Cornell Lawsuit: Male Student Suicide Attempt After Title IX Investigation
After suicide of male student at UT-Arlington, new lawsuit raises questions about campus “kangaroo courts”
The way in which sexual misconduct on college campuses is investigated often puts the accused, usually men, in horrible situations. We have written many times about these “kangaroo courts.”
Sometimes tragedy follows.
We recently covered a tragic case in Texas:
Student in Texas Commits Suicide After Trial by Kangaroo Court
This is such a sad story. To make matters worse, it’s all just based on accusations. Nothing more.
Ashe Schow reports at Watchdog:
Texas student commits suicide after Title IX kangaroo court
If every other egregious example of a male student denied due process after being accused of sexual misconduct gets ignored – this one should not be.
A male student who was accused of sexual harassment committed suicide just days after the University of Texas at Arlington ignored its own policies in order to punish him. The accused student’s father, a lawyer acting as the administrator of his son’s estate, is now suing the school for violating his son’s Title IX rights.
College administrators, as well as members of the media and legislators, would do well to remember the name Thomas Klocke. Klocke, a straight male, was accused by a gay male student of writing anti-gay slurs on his computer during a class. Klocke vehemently denied the accusation, and administrators who investigated the incident acknowledged there was no evidence to support the accuser’s claims, yet Klocke was still punished.
Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident.
Drew Musto reports at the Cornell Daily Sun:
Student Who Says He Attempted Suicide During Title IX Investigation Sues Cornell
Cornell University is being sued by a male student who claims the University discriminated against him on the basis of sex while investigating him for sexual misconduct.
The pseudonymous plaintiff, James Doe — a senior in the College of Arts and Sciences — is suing in part to recover damages for emotional distress. The student says Cornell’s investigation caused him to attempt suicide.
The suit, filed in federal court on Tuesday, comes nearly four months after Cornell lost a similar case in January. In that case, a Tompkins County Supreme Court judge ruled that the University was “arbitrary” and “capricious” in refusing to investigate a male student’s claim that a a Cornell Title IX investigator discriminated against him based on his sex.
This decisive court loss was not the end of Cornell’s complicated relationship with Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education.
In early February, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights opened a sixth Title IX investigation into Cornell, making it the University with the most active investigations of any in the country. One month later, participants in an open forum held by the Office for Civil Rights investigators harshly criticized the University for its handling of sexual misconduct complaints.
The circumstances surrounding the case sound all too familiar:
Court documents say that the events motivating the suit occurred in September 2015, when Doe and his accuser, Sally Roe, met at a party. At one point during the night of the party, Doe and Roe went to Doe’s bedroom together, the suit says.
While there, Roe allegedly beckoned Doe to his bed, where she “pinned him down” and made sexual advances, making Doe uncomfortable, he says in the lawsuit. When the male student asked Roe to stop her advances, he tried to push her off his body, the lawsuit says, after which Roe allegedly punched Doe’s testicles. Roe admitted to doing so, according to the suit.
This led to a point where the young man gave up hope:
To demonstrate the extent of his emotional distress, Doe says he was diagnosed with severe anxiety and major depressive disorder after Cornell issued an interim suspension.
His mental state worsened, according to the complaint.
Last spring, the day Doe was notified of his second suspension, he tried to commit suicide, he says in the suit.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
These cases should be instructive to the universities as to how “due process” actually works. I hope they’re paying attention to the tune of millions of dollars.
In the case of John Klocke the administration should investigated for violating his civil rights and due process. The administrators are employees of the state of Texas and should be bound by state laws and if they are tried and found guilty should spend time in prison.
The thought of going to prison should shut some of these “Courts” down.
Let’s call them what the are: The New KKK.
Time honored traditions like the presumption of innocence and due process seem to falling out of fashion with the new generation. Look at the various high profile “excessive force” cases of late. BLM just wants “justice” which apparently means “put cop in jail then convict him.” Look at how they view freedom of speech. Look at how they view free enterprise and personal responsibility.
We’re losing it folks. Its all slipping away.
Make the people who did it pay, not the taxpayers.
I would extend that paying to rogue district attorneys (Nifong being an example), cops who obviously overstep boundaries, and judges who make decisions based on feelings and not law.
In the case of the TX suicide, I agree.
In the case of the Cornell attempted suicide, parts of Cornell are private, so the appropriate school should pay for the damages.If the student was part of the private college – go for the private side. If part of the NYS side (cow college, etc) then sue NYS.
Having attended this university a long time ago, the temptation of suicide was strong. The campus is in between two gorges, hence the term to “gorge out”. It is a difficult school. There are seasons where the sun really doesn’t shine. I was in Ithaca for 2 years and Syracuse for 3 years. Lack of sun and so much snow is a factor for depression, on top of class demands. Then try to walk across a bridge to your car – the gorge does look good. I laughed and just looked at the water. Other people did not. But, there may have been a time or two where it was tempting. And I was just in grad school. I cannot imagine being accused of something.
So, she assaults him, and he’s the aggressor? I can only assume that she claimed he tried to rape her and that was the only way to stop him, and of course the investigator believed her because she’s a woman and found him guilty simply because he’s a man.
I’m so glad I don’t have sons. If I did, I’d be strongly pushing them to go into a trade. I haven’t heard about plumbers’ or electricians’ apprentices routinely being accused and found guilty of sexual assault simply because of their sex. Probably because they get to use the real police and court system rather than a college setup full of insane leftist academics (and I say this as the daughter and the sister of academics).
It may also be time for a return to the days of colleges that were not coed. Let, for example, Vassar return to its days of being a finishing school for the female members of good families*.
* Good family: blood-related members of a group who are a) from New England, b) had ancestors who claim to have come over on the Mayflower, c) “old money”, or a combination of all three.
It’s interesting that female only schools are still around. Most of them let men in to take classes, but residential is strictly female.
But if a college tried to be male only, they’d have the equality police down on them instantly. According to Wiki, there are only three men-only colleges left in this country, while they list 37 women-only.
Universities don’t care.
They have made the cynical, and CORRECT, calculation that paying out settlements for blatantly discriminating against males and violating their due process rights costs them LESS money than the liberals threatened to take away in federal funding.
The only thing that will make this bullshit stop is to reverse direction and for Trump to put out clear and unambiguous guidance that any university found violating due process rights of students REGARDLESS OF GENDER will lose all federal funding.
A few million dollars here and there is the expected cost of their current course of action and will change nothing.
Something else that might help would be for any monetary finding be levied against the endowments. That might protect students from tuition increases resulting from a judgement against the administration.
Placing the administration of potentially life-changing complex legal decisions in the eager hands of Liberal social justice warriors was doomed from the very start, these incidents being sadly indicative of the extent to which ordinary principles of due process can be so drastically perverted by the Liberal mind.
Does anyone recall “The Harrad Experiment” (https://www.amazon.com/Harrad-Experiment-Robert-H-Rimmer/dp/0879756233/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1492381783&sr=8-2&keywords=harrad+experiment) from a couple generations ago?
Shocking at the time, it was still far more optimistic than our current malignant process.