Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Scarborough: ‘I Don’t Question Comey’s Integrity. I Question His Courage’

Scarborough: ‘I Don’t Question Comey’s Integrity. I Question His Courage’

Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco

Last night, I emailed our Legal Insurrection leader Bill Jacobson to say I was counting on Joe Scarborough to have his finest moment this morning in light of the fiasco of the failure of the FBI to recommend the indictment of Hillary Clinton.

This morning, Scarborough rose to the occasion. With significant support from Mika Brzezinski, Morning Joe‘s opening segment was one long blast at Hillary — for doing what she did with her email and lying about it — at James Comey — for failing to indict — and at President Obama — for putting his thumb on the scale on Hillary’s behalf. There were many noteworthy moments that you will find in the video montage we’ve assembled. One highlight: Scarborough says that while he doesn’t question Comey’s integrity, “I question his courage.”

The mood in conservative circles since Comey’s announcement has been one that goes beyond disappointment to anger, depression and a sense of helplessness. For now, our only resort is the ballot box. Do the #NeverTrump people really want to perpetuate this kind of brazen lawlessness for another four to eight years?

Readers are encouraged to view the video to get the full sense of the comprehensive condemnation that the Morning Joe crew, with the exception of Hillary supporter Steve Rattner, levelled at the Clintons, Comey and President Obama.  Among the other highlights were Joe blasting the media for being “stupid” enough to give big coverage to Hillary’s campaign appearance yesterday with Obama, falling for the “nothing to see here, move along.”

Also, Mark Halperin, whose sources are usually strong [he said two days ago, for example, that the Hillary campaign was feeling very relaxed regarding any possibility of an indictment], predicted that we will be hearing from FBI investigators and prosecutors who might have a different view from Comey’s as to whether Hillary should have been indicted. We’ll stay tuned.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: What just happened?

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: I mean —

JOE: What just happened? I mean, I don’t get it. It’s interesting, I was actually, going to write a post for Washington Post two nights ago and title it “I don’t get it,” because everybody was saying she’s not going to be charged. And I read the statutes and I looked at all the information and I saw the people who had been charged in the past for doing much less than she did and then yesterday morning Jonah Goldberg in the National Review had a column called “I don’t get it.”

This is like a scene out of Big. You’re Tom Hanks and you’re looking at this thing. And I don’t get it. There are people that have been convicted with no intent for doing far, far less and their only crime in the end was their last name wasn’t Clinton, so they didn’t walk. It’s staggering. And then you look, Mika, at what’s happened over the past week with the meeting between Clinton and Lynch. You look at the dangling of the job offer in front of Loretta Lynch in the New York Times. You look at them trying to hide the interview on Saturday morning, Fourth of July weekend, and then Comey yesterday coming out saying she’s guilty but we’re not going to charge her with anything. Which is in effect if you read the statutes and Rudy Giuliani is coming on later today, you read them. It was staggering what we saw yesterday. She’s guilty, but we’re not going to charge her.

. . .

JOE: It also proves, Mika, she just didn’t tell the truth. From the very beginning. She just — we have two candidates running for President of the United States who are completely disconnected from the truth.

MIKA: So, what we have and what we just showed our viewers and we have more, says that for itself. It’s kind of hard to deny. I guess one does it better than the other, in terms of the two candidates. Which is really depressing. And alarming. . . . .

NICOLLE WALLACE: [Comey] cemented with those six exhibits what a lot of people worry about with her, which is that she has a horrifically difficult relationship with the truth. That the Clintons don’t just think they’re above the law, they function in government as though they are above the law.

JOE: And by the way, they time and time again have proven to be above the law. You can lie under oath before a federal grand jury and you’re fine. No, you get disbarred. They disbarred Bill Clinton, but you’re fine. You skate. Any of us lie in front of a federal grand jury, we would go to jail. We just would. If any of us mishandled classified information that way, it would not be followed by a “but we’re not going to file charges.” We would go to jail. There is a naval reservist last year who just got some information which we’ll tell you about, just put some classified information on a private laptop and took it home to his apartment. Had no intent to distribute: arrested, convicted, busted.

. . .

STEVE RATTNER: You have to decide whether you’re going to question the integrity of James Comey who until now has had an unimpeachable reputation for integrity.

JOE: I don’t question, I don’t question —

RATTNER: And where he said very definitively that there was no basis to prosecute her and no responsible prosecutor would have prosecuted her.

MIKA: But that’s not the only thing he said.

JOE: I don’t question James Comey’s —

RATTNER: Joe just said that anybody else would have gone to jail, and James Comey is saying —

JOE: Anybody else would have gone to jail.

RATTNER: Well that’s not what James Comey said.

JOE: Well let me just say: I don’t question James Comey’s integrity, I question his courage.

RATTNER: He lacked the question? You question the courage —

JOE: Yes.

RATTNER: — of a guy who rushed to John Ashcroft’s bedside to put off the chief of staff to the President of the United States?

JOE: I do. Yes, I do. Because the FBI last year under James Comey convicted a man who did far, far less.

MIKA: All right, gentlemen, let’s look at this from a different perspective.

JOE: And I wonder how he’s feeling this morning? Go ahead.

MIKA: There is a big picture that is troubling as well, I think equally as disturbing because after that litany of violations that he outlined, some might say that you would think he would recommend charges. Nope. That didn’t happen. And it seems to cap this investigation, which many feel has the appearances of impropriety from the start. Let’s go back to President Obama. President Obama. The President of the United States speaking out on the case —

JOE: Who runs the Justice Department.
MIKA: — which is still active.

RATTNER: But not the FBI. Comey has a ten-year term.

MIKA: In April, in April: take a look.

BARACK OBAMA: Hillary Clinton was an outstanding Secretary of State. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy. And, what I also know, because I handle a lot of classified information, is that there is classified and then there’s classified. I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security. Now, what I’ve also said is that, and she has acknowledged that there’s a carelessness in terms of managing e-mails that she has owned and she recognizes. But I also think it is important to keep this in perspective.

JOE: I’ve got to say, Mika, it was also shocking. We mentioned back in October I think on 60 Minutes where he said, in October, while they were investigating. The President of the United States who runs the Justice Department: no evidence, she did nothing to jeopardize national security. That’s not what Comey said yesterday. And here you have the chief law enforcement officer of the United States deciding almost a year before the findings come out that there is nothing to see. That is frightening.

MIKA: Flash forward to eight days ago when President Bill Clinton had a private meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Phoenix inside her plane. Lynch says they discussed personal issues like golf and grandkids unrelated to the investigation of Secretary Clinton. Only, it was followed up days later in New York Times which reported that Clintons appear to dangle a job in front of the attorney general. “Democrats close to Mrs. Clinton say she may decide to retain Ms. Lynch who took office in April of 2015.”

JOE: This written in the New York Times in the midst of an investigation that could indict Hillary Clinton and end her presidential run and the New York Times doesn’t even write at the end of that sentence, Mika: currently Mrs. Lynch will have a decision on whether to prosecute Hillary Clinton for matters related to her e-mail.

. . .

JOE: And you’ve got the President of the United States, again, we’ve gone down this litany of just how horribly this administration has handled this investiation, and then you’ve got the President of the United States going out, trying to cover up the news of the day —

MIKA: Live at five.

JOE: — and there were people actually stupid enough to lead with Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail together. Stupid enough to take their bait. Stupid enough to follow what the white house wanted them to follow. Nothing to see here, move along. The whole thing really is an unfortunate stain on the Obama administration, is it not?

MARK HALPERIN: Well look, at the time the president said what he said, we discussed it at length on the program and it was either the case that he somehow knew the facts of the investigation and was sort of teasing them out, or he was just saying it with no facts. It seemed like the wrong thing to do at the time and I think that’s been borne out. Because he couldn’t have possibly known then all the things that Comey listed yesterday. Comey did something extraordinary.

JOE: So you’re just saying, you’re right. The president just made it up six months ago, eight months ago.

HALPERIN: He must have.

JOE: If you listen to what Comey said. The president was dead wrong when he went on 60 Minutes in the fall saying that she didn’t jeopardize national security. He was dead wrong and reckless while the FBI agents were investigating this case.

HALPERIN: No basis to say it and clearly an improper thing for a president to do in the midst of an ongoing investigation from which he has to keep some arm length distance. What Comey yesterday did was extraordinary and in some ways improper. It’s not really the role of the FBI or a prosecutor to say: here are all the facts we found.He convicted her without giving her in some ways in the court of public opinion without giving her a chance to respond.

I believe now, because he’s opened the door, we’re going to eventually hear from FBI agents who worked on the case, be interesting to see if they all agreed with his decision. The prosecutors that the FBI was working in tandem with: what do they think about this decision? And it will be debated quite a bit in the context of the campaign trail. The Trump folks are looking at what Comey laid out or looking at some of the discrepancies between what she said and the facts. The fact that they claimed that they handed, they read every e-mail and meticulously handed over all the work-related ones has now by Comey’s account proven to be wrong. So I think other people, as Comey has extraordinarily weighed in, I think other people with knowledge of the case are likely, on the record and in other ways, to weigh in as well.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Thanks for the post, Mr. Finkelstein. As one who has gone “beyond disappointment to anger, depression and a sense of helplessness,” it gives me some hope to see that at least some on the left are outraged. But I really don’t want to have to watch MSNBC to learn that. 🙂

Mark Finkelstein | July 6, 2016 at 10:44 am

Thanks, Anonamom. Watching MSNBC is my, twisted, pleasure! And as we say: we watch so you don’t have to 😉

Halperin: “He [Comey] convicted her without giving her in some ways in the court of public opinion without giving her a chance to respond.”

My take is that Comey knew the time of day. That is, he knew that the DOJ would NEVER indict Hillary. Realizing that he did the best given the circumstances. A half loaf instead of no loaf sort of thing. He lays out all these facts, which Trump will wisely use and state as established/proven facts, and Hillary will have no defense with which to respond because the facts are now part of the record.

    Marco100 in reply to pfg. | July 6, 2016 at 12:01 pm

    Comey never stated that there was a lack of probable cause to indict her. He completely avoided and evaded the only relevant legal standard. At a minimum, he should have recommended that a grand jury be formed and that the facts should be presented in secrecy to the grand jury to let them to decide whether or not she should be charged with a crime.

I stopped watching Morning Joe when Joe started his insufferable daily I Hate Trump tirades but I woke up early today to be sure not to miss a minute. I didn’t care what Joe said. I was all about seeing Mika’s reaction to her beloved Hillary. She did not disappoint. Eye rolls AND head shaking. Gotta love it.

Scarborough does not seem to understand what integrity is. But, yes, Comey has no courage – he is a coward.

This is great stuff; It may even sway the minds of all 7 or 8 MSNBC viewers.

Does Neuticles have a sale going on for prosthetic testicles?

The standard on whether or not to prosecute Hillary Clinton is whether or not probable cause exists. James Comey’s silence on this critical issue was deafening. At no time did he ever suggest that the available evidence to the FBI failed to rise to the level of probable cause. His conclusion that “no reasonable prosecutor” would indict her, aside from being his purely subjective opinion, deliberately obfuscates the applicable legal standard.

Obviously, the existence of probable cause to indict or charge her with a crime(s) does not mean she would not be entitled to full and fair due process before a petit jury, and would still be presumed innocent until proven guilty. She would of course have that legal presumption of innocence as all indicted defendants do.

What Comey obviously should have done, if he was too cowardly or politically motivated to directly recommend charging her with a crime,at a minimum, was to have recommended that federal prosecutors empanel a grand jury with subpoena power to conduct further investigation. This would either have resulted in her indictment or a no true bill. Obviously Comey was well aware that recommending the formation of a grand jury would most likely have led to her indictment.

So he obfuscated.

“Last night, I emailed our Legal Insurrection leader Bill Jacobson to say I was counting on Joe Scarborough to have his finest moment …. “.

Sheezus, that’s not setting the bar very high, is it now? What’s with the slobbering love affair you have with JoeY? You can’t find someone sentient to cover?

    Mark Finkelstein in reply to Hanzo. | July 6, 2016 at 2:21 pm

    Hanzo, I have been very critical of Scarborough at times. So much so that Joe contacted the head of the organization where I previously blogged to complain about me.

    And if you look back through the archive of my relatively brief tenure at Legal Insurrection, you’ll see I have been critical of Scarborough on several occasions: his support for more gun control, his lauding of Elizabeth Warren as a VP candidate, his vulgar attack on Trump, his attack on Trump’s immigration policy, among other examples.

    However, I did expect Scarborough to criticize Comey’s decision and indeed he did so in articulate terms. Please view the video and let me know whether you disagree with what Joe had to say, and whether you feel they are the words of a non-sentient being.

      randian in reply to Mark Finkelstein. | July 6, 2016 at 2:27 pm

      This has nothing to do with Trump, but Scarborough still couldn’t resist smearing him during his discussion of what Comey said: “we have two candidates running for President of the United States who are completely disconnected from the truth”.

        Hanzo in reply to randian. | July 6, 2016 at 2:30 pm

        Exactly.

        princepsCO in reply to randian. | July 6, 2016 at 3:01 pm

        “…we have two candidates running for President of the United States who are completely disconnected from the truth”.

        Pretty accurate statement, that…and nonetheless, millions of people will still vote for both of them–a liberal crony capitalist and a lying, corrupt crony politician.

        Hello, civil war 2023.

      I did watch the video, and I did find Joe to be pretty much spot on. However, as noted by randian, his severe partisanship still wouldn’t allow him to comment without taking a jab at Trump.

      I find Scarborough to be a very disingenuous person, he’s certainly not a conservative, as he’s claimed, and he’s barely worthy of the moniker “RINO”, he’s more of a liberal progressive. I cringe every time I see him on the telly, and I immediately turn it. Combine his nonsense with Mika’s slavish attachment to anything Hillary and I find the Morning Joe Show to be a complete disaster. MSNBC uses Scarborough as a token Republican, elevating him in order to make other Republicans, especially conservatives, to look like a bunch of intolerant bigots. Come now, surely you can find someone else to highlight.

      As for his being right this 1 time, at least a broken clock is right twice a day.

      Perhaps you could have covered this instead? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttccv9Y4y-Q

stevewhitemd | July 6, 2016 at 2:22 pm

Okay, what did we not hear from Hillary yesterday and today?

Outrage.

Which is strange when you think of it, because she does outrage really, really well, and has done it for decades.

Here is the FBI Director telling everyone that Ms. Clinton was careless, negligent, derelict, and inappropriate in how she ran her office, handled her email, and kept state secrets. Remember, Hillary is telling everyone for months that she did nothing other than delete recipes and wedding plans. Now Mr. Comey is telling everyone that she’s crooked as all hell (even though he won’t push for indictment).

If you or I were innocent of a crime and a police officer, detective, FBI agent, etc was out there telling the world otherwise, you’d demand a retraction. You’d threaten a lawsuit. You’d proclaim your innocence far and wide.

Yesterday from Hillary? Crickets. It’s all over, nothing to see, move on.

She’s not acting like an innocent person. There’s a reason for that.

“You have to decide whether you’re going to question the integrity of James Comey who until now has had an unimpeachable reputation for integrity.”

Not anymore.

Comey is the John Roberts of the FBI.

What a bum.

Richard Aubrey | July 6, 2016 at 4:50 pm

Hate to have one of those weight-lifting accidents….

If he had integrity but not courage he would have resigned.

What he did proves he has absolutely no integrity whatsoever.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend