Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Nicole Wallace Falsely Accuses Trump of ‘Talking About Exterminating Latinos,’ Offers Lame Apology after uproar

Nicole Wallace Falsely Accuses Trump of ‘Talking About Exterminating Latinos,’ Offers Lame Apology after uproar

Sorry, not sorry.

TONE DOWN THE RHETORIC. Guess what, leftists. You cannot have it both ways. You want President Donald Trump to tone down his rhetoric then you guys must do the same thing.

First, we had Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX) tweet out San Antonio donors because they fuel “a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders.'”

Then we had MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace stress that Trump talks “about exterminating Latinos” during a conversation with USA Today columnist Raul Reyes. Now Reyes isn’t innocent either as he claimed Trump “basically declared open season on Latinos.”

If I could go off on one of my rants here I would in a heartbeat. If you follow me on Twitter you know exactly what I would say, but I’ll back off for Professor Jacobson’s sake.

From Fox News (emphasis mine):

On Monday, Wallace led a conversation where USA Today opinion columnist Raul Reyes slammed Trump’s remarks condemning white supremacy since he had “basically declared open season on Latinos” during his entire presidency.

He then listed examples of Trump’s rhetoric towards Latinos and illegal immigrants like describing the caravan that was heading to the U.S. southern border as an “infestation.”

“What do you do with an infestation? With an infestation, the natural conclusion is to attempt an extermination,” Reyes said. “So, to me, there’s very little distinction between his inciting this violence and the fact it’s now happening.”

“What do you do when, certainly, the last Republican president fought for, sought and — it’s not ideal — but had 44 percent of Latino voters. So politically powerful inside the last Republican administration,” Wallace then responded.

“President Obama used the power of the presidency to try to pass comprehensive immigration reform, with the Latino community, Latino leaders, at the table. You now have a president, as you said, talking about exterminating Latinos.”

Only after receiving a well-deserved backlash, Wallace offered up this lame apology with a shot at Trump.

No, you’re not sorry. The answer to Trump’s hyperbole is not more hyperbole. You accuse Trump of using rhetoric to rile up his supporters, but what do you think this does? You add fuel to the fire trying to incite fear in those on your side.

Trump has truly broken people.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


See Ace/Sefton/Morning Report: Angelo Codevilla, Daniel Greenfield, et al

    Nicole Wallace is a dirty whore. Oh wait did I make that up or it is true.

      Firewatch in reply to EBL. | August 7, 2019 at 12:34 pm

      That’s why she had no college loans?

        notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Firewatch. | August 7, 2019 at 8:36 pm

        Nicolle Wallace works for MSNBC?

        In other words Nicolle Wallace DOESN’T WORK AT ALL.

      Tsquared in reply to EBL. | August 7, 2019 at 8:13 pm

      She has the equipment. What evidence is available to prove otherwise

      myiq2xu in reply to EBL. | August 8, 2019 at 6:12 am

      Nicolle Wallace is the reason that Sarah Palin has shiv marks up and down her back. She was supposedly a GOP campaign consultant in 2008 but now she is a Leftist Democrat activist disguised as a journalist.

      Dante said the 9th Circle of Hell is for faithless counselors and other treachers. I guess we know where to find Nicolle Wallace in the afterlife.

I’m sorry I made up a horrible lie about someone but he said a bad thing!

She should be fired but probably won’t be. Hating Trump is okay in that crazy world.

It is now a competition to say the most outlandish and outrageous claim possible, knowing that there will be no repercussion and that a lame apology will have little effect in quashing the claims. “Trump uses sacrificial latino baby’s blood in his satanic rituals against the Federal Reserve. The concentration camps on the borders were set up to provide an unending supply for this purpose.” Ooop,sorry, I misspoke.

I’m truly grateful for the “non-partisan”, “neutral” Press to finally reveal that they are almost completely a partisan disinformation operation in thrall to the Democrat Party, i.e. an Enemy of the People.

That’s an apology? These Democrat activists^W reporters are beclowning themselves.

Close The Fed | August 7, 2019 at 10:17 am

AGAIN, this is a phantom. When we speak of an invasion of latins, we are being literal. When you have 100 or 1,000 people crossing a day, IN A GROUP, this is an INVASION. When you have tens of thousands of people crossing into our country, every year, UNAUTHORIZED, this is an INVASION.

“INVASION” has constitutional ramifications, OF COURSE! Because we are a country, and not a bar. We use the term “INVASION” to emphasize that the federal government has an obligation under the constitution to “REPEL INVASIONS.” This duty is BEING IGNORED BY CONGRESS.

I don’t have my favorite copy of the constitution with me, but in Article I, Section 8, clause I don’t have notated, it’s down in there, around 10? it states:

“The Congress shall have Power ……

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections, and REPEL INVASIONS….”

Of course, the militia being called up, the President is the Commander-in-Chief.

THEN, in Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America (anybody remember this thing?!?), it states:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State (EVERY STATE!!!) in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against INVASION; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.”


SO THESE STUPID TALKING HEADS, with NEXT TO ZERO EDUCATION ABOUT THEIR OWN DAMN COUNTRY, don’t know that when the Educated Set discussions “Invasion,” we are doing so in the context of CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

This is a good damn reason to fire these asshats, these utterly clueless asshats. What the HELL are they being paid for, to “COMMENT” when they don’t know the BASICS about BASIC and OVERARCHING LAW????

Hire someone that’s read the Constitution at least twice, save $$.

    artichoke in reply to Close The Fed. | August 7, 2019 at 11:37 am

    As a point of information, the latest wave is reported to be something like 80% Africans.

    So it’s definitely the invasion, not the latinos, that the policy is about.

Close The Fed | August 7, 2019 at 10:26 am

Let’s call this “Part 2.”

So, under the Constitution (that the LEFT regrets the existence of — thus their utter refusal to ACKNOWLEDGE the Federal Government’s obligations under it!) — when a STATE is being INVADED (both terms IN Our Constitution) — the Federal government is to “REPEL” the Invasion.

What is that? That is putting men with guns and OTHER MILITARY EQUIPMENT, on the border, to REPEL THE INVASION. You know, you shoot them, you take prisoners, you invade the other country if need be to use FORCE to MAKE THEM stop the invasion.

This is basic physical facts.

AND you take prisoners of those who have invaded your country, and hold them as prisoners of WAR until you have terms with the invading country.

Mexico et al are playing footsie with this, pretending they aren’t responsible. THEY LOVE IT! THEY LOVE THE REMITTANCES, ETC.!


Declare War on these Sons of bitches.

Instead, we have laws that are inferior to our Glorious Constitution, which we PRETEND eliminate that Constitutional OBLIGATION.

So, Congressmen (sexist?! Who gives a damn?! NOT ME), when do you PlAN to DO YOUR DUTY? When will you be calling up our Militia etc. to DEFEND OUR STATES FROM INVASION, AND TO TAKE PRISONERS OF THE INVADERS?

Americans have demanded this action for years, and the political set and ignorant commentariat continue to pretend this duty doesn’t exist. They amended our Constitution by FIAT.

    artichoke in reply to Close The Fed. | August 7, 2019 at 11:36 am

    In general I agree that’s appropriate, and I’ve long since run out of patience. But we can do even better under Trump I hope.

    Trump just now has a deal with Guatemala, and recently with Mexico, to guard their own southern borders and repel asylum seekers who will not request asylum right there. They can’t request asylum in the US border if they’ve requested asylum in Guatemala or Mexico, and they will be repelled from even getting through the countries to our border.

    Trump is “let’s make a deal” and he makes brilliant ones that drive the Dems berzerk.

      walls in reply to artichoke. | August 7, 2019 at 11:42 am

      We need an armed military on our southern border NOW. Where is it? We protect borders all over the world … except at home. Pathetic.

Close The Fed | August 7, 2019 at 10:32 am

Also, for the younger set, in America we Anglicize foreign words. So the word is NOT “latino,” it’s “latin.”

We’re the Big Dogs on the planet and we should resume acting that way.

These clowns that think I’m going to grovel haven’t met a genuine article American in a LONG time.

    artichoke in reply to Close The Fed. | August 7, 2019 at 11:30 am

    And even the latinos / latins don’t capitalize it. The made-up word Hispanic is capitalized, but that’s not a word that’s used south of the Rio Grande.

Trump has truly broken people.

See? It’s Trump’s fault.

BerettaTomcat | August 7, 2019 at 10:42 am

Per Neocon Wallace, Trump has been promoting violence against Hispanics for the last four years, since his 2016 campaign began. He is not good at it if it takes four years for the violence to materialize.

It’s not hate speech if you hate the “right” people. It’s not lying if you believe it.

SeekingRationalThought | August 7, 2019 at 10:58 am

Painful as it is to watch Wallace’s shallow and childish behavior, there may be a bright side. The “progressive” lefts rhetoric has gone so low and become so dishonest that some voters are bound to be offended. In a nearly evenly divided country, it doesn’t take many voters at the margin to reelect President Trump. I’m sure that Wallace and her ilk will claim that their rhetoric is justified not because its true or ethical, but because “Orange Man Bad,” and because it will motivate their base. After all, a few votes on the margin can work both ways. One of the negatives of living in a bubble of bias, however, is that they don’t realize how disgusting and stupid they appear to others. They also forget that many Trump voters don’t advertise or even admit their support out of fear of ostracism or even physical violence. If this is true of majority voters, it must be even more true of minority voters and those in liberal strongholds.

Voters elected President Trump with all his flaws because they determined that Hilary Clinton was even worse. The President’s performance has surprised many thoughtful people and his opposition has been acting less ethically and saying even dumber things than Hilary. Trump supporters often don’t admit that support. You do the math.

    It was true in the 2016 election too. We lied to pollsters. In the post-mortem after losing the election, the main thing the Dem insiders said is that their polls were wrong!

    So it worked. Yay!

    If Dems had known how much support Trump had in Michigan, they would have recounted those black Detroit votes 10 or 20 times, whatever the math would indicate, to push them over the top. As it is they only recounted them 6 times, and it wasn’t enough!

    (Remember we found out about the 6x recounting in some Detroit precincts because the 3rd party woman candidate was demanding recounts, but only in states Trump won narrowly. Not even states like Nevada which Hillary won narrowly.)

2smartforlibs | August 7, 2019 at 11:17 am


Reyes blames Trump that we don’t hear about “latinos in education”, “latinos in climate change”, only with regard to immigration.

Then why doesn’t MSNBC ever talk about latinos in other contexts? Trump already does, in particular about how latino unemployment is at a historic low.

And Trump now talks about how it’s Africans coming up on the border. So it’s the invasion, not the latinos.

The emphasis on immigration in the latino narrative is certainly more MSNBC’s fault than Trump’s.

“…Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders.’”

No, they are legal immigrants. There’s a difference between legal and illegal. Hence the phrase “Words have meanings.”

Close The Fed | August 7, 2019 at 11:46 am

So let’s go a little further, veering off the path for a moment.

This discussion is proof that “diversity” is our weakness. And it may prove our fatal weakness.

Putting aside ENTIRELY any differences between groups, the fact remains that cunning, craven and ambitious people will use or MANUFACTURE differences in order to fulfill their ambitions.

Insulting more than half of the country in order to get more of the remaining part of the country to vote for you, has been time-tested and proven to work. So if destruction of citizens is required, for the cravenly ambitious, to create dissension even from none whatsoever, is a plus.

The lack of diversity would kill this opportunity.

I’ve seen the quote a hundred times, as I’m sure you all have, of the successful black American shortly after the War Between the States, stating that some blacks liked to use black victimhood as a means of supporting themselves. Same con.

So, yes, diversity, all other things being peachy, is a weakness.

“Democrats are the problem. They don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13. They can’t win on their terrible policies, so they view them as potential voters!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 19, 2018

The only Latinos specifically referred to are MS-13.

    Close The Fed in reply to Tunkmaster. | August 7, 2019 at 12:04 pm

    Well, Tunk, there’s plenty that aren’t MS-13 that kill, rape, torture Americans. So if he limited it, it was an inadvertent error. There’s also the visa overstayers that committed 9/11. There’s the muslims that kill Americans. There’s all sorts that get drunk and kill Americans by drunk driving.

    I talked to the father about the death of his son by a drunk illegal alien. The father explained to me that Mexico will not extradite the man, because they do not extradite for acts that are NOT crimes in Mexico.

    Evidently, in Mexico, it’s not a crime to kill someone because you’re drunk when you’re driving. Explains a lot.

    He showed me the letter from our State Department.

      I’m *almost* positive that the age of consent in Mexico is 14. So I assume Mexico would not extradite for that as well.

      We are long overdue … and I mean LONG overdue … for some vigilante justice. When our laws don’t work, we make our own laws …

        Close The Fed in reply to walls. | August 7, 2019 at 12:18 pm

        Good point, Walls. Actually, in most Mexican states, the age of consent is 12.

          artichoke in reply to Close The Fed. | August 9, 2019 at 12:17 pm

          Really!? I don’t have any specific knowledge about it and never lived there, but I am surprised. How can you have a huge party for your quinceanera when you already have 2 little ones running around and are bulging with your third?

          artichoke in reply to Close The Fed. | August 9, 2019 at 12:21 pm

          Or maybe the quinceanera (at age 15) is the blow-out fire sale for the young woman before she turns into an old maid, if nobody’s snapped her up in her first three years of eligibility since age 12.

        artichoke in reply to walls. | August 9, 2019 at 12:15 pm

        I’d expect it’s at least 15 in Mexico and all of Latin America. The 15th birthday for a girl is a big deal, the “quinceanera”. A big party. It’s when she becomes a woman, as I understand it.

They ought to limit the broadcast news networks to 12 hours of broadcast per day/24 hr period. The other 12 are for “equal time” of rebuttal. Like – conceptually – CNN and Fox broadcast on the same channel, back to back hour long segments. Or, if all news is to be politicized, then it must be presented by both sides in the same broadcast. Let every news broadcast personality duke it out with their political alter-ego, like the View – watch how fast they either change their rhetoric or viewers turn them off. Perhaps even take a cue from the Milgram experiments and wire them up with SHOCK buttons to give the other guy a good jolt when they say something untoward.

Seems like part of the problem is that they can shoot their mouths off from a cushy broadcast chair, surrounded by partisan coworkers, and without consequence of any kind. Some real world consequences would be welcome for the flannel mouth set.

    Milhouse in reply to MrE. | August 7, 2019 at 3:21 pm

    The first amendment prohibits that. The old “fairness doctrine” could only ever have existed on broadcast media. On cable it would be unconstitutional.

      artichoke in reply to Milhouse. | August 9, 2019 at 12:27 pm

      Right, because it was in return for the privilege of (somewhat scarce) broadcast bandwidth, stations complied with Fairness Doctrine. That’s how we regulated them. It was a happy accident that we were able to do that — that needed bandwidth was scarce.

      Now with the internet it’s harder to regulate because there are effectively an infinite number of sources. But regulation is needed for the public good. We can’t let Facebook and Google dominate commercially and thereby dominate information.

      Maybe what we can do is restrict big internet players (tricky to define but it would include FB, Google, Twitter and exclude LI and you and me) and put them all on .big domains. And on .big domains, regulations are like the Fairness Doctrine.

What’s your evidence leftists cannot have it both ways? They’ve been doing it for a hundred years.

To lie so blatantly, without any conscience – especially as a purported “news” person, Nicole Wallace has put on display her deep neurosis, pathetic narcissism and low character.

At least we know.

Standard Operating Procedure. Get the accusation out there, let it be discussed for a day or two, let it get embedded in the internet and then claim you misspoke or didn’t understand the question, etc. Mission Accomplished.

Close The Fed | August 7, 2019 at 12:45 pm

Listening to Rush Limbaugh, and even he doesn’t mention the Constitutional context and significance of the word “invasion.”

What a shame. If anyone calls in, please point it out to him.

1-Insult millions with the most revolting of smears.
2-Apologize weakly to a few dozen of them.
3-Claim neutrality.

Welcome to the Modern Mainstream Media.

But don’t call Nicole Wallace a clown.