Image 01 Image 03

Humorless Pro-Abortion Feminists Live Tweet Criticisms of Super Bowl Ads

Humorless Pro-Abortion Feminists Live Tweet Criticisms of Super Bowl Ads

Does it get any worse than this?

NARAL Pro-Choice America is live tweeting its criticisms of various Super Bowl ads.

It’s everything you would expect. And no, it’s NOT THE ONION, because in The Onion even feminists take a break:


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


This HAS to be a parody account. Right?

    Exiliado in reply to Subjag. | February 7, 2016 at 9:00 pm

    Never over-estimate the intelligence of that crowd.

    If it sounds like parody, it’s most likely the real stuff.

Humanizing a human baby before its birth, really?

Evolution is a chaotic process that begins with conception. It is not characterized by an arbitrary threshold of viability or a selective state of convenience or desire.

The “final solution” is not a viable choice.

The rainbow is objectively lackluster. Transgender does not begin with homosexual and end with crossover orientations (i.e. biases) and expressions (i.e. prejudices). The congruence movement (“=”) need to defend their advocacy for pro-choice policy or selective exclusion.

    n.n in reply to n.n. | February 8, 2016 at 1:46 am

    Judging by the feedback, it is evident that there are people who support selective or arbitrary discrimination of politically unfavorable orientations and behaviors. Perhaps the winds will change again, they will discover their principles, and reject the pro-choice religion.

I think the great, irreverent cartoonist John Callahan pegs this perfectly with the cartoon on the cover of his book “Freaks of Nature”, picturing the honest lawyer, the obedient cat and the happy-go-lucky feminist.

Women break for men. Sexist.

Men break for women. Sexist.

Avert your eyes!

humanizing fetuses?

What the hell do they think they are? Puppies?

    Their nihilistic faith characterizes them as a clump of cells, mass of tissue, or assembly of organs to be rendered incoherent (i.e. dead or inanimate) in an abortion industry clinic or cannibalized in a Reactive Parenthood office. Paradoxically, this “final solution” was normalized or promoted for the children.

    Well, nihilistic faith or an ingenuous strategy for survival of the fittest. Who would have thought that women and men could be convinced to voluntarily sacrifice their own children in exchange for promises of secular wealth, pleasure, leisure, and favor? Only in an advanced state of civilization.

    JPL17 in reply to Sanddog. | February 7, 2016 at 11:18 pm

    “What the hell do they think [fetuses] are? Puppies?”

    Sanddog, you’re making the mistake of humanizing feminists.

Women fight over the wedding bouquet. Men fight over the women who fight over the wedding bouquet.

What part of normal does NARAL actually get?

It’s boy-girl relationships 101. I wonder if anyone else is similarly confused or suffering from an advanced state of nihilism.

you couldn’t find a single female astronaut to feature in your ad?

Quick…can you name one of the female astronauts who went to the moon? I didn’t think so.

I’m sure they’d blame the 1960’s white patriarchy for that.

One thing nice about feminists is their ability to seek out and point at prime examples of humor. All I have to do is to look at the commercials they hate the most and I know I’ve found the best ones.

What was wrong with the Kevin Hart Hyundai commercial? The ad was making fun of the “patriarchy,” with dad’s actions being presented as bizarre and over-the-top. The man in the commercial was the source of the humor because of his abnormal behavior. The commercial was not promoting the behavior nor was it suggesting that young women out on dates require supervision or are otherwise not to be trusted to use their own judgment. These “feminist” are just looking for trouble, and finding it even in places where it doesn’t exist.

How many women does it take to change a lightbulb?

Naral: “THAT’S NOT FUNNY!!!!!”

No, dearie … to you, nothing is …..

There is no ambiguity. To have or not have sex. That is the choice.

A human life begins its evolution from conception. The consensus is that humanity is exceptional. Let’s recognize the merits of that classification and travel the chaotic path together.

There are natural imperatives and two moral axioms: individual dignity and intrinsic value. Go forth and reconcile.

Finally, it’s an established point under the Matriarchy of Mother Nature, and under the Patriarchy of God. Pick one, the other, or both, and reach the same conclusion. Men and women, boys and girls, are equal and complementary.

NARAL: Kill your baby.™

MaggotAtBroadAndWall | February 8, 2016 at 6:57 am

Those advertisers paid small fortunes to reach the Super Bowl audience. Now NARAL pays NOTHING to use social media to highjack the advertisers messaging for NARAL’s benefit.

Sort of like how Trump highjacks the media almost daily by making outrageous statements to get the media to cover him for free.

Democrats know how to work the system to their advantage.

“Transphobic & implies women OK w being objectified as long as they have snacks.”

So, it’s OK for women to be objectified by NARALY women as long as they tweets? #I’mBuyingIt”

My pregnant wife and I laughed very hard at the Doritos add with the pregnant mother and the baby and the Doritos eating father. It reminded us very much of our ultrasound experience.

To paraphrase a great old STYX tune, these are angry, ugly women who have “too much time on their hands.” (And before you call me sexist, I’m a woman)

Makes me want to eat Doritos and Snickers in my brand-new Hyundai…which is strange because I’ve never wanted a Hyundai before…

Ok. Dad’s as Clueless and Mothers as uptight is a little overdone but apparently there is always room for more “humourless feminist thought police”.
The pro life crowd should have put this on the Super Bowl to really blow their minds.