Carly in? CNN Changes Debate Qualification Criteria
And then there was a debate main stage shake up
Late Tuesday afternoon CNN announced an amendment to the rules for its debate scheduled for September 16.
CNN’s original rules included time-specific polling data that did not accurately mirror current GOP primary field standings. In particular, Carly Fiorina’s rapid rise in the polls.
Last week, a spokeswoman from CNN said the network would not yield to candidate complaints, saying:
“Our criteria are totally appropriate and we have been absolutely transparent about them throughout. If the Fiorina campaign had an issue with them they could have raised it when we published them in May. They did not,” the spokeswoman said. “Revising the criteria on the eve of the debate at the demand of and solely for the benefit of one particular candidate is not something we have done in the past, and we will not do it now.”
Mounting pressure from news outlets, public figures, and Carly Fiorina’s campaign seems to have caused CNN to reconsider.
The network explained that a lack of national polling data was to blame. With a significantly greater number of national polls taken during the same timeframe in previous election cycles, CNN claims they had no reason to believe this cycle would have rendered a polling deficiency.
Rather than look to national polling averages in data collected from July to September, CNN has amended the debate qualification criteria so that rankings will be decided based on polling data released from August 7 to September 10.
CNN is amending the criteria for its Republican presidential debate on September 16, possibly opening the door for Carly Fiorina to join the other top-tier candidates on the stage.
The cause: a lack of national public polling following the August 6 debate has so far provided only three new polls to determine the lineup for the Reagan Presidential Debate, according to a CNN statement.
As a result, CNN reevaluated its criteria and decided to add a provision that better reflects the state of the race since the first Republican presidential debate in August, the network announced Tuesday.
Now, any candidate who ranks in the top 10 in polling between August 6 and September 10 will be included.
The adjustment may result in additional candidates joining the top-tier debate, but the final podium placements will not be known until the eligibility window closes on September 10.
“In the event that any candidate is polling in the top 10 in an average of approved national polls released between August 7th and September 10th, we will add those candidates to our top tier debate, even if those candidates did not poll in the top 10 in an average of approved national polls between July 16th and September 10th,” CNN said in a statement. “We have discussed these changes with the Republican National Committee and the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, and they are fully supportive.”
…CNN, which is telecasting the Republican National Committee-sanctioned debate, released criteria for the debate May 20 that outlined specific polls and a timeframe to determine eligibility for this event. As of Tuesday, only three polls recognized by CNN have been released, and it appears there will not be enough to make a fair editorial judgment before the September 16th debate, according to the network.
The network said that from August through mid-September 2007, there were 16 polls released. During the same period in 2011, 15 polls were released. Based on previous poll releases, CNN created its original criteria.
“In May, we announced criteria for our September 16th Republican debates at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library,” CNN said in a statement. “We said that we would use the average of approved national polls from July 16th through September 10th to determine the makeup of the debates. At the time, we expected there to be many more national polls following the first Republican debate, in August, than there appears there will be.”
CNN continued, “We learned this week that there will likely be only two more polls by the deadline of September 10th. In a world where we expected there to be at least 15 national polls, based on historic precedent, it appears there will be only five. As a result, we now believe we should adjust the criteria to ensure the next debate best reflects the most current state of the national race.”
Meanwhile, in camp Fiorina:
We look forward to watching @CarlyFiorina debate the other front runners at the Reagan Library. (3/3)
— Sarah Isgur Flores (@whignewtons) September 1, 2015
As with the Fox News debate, there will also be an earlier debate for GOP contenders not making the top 10 cut off.
Follow Kemberlee Kaye on Twitter @kemberleekaye
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
YOU GO GIRL…!!!
We need separate, independent debates held free of the evil media/government industrial complex’s control.
Such as being held online – maybe sponsored by LegalInsurrecton.com or such………….
I’m sure it was getting very difficult to explain excluding the only female candidate who was polling at #3 – talk about War on Women.
Forgot to add, that it really was in Fiorina’s best interest to get snubbed because it would generate much more attention, buzz and interviews for her than she’ll get from the debate itself.
I note that it was “conservative” Fox News that excluded the only woman running as a Republican, but the liberal CNN who intends to include her. Bad optics, I’d say.
meh. Fox didn’t exclude her, they just relegated her to the Happy Hour debate based on where the polling was at that time. She kicked butt and deserves an upgrade. Had CNN denied her that upgrade, the egg would have been on their face.
Excellent news. You go, Ms. Fiorina!
I would love to see the election come down to a choice between a rich, old, DC insider woman and a young, hard working, DC outsider woman.
RE: “…rich, old, DC insider woman…”
That could be both Lizzie Borden Warren, or Killary….
“As with the Fox News debate, there will also be an earlier debate for GOP contenders not making the top 10 cut off.”
The way I read it, they may have more than ten. They are adding candidates that make it using the new criteria, but maybe still keeping the top ten from the old standard. Not crystal clear, but that’s how it sounds to me.
Add … not replace or subtract. This would keep them from arguing with the one that would get kicked out.
Carly expanded her website. One can ask a question and a bunch of brief video choices are offered. I’m sure it will expand, but I didn’t get a response to anchor babies or the 14th amendment issue. Seems like a nice idea though.