Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Branco Cartoon – Notorious

Branco Cartoon – Notorious

People’s Court

Note: You may reprint this cartoon provided you link back to this source.
For more A.F.Branco cartoons at Legal Insurrection click here

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:

Comments

it’d be a joy to see potus replace her & kennedy….

    Yujin in reply to jmt9455. | June 5, 2017 at 1:52 pm

    If RBG dies while Trump is in office, the Left will initiate “Operation Weekend at Bernie’s”.

Scalia wasted his time in trying to turn her. Imagine, he would even take her to the opera!

The problem is not that she states her biases –

The problem Is that she is Biased.

    “Biased?” She’s a traitor, considering the oath she took:

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court embraced the practice of consulting foreign legal decisions on Friday, rejecting the argument from conservatives that United States law should not take international thinking into account.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/02/politics/justice-ginsburg-backs-value-of-foreign-law.html?mcubz=2

    The oath:

    “I, Ruth Ginsberg, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

sjf_control | June 5, 2017 at 8:26 am

Shouldn’t that pin read, “Resist we much”? 😉

Is she standing in the cartoon? Funny, I didn’t think she could… Notorious and then some! Ty.

Perfect depiction of the crazy, biased old bat.

Look for Ginsburg to issue an opinion in conjunction with Justice Kagan and a half gallon of merlot.

Ruth needs rehab.

In a sick and twisted way, she has a point. Her personal opinions as expressed in the media won’t affect her vote. Her vote is always 100% predicable. She is possessed by ideology, and that ideology will always determine what she does. If she were going to recuse herself, it should be from the court itself.

Couldn’t she be removed via amendment 25, just like a senile President? Damn sure time to try.

Looks just like some of the notorious nevertrumpers to me.

Not a dime’s worth of difference.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend