Image 01 Image 03

Wikileaks Podesta Hack Exposes Clinton Campaign’s WAR ON CATHOLICS

Wikileaks Podesta Hack Exposes Clinton Campaign’s WAR ON CATHOLICS

Plotting a “Catholic Spring”

In an explosive new email chain released within a new cache by WikiLeaks, Podesta explains their attempts to subvert the Catholic church with progressive organizations created for the purpose of prompting a “Catholic Spring.”

The “seeds of this revolution” take the form of progressive groups like Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United.

From WikiLeaks:

Sandy Newman is the president of the progressive Voice for Progress.

The Lifezette reports:

Newman, who is Jewish, admits he does not know much about the Catholic Church and isn’t volunteering personally to subvert Catholic teachings. “Even if the idea isn’t crazy, I don’t qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about how one would ‘plant the seeds of the revolution,’ or who would plant them.”

Podesta’s response is jaw-dropping:

In another email chain, the progressive thoughts about American Catholics are mocking and condescending.

Lifezette writes:

The conversation further reveals the contempt with which radical progressives view Catholics and the Catholic Church. On Monday, WikiLeaks published an email showing Democratic operatives mocking conservative Catholics.

A scholar at the Left-wing Center for American Progress emailed Podesta in 2011 bashing then-Fox News CEO Roger Ailes for his Catholic Faith.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


OnlyRightDissentAllowed | October 12, 2016 at 1:32 pm

This is truly shocking since American Catholics don’t engage in birth control or abortion under any circumstances. Any attempt to get them to vote for a Democrat is sure to send them straight to hell – just where the demon Hillary wants them.

Weren’t there a bunch of Bishops who directly and explicitly inserted themselves into the Bush/Kerry election? I guess it would be a dastardly, underhanded move to do anything to combat the reactionary forces of the one true church. That is what Catholic means. Isn’t it?

How many marriages has Murdoch had? Four, Five, Six? I’ve lost count. But I can see where he has embraced the tenets of his newest allegiance. Didn’t he become an American so that he could own TV Stations and a Network. That is almost as big a sacrifice as the Donald did by putting up buildings. Didn’t he think that his sacrifice equated with the Kahn family?

I guess Wikileaks will roll out this shocking material until election day. I can’t wait until they do the same to The Donald. I forgot. They won’t.

So, children, lets sum this up. Hillary Clinton is a politician and has a staff dedicated to getting her elected. Donald Trump is a huckster who has a staff trying to make him look slightly Presidential. Let the games continue. Anybody here doubt that Trump is a bigger liar than lying Hillary? No? That’s OK. A large plurality of the country does.

Funny how Wikileaks hasn’t manage to hack even one Trump email. He must have some awesome security! Maybe Assuage won’t have to go to Sweden and face his rape charge.

    Maybe Trump is following standard good security protocol that a majority of companies have to do? When you leave your security open you allow someone to put a back door into your system. When you email the new password to everyone on a hacked server then your just dumb. My feeling personally is that HRC was intent on hiding her info from the US government which wouldn’t hack her and felt safe that she was such a progressive that no one else would either. She was protected by her ignorance, but her server wasn’t.

    Or maybe the hacktivists just realize how bad it would be with her in charge, after all she does want to drone Assange and Obama has already droned an American citizen with out a trial.

    2nd Ammendment Mother in reply to OnlyRightDissentAllowed. | October 12, 2016 at 2:20 pm

    Maybe Trump lives in the real world where there are real legal consequences for companies that are hacked and lose control of their data…… and I’ll bet there’s not a single deleted email, since there are real world consequences for businesses that don’t retain every single email regarding business transactions….. or maybe he just hires competent people instead of cronies?

    Maybe because there aren’t any for Trump. The only thing the Hillary camp can come up is some words spoken but WE all know the way Hillary attacked the women her husband raped. This is against ANY person of faith no matter what faith but especially all Catholics. As a Catholic i find it disturbing you are actually defending Hillary that wants our demise as Catholics, she and Kaine will do their best to destroy God’s words and force our Church to accept their agenda. Does anyone actually think that all Democrats are not working to force our Church to allow the LGBT to walk down the aisle..? Stop defending this criminal Hillary and all other Democrats and vote your conscience which should be totally against all Democrats.

      OnlyRightDissentAllowed in reply to Rosavera. | October 12, 2016 at 2:39 pm

      Sure. Trump is pure as the driven snow, never lies and is so smart that he can’t be hacked. Sure.

      Hey, I have a casino to sell you.

        You are as much a liar as your protégé Hillary… are you sure you are actually a Catholic and believe in the faith…?
        It seems to me you are more like a hack and doing the Democrat’s work to divide us Catholics. Feel sorry for you for you, but then you know exactly what you are doing and it is not without us seeing you for what you really are, a fake and a fraud, another Hillary/Democrat hack…

    Seriously? Wikileaks specializes in hacking the government. Trump is not in government, thank you very much, nor is he ever going to be.
    We know plenty about his dirty business dealings, groupings, walking into a room full of naked teenage girls, etc. he’d lead a very public life.

Boy – HRC’s team trashes the Catholics and you make it sound like it’s all Trump’s fault. But it is not Trump or Wikileaks that is trashing the Catholic Faithful.

I have one question? Do you get paid by the post or by the hour? With all your wordy rambling I think Hillary must pay her trolls by the word.

    Who are you talking to? It can’t be me, I didn’t mention–or even THINK of–Trump while writing this post.

      OnlyRightDissentAllowed in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | October 12, 2016 at 2:18 pm

      It is me. He hit the wrong button. But if you think the Wikileaks dumps aren’t an attempt to tilt the election to Trump, they are paying you too much.

      I do not believe that Sweden, a neutral country, is trying to turn him over to us. It seems more likely that Swedish authorities want him to face a rape charge.

      Hey this great – (from “A UN panel this year concluded that Mr Assange was being forced by Britain and Sweden to live in arbitrary detention in violation of his human rights. ” Anyone want to defend the UN on human rights?

        2nd Ammendment Mother in reply to OnlyRightDissentAllowed. | October 12, 2016 at 2:25 pm

        Wikileaks wouldn’t have anything to dump if the morons hadn’t written it in the first place….. if you don’t do stupid things, then you don’t have anything to be embarrassed about.

          OnlyRightDissentAllowed in reply to 2nd Ammendment Mother. | October 12, 2016 at 2:35 pm

          Yep, above all else, Trump is known for never doing anything stupid – like speaking into open mics.

          That has got to be the answer. He is so good and only hires the best. That explains why he is on his 3rd team.

          Ever heard of a zero-day?

          Why, yes. Yes I have.

          Have you ever heard of defense in depth?
          Have you ever head of minimizing the attack surface?
          Have you ever heard of not sending passwords in the clear?

        YOU really don’t know what you are talking about, and it is soooo disturbing to see you post such lies. Are you just like Hillary and all other Democrats hell bent on destroying our Catholic faith…? Stop posting lies and excuses for a huge criminal like Hillary and start defending the Catholic church and all of us Catholics..!

        I know the leaks are intended to sway the election, but relax, they won’t. Most Hillary supporters know she’s a despicable human being and a chronic liar; ditto Trump supporters of their guy. They do not care. Get it? They don’t care one bit, but they do care very much about pointing out how much “worse” the other one is. Again, a fruitless occupation as there is no swaying a Trump or Hillary supporter. They just hope to make their guy or gal look less revolting and repellent. That won’t work, either, of course. Or do you imagine that anyone who has ever even thought about supporting Trump would vote for Hillary . . . except for these WikiLeaks emails? Come on, you know better than that.

          Henry Hawkins in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | October 12, 2016 at 3:57 pm

          Charles Manson, having murdered fewer people, would be the superior presidential candidate compared to Ted Bundy.

          What I think every time I hear someone say, “but Clinton (or Trump) is worse!”

          I’m writing in WAJ for president, not as a joke, but because he’d definitely be a better debater than Trump or Clinton (as would a third of LI writers and a half dozen or so of LI regular commenters), and he’d very likely make a better president any damn way. (Don’t get cocky, Prof – the bar is low, lol).

          Down ballot here in NC, I’ll be voting straight ticket GOP.

          I was kind of hoping that the leaks would eventually force a real investigation maybe even force a reporter to ask a real question. I think the only way that happens is if the emails actually attack a reporter by name forcing that person to retaliate.

          At what point if ever does the media lose it’s 1st amendment protection based upon either totally ignoring or trying to cover up the illegal activities of HRC and the DNC? Also doesn’t the media have some sort of journalist ethics they have to follow? If so are they just suggestions or actual laws?

          Good question, scaulen, but the First Amendment isn’t dependent on what view the press chooses to report. If it were, it wouldn’t be a protection, it would be a diktat.

          Our Founders didn’t count on journalists who chose to be propagandists, but they did allow for it. The problem occurs only if the government intervenes and quells freedom of the press; they are free to say whatever lying crap they want in the meantime. Our Founders also put a lot of stock in Americans and intended us to be vigilant in protecting our republic. We may have dropped the ball for decades, but it’s not too late to pick it back up and knock the you-know-what out of the progressive hordes.

        Wikileaks started dumping documents in 2006, long before Hillary was running for President. There was a lot of dirt on Bush and his administration, interrogation techniques, secret CIA renditions etc. They publish what ever they can hack. The fact is that Hillary’s priority was to hide her emails from the archives. Because of that she couldn’t use a professional company to set her server up as that would have left a paper trail. She used someone that was loyal but not as tech savvy as was needed. I deal with many of these types in my job, they have the diplomas but no real world experience. What they set up for her was supbar. Someone either noticed the email name from another hacked account or someone leaked the info to the hacking community for a reward or cred. What they found wasn’t low hanging fruit it was fruit sitting on the ground. Once they were in it was over for the security of that box. They probably added themselves as a user and were getting the email password updates sent to them. This is criminal negligence for all involved, especially if it’s found out that the travel itinerary for Ambassador Stevens was passed through that server. Which could be one of the main reasons they are destroying emails and hardware. After all, if there is nothing illegal or incriminating then why go through all the trouble to get destroy all of it?

    OnlyRightDissentAllowed in reply to MattMusson. | October 12, 2016 at 2:05 pm

    My pay will be revealed in a future email.

    Funny, I have known a neighbor who has been a devout catholic his entire life. He quit the church because the new pope is too liberal. I guess the pope is only infallible when he speaks republican.

In my travels around several Latin American countries I noticed a lot of very far left priests. Some were hard line communists and they preached it.

    Rosavera in reply to Anchovy. | October 12, 2016 at 2:42 pm

    and unfortunately they do a lot of harm to our Church. The Catholic Church is not ”liberal” nor ”progressive” we only teach what God taught us when He walked the earth and gave us His gospel of Hope, Faith, and Love…

    RodFC in reply to Anchovy. | October 12, 2016 at 3:02 pm

    It’s called liberation theology, and I remember how JPII chastised a bishop in Nicaragua for supporting it.

Which “Catholic” does anyone go to war against?

“Gropy” Joe Biden, Nanny Pelosi, and literally dozens of other Collectivist crap-0-crats are Catholics.

OTOH, there are very fine people of fine conservative creds who are ALSO Catholics.

    scaulen in reply to Ragspierre. | October 12, 2016 at 2:09 pm

    It doesn’t matter really, it promotes division and diversion. The CIN’s could care less, they’ll mouth what their electorate wants to hear but do nothing. Real church goers will raise a ruckus and flock to the politicians that will fight for them. The Other Than Catholics will jump on board the spring movement. It breaks the groups up into bite size morsels. psywar at it’s finest

      2nd Ammendment Mother in reply to scaulen. | October 12, 2016 at 2:29 pm

      I’ll go there…… Would a Catholic Spring look like a new Holocaust? Forgo your faith or become 2nd class citizenry.

      And here we all thought JFK had dealt with the stigma of Catholics in public office.

      2nd Ammendment Mother in reply to scaulen. | October 12, 2016 at 2:35 pm

      I forgot to point out the the liberal infrastructure has already successfully launched anti-Israel groups, so anti-Catholic groups would necessarily follow.

War against Catholics who are not “progressive”, “liberal”, “conservative”, or Pro-Choice. That is, Catholics who are Catholic. The philosophy and principles are unambiguous and incorruptible.

It’s not news unless the news people report it as news. And they won’t be doing that.

So … There’s nothing to see here folks. Move along.

As a Catholic i am appalled, not surprise, to see such subversion by the Democrats especially from Hillary and her camp. She is the most arrogant, liar, criminal ever to be in office. Democrats want to destroy our faith by diving us all and by dividing our vote, we are 69,470,686 strong Catholics in our USA which is 22% of the population. Are we going to vote in a block and be a force to contend with, or are we going to allow such criminal politicians like Hillary and Democrats to destroy us and our Church…?

    2nd Ammendment Mother in reply to Rosavera. | October 12, 2016 at 2:59 pm

    If you want to see what Podesta has in store for Catholics, take the time to read through the Professor’s documentation of the anti-Israel movement across the US that has gained a very successful foothold.

    We already have a White House that has actively sought the destruction of Israel for the past 8 years, right down to interfering in it’s elections. With the continued militancy of the Islamists in Europe, does anyone doubt that Rome will soon become a target?

    It’s not as though Catholics really needed this leak to know where they stand in the eyes of Hillary, Obama and the entire DNC. Short of burning down churches or converting them to Mosques and abortion clinics, Dems don’t exactly keep it hidden.

      2nd Ammendment Mother in reply to Andy. | October 13, 2016 at 10:22 am

      True….. however, it’s nice to know that there is a real conspiracy with boots on the ground instead of just garden variety paranoia.

Stay strong in your faith and do not let these ugly subversive anti-Catholic politicians attack us as a group and divide us. We are 22% of the population and staying strong we can beat these devils that want to destroy us in our faith and our Church. Stop voting for Democrats.

The only thing shocking would be a leak saying a democrat said something positive about Church going people of the Christian faith.

This just in from Drudge.
Bubba Clinton aka Slick Willie calls Trump supporters rednecks.

Is there ANYONE the Clinton’s haven’t declared war on?

Hillary haaad picked Kaine for VP in 2015!

Thing is, John Podesta is a Roman Catholic.
IIRC in 2008 Catholics had no problem voting for both Pelosi and Biden, both excommunicated Catholics at the time. My Catholic, church-going in-laws were among those who voted for them.
Even if this is a teaser for a soon-to-be-released Hillary email condemning the Pope, I seriously doubt this will sway the election.

    most self identifying Democrats will vote Democrat regardless of the beliefs of the candidate, the term “yellow dog democrat” comes to mind.

      I agre. I also think that my in-laws politics are influenced by their church. In LA where they live, at least, many Catholics are of Mexican extraction. And come to think of it Pope has a position on Amnesty.
      I’m glad my in-laws are pro-life, though, because we suspect my husband wasn’t “planned”.

4chan has a post that Podesta hasn’t changed his password and they are still going in.

I have not seen it yet ,but apparently a Podesta email detailed how internal polling is showing a Trump landslide