Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Morning Joe Mocks Trump Admin ‘Stooges’ Praising President

Morning Joe Mocks Trump Admin ‘Stooges’ Praising President

President Obama didn’t need admin members to praise him: he had the MSM doing it free of charge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hcghU1P3t0

After today’s Morning Joe played a montage various Trump administration members praising the president, Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough savaged them as “robots” and “stooges” who sounded like people in countries like North Korea and Iran.

Of course, President Obama didn’t need people in his administration to praise him. He had the liberal media doing that for him, free of charge. Check out, courtesy of our friends at NewsBusters, this assemblage of the MSM drooling over Obama.

Not that there weren’t members of the Obama administration willing to fawn over their leader. Remember Valerie Jarrett saying this?

“I think Barack knew that he had God-given talents that were extraordinary. He knows exactly how smart he is. … He knows how perceptive he is. He knows what a good reader of people he is. And he knows that he has the ability — the extraordinary, uncanny ability — to take a thousand different perspectives, digest them and make sense out of them, and I think that he has never really been challenged intellectually. … So what I sensed in him was not just a restless spirit but somebody with such extraordinary talents that had to be really taxed in order for him to be happy. … He’s been bored to death his whole life. He’s just too talented to do what ordinary people do.”

For that matter, President Obama wasn’t reluctant to praise himself.

“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m gonna think I’m a better political director than my political director.”

After montage plays . . . 

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Mmm. Covfefe!

. . .

JOE SCARBOROUGH: This is the language of autocrats. This is the language of dictators.

MIKA: To have robots spewing that.

JOE: This is the language employed by stooges in North Korea, in Iran, in Russia.

MIKA: You’re so right.

JOE: And coming to a country like Turkey soon, in countries like Turkey.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Wondering how she fits obama and Joe’s knob in her mouth at the same time? Now I know why obama always wore that smug expression, he had so many mouths on him he must have felt like a deity.

why torment your readers with constant tales of a washed up political hack and his ho’?

You don’t waste space on giving Joy Behar a platform, why do it for this far left trash couple?

Mika and Joe gave Obama a “Lewinsky” on a regular basis.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to EBL. | June 1, 2017 at 1:54 pm

    So……..that explains all the White………er……Wash!

I’m beginning to wonder if Joe has a secret room where the walls are covered with pictures of Trump that he’s slashed up. His obsessive personal hatred of Trump is getting disturbing.

Stooges? Joe mistook a mirror for a window again.

Projection is not just a river in Egypt.

I’m beginning to seriously wonder if the MJ duo aren’t suffering from some very real mental issues. They’ve wandered way beyond pandering to an audience of simpletons. It takes real commitment to be that miserably hateful on a daily basis.

Joe is turning into a real “boy”.

“Whatabout-erism” is the most intellectually lazy and morally bankrupt thing a person can indulge in.

It never addresses any issue. (Which, in this case, wouldn’t be hard…”Yeah, T-rump does have his sycophants…pretty much all POTUS’s do…”).

No wonder it is Finklestein’s forte.

    Mark Finkelstein in reply to Ragspierre. | June 1, 2017 at 1:24 pm

    If you’re going to insult me, at least endeavor to spell my name right.

    Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | June 1, 2017 at 1:56 pm

    See, this is a lot of your problem.

    You read any critique as an “insult”.

    T-rumpian…

    Mark Finkelstein in reply to Ragspierre. | June 1, 2017 at 2:19 pm

    Were you calling someone else “intellectually lazy and morally bankrupt,” not me?

      Saratoga in reply to Mark Finkelstein. | June 1, 2017 at 2:34 pm

      This A-hole accuses people of using Ad hominems but thinks that somehow T-rump is clever.Go figure.

        Ragspierre in reply to Saratoga. | June 1, 2017 at 3:05 pm

        I don’t “accuse”. I observe.

        Aashole.

          Saratoga in reply to Ragspierre. | June 1, 2017 at 3:32 pm

          Oh Oh Looks like rags on the rag again. LOL! Ef-tard!

          guyjones in reply to Ragspierre. | June 2, 2017 at 5:52 am

          Rags’ tiresome, infantile shtick emerges once again, in which he predictably descends to insult in short order, displaying both his perpetually frustrated persona and his childish inability to engage in civil and cogent discourse with people who have the temerity to disagree with him.

          I don’t know why he hasn’t been banned from LI, as he adds nothing to the discourse, here, and, more importantly, his snarky, surly and embittered antics represent nothing more than the provocations of a deeply insecure and disturbed personality.

      Ragspierre in reply to Mark Finkelstein. | June 1, 2017 at 3:03 pm

      No, no, Marky, baby.

      I was making the observation that what you wrote was all that.

      THAT is called “criticism”. AND, in this case, it is perfectly valid.

      “Insult” would take the form of “Your mother services the Pacific Fleet”. Which I sure is not valid.

      I know your can do better. Give it a try.

        Helen in reply to Ragspierre. | June 1, 2017 at 6:18 pm

        Marky, baby, I wouldn’t even bother with Rags…he seems to think if he thinks something is so, then it must be so. He couldn’t be more full of it. Just an observation, not an insult.

          Ragspierre in reply to Helen. | June 1, 2017 at 7:58 pm

          So, Hellen, honey, two questions…

          1. if you think something is so, than it must NOT be so?

          2. do you think “whatabout-ism” is a valid defense for conduct, or is it just a tribal broke-ass cant?

Saying that Trump is the Devil doesn’t really have any sway after awhile.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend