Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Media Giving The Clintons a Marriage Makeover

Media Giving The Clintons a Marriage Makeover

Camelot 2.0

In addition to ignoring as many of Hillary’s negatives as possible, another form of media bias is happening in this election cycle. The media is rehabilitating Bill and Hillary’s marriage.

It’s easier to see the Clintons back in the White House if they’re perceived as a happy and normal couple, not the scandal plagued, loveless pair who stayed together for purely political purposes.

To aid in their image makeover, we’re seeing pieces like this one from CNN:

The surprising secret to Bill and Hillary Clinton’s marriage

Tuesday night, Bill Clinton took the stage at the Democratic National Convention to make the case for another Clinton: the former U.S. Secretary of State– and his former First Lady — Hillary Clinton, as the next President of the United States.

It was a politically historic speech — the first time a former commander-in-chief would speak on behalf of a life partner who herself had made history as the first female nominee of a major party.

Bill Clinton has always been a gifted orator and this address was no different; it was powerful, convincing and heartfelt. But it was more than just a speech to satisfy an agenda; far more than a means to a political end. Loving, respectful, proud, and very human, his speech spoke volumes not only about his wife, the candidate, but, more notably, about the modern marriage ideal.

There was firstly, and undeniably, love. Before millions of viewers, Bill Clinton spoke of the first time he saw Hillary. He described, in personal detail, the qualities about her that he believes make her a good candidate for President and how they are similar to the qualities that make her a good wife, mother, friend.

The article briefly mentions the “extramarital affairs” then gets back on track with this:

The fact is that the Clintons’ marriage has survived, perhaps even thrived, to become a very real and modern testament to the marriage bond. There is sacrifice, but there is also a notable lack of sacrifice. Hillary supported Bill for many years, but not while abandoning her dreams entirely. He either didn’t ask, or she didn’t comply. Either way, they made it work, through challenges and successes.

Now, some 40 years in, the Clintons’ marriage has emerged to serve as an example: partnership can take many forms, and sacrifice, while important, needn’t be absolute.

As bad as that is, it’s not the worst example.

Life News recently found this gem:

Cosmopolitan Magazine Says Bill and Hillary Clinton are “Good Marriage Role Models”

Only the sex-obsessed writers at Cosmopolitan could try that line out. There are a lot of ways to try to defend the Clintons, but that’s not one.

In the article The Clintons and the Reality of a Long Marriage, the women’s magazine attempts to make the case that the Clinton marriage is actually one that everyone should look up to. Apparently, hating philandering men is no longer a part of the feminist agenda. At least, as long as one’s wife is running for president.

Bill Cllinton’s lengthy stroll down memory lane reminded Cosmo writer Ada Calhoun that the Clintons’ 45-year marriage has “outlasted the Gores, the first two Trump marriages, and the first two Gingrich marriages.” Wow, rather a low bar. Why not throw in Elizabeth Taylor or Henry VIII?

The article attacks divorcees Trump, Giuliani, and Gingrich for all being critical of Hillary standing by her cheating man. These men, Calhoun laments, think “you should have the ‘decency’ to leave your spouse” if you cheat on them. Never mind the decency to not cheat on them in the first place, right Bill?

But virtuous Hillary Clinton stuck by her man! She “could have put her husband’s recklessness behind her like a bad haircut and moved on to continue her change-making and achievements without him too. But she stayed.” And now, the sweet old couple “get to be doting grandparents together, mutually supporting each other in their latest acts, and potentially becoming the first married to couple to ever both be President, which will make a good Christmas letter.”

Expect more historical revisionism as we go forward into the fall.

By November, the FBI investigation will be the stuff of myths.

Featured image via YouTube.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“The first rapist to give a speech supporting his rape-apologist wife.” Meanwhile, no word on whether Hillary will repudiate her support for racist murderer “Reverend” Al Sharpton.

legacyrepublican | August 4, 2016 at 2:40 pm

I feel like Bill is still singing “Tiptoe through the Trollops with me.”

OnlyRightDissentAllowed | August 4, 2016 at 3:09 pm

This line of attack is a non-starter. I smell desperation.

A marriage of convenience becomes a convenient marriage. (Ashtrays optional)

Stand by her man? Doesn’t that sound so passive and sweet. And Stalin stood by communism as a political and economic philosophy. Oh, and Stalin murdered tens of millions of people.

This evil woman actively tried to destroy Bill’s victims. EVIL. Her apologists are as disgusting as she is.

    OnlyRightDissentAllowed in reply to TX-rifraph. | August 4, 2016 at 7:13 pm

    Actually ‘The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy’ tried to destroy him. It has been documented now.

    All you could get him on was lying about oral sex. Donald Trump brags about that.

    Couldn’t get him, but the blind rage hatred has you going after her. Too bad you picked a grifter and his con is falling apart. He can’t go the distance. He will continue to self-destruct.

      Hillary lied when she first used the term Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. In an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today Show on January 17, 1998 she claimed the VRWC was responsible for the false rumors about Monica Lewinsky. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vast_right-wing_conspiracy#The_Today_Show_interview Hillary knew the truth at the time. And the press knew she was lying but let her continue to use the term with impunity.

      Bill Clinton was not impeached for lying about oral sex. And you know it. The President of the United States who was an attorney and past Attorney General of AK lied to a federal judge and federal grand jury, withheld evidence, and suborned perjury when he not only told Lewinsky to lie but said he’d tell her what to say. Clinton and his cadre were treating Lewinsky like dirt till she reveal she had that semen-stained dress.

      Bill Clinton paid a fine — and facing the embarrassment of being barred from practicing law before the Supreme Court, he resigned from the AK bar.

      If he had not lied and just told the truth, the whole affair would have blown over in a couple of weeks, as evidenced by polls that showed he could have been elected a third time. So the Clintons lied and covered up and put the country through hell for nothing.

      The Lewinsky Affair came out of false testimony in the Paula Jones case in which Bill Clinton paid a fine of $850,000.

      It appears that Hillary is a much better liar than her husband.

It might be more convincing if they wrote it up in the style of a Nigerian e-mail scam. Anything involving both Hillary and illicit money is automatically believable.

Vomit.

CNN covered up for Saddam Hussein, too.

Eason Jordan, the VP that spent two years running around the world telling people in other countries (falsely) that the US was “targeting” journalists, tried to pretend that the coverup was for fear of the reporters’ safety, but the coverup also guaranteed CNN access to Hussein.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=73a_1181328755

Is it possible to put a value, in dollars and cents, to the contributions made by MSM to Hitlary’s campaign ?

We are used to watching actors and actresses portray love in a performance before a camera or on stage. Why should we be surprised to see one of the premier politicians of his time give a speech that does the same thing?

And why, given the years-long defacto separate lives these two have led, would anybody believe the love portrayed in this way is any more real than what we see in the movies?

Love you until Great Birnam wood to high Dunsinane hill Shall come.

Ride those fat ankles, Bill.

Would the marriage have lasted if Bill Clinton lost the race for the presidency? I think not.

One big thing that the GOP misses all the time. Democratic politicians constantly deride the 1% and complain about excesses, but when you examine them, they are the ones who are living like the 1% they deride, and showing signs of extreme elitism.

Only the rich and upper, upper middle class could live the lives the Clintons live and survive financially.

buckeyeminuteman | August 5, 2016 at 1:47 pm

What do you get when you cross a crooked lawyer with a crooked politician? Chelsea Clinton…

Hillary more than enabled Bill Clinton’s personal war on women. For a time in the White House she was in charge of investigating and harassing the women who said they were abused by her husband. She knew the women were telling the truth. The same way she knew the truth when on the Today Show she blamed the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy for the rumors about Monica Lewinsky.

After much research, Christopher Hitchens concluded that Bill Clinton was guilty of raping Juanita Broaddrick.

A chapter in Hitchens’ book NO ONE LEFT TO LIE TO is titled IS THERE A RAPIST IN THE OVAL OFFICE?

Hitchens concludes the chapter this way:

“What are the chances that three socially and personally respectable women, all three of them political supporters of Mr. Clinton and none of them known to each other, would confect or invent almost identical experience which they did not desire to make public. And how possible would it be for a network of anti-Clinton rumor-mongers to create, let alone ventilate, such a coincidence? The odds that any of these ladies is lying seem to me to approach zero; their reasons for reticence are all perfectly intelligible.”

After covering up for her husband, harassing the women he abused, Hillary is just as guilty as he is.

The MSM went back to alleged high school incidents involving Romney but can’t seem to find the “energizer bunny” Bill is schtupping in Chappaqua.

Bill Clinton insulted the nation by turning the White House, The Peoples House, into a bordello. If Hillary allows Bill to stay in the White House, if she is elected, it would be a repeat of the insult. Bill should never be allowed in the WH again.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend