

Secondly, if I’m elected president, my cabinet, my administration will look like the country and I commit that I will, in fact, appoint a — I’d pick a woman to be vice president. There are a number of women who are qualified to be president tomorrow. I would pick a woman to be my vice president is. Number three, I’m the guy that wrote the domestic violence law. I’m the guy that put in the prohibitions that no one who abuses someone else should be able to own a gun. Period. They should not be able to own a gun.

Wonderful. But I wonder if he will concentrate on the female’s qualifications or just try to appease the left.

Our ancestors fought so females could be equal. They wanted equality, not superiority. They didn’t want people to judge them on their sex.

It’s not very feminist to push people to pick you based on your sex.

It would infuriate me if someone picked or hired me because I’m female. I’d be so insulted if someone chose or appointed me to fill a quota. I’m more than my chromosomes.

You are lame if you pick or don’t pick someone based on their race, sexual orientation, or sex.

The Washington Post already latched onto Biden’s promise because it ran an article about the women possibly on Biden’s shortlist.

The newspaper immediately named Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as a running mate. Biden has praised her since she dropped out of the race in December. In one interview, he said he would consider her for a position in his administration.

Another option is Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN). She immediately backed Biden after she dropped out of the race. He believed her endorsement helped him win Minnesota.

WaPo, of course, suggested failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams. No list is complete without Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)!

But again, is he doing this because the woman he chooses will have better qualifications than other choices?

If Biden and the left did not make such a big deal about picking a female, then maybe I would believe that he picked her based solely on qualifications.

Then again, Biden and the left can quickly use the sexism card against you as everyone did with failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton if he does not win. If he picks Harris, they can use the sexism and racism cards!

Maybe Biden will go for the trifecta so the left can use the sexism, racism, and homophobe cards.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

To change his diaper?

It’s the magic vagina.

The Friendly Grizzly | March 16, 2020 at 4:24 pm

He promised because women will flock to the polls and vote for him for that reason, and that reason alone, dontchaknow!

Does that include a biological male who identifies as female?

I thought he said a Black woman for SCOTUS

Klobuchar supposedly let slip that she is the VP

They wanted equality, not superiority.

Forget superiority. Nobody even has equality if they have to have their offices handed to them. Work for it and earn it like any other American if you ever plan to be taken seriously.

    rabidfox in reply to tom_swift. | March 17, 2020 at 8:25 pm

    You know, I was part of the feminist movement back in the 60’s and that was what we wanted – the ability to do the jobs we were qualified for and not be shut out just because of our sex. We wanted to be seen as people and not sex objects. Sigh. I moved on when they started burning bras. Today’s feminists push the walking vagina image of women. It’s enough to make you weep.

He has to pick the worst. The worst happen to be Fauxcahantas, harris and clinton.

The best happens to be Gabbard. He’s too dumb to pick her: she’ be too threatening.

Then there’s this treasonous pig:

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib: F*** Trump’s national day of prayer: Muslim lawmaker reacts to president’s call to ‘Americans of all faiths’

https://www.wnd.com/2020/03/congresswoman-rashida-tlaib-f-national-day-prayer/

2smartforlibs | March 16, 2020 at 5:03 pm

I want the best and brightest not a liberal box of crayons fixing our problems.

    CorkyAgain in reply to 2smartforlibs. | March 16, 2020 at 5:39 pm

    Don’t worry, even if the top two offices are filled by incompetent figureheads, the rest of the government will be staffed by other members of the Democrat team.

    Oh, wait, that’s still not “the best and brightest”.

Julia Louis-Dryfus is my choice.

“Number one, I committed that if I’m elected president and have an opportunity to appoint someone to the courts, I’ll appoint the first black woman of the courts. It’s required that they have representation now.”

Wow! When did I miss the statutory, or Constitution’s, requirement for a quota of black women for the Federal Court system. Wait, there are black women on the Federal Bench already. Ah, he means there’s a quota for one black woman to be on the SCOTUS. When did I miss passage of/SCOTUS decision with that quota requirement?

    CorkyAgain in reply to Edward. | March 16, 2020 at 5:48 pm

    One of the worst things that’s happened to our republic is the idea that people can be validly represented only by someone who is the same sex, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation as them.

      The Marxists tried to split us apart by class. That didn’t work.

      The Neo-Marxists have apparently found a winner with this intersectionality nonsense.

From the woods of Chappaqua, a distant cackle is heard…

These idiots don’t even acknowledge that there are “men” and “women”. They don’t even know which shithouse to use. Still, my guess is “CREEPY JOE/WILLIE’S HO 2020”. What a bumper sticker.

Judge a person… human life by the color of her skin or another low information attribute. Diversity is a double-edged scalpel for its practitioners.

I could see Biden appointing Maxine Waters to SCOTUS. Imagine the well reasoned, clear cut decisions.

“Wonderful. But I wonder if he will concentrate on the female’s qualifications or just try to appease the left.”

What? Having ovaries and knowing what it’s like to menstruate isn’t an accomplishment? Hillary! Clinton said it was an accomplishment; in fact it was her only qualification and therefore every woman in America owed her their votes back in 2016.

thalesofmiletus | March 16, 2020 at 6:04 pm

Because he’s not into sniffing men’s hair.

If he doesn’t give Stacy, (I’m the Governor of Georgia), first right of refusal as well as a cabinet position, she WON’T go away. She’s made it clear that she’s interested and the only possible reason he WOULDN’T choose her would be racism.

Apologies to Ned Washington.

Panderin’,Panderin ‘, Panderin’
Panderin’, Panderin’, Panderin’

Keep on Panderin’, Panderin’, Panderin’
Though the streams are swollen
Keep them women votin’,
Rawhide

Rain and wind and weather
Hell bent for leather
All the things I’m missin’
Good vittles, love and kissin’
Wishin’ my gal was by my side

Don’t try to understand ’em
Just rope, throw, and vote ’em
Soon we’ll be living high and wide
Move ’em on, head ’em up
Head ’em up, move ’em on
Move ’em on, head ’em up
Rawhide!
Cut ’em out, ride ’em in
Ride ’em in, let ’em out
Cut ’em out, ride ’em in
Rawhide!

Rawhide!

This may sound kind of silly, but what about choosing a running mate based on their actual qualifications and accomplishments? You know, a meritocratic, “content of their character” kind of thing. Crazy, huh?

He needs the votes of people who hope he will die.

Possessing female genitalia and/or dark skin pigmentation now constitute the Dhimmi-crats’ primary criteria for choosing candidates for Vice-president, and, U.S. Supreme Court justices, rather than character, intellect and professional accomplishment. This notion of race and gender-based professional selection/promotion is utterly contemptible.

The Dhimmis are doing their damndest to undermine Dr. Martin Luther King’s aspiration that people ultimately be judged largely by their character, as opposed to their skin color.

Announcing the latest, but not too original (remember, it’s still Slow Joe) campaign theme: Pander Express 2020! Retracing Route 66 in a 62 Corvette.

Dennis Miller @DennisDMZ
“If the Democrat’s are really serious about putting a truly representative member of their Party forward in 2020, they must choose Rashida Tlaib. To not do so will be sexist, Islamaphobic and not loyal to their core message.”

He’ll pick Shrillary Shrooooooo. Two weeks after being elected, he’ll be declared senile, or commit Arkancide, and Shrill will be our POTUS.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend