Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Democrats are responsible for politicizing FBI and DOJ

Democrats are responsible for politicizing FBI and DOJ

The Clintons corrupt every institution they touch.

From the Arkansas Governorship to the U.S. presidency to the State Department to the Clinton Foundation, the Clintons corrupt every institution they touch.

That includes the current presidential election, with Bill Clinton meeting secretly (until caught) with Attorney General Loretta Lynch as the FBI and DOJ were evaluating whether to prosecute Hillary. Bill didn’t need to say particular words to influence Lynch, the message was sent by the meeting. It tainted Lynch, DOJ, the FBI and the entire investigation.

Hillary was under investigation because she improperly set up a private server to handle her work email traffic, including classified information. This was done for the worst of reasons, to create a shadow electronic government completely under the control of Hillary and her team in order to shield her records of public service from public scrutiny.

All else flows from that, including putting Obama in a position of lying to the public about what he knew and when he knew it.

Allahpundit on Twitter nailed the problem. By nominating someone under FBI investigation, Democrats assured that the FBI would become political.

This is how the Clintons corrupt. They force others to cover for them to maintain Democrats in power, and thereby make those defenders complicit.

Comey was wrong not to recommend charges, but correct at least to update Congress that his prior representation that the investigation was completed no longer was true. To do otherwise would have made Comey complicit.

Had the FBI said nothing, the presumption would be that the case still was closed — a talking point for Hillary. So doing nothing to correct the record would have been just as political.

Democrats put the FBI in the untenable position of possibly deciding the election. That’s all on them.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“It tainted Lynch, DOJ,”
The clintons corrupt institutions because they are democrats. Democrats have been wildly successful in destroying SCOTUS and the rest of the federal judiciary, congress (with the help of uni-party republicans), and the executive branch (by its aggrandizement). The democrats also have eviscerated fundamental non-federal institutions that once helped America have a coherent and meaningful society, such as our education and health-care systems.

All else flows from that, including putting Obama in a position of lying to the public about what he knew and when he knew it.

Right meme wrong person.

This morning I was telling people that there is a bit of strangeness in this whole, in that Weiner seems to be playing the role of John Dean. ( Rumor has it he is spilling his guts to the Feds. )

Then a strange thought occured to me, that he is probably playing a role closer to Martha Mitchell.

    Rick the Curmudgeon in reply to RodFC. | October 30, 2016 at 9:00 pm

    Think of the damage Martha Mitchell could have done with a debit card at the liquor store, a laptop and a smart phone.

“If you don’t want the FBI involved in elections, don’t nominate someone who’s being investigated by the FBI”

I dunno. Seems so damned simple to me.

But you have to remember that the whole DNC was corrupted by the Clintons long ago, so who else was going to emerge as their nominee…???

This posting is yet another reminder,

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral[*] and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

– John Adams (1735-1826)

*As in the J/C variety. And if you don’t have the kind of morality (in addition to the J/C kind, there are other belief systems which do value honesty and integrity (Islam NOT being among them)) where your Yes means your Yes and your No means your No, then you will tormented by the likes of today’s Democrat Party and people like the Clintons.

    Valerie in reply to fscarn. | October 30, 2016 at 2:01 pm

    This is a gentle reminder that Bill Hillary, and the vast majority of the Democratic party are nominal Christians.

    I do hope our voters are, on the whole, better people.

But its not just the Clintons and the DNC.

It’s the people. Its Democrats. There is something fundamentally wrong with them, and its dangerous to ignore this. Clinton is only in this position of power because our fellow Americans have given their full-throated support (stop that!) of her corruption since her husband was impeached.

They are dishonest, immoral and corrupt. They are okay with their leaders paying homeless to incite violence at opposition events. They are okay with thugs beating down that homeless woman who was protecting Trump’s hollywood star. They are okay with Hillary’s corruption because they think her tyranny will be directed at the people they hate.

They are the new Little Eichmanns, continuing to support the Party despite the horrible things it is doing to their neighbors. And even if Hillary is defeated, they will remain.

Hillary is wicked. No doubt. But she is only in a position of power now because her base of support is as corrupt as her. Win or lose, we will still have to deal with these people.

“Plato, in The Republic, and Aristotle, in his Politics, teach that polities reflect the persons who rise to prominence within them, whose habits the people imitate, and who set the tone of life in them.

Consider, for example, how republic-killing an event was the ruling class’s support of President Bill Clinton in the wake of his nationally televised perjury. Subsequently, as constituencies of supporters have effectively condoned officials’ abusive, self-serving, and even outright illegal behavior, they have encouraged more and more of it while inuring themselves to it. That is how republics turn into empires from the roots up.”

http://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/after-the-republic/

    Ragspierre in reply to Fen. | October 30, 2016 at 2:25 pm

    And remember that one of Dollar Bill’s chief defenders and very public trashers of his victims was one Donald J. T-rump.

      a random guy in reply to Ragspierre. | October 30, 2016 at 7:57 pm

      Why is this downvoted? Is it not true? (I don’t know) It is somewhat relevant, although on a tangent.

        Its downvoted because Rags is petty. Even the Truth is not immune from his partisan temper tantrums. Adjust accordingly.

          Henry Hawkins in reply to Fen. | October 31, 2016 at 9:40 am

          Oh, for crissakes, grow up and give it a rest.

          Ragspierre in reply to Fen. | October 31, 2016 at 2:31 pm

          No. The truth is simply what it is. It is NOT subject to partisanship.

          This is why you go ape-shit when I state something truthful, as above. You can’t tolerate the truth. It’s like pouring salt on a slug. It BURNS…!!!

        Ragspierre in reply to a random guy. | October 31, 2016 at 10:02 am

        It’s absolutely true. You can find his own comments on the matter.

        T-rump was a YUUUUUUG defender of Clinton’s, and referred to the victims publicly as “terrible women”. That’s what I recall, and there could have been more.

Professor, the speculation at Reddit is running so hot I am not going to write about it.

I am going to wait and see what’s in those emails. I am fairly sure all of the excuses being thrown out by the Hillary Campaign (repeats, nothing there, etc.,) are untrue.

In my opinion, the least damaging possibility is, that they contain something that directly contradicts a claim made to him, that was essential to the issue of intent.

Professor, the press is reporting that the FBI is attempting to get a search warrant for Weiner’s computer. It was also reported that Weiner surrendered his computer to the NYPD via subpoena.

If the NYPD searched the computer and found questionable emails and gave them to the FBI, isn’t the evidence already tainted if the NYPD searched the computer without a search warrant? And there is the question of which “folder” in the computer contained the questionable emails. Was the “folder” only belonging to Huma with access via Huma’s password? Seems like a minefield.

What if DOJ does not authorize the SDNY to obtain a search warrant? ( All political potential investigations are controlled by DOJ )

DieJustAsHappy | October 30, 2016 at 2:59 pm

When you have a significant number of the population accepting from the POTUS such a statement as “depending upon the what the definition of ‘is’ is,” then the Clintons have had and continue to have many willing accomplices. The only difference between these willing participants, whatever their political affiliation, is the degree of their culpability.

This continued into and through the present administration wherein it has reached mind-boggling proportions. With the Clinton crime family, the head might be chopped off, but there’s still the body awaiting a new head.

Hillary is going to jail. I was trying to figure out why her aide would send emails to herself over her husband’s computer. Then it dawned on me, Hillary’s server would keep emails from being archived and bleaching them would definitely remove them from any scrutiny. Huma was clearly aware of that, but by sending them to herself, she established a record that could not be erased. Thus, the emails would be in the Microsoft cloud or similar for Apple. Now, why would she do that? She states it was to facilitate printing. Why does she need to print them, especially all 30,000. And, she would have been required to give those papers to the FBI months ago or provide evidence of their safe destruction (I have to do this for medical records).

So, why keep the emails? It is clear that this was Uma’s get out of jail card. This was her little hide that would be used to negotiate her position in the future if a really true criminal case was developed. But the FBI stumbled upon it. These emails will have the dirt on Hillary and the foundation. It is what the public has been trying to get for years and what Hillary has been trying to hide, as well as Obama and Justice.

What does this mean? Hillary is going to jail (I am doing my happy dance). She might be elected as we have very stupid people in our country, but immediately a special prosecutor will be arranged, and she will go to jail. Her crimes are so extensive that I don’t think Obama can pardon her, and that may mean that Obama will be looking at time as well, and even Lynch. If Trump gets in, then he can use this as a spring board to clean house of both the Republicans and Democrats.

Will Huma take the fifth.
OK technically not the fifth.
There is some question about whether the FBI can look at the emails without a warrant or even with a warrant.

Since this was a shared computer and their investigation was for Weiners child pr0n. So Huma might be able to fight the warrant due to spousal privilege.

The question is will she, and cost Hillary the election.

    4fun in reply to RodFC. | October 30, 2016 at 5:04 pm

    The news that Weiner is cooperating, reported by Fox News’ Bret Baier on Sunday, would help law enforcement with the investigation, since officials didn’t yet have a warrant to read through the material found on the device.

    Rick the Curmudgeon in reply to RodFC. | October 30, 2016 at 9:07 pm

    I think Huma is going to take a flight out of the country or a cab to a sympathetic embassy.

Maybe Hillary was sending nude selfies to Carlos Danger.

We just might have a new theory of gravity in the making.

If the laptop was seized by police as part of a search warrant in the Weiner sexting matter, wouldn’t other evidence on the device be available to police as well? Police come in your house with a search warrant and sitting out in view is evidence of another crime. Can’t they use that? Looking for lawyers’ comments. Thanks.

    Ragspierre in reply to tarheelkate. | October 30, 2016 at 5:40 pm

    Seems I recall a “plain sight rule” that allows officers admitted to a home to seize and use evidence they find, regardless of a warrant.

    Conversely, some warrants are specific to items or suspected crimes, and things outside their scope might not be good evidence under that warrant. The LEOs can always get another one with good probable cause.

    As usual, nothing is simple. And I could be mistaken, as this is not my wheelhouse.

I’m hoping on the carlos laptop they find emails colluding on how to respond to their fbi interviews.
It’d be really nice if mills sent one telling them to all use the old hilldawg “I don’t recall” defense.

Henry Hawkins | October 30, 2016 at 7:58 pm

I was wondering if this election couldget any crazier and a thought hit me – what if in addition to more evidence against Hillary, Comey also found emails revealing collaboration between the Trump and Clinton campaigns, re: Trump as false flag conspiracy theory? That seems totally nuts to me…. which only increases the possibility this year, lol.

Why downvote Henry on this? He is clearly postulating ‘tongue-in-cheek.’

Some peeps here have the sense of humor of a Democrat . . .

What better proof is there that Obama has turned our country into a Banana Republic. Libs can break any law they choose and the DOJ and FBI ignores it. And the IRS still treats conservative groups as terrorists.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend