Image 01 Image 03

Hate Crime Charge Dropped Against Cornell Student

Hate Crime Charge Dropped Against Cornell Student

Prosecutor: “a level of doubt whether the victim was selected based upon his race”

This student, from Toronto, was facing deportation for a hate crime. He got community service instead.

The Cornell Daily Sun reports:

Prosecutor Drops Hate Crime Charge, Cornell Student Sentenced to 75 Hours of Community Service

John P. A. Greenwood ’20 struck a plea deal with the county’s top prosecutor on Tuesday and agreed to complete 75 hours of community service in what amounted to a substantial reduction of the charges the prosecutor brought five months ago, when he accused Greenwood of a hate crime.

Greenwood, 20, of Toronto, pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, a violation. He will have to pay $700 to replace a student’s damaged phone, will be on a one-year conditional discharge and will need to stay away from the victim in the case.

District Attorney Matthew Van Houten said he had consulted with the victim, Solomon Shewit ’19, a black Cornell junior, when deciding to drop the three misdemeanor charges — including the one hate crime charge — against Greenwood. Van Houten said Shewit wanted to focus on his time at Cornell and avoid the “continued stress of this litigation.”

“Based upon extensive discussions with the victim and with the approval of his parents, we agreed to resolve the case in this manner instead of proceeding to trial,” Van Houten said.

The prosecutor said the legal side of the charges is “extremely complex” and that details of the altercation had placed the strength of the criminal case into question.

“The fact that the victim, who is a person of color, pursued the defendant onto the defendant’s property, with the intention of confronting Greenwood about his offensive language, creates a level of doubt whether the victim was selected based upon his race,” Van Houten said. “Additionally, alcohol was a significant factor in this altercation.”

Van Houten said “there is no excuse for such deplorable behavior” at Cornell or anywhere else and acknowledged that members of the community may want to see a harsher sentence for Greenwood.

But Van Houten said people should not allow their emotions “to outweigh an objective analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence” and that “we cannot substitute our own feelings for those of the victim, who fully supports this resolution.”

Sitting in the lobby of a hotel in downtown Ithaca on Tuesday morning, Greenwood’s lawyer, Ronald P. Fischetti, told The Sun that the sophomore “never struck” the victim and that he “never should’ve been charged.”

“It’s very simple,” Fischetti said. “He just didn’t do it.”


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Geoffrey Britain | April 20, 2018 at 1:50 am

So a verbal racial slur is a “hate crime”?
If a black man calls a white man a “honkey”… is that a hate crime?
If not, why not and why wouldn’t that be a double standard and unequal treatment under the law?

    The Friendly Grizzly in reply to Geoffrey Britain. | April 20, 2018 at 8:04 am

    Sorry for the down-tick; I was aiming for “Reply”.*

    The answer to your question is: black privilege. They get away with things that drag anyone else into the Through the Looking Glass world of hate-crime law.

    *To the LI staff: I respectfully suggest that a re-do of the comment section layout is due, so “Reply” can be moved away from the ranking thumbs. Thank you.

      Geoffrey Britain in reply to The Friendly Grizzly. | April 20, 2018 at 9:50 am

      Yes, it’s about power and dominance not law. When a liberal prosecutor refuses to prosecute a black for the same ‘crime’, isn’t that a violation of the 14th amendment and therefore opens that official to a lawsuit?

      I also agree that the repy icon is far too close to the up and down icons, especially when viewed on a tablet.