Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

California Senate Proposes Nixing State Income Tax for Teachers

California Senate Proposes Nixing State Income Tax for Teachers

Taking “Teacher Appreciation” to a whole, new level

The California Senate may have taken “Teacher Appreciation” to a whole, new level.

As Legal Insurrection readers are aware, California is one of the most heavily taxed in the nation. However, at least our teachers are poised to get a huge tax break if a proposed measure becomes law.

A Los Angeles state lawmaker has introduced a bill to exempt teachers from paying state income tax after five years in the classroom.

Under Senate Bill 807, teachers and other educators would also be allowed a tax deduction for the cost of obtaining a teaching credential.

The bill was introduced by Democratic Sens. Henry Stern of Los Angeles and Cathleen Galgiani of Stockton, and sponsored by EdVoice, a nonprofit advocating for education reform.

SB 807 is aimed at retaining teachers long-term, even as the rate of teachers leaving the field is six times greater than other public employees, and 50 percent faster than first responders, according to California State Teachers’ Retirement System.

Perhaps our legislators will eventually learn there is an inversely proportional relationship to how much citizens are taxed versus how much incentive they have to stay.

“We want to increase across the board take-home pay for teachers in the state of California, anywhere from 5 to 7 percent,” said Stern.

The teacher-turned-state-senator co-authored the bill, SB807. He says one-third of all California teachers quit before their fifth year because it’s too hard to manage. He’s trying to keep them in the classroom.

“You’re not going to be able to get paid $50,000 a year and go live in the Bay Area, go teach at the local school….we think it’s a pretty creative tool, we’ll see how the fiscal conservatives in this house want to approach this,” said Stern.

The fact that teachers are a reliably Democratic constituency is likely factored into this proposal, which pairs with the California Senate’s move to give 17-year-olds the vote.

But granting tax relief to teachers has complications. First, our state is looking at a $2 billion deficit. So, other taxes will be raised and fees will be increased to make up for the shortfall.

The current infrastructure improvement bill provides a glimpse into why Californians, including teachers, may consider moving.  Here are samples of the money-extracting proposals.

  • An increase in the gas tax by 12 cents per gallon over three years, with a 6-cent increase in the first year followed by two years of 3-cent increases.
  • In increase the diesel fuel excise tax by 20 c.ents and an increase the diesel sales tax by 4 percent.
  • Vehicle registration fees will be raised by $38.
  • Drivers of zero-emission vehicles will have pay an annual $100 fee toward maintenance and repair (because they aren’t paying for the gas taxes like the other drivers).

Another likely consequence, if this proposal is made law, is that other professions will lobby to also be tax-exempt. Why should teachers be the only ones worthy of tax break? Aren’t doctors and nurses needed? Surely, firefighters and police are essential.

And Legal Insurrection authors are vital. I am sure my tax break will be forthcoming!


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.



I assume that this would also apply to home school parents.

Local government employee income taxes do not increase local government tax revenues, so it is a charade to say that they pay taxes. However, to properly incentivize government employees, their pay should be reduced the same percentage that income tax rates for private sector employees are raised.

    No. Think about it. If a local government spends $1000 in salary and get $200 of that back, they have spent a net of $800. Once they do this, that extra $200 will have to come out of somewhere.


Teachers have 3 months off every year and lots of other vacations. They are paid a lot better than it appears.

“a bill to exempt teachers from paying state income tax after five years in the classroom”

And, if allowed, exactly how long do you think that ALL other public employees will demand that they too be excused from the income taxe?

Answer, “In no time!” Because before the bill ever gets into final shape oodles of amendments will be added including every public employee.

Slowly, inch by inch, the mask and the Government Class reveals their disdain for the rest of us. Senators exempt from insider trading laws, government employees enjoying better health insurance than anyone else can now find, pensions and total compensation that make government jobs pay on average 150% of private sector jobs, and now they don’t want to “pay” any taxes (out of their pot of money that was already confiscated from the rest of us). It’s really no wonder that they are so eager to ban guns, is it?

What about nurses? Surely they are as vital as teachers . . . are they going to be exempt from taxes and get credit for their licensing fees too?

What ever happened to “equality”?

What about nurses? Surely they are as vital as teachers . . . are they going to be exempt from taxes and get credit for their licensing fees too?

What ever happened to “equality”? I guess some pigs are just more equal than other pigs.

Now to find teachers who can teach.

They should actually reduce spending and eliminate the state income tax for everybody.

Trump to Brown: I see that you are giving tax breaks to teachers. I guess that means you have enough money that you do not need any extra federal income.

PS; Maybe you can start a fund in schools for teachers to donate to help maintain your damns.

The California Teacher’s union (and other unions) pay a substantial part of the tab for California elections at all levels. That is part of why it is a one-party state.

Average California teacher pay: $90,000.00.

And the custodial staff?

If teachers are excused taxation because of their key role in helping the public, then surely those legislators who bring in these laws want to see their jobs on the list too, as they would believe they are at least as laudatory and beneficial to the public as teachers.