What Obama created by the stroke of a pen, is removed by the stroke of a pen.
The Trump administration has notified the Supreme Court, in a pending case, that it is withdrawing the transgender bathroom mandate ordered by the Obama administration.
The notice is here. (full embed at bottom of post.)
Bryan analyzed the issues in the Supreme Court case last October, On the Basis of Sex: Supreme Court should reject transgender teen’s bathroom challenge.
Buzzfeed, which is in favor of the mandate, reports on the latest development:
The Trump administration on Wednesday issued new guidelines that roll back an Obama administration policy that had been designed to reduce anti-transgender discrimination in public schools.
In issuing new school guidance, the Department of Justice and Department of Education sent a letter to public schools that said the departments “have decided to withdraw and rescind the above-referenced guidance documents in order to further and more completely consider the legal issues involved. The Departments thus will not rely on the views expressed within them.”
“Please note that this withdrawal of these guidance documents does not leave students without protections from discrimination, bullying, or harassment,” it stated….
Despite the federal government’s latest position, states and local school districts could adopt their own transgender-inclusive rules — and those with existing rules will remain in place. Trump’s latest guidance also does not block individuals or advocacy groups from raising their own complaints in federal court that a transgender student’s rights have been violated.
James Esseks, who oversees the ACLU’s litigation on behalf of a transgender student in Virginia, told reporters on a call Tuesday, “Courts enforce Title IX and courts at the end of the day decide what the scope of Title IX is.”
Here is the text of the letter to the court:
This case, which is scheduled for argument on March 28, 2017, involves a question about the proper application to transgender students of the prohibition on sex discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., and its implementing regulations, see 34 C.F.R. 106.33, in the context of sex-segregated facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms. In the decision below, the court of appeals deferred to the interpretation of Title IX and its implementing regulations reflected in administrative guidance issued by the United States Department of Education. See Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997).
This letter is to inform the Court that, on February 22, 2017, the Department of Education, in conjunction with the Department of Justice’s Office for Civil Rights, announced their decision to withdraw that guidance and a subsequent joint guidance letter, not to rely on the views expressed in the guidance, and instead to consider further and more completely the legal issues involved. Enclosed is a copy of the document withdrawing the guidance.
Here is the key sections of the new guidance letter:
The purpose of .this guidance is to inform you that the Department of Justice and the Department of Education are withdrawing the statements of policy and guidance reflected in:
• Letter to Emily Prince from James A. Ferg-Cadima, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Education dated January 7, 2015; and
• Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students jointly issued by the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and the Department of Education dated May 13, 2016.
These guidance documents take the position that the prohibitions on discrimination “on the basis of sex” in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and its implementing regulations, see, e.g., 34 C.F.R. § 106.33, require access to sex-segregated facilities based on gender identity. These guidance documents do not, however, contain extensiv_e legal analysis or explain how the position is consistent with the express language of Title IX, nor did they undergo any
formal public process.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that the term “sex’ in the regulations is ambiguous and deferred to what the court characterized as the “novel” interpretation advanced in the guidance. By contrast, a federal district court in Texas held that the term “sex” unambiguously refers to biological sex and that, in any event, the guidance was “legislative and substantive” and thus formal rulemaking should have occurred prior to the adoption of any such policy. In August of 2016, the Texas court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the interpretation, and that nationwide injunction has not been overturned.
In addition, the Departments believe that, in this context, there must be due regard for the primary role of the States and local school districts in establishing educational policy.
In these circumstances, the Department of Education and the Department of Justice have decided to withdraw and rescind the above-referenced guidance documents in order to further and more completely consider the legal issues involved. The Departments thus will not rely on the views expressed within them.
Please note that this withdrawal of these guidance documents does not leave students without protections from discrimination, bullying, or harassment. All schools must ensure that all students, including LGBT students, are able to learn and thrive in a safe environment. The Department of Education Office for Civil Rights will continue its duty under law to hear all claims of discrimination and will explore every appropriate opportunity to protect all students and to encourage civility in our classrooms. The Department of Education and the Depart_ment of Justice are committed to the application of Title IX and other federal laws to ensure such protection.
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, who apparently wanted different language in the new guidance, issued the following statement tonight:
I consider protecting all students, including #LGBTQ students, not only a key priority for the Department, but for every school in America.
— Secretary Betsy DeVos (@BetsyDeVosED) February 23, 2017
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.