Image 01 Image 03

Shooter of Republican Congressmen Identified: Trump hating, Bernie loving

Shooter of Republican Congressmen Identified: Trump hating, Bernie loving

“He was more on the really progressive side of things.”

Wednesday morning at a practice for the upcoming Congressional baseball game, a shooter opened fire injuring House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA). Several aides and Capitol policemen were also injured.

Law enforcement identified the shooter as James T. Hodgkinson from Bellville, Illinois. The 66-year-old owns a home inspection business.

According to the Washington Post, Hodgkinson, “was charged in April 2006 with battery and aiding damage to a motor vehicle, according to online records in St. Clair County, Ill.” The charges were later dismissed.

The Telegraph has more:

Mr Hodgkinson was vociferous on social media about his dislike for Donald Trump and reportedly volunteered on political campaigns for Bernie Sanders.

Charles Orear, 50, a restaurant manager from St Louis, told the Washington Post he met him during a campaign in Iowa.

“He was this union tradesman, pretty stocky, and we stayed up talking politics,” he said. “He was more on the really progressive side of things.”

Hodgkinson was shot before being taken into custody.

President Trump was first to announce that Hodgkinson died:

Trump’s full remarks:

Hodgkinson’s social media posts were undeniably anti-Trump:

From the Belleville News-Democrat:

Two days ago, Hodgkinson posted an angry tweet about President Donald Trump on Facebook.

“I Want to Say Mr. President, for being an ass hole you are Truly the Biggest Ass Hole We Have Ever Had in the Oval Office,” he wrote on Facebook.

Hodgkinson is a member of a number of anti-Republican groups on Facebook, including one called “Terminate the Republican Party.”

▪ “The Road to Hell is Paved with Republicans”

▪ “Donald Trump is not my President”

▪ “President Bernie Sanders”

▪ “Illinois Berners United to Resist Trump”

▪ “Boycott the Republican Party”

▪ “Expose Republican Fraud”

▪ “Terminate the Republican Party”

Hodgkinson took a Democratic ballot in the primary election in 2016.

Over the years, Hodgkinson wrote several letters to the editor of the Belleville News-Democrat, which they published today:

SEPT. 12, 2012
The path out of our deficit

The best book I’ve read in a while is “Aftershock” by Robert B. Reich. He explains that the lowering of taxes on the richest Americans was a major cause of the Great Depression. He also states that it is a major cause of the Great Recession, which started in 2007.

He states that the year before the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Recession were both peaks of the incomes of the top 1 percent at more than 23 percent of the total income of the country. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his Federal Reserve chairman, Marriner Eccles, brought us out of the Great Depression by raising taxes on the rich.

During the 1920s three Republican presidents lowered tax rates leading up to the Great Depression. In 1931 we had 23 tax brackets from 1.5 percent for incomes up to $59,000 adjusted for inflation (which covered more than half of total population) to 25 percent for income over $1,476,000.

In 1932 we had 55 tax brackets from 4 percent for incomes up to $65,500 up to the 42nd tax bracket of 50 percent, which was equal to the top income of the previous year. Then the added tax brackets kicked in. Fifty-one percent to 56 percent were brackets increasing by approximately 1 percent for every $40,000. Brackets 57 percent to 60 percent were for income increases of approximately $1 million. Brackets 61 percent to 63 percent were for income increases of approximately $4 million, topping out at 63 percent for income over $16,378,000. Now that is what we need today.

AUG. 28, 2012
An idea worth repeating

Letter writer Roddy Riggs reminds me of Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly, but I’m sure he doesn’t bring in the millions of dollars those two do. They speak their lies and hatred and misdirection to anyone who will listen.

If I seem to be a broken record, it is because of the simple facts that need to be understood by everyone of voting age. I just want to let everyone know that income inequality was a factor in the causes of the Great Depression as well as the greed of Secretary of Treasury Andrew Mellon under the Republican Presidents Harding, Coolidge and Hoover.

Mellon was the third richest man in the country. This millionaire persuaded the presidents and Congress to lower the top marginal tax rates, from 73 percent to 58 percent, to 50 percent, to 46 percent, to 25 percent and finally 24 percent in 1929, the year of the stock market crash and the start of the Great Depression.

This is what the Republican Party wants to do today.

We need to bring our country out of today’s recession by raising the number of tax brackets from six to 20 or more and the top marginal rate of 35 percent on $380,000 to 60 percent on $20 million or more. In 1938 we had 33 brackets from 4 percent for most of the country to 79 percent for income over $79 million.

I believe anything near these rates would be fair and balanced. In rebuttal: I have never said “life sucks,” only the policies of the Republicans.

AUG. 17, 2012
Income inequality is risky

The right-wing writer Dennis Rodenhofer has twice enough hate to go around since he is beside himself to cut down my sources of the causes of the Great Depression.

I named the economists of the Austrian School Economics, and they are Waddill Catchings and William Trufant Foster. He can’t believe anything on Wikipedia, so I followed up with Waddill Catchings’ biography on to get that site’s opinion. They are identical.

The income inequality was a major cause of the Great Depression, in that the production of the country was full blast but the common worker couldn’t afford to buy the same goods that they were producing.

If Rodenhofer doesn’t see this as a major reason for the causes of the Great Depression, he has his head in the sand.

I don’t believe all of the messages on Fox News but I still think they get some of it right. Change channels to MSNBC and get a better, balanced opinion.

As for my loving President Obama, I say when people look at the other side, the choice is obvious. I don’t want a president who won’t even keep his money in American banks. I don’t want a president who will lower taxes on the rich and raise them on the other 99 percent.

I don’t want a president who wants to lower the number of tax brackets when everyone with a brain knows we need more tax brackets in order to reach all classes of income.

JULY 29, 2012
Trying to buy tax breaks

One of my favorite TV shows is “The Rachel Maddow Show” on MSNBC.

On a recent show she stated that 17 very rich men are supplying the Republican Party with more than 60 percent of their campaign contributions.

These men are trying to buy our country. You know they expect something for all this money. That something is that Mitt Romney and a Republican Congress won’t raise their taxes. We all know that the rich don’t pay enough taxes.

In response to letter writer Roddy D. Riggs calling me ignorant and making up facts, I say: Look up “Causes of the Great Depression,” on Wikipedia. Income inequality is on the list. This theory was held by economists Waddill Catchings, William Trufant, Rexford Tugwell, Adolph Berle and John Kenneth Galbraith and influenced Franklin D. Roosevelt.

It held that the economy produced more goods than consumers could purchase because the consumers didn’t have enough income. In the productive 1920s, the mechanization of industry caused layoffs and unemployment started a steady rise but the rich got richer.

If the rich paid their fair share of taxes today, we wouldn’t be in this predicament. We need to vote all Republicans out of Congress. We need to demand Congress add 10 or more brackets to the existing tax code. We need 20 brackets to $20 million, and a 60 percent top marginal rate.

We can get our country back if we all vote the right way.

JULY 8, 2012
Obama’s for U.S. workers

I can’t believe how many people are upset with our president. You’d think that the world was full of rich millionaires. Why else would these people talk badly about a guy who has their best interest at heart?

I read the other day about a man blaming President Barack Obama for food stamp recipients going up from 26 million to 46 million. Anyone with a knowledge of the facts would know that this is because of former President George W. Bush, and his ruining our economy. He got us into two wars that we couldn’t afford and gave all his rich friends tax breaks.

If people would check the causes of the Great Depression, they would find that income inequality was one of the major causes. Because of this fact, President Franklin Roosevelt and Congress raised taxes back up to what they were before the Republican Presidents Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge and tax cuts of 1921, 1924 and 1926, leading to the Great Depression.

If we don’t want another Great Depression, we should re-elect the man who is working for the working man. President Ronald Reagan’s “trickle down” policy did not work, and never will.

A strong middle class is what a country needs to prosper. The only thing that has trickled down in the last 30 years came from Mitt Romney’s dog.

Let’s vote all Republicans out of Congress, and get this country back on track. We need 10 more tax brackets for income over $1 million, $2 million, $3 million, $4 million and $10 million.

MAY 25, 2012
Use 55 tax brackets, not six

IT IS A shame that Democrats won’t attack the Republicans over the minuscule and lopsided tax system with only six brackets, ranging from 10 percent to 35 percent. It looks like the super rich have bought their vote as well. This recession was started years ago when congressmen found out they could make money by accepting money from the super rich in the form of donations, by simply changing the tax laws and putting more of the burden on the working man.

You see, we have always had a progressive tax system. In fact, in 1932 we had 55 brackets ranging from 4 percent to 63 percent. Everyone paid 4 percent for the first $4,000 income, which would amount to more than $50,000 today. The top marginal tax bracket was 63 percent for all income of more than $1 million, which would amount to more than $12 million today. Now I think everyone would like to see the rich and the super rich taxed at a higher rate.

The argument today is taking away the Bush tax cuts or not, which would add only 4 percent to the top marginal rate. The argument should be to rewrite the tax laws as they were in 1932. We need 55 brackets ranging from 4 percent to 63 percent. Anyone can look up the history of federal income tax rates on the Internet. Check it out.

These guys are cheating everyone in this country while telling us all the time that they are broke when it is the super rich with all the money.

MAY 4, 2012
More brackets needed

Letter writer Roddy D. Riggs missed my point completely. Although he did whine about not taxing the rich any higher or they might leave the country, my answer to him is that they have already outsourced many jobs and keep their money in offshore accounts. What difference could this really make?

Whenever we were at war in the past, our government had enough sense to raise taxes across the board to pay for the war. The main difference was that there were a lot more tax brackets to raise. For most of those years there was more than 23 tax brackets.

We have always had a progressive tax system, but now it tops out at $357,000 and only six brackets. It should extend with at least 12 brackets to $12 million.

I don’t envy the rich; I despise the way they have bought our politicians and twisted our laws to their benefit. In the past, government taxed according to ability to pay. While most of the country works hard to earn $100 to $400 a day, many people make $100,00 to millions a day. By changing the income tax brackets to 12 brackets and to $12 million, we will be less dependent on China, help offset the bonus policies of many corporations, create more jobs, lower the crime rate, help the economy, and get back some of the American pride. I recommend 12 brackets to $12 million.

APRIL 18, 2012
Maybe next tax day

I’m still convinced that the major change that we all need to push for is a change in the federal tax code. We need more brackets to reach all classes of people.

We need a much higher bracket that actually reaches into the rich and super-rich incomes. I wish everyone would check out, so they could see for themselves and not just believe me as to how the leaders of the past reached all classes of income. They would like you to think that there is a lower class, middle class, and upper class. This is just not so.

In 1938 we had 33 tax brackets to reach all classes of income. These brackets ranged from 4 percent for income up to $64,000 (adjusted for inflation), all the way up to 79 percent for income over $79 million.

If we had anything close to the way our great leaders of the past set up the tax code, we could eliminate 90 percent of the country’s problems, pay down the debt and get the country back in the black in no time.

The income inequality of the 1920s was a major contributor of the Great Depression, and if we don’t raise the tax brackets to reach the rich we will never get out of this Great Recession.

I would wish all people under an annual income of $1 million to get behind the 99 percent, and back the push for tax reform. My motto is: “Tax em like 1938.”

God bless the 99 percent.

JAN. 24, 2012
Money-making ideas

I believe to stimulate the economy, it is time to legalize or at least decriminalize marijuana use.

Also to fund the government deficit I hope the Obama administration raises the income tax rate for the rich to 70 percent or more. If a person has an annual income of more than $10 million, he should be proud to be an American and proud to live in a country that would allow this kind of income, and proud to pay his fair share of taxes.

Follow Kemberlee on Twitter @kemberleekaye


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


This is all some kind of mistake, for sure the shooter was a member of the Tea Party. Tell me it’s so, CNN!

A quick search of the suspect’s name on facebooo turns up a few dake pages created in the last hour. These fake pages portray the suspect voicing support for the 2nd amendment, the NRA, national carry laws, etc.

The obvious intent of this disinformation is to paint this clown as a ‘rightwing gun nut.’ And you know what that means: More gun laws!

Never let a crisis go to waste, right, Saul??

First Portland, now this. Bernie needs to take some responsibility for this.

That is how modern politics works, right?

    Miles in reply to malclave. | June 15, 2017 at 2:19 am

    And the fact that Nutzo “slice n’ dice” in Portland is another BernieBot needs to be spread as far, wide and loudly as possible.

    Bernie needs to have this stick on him like a cheap suit.

Just more proof of Trump inciting violence – eh?

A progressive loon from a state with some of the strictest gun-control laws in the country gets whipped into a frenzy by violent rhetoric coming from Dim leadership, goes on a shooting rampage and what does the left want to talk about? You guessed it, gun control. They’re freaking insane.

    fscarn in reply to Paul. | June 14, 2017 at 12:53 pm

    Not insane, just evil.

    The Democrats especially are single-minded in their quest for total government.

    As one of the stalwart groups is called, By Any Means Necessary.

Sounds like every liberal I’ve ever known. Anyone who goes on facebook sees this kind of vitriol from the Left EVERY DAY!

color me not shocked…

Wow. This guy needed a lesson in correlation =/= causation. He’s sure thought government could fix everything if it just had enough money taken from the wealthy.
So stupid … concealed carry of long guns .. really ?

Another disenfranchised Democrat, but this time he targeted people outside his tribe.

Note the liberal memes that run counter to this event.
1) Tea party types are the most prone to violence. (Shooter was a Bernie supporter)
2) Gun Free zones work. (Park was gun free as per Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-287.4 although VA Concealed Carry license holders are exempted)
3) Even if a concealed carrier is at the scene of a mass shooting, they will be unable to do anything about it. (The two handgun carrying officers managed to pin down and kill the rifle carrying shooter)
4) The only thing you should do in a mass shooting is take cover and call the police. (In the ten minutes it took for the police to show, the shooter would have been able to kill dozens of unarmed and defenseless people. Thank God Scalise had a security detail.)
5) Liberals are the voices of peace and compassion. (Within minutes, the tweetstorm from the usual suspects began.)

He probably believed that redistributive change should compensate for progressive cost of living forced by anti-capitalist practices and other economic and social distortions. Perhaps in the short-term.

    Neo in reply to n.n. | June 14, 2017 at 1:16 pm

    He obviously avoided reading about JFK, who got rid of the highest tax brackets because nobody was stupid enough to not avoid them.

Apparently, ObamaCare didn’t help the shooter .. dead at 9:15AM

The guy even looks like Bernie. Weird.

The MSM – Uh oh, the shooter wasn’t some crazed Trump lovin,’Rush Limbaugh following, sexist, racist, homophobic, xenophobic, Right Winger.

broomhandle | June 14, 2017 at 1:56 pm

What really matters now is did he use an assault rifle?

I’m not blaming Bernie, Griffin or Shakespeare in the Park. Any more than I blamed Sarah Palin for the shooting that maimed Gabbie Giffords.

This was another deranged, delusional individual. But the circumstances are a bit different. The Giffords shooter wasn’t motivated to kill Democrats by any atmosphere of right-wing hate in which he had been steeped (since there wasn’t any). He wasn’t a member of any anti-government militia. He was just nuts.

Was this act, by a man apparently steeped in an atmosphere of left-wing hatred & anger, inspired by hatred specifically for Republicans & Trump? Maybe.

But he still acted on his own volition, whatever his motivation. No left-wing groups or organization is known to have collaborated with him.

We non-leftists should apply the same logic & reasoning to this event as we (rightly) did to the Giffords shooting.

    Barry in reply to Daiwa. | June 14, 2017 at 9:32 pm

    “I’m not blaming Bernie, Griffin or Shakespeare in the Park. Any more than I blamed Sarah Palin for the shooting that maimed Gabbie Giffords.”

    I don’t recall Palin calling for the assassination or beheading of the president. One is not the same as the other.

    Griffin and “Shakespeare in the Park”, and all those like them are absolutely responsible. They are advocating murder.

If someone wants to see an in your face case of blatant hypocrisy, look no further than the male bovine excrement that is being hauled in on the DemocRAT side of the aisle in both Congressional chambers. They are all sympathetic to the people who were shot today, but tomorrow when this all blows over, the Dems will go back to their own talking points about how Russia stole the election from Hillary.

BrokeGopher | June 14, 2017 at 3:42 pm

You’re all missing the proper angle on this story. The headline should be “Republican security detail guns down concerned citizen in cold blood.” #JusticeForJames

The blame for this shooting rests squarely on that obama, clinton and the organ grinder democRat media whose monkeys they are.

When people talk about rich people not paying “their fair share” of taxes, you know right off the bat they not particular bright. If we all paid our “fair share” every person in this country would pay exactly the same amount. So we know the shooter wasn’t very bright… which explains why he’s a progressive.