Democratic Debate Overshadowed by Labor Disputes, Candidates Demanding Qualification Changes
Will the debate even happen?
![https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-debate-in-jeopardy-amid-labor-disputes](https://c4.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/December-Debate.jpg)
The next Democratic presidential primary debate is scheduled to take place on December 19 in Los Angeles, but the DNC faces a few challenges.
Qualifications
The DNC received a letter from Sen. Cory Booker, Julián Castro, and all seven candidates who will appear in the December debate.
They asked the DNC to change its requirements for the January debate so Booker and Castro can participate. They want “the DNC to return its qualifications to either achieving the threshold through polling or through individual contributors — rather than requiring candidates to reach both.” From Politico:
“Adopting the aforementioned criteria will produce a debate stage that better reflects our party and our country; will recognize a broader definition of what constitutes a viable candidacy, particularly in the early primary and caucus states where strong organization can outweigh media persuasion efforts; and will reflect the practical reality that the polling threshold has proven to be an unreliable metric, with only four national debate qualifying polls released since the last debate,” the letter reads in part. “With the holiday season upon us, and a brief qualification window for the January debate, it’s vital to make modifications to qualification criteria now.”
Booker and Castro achieved the donor thresholds, but not in polling.
The DNC has so far said no:
But the DNC resisted the request in a statement shared with POLITICO: “The DNC has led a fair and transparent process and even told campaigns almost a year ago that the qualification criteria would go up later in the year — not one campaign objected. The DNC will not change the threshold for any one candidate and will not revert back to two consecutive nights with more than a dozen candidates. Our qualification criteria is extremely low and reflects where we are in the race. Once voting starts in February, our criteria will reflect those contests, which is more than appropriate. We’re proud to have given candidates so many opportunities to get their message across, and will continue to have fair criteria that reflects each point in the race.”
Another DNC official said that “multiple campaigns have privately signaled to the DNC their frustration with the large debate stage and asked them to hold the line.”
DNC Chairman Tom Perez promised a fair fight before the primary began earlier this year. However, the field remains large, even with tightening qualification requirements.
If the DNC changes qualifications could mean former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg could take the stage. He is funding his own campaign, which means he will not meet any of the donor requirements. If the DNC only required poll numbers then he would make it because he has hit 5% in the qualifying polls.
Labor Dispute
A labor dispute has also threatened the December debate.
The DNC had to move the debate from UCLA to “Loyola Marymount University after AFSCME Local 3299 – the union representing more than 25,000 University of California service and patient technical care workers – and the state school forced UCLA to inform the Democrats and its media partners to abandon plans to host the debate at the Luskin School of Public Affairs.”
Now a labor dispute at Loyola has caused problems. A few candidates have threatened to boycott the debate if they have to cross the picket line:
A labor union called UNITE HERE Local 11 says it will picket outside the event, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders responded by tweeting they wouldn’t participate if that meant crossing it. Former Vice President Joe Biden, Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind.; Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, environmental activist Tom Steyer and businessman Andrew Yang followed suit.
“The DNC should find a solution that lives up to our party’s commitment to fight for working people. I will not cross the union’s picket line even if it means missing the debate,” Warren tweeted.
Sanders tweeted, “I will not be crossing their picket line,” while Biden tweeted: “We’ve got to stand together with @UNITEHERE11 for affordable health care and fair wages. A job is about more than just a paycheck. It’s about dignity.” The other candidates used Twitter to post similar sentiments.
UNITE HERE Local 11 “represents 150 cooks, dishwashers, cashiers and servers working on the Loyola Marymount campus.” Labor negotiations began in March with the food company Sodexo “for a collective bargaining agreement.”
Sodexo canceled “contract negotiations last week” after workers and students picketed on campus in November.
The DNC learned about the negotiations last Friday. DNC Communications Director Xochitl Hinojosa “expressed support for the union and the candidates’ boycott, stating that ‘Tom Perez would absolutely not cross a picket line and would never expect our candidates to, either.'”
[Featured image via Fox News video]
![](https://c1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/subscribe-ad.jpg)
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
WHAT?????
ANOTHER ONE??????
We’re all tire of the DEM Circus!!!!!!!!
“tired”
Victor Davis Hanson: Spygate, Impeachment & the Assault on Trump For Undoing the Progressive Agenda
How is Trump dismantling “the Progressive project,” and how does this explain the anti-Trump “Resistance”?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=64&v=-4Gkm77usT0&feature=emb_logo
Soft bigotry of low expectations for black candidates.
Note this.
Poll: Trump Drawing More and More Black Support
Black voter support for Trump at ‘highest levels,’ could seal 2020 win
http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=384811
Corey Booker surprised that there isn’t an AA component for qualifying. Demands that one be put in. Pronto.
Maybe he can get Greta to screech for him.
Seems Greta just LOVES living like Royalty….
AFP news agency
✔
@AFP
Greta Thunberg has defended herself in a Twitter spat with German railway service Deutsche Bahn. She said her trains through Germany were ‘overcrowded’. The rail firm said she should have mentioned the friendly staff who treated her well in first-class. http://u.afp.com/JyrW
Who is this?
A DEM candidate or Greta?
“After spending much of the past year crisscrossing the globe in the luxury of a state of the art racing yacht while skipping…..and boosting the popularity of…fame-starved opera singing mother….”
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/greta-thunberg-busted-after-bizarre-feud-german-train-company
Yelp!
Greta is a Democrat Party member! Snark.
“Greta Thunberg was called out by a German train company after the Swedish climate activist tweeted a photo of herself sitting on the floor of what she said was an “overcrowded” train.
“Traveling on overcrowded trains through Germany,” she tweeted…
German Train company SLAPS her LIE down.
“…but it would have been even nicer, had you also reported how friendly and competently you were looked after by our team at your seat in the FIRST CLASS.”
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2019/12/16/train-company-issues-brutal-correction-to-greta-thunbergs-tweet-n2558050
Affirmative Action? Or, African American?
I legit thought this was Alcoholics Anonymous, and wondered what news item I had missed. It makes it a much funnier comment though.
Are any of them viable?
From the look of the picture at the top of the article: only the
Whites.
Yang is white?
To quote the media, he’s a “White Oriental.”
He is not a N3gr0. Nor does he possess a Spanish surname. Ergo; he is white.
Spartacus is complaining about the lack of diversity, yet of seven people you have two women, an Oriental, a non-practicing Jew, a gay man, a billionaire, a man suffering through the early (middle) stages of dementia and a fake Indian princess. Sounds like a pretty diverse field to me.
Oh, you mean no blacks? That kind of diversity? Maybe if you weren’t such a crappy candidate, Spartacus?
What a Day!
Barrack-tini Obama throws her hat in the ring/race as a women!
(I think that’s what this means.)
How Sexist of White Barry! (It’s Racist Too!)
Obama Says Women Are “Indisputably Better” Than Men, And Should Lead Every Country
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/obama-says-women-are-indisputably-better-men-and-should-lead-every-country
I’d like to see them revise the qualification rules so that Wacky Crystal Goddess Williamson gets back in. Sure she’s a loon, but she’s an entertaining loon. These others are about as entertaining as back-alley pickpockets with hygiene issues.
The key to this is the fact that if they relax the criteria to allow Booker and Castro in, they cannot with a straight face refuse to allow Bloomberg in, and they are terrified of Bloomberg because he would wipe the debate floor with the rest of them, and the party would split hopelessly. Regardless of whether one supports Trump or not, reality is that Bloomberg is the only Democrat who can go toe to toe with Trump. Bloomberg is correct in his observation that Trump would shred any of the other Democrat.
So…a group representing 150 people is picketing, and the Democrat candidates won’t cross the line? They, collectively, represent all Democrat voters, right? Roughly 73 million people. So somehow, .0002% of their population is preventing a debate supposedly representing all of them?
No wonder their party can’t win anything, if this is how they act. Tyranny of the minority indeed.