Image 01 Image 03

‘Jeopardy!’ Trudges into Neo-Feminism, Features “Mansplaining”

‘Jeopardy!’ Trudges into Neo-Feminism, Features “Mansplaining”

Et tu, Trebek?

Everything is awful. EVERYTHING.

Not even ‘Jeopardy!’ is safe from the tentacles of spoiled, overly-sensitive, entitled brats neo-feminism.

According to HuffPo, “mansplaining” made its ‘Jeopardy!’ debut on October 19.

The segment is here:

Like most neo-feminsist ideals, “mansplaining” unfairly and categorically maligns men, while pretending women are never condescending. The entire premise of mansplaining is based on the assumption that condescending men are so because they are speaking to a woman, and fails to consider other variables.

There’s no such word to describe a condescending female degrading a male counterpart. Am I supposed to believe never has there been a condescending, rude woman? The absence of “womansplaining” or some such term implies as much. But we all know that’s a crock of hooey.

Sometimes people are rude. Sometimes people are dumb. Never have a I met an American man who treated women poorly because of their gender. Do chauvinists exist? Statistically, they have to. Are they representative of the whole of mandom? Absolutely not. But that’s how modern progressivism works — pretend a minuscule minority is representative of the majority.

And as for ‘Jeopardy!’ buying into this garbage? ‘Sean Connery’ said it best in an SNL rendition of ‘Celebrity Jeopardy!’:

Follow Kemberlee on Twitter @kemberleekaye


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.



Jeopardy! Was always reliably on the right. I blame the Trump effect splitting conservatism. Nobody wants to be with the pig.

For as long as I can remember, Jeopardy has had a liberal slant. For the most part I just ignore it. Besides, now we have an alternative:

Black Jeopardy

ugottabekiddinme | October 25, 2016 at 7:46 pm

No surprise, given that the age of their Q & A clue writers is probably not above 22 or so. This slant and the newspeak and the rest is all “baked in” given the years of their “education.” Soon I expect a clue/question on the goofy “pronouns” the social justice idiots insist we all start using, because for some reason in their world one must not discern the sex of someone as we speak to them, zir, hir, whatever.

I miss the G.E. College Bowl.

What is the word when a female chauvinist tells a male, a female, about a topic he, she, already understands?

I’m sitting here with a good cigar, some fine Islay scotch, man-spreding for all I’m worth!

First we let them vote, now look at the mess we have. How many women actually know how to make a pie today?

OwenKellogg-Engineer | October 25, 2016 at 9:02 pm

Laphroaig or Ardbeg?

How’s a guy to know if the stupid . . . .

did you ever wonder why they don’t sell encyclopedias anymore? It’s because every man’s wife already knows everything there is to know. No need to explain anything to women.

Well, someone needs to explain to them how to make a pie.

What my wife and I really hate on Jeopardy is Alex Trebek’s affected French accent. He’ll always correct the contestants’ pronunciation to prove he’s better than they are. We’re eagerly looking forward to his long-overdue retirement.

What’s the word for when women lecture men on perpetuating a rape culture that they know does not exist?

Jeopardy went down the tubes a long time ago when the questions became so easy that I knew the answers.

“Am I supposed to believe never has there been a condescending, rude woman?”

Every. Leftist. Woman.

Including the one running for President.

Corrupt, incompetent traitors for 20.

‘Clintons.’ Though the judges agree that ‘Obamas’ will also suffice.