Image 01 Image 03

Post-Election Harvard Crimson Editorial Addresses Lack of Ideological Diversity on Campus

Post-Election Harvard Crimson Editorial Addresses Lack of Ideological Diversity on Campus


This is the most rational response to the election in higher education I’ve seen so far. In fact, maybe the only one.

Kudos to The Crimson:

Elephant and Man at Harvard

As students and professors continue to take stock of the results of Tuesday’s election, the ideological uniformity of much of Harvard’s population will no doubt dominate campus conversation. Honing in on Harvard’s undergraduates, The Crimson’s pre-election survey affirmed—to an extent—the College’s reputation as a liberal bastion. While we should use caution in using these results to make blanket assumptions about all academic and social contexts in which students discuss politics, the survey points to an overall lack of ideological diversity that should concern faculty, administrators, and students alike, especially at this moment in our history.

The most glaring ideological diversity deficit among undergraduates is the relatively small number of students who identify as conservative. In the election survey, fewer than 13 percent of respondents described themselves as “somewhat” or “very” conservative, compared to over 70 percent describing themselves as “somewhat” or “very” liberal…

Ultimately, this week’s surprises have underscored Harvard students’ need to understand those who disagree with us, however strongly we feel that their views would lead to catastrophe or injustice. Though Harvard will never perfectly reflect the American public’s political composition—nor should it seek to—Harvard students are not exempt from remaining in touch with reality.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Sigh. Academics.

They need a research grant and three days of study to see what is immediately obvious to everyone else.

Yes, but at least they’re smart enough to ask to get paid for it.