Image 01 Image 03

James O’Keefe to #ExposeCNN With Undercover Video Dropping Monday

James O’Keefe to #ExposeCNN With Undercover Video Dropping Monday

“dozens of recordings made of officials at the highest levels of CNN, revealing a political agenda, bias and misconduct hidden from public view”

James O’Keefe and his Project Veritas group have apparently found an insider at CNN who has recorded some politically inconvenient conversations with higher-ups at the liberal network. They’re planning to expose this information starting Monday.

They made the announcement on Saturday night.

From Project Veritas:

On the Eve of the CNN Insider blowing the whistle on his own network…

This week, a CNN insider will blow the whistle and through Project Veritas will release dozens of recordings made of officials at the highest levels of CNN, revealing a political agenda, bias and misconduct hidden from public view.

This series of tapes — which we think will be the biggest story of the year for Project Veritas — blends two extraordinary series of events; a brave insider secretly recording at work. This is a hard-hitting piece of hidden camera muckraking into one of the supposed “most trusted names in news.”

A major aspect of this story is the heroic actions of an insider.

By far, the most often asked question (and most important) is “What can I do?” There is a new genre of answer—you can wear a hidden camera and blow the whistle on your employer through Project Veritas. This new movement, which we are calling “Be Brave. Do Something” is enabling citizens to become catalysts for reform. It is the modern incarnation of what Jack Anderson once described as “the sirens of Greek mythology, who, by their seductive singing, enticed unknowing wayfarers to abandon the cramped boredom of safe passage for a hazardous try at strange excitements and gratifications.”

Here’s a video of O’Keefe making the announcement at an event this weekend:

At the time of this writing, the hashtag #ExposeCNN is blowing up on Twitter but still not trending:

This should be good, so stay tuned.

Let’s see just how much CNN likes whistleblowers when this story drops.

Featured image via YouTube.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


CNN will squirm lie and deny. That’s what communists do.

    casualobserver in reply to Whitewall. | October 13, 2019 at 12:55 pm

    Wagons will be circled from NY to DC to LA media centers, too. Step 1 – attack O’Keefe as a conspiracy theorist alt-right supremacist criminal (they did get him arrested once). And that’s just for starters in rehashing the old stuff. They may even try new stuff, too.

      My fear is they’ll Breitbart him..seriously.I think they took Andrew out..Might of just been Hillary for the sake of Weiner and Huma but I think the media had their hands in it as well..

        notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to whthfk1. | October 14, 2019 at 12:53 pm

        Methinks many think that.

        Just too, too many, oh so convenient deaths that benefit only the DEMS…………

O’Keefe found a CNN whistle blower? What an irony! There IS a God!

Will be interesting to see if this “whistleblower is taken as meaningfully as the Ukraine one…..also wonder if he/she is afforded the same safety concerns and anonymity.

My guess would be NO


Good! Stick it to the dirty Mother Zucker.

My predictions:

They (CNN and their friends in the media and Democrat party) will move mountains to figure out who the whistleblower is.

If at all possible, they will terminate the whistleblower’s job and seek prosecution.

They will express indignation at the lack of trust.

They will insist the video is deceptively edited, even when the full unedited version is available.

All eleventy-thousand candidates for the Democrat nomination for the presidency will compete with each other to come up with the most violent and offensive condemnation of James O’Keefe.

CNN’s ratings will stay the same, since no one watches it outside airports and newsrooms anyway. The failure of this to affect CNN’s ratings will be pointed to as proof that the people know better than to believe the Project Veritas “propaganda.”

Those of us who don’t watch CNN will shrug and maybe tell our Liberal friends and relatives, “See?” But they won’t listen. If the ever listened, they wouldn’t still be Liberals.

Project Veritas will see an increase in both donations, and volunteers. This is good.

Though this probably won’t move the needle at all when it comes to EVERYTHING, there is virtue in constantly exposing the liars and propagandists as just that. At the very least, it can slow or stop their efforts to convert people to their twisted world view and get individuals to start thinking instead of being Sheeple.

As usual, if O’Keefe’s revelations from before are any indication of the exposure he is going to get, then I don’t expect much coverage by the msm. They will treat like they did “Pay to play” for hillary and his last expose of the baby parts scandal. I don’t understand why we keep thinking that the msm will be fair when we know they will not. If the tables in the House were reversed, all of the behind-closed-doors meetings would have already been leaked to the msms. Why is it when national security from impeachment is at hand not one single Republican will do what almost every Demorat does and that is leak vital info concerning the issue? To counter the secret nature of Schifforbrains and Pelosi, our side has to get the hidden material out into the public. I saw the R talking heads this morning and they are all WAITING for the IG report to come out and wipe out the Dems impeachment claim. No it it won’t! Didn’t we already learn this?

The real truth is inconvenient so the Left will redirect the narrative, assemble a new set of manufactured facts and refashion their “truth”. Trump requests that a foreign government look into potential corruption and the Dems call that looking for political dirt. There was dirt….pay dirt for members of government and their families.

Notice the new narrative…Nixon’s 15 minutes and now Trump’s 30 minutes. I wonder how many hours Obama and Biden really had.

Blaise MacLean | October 13, 2019 at 12:57 pm

It takes two elements to create a scandal.

The first is an act that is wrong/illegal/embarrassing/shameful that is sought to be kept secret. This “act” can be either true or a lie/creation.

The second element is that the secret gets out, is publicized and spread.

Unfortunately, it is the second element that will result in this amounting to nothing. The news media will suppress and Deep-Six this so that even if it is reported here, on talk radio or on some cable news outlets (eg. Fox) it will not get general dissemination. It will not, in other words, enter the narrative.

I heard someone say once that the media’s greatest power of corruption is the power to suppress news (I am paraphrasing). This will be as clearly seen here when they suppress this story as it is when they suppress realities about the “whistleblower” so-called.

We live in frightening times.

    Because the Derp State Media have absolute and unchallengeable control over the dissemination of all information — which is why Bill Clinton hasn’t become a skirt-chaser punchline, and Dan Rather is still universally respected and revered by the American people, and nobody ever snickers when they read or hear the name “Anthony Weiner.”

The “progressives” will smear the hell of him. So be it. The videos will speak for themselves. Should be fun. As a former professional journalist of the old school, from back when that meant something good, I am as upset as anyone I know about what the major media have done to themselves.

They have abandoned the pursuit of objectivity and facts, and have obliterated what was once a much greater separation of news and opinion. In doing so, they’ve also discarded the verification of material, and balanced, contextual presentation of controversies and disagreements.

There are commercial reasons for this. As advertising has increasingly gone online, media outlets depend on audiences that want a partisan spin on everything. The New York Times is a case study; they now depend heavily on digital subscriptions, which have the effect of tying them to a partisan audience.

So we wind up with the Internet, who sites (including this one) preach to their respective choirs. This was what “the press” was prior to the Civil War, and it did not serve the public interest very well.

There are arguments to be made on both sides of that, but the rise of an objectivity-seeking media, starting during the Civil War when everyone wanted to know how this or that battle had turned out and especially whose sons had died, was a major advance in public information.

Combined with the telegraph, the mechanical printing press, and the rise of a middle class and advertisers who wanted to reach as broad an audience as possible, we had a pretty solid media (mostly print) that, from the Great Depression until the NYT’s embrace of Bush Jr.’s “weapons of mass destruction” propaganda, was a positive force in this country.

That is vanishing quickly, and I think will be all but extinct a decade from now. The media have never been charities; without the commercial underpinnings for the objectivity-seeking business structure, we’re not going to have the media we once did. It’s not going to return, because no one will be able to make money at it.

We live in interesting times, and they are going to get even more so.

    Eric R. in reply to RandomCrank. | October 13, 2019 at 2:29 pm

    We have never had an objective media. The left merely posed as non-partisan after WW 2. Walter Cronkite was the ultimate example of this. A radical leftist who was made into “the most trusted man in America.” An America-hating POS who lied about Tet because he was against the war; condemning millions of Southeast Asians to death.

    To steal the leftist chant from the Aughts:

    “Cronkite lied, millions (really) died.”

For this to be a scandal, CNN would have to be embarrassed about it. I am sure, in fact, that they are PROUD of what he will expose. And the leftist propaganda media will be proud of CNN for it.

It’s a bit odd to announce something like this several days before actually doing it. Why the delay? If the Hammer of Heaven is about to strike the unrighteous, it will be most effective if it strikes suddenly, without preliminary fanfare. This announcement makes me suspect that it’s not much of a Hammer at all, and somebody’s hoping that the reaction to the announcement will itself make some damaging information available. Seems like a long shot, though.

BierceAmbrose | October 13, 2019 at 2:58 pm

Why’s O’Keefe need sources or video? I heard from a guy, who heard from a guy (who heard from a guy), that CNN did something to somebody. So impeachment expose time, right?

CNN will hunt the whistleblower down, dox him, SWAT him, destroy him, and salt the earth where he stood.

And then they’ll be shocked when the whistleblower sues them for millions, and wins.

I bet it’s ratings-driven, not politics-driven. They’re aiming for a narrative that women will enjoy following to interpret anything Trump does. The dems are just free-riding on ratings.

Only if you have an audience that doesn’t short-circuit to feelings would it be different.

The right has news channels devoted not to news but to you won’t believe what the left is up to now, parasitic on this.

I hear O’Keefe likes to run over baby deer with his SUV and then has sex with their still warm bodies.

Details at 11.

Anything O’Keefe reveals will probably verify what thinking people have assumed all along

Looking forward to this more than anyone can know..I want these people exposed for all the fraud and the communist BS they are pushing on the American public..Sick to death of their feeble attacks on President Trump and the continued Alinsky methods they keep using..Take them down James and then go after all the other news sites including FOX now that the sons have taken over.

They’ll start by calling it “heavily edited”, even after the complete unedited video is made available. Then they’ll call it “deceptively edited”. Finally, they’ll just call it the “discredited” video, even though everything in it is absolutely true.

We’ve already seen their playbook.

At this point, what could they possibly reveal about CNN that would shock anyone?

notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | October 14, 2019 at 3:44 pm

Maybe James O’Keefe can check out some things such as this.

#Woke Plutocrat Bill Gates Met With Jeffrey Epstein After His Sexcrime Convictions, To Discuss Fund to Help… Little Girls

I’ve yet to see O’Keefe legitimately discredited.

The only thing I see are uppity journalists getting mad that he exposed them by sending people in on sting operations.

They caught him on one going after WaPo, which doesn’t really prove that he was lying about anything (or that WaPo wouldn’t have published it if they hadn’t successfully doxxed the person).

That’s the most I’ve seen. Other than that, they just try to shame his tactics. If they weren’t so worried about what his tactics might reveal, then they wouldn’t scream so loudly, either.

I see random claims of “heavily edited” video but no proof yet that he actually changed someone’s words. Context is always useful, and that’s why it’s good when investigators like this release unedited versions, too (like with the PP scandals). However, I think some burden of proof on context reverts back to the caught party in the court of public opinion.