Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Jill Stein: Trump Less Dangerous Than Hillary Who Would Start War With Russia

Jill Stein: Trump Less Dangerous Than Hillary Who Would Start War With Russia

“it is actually Hillary’s policies which are much scarier”

https://youtu.be/_le-V-Q0NsE

Green Party candidate Jill Stein is no fan of Donald Trump, but she’s apparently more concerned about the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency. During a recent appearance on C-Span, Stein suggested that Hillary would use nuclear weapons in a war with Russia.

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

Jill Stein: Trump Is Less Dangerous Than Clinton; She Will Start Nuclear War With Russia

It is important to not just look at the rhetoric but also look at the track record and the reality is the lesser people and greater people is a race to the bottom, and even Donald Trump in the right wing extremism grows out of the policies of the Clintons, in particular Nafta, which sent our jobs overseas and Wall Street deregulation, which blew 9 million jobs up into smoke.

That is what is creating this right wing extremism. A vote for Hillary Clinton isn’t going to fix it…

It is now Hillary Clinton that wants to start an air war with Russia over Syria by calling for a no fly zone.

We have 2000 nuclear missiles on hairtrigger alert. They are saying we are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been.

Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria.

I sure won’t sleep well at night if Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won’t sleep well at night if Hillary Clinton elected. We have another choice other than these two candidates who are both promoting lethal policies.

On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary’s policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia.

He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia.

Here’s the video:

Before you write off Jill Stein as the crazy Green Party candidate, consider the report below from ABC News:

Russian Television Warns of Nuclear War Amid US Tensions

With diplomatic relations between Moscow and Washington at their lowest point since the Cold War, one could be forgiven for being alarmed by recent Russian news broadcasts. For the past month, Russian media outlets have been punctuated with reports asking people whether they are ready for nuclear war.

“If it should one day happen, every one of you should know where the nearest bomb shelter is. It’s best to find out now,” according to one particularly fevered report on the Russian state-owned channel, NTV.

Russia’s main current affairs show, hosted by a presenter known by critics as the country’s propagandist-in-chief, recently spent two hours warning that Russia would defend itself with nuclear arms.

“We’ve had it with American scolding over Syria,” the show’s host, Evgeny Kiselyov, told his audience. “Impudent behavior,” from the U.S. he said, can take on “nuclear dimensions.”

Four years ago, Obama mocked Romney for raising concerns about Russia.

Turns out the 1980’s really did call.

Featured image via YouTube.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

She’s dangerous all right, but the media trying to spike the real news about her malfeasance is even more dangerous.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-14/wall-street-journal-blasts-press-consistently-buries-hillary-clintons-sins

What’s not being carried in my local paper, among many other things:

She used the Department of State to funnel billions of dollars to the Clinton foundation, which promptly funneled the money to Friends of Bill, who pocketed the money instead of using it to rebuild Haiti, as intended. A rebuilt Haiti should have had fewer deaths from the latest storm, because there was plenty of time to build shelters and infrastructure with decent building codes.

    RE: Haiti

    U.S. donors reportedly sent a 10-figure sum of money (for the math-challenged, that means BILLIONS) to Haiti after the last big hurricane. Haiti is not a large nation. A billion dollars should have rebuilt and repaired pretty much everything.

    So why the hell is half the country still living in shacks made of materials salvaged from the wreckage of the last storm? Where did all that “rebuild Haiti” money go?

Hillary will certainly plunge us Deeper into a Middle East Knife Fight. And, US Troops and Planes WILL end up fighting Russian Troops and Planes.

What could go wrong?

Citizen journalists are raising the topic of who will be counting our votes in the next election, and the top story in my local newspaper is about dirty talk.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57gne4/red_alert_vice_chairman_of_george_soros_highly/

(Mark Malloch-Brown) chairs the Boards of a number of non-profit boards including …the Open Society Foundation… http://www.smartmatic.com/about/our-team/detail/lord-mark-malloch-brown/

On their company website they state that they have now configured 392,000 electoral devices in America and ‘deployed’ (odd choice of word for them to use) deployed 57,000 vote counting machines. . . . SOURCE – -http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/united-states-elections/

Smartmatic’s equipment, software and technicians will be counting votes behind closed doors in the following US states- — Arizona — California — Colorado — District of Columbia — Florida — Illinois — Louisiana — Michigan — Missouri — New Jersey — Nevada — Oregon — Pennsylvania — Virginia — Washington — Wisconsin . . .SOURCE – – http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/united-states-elections/

Let’s bring Smartmatic out into the public light of cyberspace at Twitter and Facebook and etc, and just plain old ask them – HOW do we know the votes are counted correctly? Who are the Smartmatic techies who will be in the room? What are their names and professional credentials? Are they affiliated with any foreign or domestic political organization? Who audits their work? What does the system look like . . are votes from various polling stations fed to a central processor? Show us a diagram.
Let’s get this all out in the open long before the Trump / Clinton votes are counted out of our sight..

******************

I want to know who counts the votes.

From the Green point of view Trump is preferable because they can successfully oppose him (and what fun they would have at the rallies!) and replace in 2020 with a more satisfactory leftist candidate than Hillary.
Greens know very well that some of their most valued achievements came during the Nixon administration, and they will tell you that it’s the people on the street who are the agents of change. So, no, they are not afraid of Donald Trump.

buckeyeminuteman | October 14, 2016 at 1:02 pm

Trump should enlist the help of any and all useful idiots in this country. She might turn out to be one…

I don’t understand why Hillary is itching so hard to start war with Russia.

She’s blaming, without evidence, Russia for every hack. That may/may not be true, but without producing evidence it sounds like a conspiracy theory.

Then there’s Syria policy. Trump said he would fight ISIS in Syria at the debate, after Hillary said she would fight ISIS, Russia, Syria, and Iran in Syria. How is Hillary’s policy possibly workable?

    Henry Hawkins in reply to rotten. | October 14, 2016 at 5:18 pm

    It’s just a diversion, a way to shift the story away from the *content* of the hacks (very bad for Clinton) to *who did the hacking*. The Russians are a good scapegoat because the accusation cannot be confirmed without Russian cooperation, which ain’t gonna happen ever, let alone by 11/08.

This election is about Hillary; Trump is entirely incidental.

The IRS has blocked conservatives from participating in elections since at least 2010 and continuing to the current election. Vote Hillary?

Hillary removed Gaddafi from power in Libya, creating a political power vacuum that was filled by various and sundry rogue groups. US Ambassador Stevens made over 600 requests for increased security during this time that Hillary chose to ignore. Ambassador Stevens and three other men lost their lives as a result of Hillary’s incompetent negligence. Vote Hillary?

Hillary, as Secretary of State, presided over US actions to remove Assad from power in Syria. Once again, her incompetence and negligence resulted in millions of refugees, hundreds of thousands of deaths, Russia’s deadly involvement in the limitless and never ending misery and instability in the middle-east. Vote Hillary?

Hillary initiated the diplomacy with Iran who, after being given a protected path to nuclear weapons, was given over $140 billion, including up to $30 billion in untraceable cash. Iran quickly purchased modern Russian air defense systems and is now funding the Houthi rebels who are firing anti-ship missiles at US and civilian ships near the Persian Gulf. Vote Hillary?

Attempts to determine how all these massive failures came about uncovered the astounding existence of a private, unsecured email server hosting highly classified national security information. The server was installed to bypass the legally required public accountability and oversight of public business. Vote Hillary?

Having been exposed by Freedom of Information requests, Hillary unilaterally purged (we can only take her word for the quantity) her private server of over 30 thousand emails to cover-up her illegal actions.

To top it all off, the DOJ’s Loretta Lynch delegated its prosecutorial responsibilities regarding Hillary’s violation of the law to another Obama appointee, James Comey of the FBI. Comey refused FBI requests for the subpoenas necessary to secure what little evidence Hillary hadn’t already destroyed. Instead, he granted immunity to individuals holding the evidence and agreed to destroy the evidence himself sight unseen. Finally, Comey, despite overwhelming evidence, refused to indict Hillary with the power delegated to him by the DOJ. Vote Hillary?

Were voting not only for the Officce of President, but for control of the DOJ, the FBI, the FEC, the EPA, the FCC and all of the incompetent, negligent political appointees running our government.

Do you want even more of the same? Do you want to risk war with Russia? Do you want Turkey to align with Russia and Iran? Do you want at least two and possibly more nations in the middle-east to obtain nuclear weapons?

Vote Hillary!

    david7134 in reply to MSO. | October 15, 2016 at 2:42 pm

    Hillary has 6 billion missing from state. She covered up the debacle in Bengasi and never explained what the ambassador was doing there, she had McCain conferring with rebel groups in Syria, then leaks have demonstrated that Hillary was buying and moving arms. The elite Republicans are very upset that Trump will win and will not keep his mouth shut as required. Now why is all this going on? Hillary is the originator of ISIS.

Nah, I don’t buy it.

Hillary’s a menace to the rule of law and the very concept of constitutional government. But her crimes will continue to be mainly domestic. She’s not much interested in foreign affairs, in that sense being much like Obama. She’ll be content to just let the world go to hell in its own handbasket; and the Russians, Chinese, Koreans, and Persians will continue to do whatever the hell they want, without fear of opposition. Hillary will concentrate on graft and corruption and a never-ending series of unconstitutional power grabs. And, of course, revenge.

    RodFC in reply to tom swift. | October 14, 2016 at 4:00 pm

    I disagree, she is interested in foreign affairs — but only as a tool to distract from what she is doing.

    Already the “Bears ate my email” excuse has caused Obama to bring us to the verge of cyberwarfare with Russia. How long until that becomes real warfare?

On one hand. On the other hand. Always and forever.

RodFC: agree that HRC is interested in foreign policy but disagree that she views it as a distraction. I believe that she is deeply committed to a neoliberal capitalist world order and will intervene as necessary to sustain it. What that means is the obliteration of sovereignty in order to establish a reduced (and standardized) labor rate—in other words, the labor cost in Mexico equals that in the US equals that in China, and so forth. HRC views the state as a clearing house for multinational corporate transactions—citizens, not so much.

She’s more a citizen of Davos than anywhere around here.

    david7134 in reply to (((Boogs))). | October 15, 2016 at 2:45 pm

    But, at the same time, she is very, very stupid and thinks she and the people around her are very smart. She is also a woman and women heads of stare always start wars, she will start a war.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend