Image 01 Image 03

FBI interview days or weeks away, but Hillary knows nothing?

FBI interview days or weeks away, but Hillary knows nothing?

FBI has already interviewed several top aides, including Huma Abedin

Despite her continued insistence that her email and personal server scandal is a nothing burger, Hillary just can’t seem to stop herself from telling untruths.  Despite wide-spread reports that the FBI was moving on to the next phase of their investigation, interviewing Hillary aides, Hillary claimed this week that neither she nor any of her representatives have been contacted by the FBI to set up interviews.

The New York Post reports:

On Tuesday, MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell asked her outright: “Have you been contacted — or your representatives contacted — by the FBI to set up an interview” over her e-mail mess?

Clinton gave a flat “no.”

Watch the segment:

Days later, CNN reports that the FBI has already interviewed some of Hillary’s top aides, including Huma Abedin.

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

In recent weeks, multiple aides have been interviewed — some more than once, the officials said. A date for an FBI interview of Clinton has not been set, these officials said, but is expected in the coming weeks. Abedin has cooperated with the probe, the officials said. Lawyers for Abedin declined to comment. The officials say the interviews of Clinton and her aides would be a routine part of an investigation like this.

As the New York Post goes on to note:

Two days later, news broke that the FBI has already interviewed Clinton’s closest confidant, Huma Abedin, and other top aides. And officials close to the probe say Hillary’s to be interviewed in the next few weeks — which means she’s surely been contacted.

ABC News is reporting that the FBI will interview Hillary in “coming days”:

But she knows nothing?


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


“But she knows nothing?”

Well, no. She lies. A lot.

Bruce Hayden | May 8, 2016 at 11:17 am

I don’t think everyone gets it. For the most part, she doesn’t actually lie, but rather dissembles. She may be right that her “representatives” may not have been interviewed. These were her closest aid’s and minions, but are very likely not authorized to speak for her, and thus not “representatives”. It is the same sort of thing with the emails themselves – she makes a big deal about the emails not being marked as classified, when that is legally irrelevant. (And apparently ordered her people to remove classified markings n one occasion). You have to parse what she (and her husband) say very carefully (we all remember when he excused saying he hadn’t had sex with that woman because it was oral, and not vaginal, sex). They are Yale trained attorneys of the worst sort, bringing their legal passing to their dealings with the public.

    Frank G in reply to Bruce Hayden. | May 8, 2016 at 11:55 am

    No, she lies. About all things large and small, even when there’s no reason to lie or when the truth would be beneficial. It’s congenital

    Haverwilde in reply to Bruce Hayden. | May 8, 2016 at 1:54 pm

    No she does actually Lie. Her communication is intended to lead a person to the wrong conclusion, ‘parse’ my arse, she is a disgrace and is dishonest. If she is the best that the democrats can come up with, they are in real trouble. The same can be said for the GoPe as well, but I will take the crass over witch any day.

    Gremlin1974 in reply to Bruce Hayden. | May 8, 2016 at 6:56 pm

    Lies of omission are still lies, lol.

The smartest woman in the history of gender identity politics:

“Like with a cloth or something? ….”

Hillary Clinton’s emails: snore.
Donald Trump’s University: snore.
On Election Day vote Libertarian.
Or None Of The Above.
Or write in your own name.

Hillary as prez means more of the same old PC crap (but with feminist interests displacing black preference as the top priority).
Trump as prez means nothing accomplished at all, as both parties will gang up to impeach him within six months (unless his improbable choice as VP is Cruz, hated even more).

America survived Nixon.
America survived Carter,
America will survive whichever of these two ding-dongs is elected.

    tom swift in reply to JasonJay. | May 8, 2016 at 2:55 pm

    America won’t survive foreign invasion.

    There’s a tipping point. Nothing is forever.

    Nixon merely lied about something actually inconsequential to the nation at large.

    Carter was just a moron, as presidents go.

    As presidents go, Obama is also a moron, but a traitor as well. The damage that a-hole is doing to this nation will take generations to repair, if it is repairable at all. (Thank you, GOPe, for standing by and watching!)

    Mrs. Scum as president would put the last nail in coffin Obama has put the nation in.

    Most of the world’s other superpowers want America tamed. So does our current traitorous president. So will Mrs. Scum.

    Name an empire: they all had endings.

If all else fails, may she be charged with lying to the feds a la Martha Stewart.

    stevewhitemd in reply to showtime8. | May 8, 2016 at 5:39 pm

    I’m sure her entire legal team is watching out for precisely that — they got Martha Stewart, Scooter Libby, and many other folks who thought they were smarter than the average FBI agent. I’m not sure the DoJ and White House would press ahead on a charge of lying during an investigation, but I’m comfortably certain it would upset the FBI guys enough that they’d pursue her forever.

      Gremlin1974 in reply to stevewhitemd. | May 8, 2016 at 7:03 pm

      It honestly may come down to whether she looks like she is going to win the election as to how the DOJ responds. If she is likely to win they will stand down. However, if she is in free fall and going to lose anyway, she will be sacrificed to the cause of liberalism to show that they hold even their elite to high standards.

        Bruce Hayden in reply to Gremlin1974. | May 8, 2016 at 11:38 pm

        I know that the FBI is technically in the DoJ, but by law, it does have a lot of independence. Under Obama, the DoJ does not – Lynch will do whatever he tells her to do. If he doesn’t, I think that Lynch has enough loyalty to the Clintns and the Dem party not to indict Hillary, esp if she is the nominee. Which is why I currently expect a criminal referral from the FBI to the DoJ, and then them running out the clock considering whether or not to indict. Safer than rejecting the referral, due to the promised leaks. And, then, maybe nice pardons for all involved as Obama leaves office.

    If all else fails, maybe she’ll drop dead during one of her coughing fits.

Gremlin1974 | May 8, 2016 at 7:00 pm

I know a lot of people have their hopes up of federal charges against Hillary, but in reality the chances of it actually happening are almost non-existent.

What will eventually happen is her defense will be that she follwed the advice of someone whom she trusted to give her good information and she thought she was within the policy. Then the “person she trusted” will be investigated and never charged and it will all just go away. We have seen it happen to many times.

    good enough morgan in reply to Gremlin1974. | May 8, 2016 at 9:44 pm

    Dead on. The best to be hoped for is DOJ determining there’s nothing to be prosecuted and resignations at the FBI.

    I don’t think she will be indicted. She will be the Democratic Party’s nominee. Having said that, I’m certain that there will be some serious leaks from the FBI if they do not feel that justice is done.

    Johnny Pony-boy Silky was right: Two Americas- The oligarchs and the rest of us proles.

I bet she never goes to an interview. She will have lawyers wrangling to keep her away from the FBI.
For her to go to this interview, is not in her best interests .She is flirting with committing perjury..
If she does go ,there will be another case of Whitewater amnesia.
I don’t know ,I don’t remember.

Or it could be
Mrs Clinton do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
Clinton “ARF ARF”

    Bruce Hayden in reply to dmi60ex. | May 8, 2016 at 11:44 pm

    The problem there is the Scooter Libby precedent. He was essentially convicted of lying when saying he couldn’t remember. Moreover, do we really want a President who can’t remember the various security briefings and classes she took, or the agreements she signed? With Trump playing this up as evidence she isn’t physically fit enough for the job?

Gremlin1974 | May 9, 2016 at 5:05 am

“she isn’t physically fit enough for the job?”

She hasn’t been physically fit since long before this. I mean she got a blood clot in her brain and now takes medications daily to prevent it from happening again.

It has also been reported that David Kendall, Hillary’s lawyer, ahs been in touch with the FBI almost daily. Negotiating perhaps? For whom, Hillary, himself? Obama? For what, time? A deal?

For now it’s a national embarrassment with the potential, depending upon who may have breached her server and what may have been learned, to become a disaster with long term ramifications. Either way is it a disgraceful state of affairs.

Nothing’s going to happen to Hillary.

The DOJ’s got bathrooms in North Carolina to deal with.