Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Fairfax Accusers Demand Action From Virginia Legislature Regarding Their Sexual Assault, Rape Claims

Fairfax Accusers Demand Action From Virginia Legislature Regarding Their Sexual Assault, Rape Claims

Vanessa Tyson and Meredith Watson claim Fairfax took advantage of their sexual assault past.

Vanessa Tyson and Meredith Watson, the two women who have accused Democrat Virginia Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax of sexual assault and rape, sat down with Gayle King for CBS This Morning to provide details of the incidents.

Tyson demanded an investigation from the Virginia legislature while Watson reminded people that she has nothing to gain by coming forward.

Vanessa Tyson

Tyson alleges that Fairfax sexually assaulted her in 2004 at the Democrat National Convention in Boston:

Tyson said she met Justin Fairfax at the Democratic convention in Boston in 2004 when he was a law student. She said he asked her to accompany him to his hotel room.

“He just needed to pick up some paperwork is what he said,” she said.

“What happens,” King asked.

“He kisses me,” Tyson said.

“And you’re OK with the kissing,” King asked.

“Yeah, I’m OK with kissing,” Tyson said.

But suddenly, she said, he became violent, forcing her to perform oral sex.

“He’s using his hand on the back of my neck. I couldn’t say anything cause I’m choking and gagging,” she said.

Tyson also claimed that Fairfax took advantage of her since she is a survivor “of incest.” From The Washington Post:

Tyson said she avoided Fairfax after the incident and rebuffed his attempts to contact her. Fairfax disputes this and has said Tyson reached out to him at a later date, saying she wanted him to meet her mother in New York.

Tyson said she did not tell anyone about the assault until recently.

“I was so ashamed,” Tyson said. “I was so humiliated on so many levels. I was this woman working at a rape crisis center, trying to, as a survivor speaker, trying to empower survivors of sexual assault. And it was like I had just walked into a trap.”

She came forward after racist pictures of Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam came to light because she feared Faifax coming to power if Northam resigned. Tyson told King that Virginia voters “have a right to know.”

She expressed disgust at the fact that these allegations have been swept away. Her lawyers have already stated that she is willing to meet with the Suffolk County district attorney in Boston.

Tyson blasted Fairfax’s statements where he likened himself to lynching victims. From The Richmond Times-Dispatch:

Tyson also pushed back on Fairfax’s likening of the accusations against him to the lynching of African Americans. Fairfax said in a February speech on the Senate floor that “the truth is on my side” and cautioned against “political lynchings without any due process.”

“Never was it two black women lynching black men,” Tyson said. “One need only look at history to try to understand that, in fact, the role of black women had always been leading anti-lynching campaigns. You know, black women were lynched specifically trying to protect black men. And speaking as someone who teaches black politics, I find it disgraceful, irresponsible and manipulative.”

Meredith Watson

Watson met Fairfax during their freshmen year at Duke University. They remained friends, which is why she didn’t think anything would happen when he invited her over in 2000 during their junior year.

Her story sort of mirrors Tysons as she also believes Fairfax took advantage of her as a survivor of sexual assault:

“He knew that the year prior that I had been raped by someone and that nothing was done about it. And he was a very good friend to me,” Meredith Watson told King. “Which is why I never would’ve expected anything like this from him.”

Watson claims Fairfax assaulted and raped her in 2000, when they were both students at Duke University. She said the two were friends and that she had confided in him about being allegedly assaulted by a Duke basketball player the year before.

“Did you ever talk to him [Fairfax] after he allegedly assaulted you, did you ever say, ‘How could you do that to me, you were my friend?'” King asked.

“I did. One night after it happened … I was at a party on campus and he came and so I went to leave, like, I left. And he followed me out and was sort of following after me, calling after me,” Watson said. “And I was just running trying to get away and then I finally stopped and I turned around. And all I said to him was, ‘Why? Why would you do that to me.’ And he said, ‘I knew because of what happened to you last year that if I got you in the right situation, you would be too afraid to say or do anything about it.'”

“Meredith, you hear that and you think what?” King asked.

“He knew what he was gonna do that night when he asked me to come over,” Watson said.

Watson told King that the night started normal until he left the room and came back. His demeanor changed and he stood in the front of the door as if he met to block it:

“Oh no, what’s about to happen,” she said. “And he did things that you shouldn’t do to someone without their permission. And I tried several times to get up and leave and was pushed back down.”

“He forcibly sexually assaulted and raped me,” Watson said. “I was not on the bed, initially. There was a couch. And he pulled me over and I tried several times to get up and was pushed back down, held down.”

“It was very clear,” she said.

Fairfax has said the night in question was consensual. To that, Watson said, “If you have to hold someone down, it’s not consensual.”

Afterward, Watson said there wasn’t any conversation. She “just wanted to get to a safe space.”

“I just left. It was humiliating,” she said. “And so I left and I told my two closest friends.”

“I believe I told them that something really awful had happened and that I had been raped. And I think I said that I was so humiliated I didn’t want to talk about it anymore,” she said.

Since Tyson came forward, Watson has felt guilty for not coming forward sooner. Through tears, she told King that if she “had the strength or the courage to say something in 2000, maybe it never would have happened to her.”

Watson said that people shouldn’t use her past against her or a way to discredit her allegations. She stressed that she doesn’t “have anything to gain by coming forward.” Instead, by speaking the truth, it has only brought her “criticism and chaos and scrutiny of me and put me under a microscope.” Despite this she knew she had to tell the truth.

Like Tyson, Watson “wants action from the Virginia legislature.” She is not demanding money and only wants Virginians to know the truth.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

#metoo was created to take out CONSERVATIVE men, not democrats. After it claimed one or two lefties, it was supposed to become a conservative eating machine. Did they not get the memo?

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to CKYoung. | April 2, 2019 at 4:10 pm

    But Democrats and the Democrat owned Media all say:

    “It is OK to embrace your inner KKK and dress in white sheets and do blackface!”….as long as you’re a Democrat!

    Even their Gay BLT “protected” special victims of the Democrat party are saying blackface and KKK white robes are just AOK by them.

    See.

    “Can We Let Our (Democrat Party) Politicians Evolve?”
    https://www.gayly.com/can-we-let-our-politicians-evolve

Morning Sunshine | April 2, 2019 at 3:27 pm

I believe all women, regardless of evidence. Please believe these two black women, and politically, socially and financially ruin the man so accused.

/sarcasm off

    They are asking for due process, not a warlock trial. Although, a trial by press does risk progress of the latter.

      Observer in reply to n.n. | April 2, 2019 at 4:34 pm

      Like Tyson, Watson “wants action from the Virginia legislature.”
      ___________________

      What kind of “due process” do they expect to get from the legislature?

      They could have taken their complaints to the local police and the courts when these alleged events occurred, 15 and 19 years ago, and obtained their due process in the justice system, but they chose not to. Now they want the legislature to do something, but investigating old sex crimes allegations is not the role of the legislature.

      These women could have pursued charges against Fairfax back when these events allegedly happened, but for whatever reason, they declined to do so. Now, after so many years have passed that they would likely be unable to prove their claims beyond a reasonable doubt (assuming the applicable statutes of limitations would not bar those claims from being prosecuted in the first place), they want the legislature to jump in and do something? Sorry ladies, but Fairfax has a right to due process too.

Yesterday – NPR’s Audie Cornish questioned the timing of Joe Biden’s accusers coming forward. As if there’s an agreed upon, politically neutral time victims of rape/pedophilia to come forward. Audie certainly didn’t object to Blasey-Ford’s timing.

Mediacrats would like #metoo to #omfg-just-go-away

Cruel and unusual.

I like that guy’s BS about lynchings. That’s the spirit! Shovel with both hands if you have to. Unfortunately it’s a bit too obvious to be effective. A little more originality might help, too.

Ghost Rider | April 2, 2019 at 5:22 pm

I hate to break it to these women. I doubt they will be treated well by the Virginia legislature because they are accusing a Democrat of color. If they were accusing a Republican, it would be a completely different story.

    VaGentleman in reply to Ghost Rider. | April 2, 2019 at 6:03 pm

    Blacks in VA have gone silent on the blackface incidents involving the Governor and AG. They have sold out whatever principles they had to protect the dem party. The quid pro quo is that Fairfax gets a pass. Even thought they have a narrow control of both chambers, Republicans are reluctant to force the issue because, no matter how they do it, they will be accused of racism; this is an election year in VA, and republican control hangs by a thread. Had they acted earlier and forcefully, they could have rammed the issue down the dem throats; now the storm has passed and the opportunity is gone.

    What will probably happen now is that the republicans will be held as responsible for treating women poorly for not holding hearings or as racists if they do hold hearings.

LOL at ny slime has a story wondering why it dropped out of the news cycle.
If only there were people that ran to cover a story like firefighters run to put to out a fire.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/us/virginia-scandal-northam-fairfax.html

‘It Just Went Poof’: The Strange Aftermath of Virginia’s Cascade of Political Scandals

In the space of a week in early February, the public was stunned by revelations about each of the three highest statewide elected officials, all Democrats: the racist photo in the governor’s yearbook; accusations of sexual assault against the lieutenant governor; and the attorney general’s appearance in blackface at a party in college. Protesters and news crews swarmed the Statehouse. Calls for resignations came from fellow Virginia Democrats, Republicans and even 2020 presidential candidates.

And then?

“It just went poof,” said Natalie Draper,

a librarian sitting in the back of a coffeehouse last week in Richmond. “It’s like it never happened.”

Meanwhile, House Democrats are investigating why Fox news did not run endless stories concerning stories about Trump’s alleged affair with Stormy Daniels (https://www.breitbart.com/ the-media/2019/04/02/house-democrats-want-oversight-over-fox-news-editorial-decisions/). If it wasn’t for a double standard, they would have no standards at all.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend