Image 01 Image 03

Black woman attacks white male for wearing dreadlocks, so what does SFSU do?

Black woman attacks white male for wearing dreadlocks, so what does SFSU do?

Plans “Afro-Themed” housing to mollify Black Lives Matter concerns. Wait, what?

Back in March, we blogged about a story from San Francisco State University that could only happen on one of today’s college campuses. A white male student was accosted by a young black woman who was also a student because he was wearing his hair in dreadlocks. The woman claimed this was a form of cultural appropriation.

At the time, I wrote:

One of the most interesting aspects of this situation is the male student’s insistence that the young woman has no right to tell him what to wear.

Millennials love being free to do what they want but since so many of them have signed onto the progressive campus culture of social justice they have essentially signed their freedom away to the collective.

When more students like this one get mugged by reality in this way, we might actually see a turning of the tide on campus.

Here’s a video of the incident, in case you missed it:

San Francisco State University has apparently come up with a solution to this problem.

Voluntary segregation.

Campus Reform reports:

SFSU plans ‘Afro-themed’ housing in wake of dreadlock confrontation

San Francisco State University has revealed plans to establish “Afro-themed” floors in residence halls following a confrontation between students last year over “cultural appropriation.”

According to CBS San Francisco, school administrators are in the early stages of their plan to create living communities tailored specifically to African American students, which is apparently a response to demands from the Black Student Union for increased inclusivity, as well as the growing influence of the Black Lives Matter movement on college campuses.

Notably, SFSU made news earlier this year for a racially charged incident which showed a black female student verbally and physically assaulting a white male student simply because he had dreadlocks.

“We want to be pro-active responding to some of the issues that have been brought out by the Black Lives Matter movement,” university spokesman Jonathan Morales told CBS. “We want to work with our student leaders in the Black Student Union and other students of color organizations to make sure that our living and learning community here is inclusive.”

Although the dorms are tailored to black students, they are open to anyone who wishes to live in them.

So to recap, the solution to a progressive problem like cultural appropriation is…


And that’s progress, how again?


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


thalesofmiletus | September 22, 2016 at 8:41 am

I like how the radical SJW culture we see on campus is backing into such traditional ideas as formal consent to sex (i.e.: marriage) and reducing violence between different people via physical separation.

All they need for total irony over the threshold of the “colored” dorms is the phrase, “Segregation Now, Segregation Forever.)

Bringing back segregation?

They have not studied any history at all. Anyone remember President Eisenhower and “desegregation”?

The liberals/progressives are getting them to go back on the plantation voluntarily.

Just exactly what constitutes an African-American themed environment? Pictures of Mumia Abu-Jamal? Theme nights where they set things on fire and find white people to beat up? Seminars in how to use your EBT card when your degree in Sub-continent Diaspora doesn’t land you a high paying job? Chicken and waffles? This is the most patently ridiculous idea any lame-brained college administrator has ever dreamed up. I thought the SCOTUS ruled that “separate but equal” was not ideal back in the 1950s. Now it’s de rigueur? Gimme a break.

Humphrey's Executor | September 22, 2016 at 9:11 am

Could if be that Brown v. Bd of Ed was wrong? Can such heresy be uttered?

Well, we have 60 years of history to look at. Are blacks in the US better educated now than they were 60 years ago?

    legacyrepublican in reply to Humphrey's Executor. | September 22, 2016 at 9:18 am

    George Wallace has stopped spinning in his grave and is now restin’ in peace.

    The Friendly Grizzly in reply to Humphrey's Executor. | September 23, 2016 at 1:04 am

    If some of the schools in DC and NYC, pre-Brown, are anything to go by, the blacks are far worse off now. Not all of the schools by any stretch, but many of them, with their black teachers and black staff, brooked no nonsense from their students, and the results were often very good.

    In all sincerity, I say that it just may BE worth reconsidering Brown vs Board.

      Brown’s daughter said that the whole point of the suit wasn’t to make sure that black and white children sat next to each other in the same classroom, but rather to make sure that all children in a district had the same opportunities, i.e., don’t give a predominantly white school music and art and up-to-date supplies in adequate amounts and not do the same for a predominantly minority school.

Time to end public funding of education.

Frankly, he deserves it. He is a SJW imitating blacks because he thinks it’s cool.


And that’s progress, how again?

You have to hand it to the progressives. They’ve managed to get black Americans to accept and desire a concept they shed blood to reject 50 years ago.

Can’t wait to see how they get them to accept, and want a return to slavery.

It’s worse than segregation – it’s an invitation to more cultural appropriation!

The new Afro-themed dorm will be open to non-African American students, but anyone who lives there will be appropriating every minute they’re in the dorm.

If whites can be attacked for wearing dreadlocks, then blacks should be attacked for straightening their hair, for dying their hair blond, red, for wearing wigs, etc.

After all, we want to be consistent, don’t we?

    pst314 in reply to Observer. | September 22, 2016 at 1:31 pm

    Also for using any of the arts and technology created by white people. Turnabout is fair play.

      The Friendly Grizzly in reply to pst314. | September 23, 2016 at 1:07 am

      Turnabout was a down-market label of Angel Records, too!

      Being serious: what would the rappers do without microphones, turntables, recording machines, and media-making devices to distribute their rubbish?

What interesting people. He’s a beta-human walking around with a case of latent Stockholm Syndrome and she’s an opportunistic saidist/predator wrapped in a black hide. They were made for each other. Can’t those crazy kids see it?

The victim in this case is clearly a Beta-male progressive fascist as a real man would have defended himself from the criminal.

    tobiathan in reply to ConradCA. | September 24, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    Funny, and sad-stupid, was her dragging him back down the stairs and then shouting “get your hands off me!”.

    Classic ghetto-logic: do a bad thing then point and yell at someone else to distract.

    Like the time the IQ-70 who attacked me from behind w/a crowbar and told the police he was the one attacked. Worse- he and i were friends for years until he decided i was “acting black”. So, that justified a crowbar attack from behind.

    Needless to say, the cops almost believed him b/c i beat the black off him waiting for the cops and ambulance.

    Sub-human morons should not be free-range.

I would suggest, then, a Jewish-themed floor.

And if the response is that there are very few Jews, I’d say

“Even more of a minority, then.”

So if a black women bleaches her hair blonde/straightens it. not only is she guilty of looking foolish but she has committed cultural appropriation? And that means I can “get in her face and call her out?”

    jack burns in reply to katiejane. | September 22, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    Please check the current BLM and by-laws but I’m pretty sure that you may not do so since your race is tainted by the original sin of privilege.

Oh, you want to play the cultural appropriation game do you? Who invented universitiies? Eh, Europeans. Everyone who is not a descendant from European stock, it’s time to GTFO campus. Same goes for plumbing, electricity, books, modern clothing (anything more advanced than a loincloth) medicine, computers and so on. Or, we could make a deal: If these savages want to use the products of our cultural heritage they’re welcome to. So long as they assimilate into the culture that so graciously shares our wealth with them.

Who’s culturally appropritaing?!? Is she Minoan, Greek, or Egyptian? And what’s wrong with liking a culture enough to follow their style? Disney is pulling Maui halloween costumes based off their upcomming movie “Moana” since only Polynesians can dress like Polynesians?!? (See: )

From Wiki:

Some of the earliest depictions of dreadlocks date back as far as 3600 years to the Minoan Civilization, one of Europe’s earliest civilizations centred in Crete (modern Greece). Frescoes discovered on the Aegean island of Thera (modern Santorini, Greece), depict individuals with braided hair styled in long dreadlocks.

In ancient Egypt examples of Egyptians wearing locked hairstyles and wigs have appeared on bas-reliefs, statuary and other artifacts. Mummified remains of ancient Egyptians with locked wigs, have also been recovered from archaeological sites.

So is this the “right side of history” that the progressives keep telling me that we’re moving towards?

Isn’t cultural appropriation the very definition of a melting pot?