Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Tom Perez: ‘I am Calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to Immediately Begin a Recanvass’

Tom Perez: ‘I am Calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to Immediately Begin a Recanvass’

However, the DNC has been in charge for the past 48 hours.

https://youtu.be/P-fWdGp1i0Y

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Tom Perez demanded the Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) “to immediately begin a recanvass” because they still do not have the results from the caucus.

Perez made the announcement before he told the IDP. He also forgot an important detail:

The caucus took place on Monday. The DNC only has 97% of the results with former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg in the lead with 26.2% of the state’s delegates.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is slightly behind with 26.1% of the delegates. However, he leads in the popular vote with 2,5000 votes.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) sits in third with 18.2% of the delegates. Former Vice President Joe Biden is in fourth place with 15.8% of the delegates.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

This just keeps getting better……

Typical leftist trick – keep voting until we leftists get the result we want. It’s how the EU came into being. The voters of several would-be members voted NO. Result, we have to do a re-do. And that’s what happened until YES. Then, magically, no more re-dos.

rustyshamrock | February 6, 2020 at 2:08 pm

Just exactly how many is “2,5000”?

Isn’t this a magic trick? Misdirection – watch their hands.

Less than the winners total, regardless or the actual number.
See how the game’s played?

“Multiple virtual hanging chads were discovered in the app. Party officials will review them one by one to determine voter intent.”

    Paul In Sweden in reply to hopp singg. | February 6, 2020 at 2:58 pm

    Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch confronted the Iowa election board prior to the caucus and informed them that according to Judicial Watch analysis of 2019 voter records, there were 8 counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible voters. The Iowa election commission contacted and admonished Judicial Watch telling him they were working off old records and that problem only exists in FIVE COUNTIES.

I do not understand. Isn’t this the same party that is running California and Chicago and Baltimore? Oh, wait…

The optics of this are priceless. I would love to see one of the lower ranked finishers [Biden or Warren] sue Perez and/or DNC for incompetence, fraud – you name it. Popcorn popping time.

The corruption is so blatant, so complete – only bette midler couldn’t see it.

Where is the jistice dept in this??

The drug cartels could learn a thing or two from the DNC.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to ghost dog. | February 6, 2020 at 3:04 pm

    DNC and Drug Cartels
    ARE NOT ONE AND THE SAME?????

    Well…..

    Learn something new every day I guess…..

    Paul In Sweden in reply to ghost dog. | February 6, 2020 at 8:38 pm

    Drug Cartels are run like big business but with Narco-Terror enforcement. If the DNC were run like a drug cartel the bodies and heads in the streets of DC would rival the San Francisco Poop Maps we often see.

Meanwhile Perez keeps his position because racism.

It reeks of rotten fish in Iowa. I can smell it from here.

The DNC sequestered the counties with the greatest Sanders vote. If the release the last three percent, as tabulated, Sanders will end up ahead. If this is released, before New Hampshire, then Bernie gains a big advantage. This is all about stopping Bernie Sanders. And, in Iowa, the party can not simply “find” the necessary votes in the trunk of a car or a janitor”s closet, to put their candidate over the top, because of the caucus system used there.

    walls in reply to Mac45. | February 6, 2020 at 3:21 pm

    ” … the party can not simply “find” the necessary votes in the trunk of a car or a janitor”s closet …”

    Then they are not looking hard enough!!!

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Mac45. | February 6, 2020 at 3:29 pm

    Plus they didn’t use the 2008 Chicago Mafia…er..Kenyan Obama’s crimes of busing in mobs and mobs of Ghetto youth muscle to intimidate the meek, little old ladies of the Dem Party into giving it all to Barrack.

    There were lots of reports of the many, various crimes there and online connected to Iowa – 2008.

    CorkyAgain in reply to Mac45. | February 6, 2020 at 5:00 pm

    They’re right there on the yellow pad!

Dear Dems: Since you seem incapable of learning to code, please #LearnToMineCoal .

Perez: “In light of the problems that have emerged in the …results, Joe Biden and I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass until it comes out the way we wanted.”

2smartforlibs | February 6, 2020 at 3:58 pm

That’s code for the truckload of Biden votes its parked outside. DONT SCREW IT UP AGAIN.

Let’s redo this until Soros is happy

If you did not vote with a paper ballot at a polling place, your vote is a sham.

BierceAmbrose | February 6, 2020 at 6:26 pm

We’ll keep counting until the answer comes out right? What are they, the EU?

BierceAmbrose | February 6, 2020 at 6:31 pm

Help me here.

Recount until it comes out right has been a D-party tactic for quite a while. It did get them Senator Gropey Face for a while. Used it in Wiscon state elections a bunch of times. And they were quite incensed when The Supremes called an end to “recount until it comes out the way we want” in Fl.

Using gamed recounts, not once but twice in highly-visible presidentials would seem to dirty up that tactic for the upcoming 2020. If they can’t recount forever, it’s that much easier (less hard) for the rest of us to beat the margin of fraud.

How does this recount thing make sense? I understand the Clintons or the Obamas hollowing out the party for their own gain, but this guy is really nothing without the party to be in.

There’s got to be some advantage to Perez to do this, but I can’t find it. Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?

    Did it ever occur to you that there’s no fraud? If you can’t find it, maybe it’s not there. There are no actual grounds to believe this is more than it appears to be. The results are a mess, so he wants them to hand-count the actual paper reports that were turned in by each caucus.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend