Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

#HillaryEarPiece: A Social Media Star is Born

#HillaryEarPiece: A Social Media Star is Born

@HillaryEarPiece must be ringing with the news of the Trump win!

President Obama has TOTUS (Telepromter of the United States) and his wife has Michelle Obama’s Mirror.

After the Commander In Chief Forum hosted by NBC and moderated by Matt Lauer, a new social media star has been born: Hillary’s Ear Piece.

It became a trending topic on Twitter last night:

This development did not make the progressive crew at Twitter too happy:

The WikiLeaks’ leaked emails beween Clinton Aide Huma Abedin and the Democratic presidential candidate confirm that the ear piece is, indeed, one of Hillary’s many devices.

The fact that it is real is a good thing, too. @HillarysEarPiece now has its own Twitter account (at least for the time being).

Needless to say, there was much speculation about the ear piece and it’s role in the forum. One report offers the following assessment from New York Police Department officials.

Sources at the New York Police Department told True Pundit Hillary wore an “inductive earpiece” to receive feedback from her handlers during the forum, where she was grilled on why she compromised national security with her use of an secret unsecured email server.

NYPD insiders say Hillary’s earpiece is similar to the type widely used by Broadway actors to get fed lines when they forget their script during a live performance.

No matter the reason for the device being in the ear, the response of the elite media this morning clearly indicates that Hillary Clinton’s performance during the forum was…weak.

Here is a scathing video review of Lauer’s moderation posted in USA Today, which confirms my observation that Matt Lauer was tough on both candidates last night.

After mulling over the forum last night over a cup of morning coffee, I have concluded that those who thought Lauer questioned Trump more are correct. However, it is because the GOP presidential hopeful actually answered the questions directly. Clinton, on the other hand, babbled a heady mix of excuses, rationalizations, prevarications, and wonkisms to run-out-the-clock and limit the number of queries she had to address.

I was blessed to be able to watch the forum with a veteran of the U.S. Army Special Forces, Barry C. Jacobsen. He was especially interested in seeing how Clinton addressed the steady stream of information coming out from both the FBI and WikiLeaks that indicate she has been clearly lying about many issues.

Here is his assessment:

“Trump clearly won the match. Hillary Clinton was on the defensive the entire time. Trump’s tone and body language indicate he was comfortable in that arena, willing to address Lauer’s questions, and happy to respond to the regular people in the audience. At this point, most voters will see Trump as a plausible President.”

In this phase of the election, Americans are trying to determine which of the two candidates is more presidential.

@HillaryEarPiece must be ringing after hearing the news of Trump’s triumph in this pre-debate showdown!

[Featured image via Twitter].


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


I suspect it was a bug.

Wow. Kurt Schlichter will be both surprised and horrified to know that ANYBODY considers him “elite media”.

Amazing, Leslie. You move from one excess to another.

Whatever this gadget is its very likely been hacked and the results will be on Wikileaks shortly.

This is good for the leftoids. Now that the puppet strings have been detected, when Hillary’s fallen and can’t get up, they can blame her handlers.

But why didn’t they try harder to disguise her cyborg attachments? Now whenever something odd happens, and is seen by millions of viewers out here in TV land, we’ll suspect remote manipulation … maybe some sort of medication-delivery device triggered from her secret headquarters.

These cheesy low-rent InfoWars-style blogs you’re quoting from and pretending are serious, respectable sources are an embarrassment.

This site used to have higher standards than that.

After all the years of everyone around Hillary mumbling under their breath “stick it in your ear, bitch” she did and now everyone is questioning it.

So many uniformed posters (and sadly perhaps the OP/Host). And perhaps more than a few sexists. While rather uncommon for a male to wear close fitting earrings (anyone see the photo of Mr. Trump with what WAS some sort of an ear bud devise?), women DO.. This was posted a good half day after this was already Fact-Checked. Guess what? Unlike Mr. Trump’s unexplained ear-bud, this was an earring. 1) Hillary Clinton Wore ‘Secret Earpiece’ During Commander-in-Chief Forum 2) Hillary Clinton Did Not Wear An Earpiece: Here Are Close-Up Pictures To Prove It 3) Trump Jr. pushes Alex Jones’ insane ‘Clinton earpiece’ conspiracy – and the internet rips him apart 4) Trump’s campaign is promoting yet another bizarre Hillary Clinton conspiracy

    mailman in reply to JonW1. | September 9, 2016 at 8:56 am

    Oh my god…go back to your safe zone snowflake! Questioning whether a candidate is fit for the highest office on the planet IS NOT SEXISM!

    Get that through your thick skull. Questioning someones competence IS NOT SEXISM. Neither is questioning their health or whether they have lied about Americans being killed in Libya.

    Try and deflect as much as you want but that will not make the questions go away. Why Did HRC wire herself up for this farce we have come to call the first Presidential debate.

    tarheelkate in reply to JonW1. | September 9, 2016 at 9:08 am

    Your theory is that Clinton was wearing an earring inside her ear? Really?

Gee, Hillary Clinton a cheating fraud.


The Friendly Grizzly | September 8, 2016 at 8:54 pm

There was a tiny little piece of dirt in there, so she is growing a cultured pearl.

    I’m not positive but it looks more like a mushroom to me.

    While I’m here I have a question for Hillary.

    Mrs. Clinton the world is dying to know….
    Is it bikini or thong?


So, anyone sat in a townhall forum with Hillary with a miniature radio receiver (assuming you get it by the Secret Service) to prove that thing in her ear is a hearing aid or also a radio receiver?

    tarheelkate in reply to Ufawlk. | September 9, 2016 at 9:11 am

    I thought about the possibility it’s a hearing aid. Many people in their late 60s need them. It’s not a serious health problem. But if it’s a hearing aid, why won’t she just say so?

buckeyeminuteman | September 9, 2016 at 7:51 am

Huma Abedin: the woman behind the curtain behind the woman behind the curtain

    ronk in reply to Robert. | September 9, 2016 at 9:18 am

    one small problem, all the pictures they use to disprove it, shows her hair back over her ears, the pictures that have the ear piece show the hair down over her ears, looking like she was trying to hide the piece.

Remember, Trumpkins! When you’re stocking up on tinfoil supplies, be sure to do it through the good professor’s Amazon link.

He may as well profit from all this insanity he’s hosting.

    DaveGinOly in reply to Amy in FL. | September 9, 2016 at 7:20 pm

    Donald Trump and his supporters are not imagining that something was in Hillary’s ear during the event. It’s either a hearing aid (and she’s been concealing a physical disability that could be related to her head trauma) or it’s a device used to coach her during the event. No tinfoil hats are necessary.

I love this blog. Calling names is just rude and doesn’t further your position.

Look at the screen capture of the supposed email from Huma Abedin. Instead of “” it says state.GOY

It makes me question the authenticity of that particular wikileaked email

Could be brain matter.

Maybe her whole brain.

Another meltdown of the neverTrump crowd at LI.

Anybody remember the comedy bit where David Letterman would have Hello Deli owner Rupert Gee out on the street asking people questions provided by Letterman via an earpiece?

Notice that Letterman has a lot of spare time on his hands nowadays.