Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Does the Secure Our Borders First Act live up to its name?

Does the Secure Our Borders First Act live up to its name?

Dissecting the bill’s provisions

The House Homeland Security Committee passed the Secure Our Borders First Act of 2015 yesterday. The Act will be introduced in the House today.

“This is probably the strongest border security bill ever presented to the Congress,” Homeland Security Committee Chairman, Rep. Michael McCaul, told Fox News yesterday.

The bill’s stated purpose is, “to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to gain and maintain operational control of the international borders of the United States.”

The Homeland Security Committee released the following to promote the bill:

“It’s the fundamental responsibility of the government to ensure the territory of this nation is secure against any illicit entry and concealed threats, and on that account the government has failed consistently. Despite billions of dollars and decades of policy debates, the border is not secure,” McCaul said in a statement.

Holding DHS Accountable

Facing numerous roadblocks to thwarting President Obama’s executive immigration overreach by tightening the purse strings, the Secure Our Borders First Act seems to have found a way to force accountability, at least on the border. The bill seeks to hold the Department of Homeland Security accountable by imposing penalties for noncompliance.

Citing the bipartisan border security bill that was passed last Congress but largely ignored by DHS, McCaul pointed out that DHS’s response to the bill was a PR tour that insisted the borders were secure.

Each tenet of the bill comes with a finite deadline for agency and department officials. Should DHS fail to meet the stringent deadlines, no political appointee of the DHS would be allowed travel by government aircraft, or receive any non-essential training, bonus pay, or raises until deadlines have been satisfied.

A Small Government Solution?

While border security advocates will likely be pleased with the bill’s mechanisms designed to encourage DHS acquiescence, small government advocates might balk at the government expansion required for extensive border enforcement measures.

Creating New Commissions

“The time to rely on the Department or this administration to measure border security progress has come and gone,” said McCaul, “it is time for Congress to lead and through this legislation, we tell the Department and the administration how to get this job done once and for all.”

H.R. 399 creates a Border Security Verification Commission that will ensure DHS is taking requisite measures to secure our borders. The purpose of the BSVC is to, “certify the accuracy of the notifications regarding situational awareness and operational control.” Compensation for serving on the BSVC is strictly prohibited.

The BSVC would consist of five presidential appointees, two from DHS and the other three from recommendations from yet another newly created commission — the Special Congressional Commission on Border Security. The Speaker of the House, House minority leader, Senate majority and minority leaders, Chairman and ranking member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, and Chairman and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs make up the last commission.

What Border Security Would Look Like

The Secure Our Borders First Act divides up the borders by sectors to best assess the risks and needs of each area. Security measures would vary by location as a result.

For example, the Rio Grande Valley sector would see deployable, lighter than air ground surveillance equipment, increased flight hours for aerial detection, interdiction and monitoring operations capability, ultralight aircraft detection capability, advanced unattended surveillance sensors, increased monitoring for cross-river dams, culverts, footpaths.

Central to every border security discussion is the issue of border fencing. H.R. 399 mandates additional fencing as well as repair of existing fences within a year and a half of enactment.

Some reports indicate the bill would remove border fencing. We spoke with Rep. McCaul’s office who indicated this was not true, nor could we find any mention in the bill that border fence would be removed.

While it’s true there’s no provision to build a fence along the entirety of the southern border, the decision is strategic and allegedly more cost effective. H.R. 399 is certainly not shy about combining almost militarized border patrol with expanded, more effective fencing.

Addressing Legal Presence Overstays

“The committee worked closely with the House Judiciary Committee to address this glaring hole [visa overstay] in the outer ring of our border security,” McCaul said.

A key component of this bill is the enforcement of a biometric data exit system. Tracking entries and exits has long been a deficiency of DHS that’s allowed exceedingly high numbers of individuals entering the country lawfully to disappear. Depending on their manner of exit and the training of the CBP staff at the Port of Entry, exits have been haphazardly recorded, if at all.

McCaul said in a statement that “the Judiciary Committee will work on legislation to deliver results on interior enforcement, such as mandatory electronic verification of employment eligibility, addressing fraud in the asylum system, and allowing state and local law enforcement to help in enforcing our laws.”

Senate Support

Senators Johnson, Cornyn, and Flake introduced a complimentary bill in the Senate yesterday that reiterates and builds on McCaul’s bill.

A Strategic Shift in Overall Immigration Strategy?

H.R. 399 seems to signal a shift in Republican immigration reform strategy. Piecemeal reform bills are likely to be more successful than a sweeping immigration Omnibus style bill.

Senator Rubio told Bloomberg Politics he also favors a piecemeal approach saying, “a comprehensive immigration plan won’t be passed by Congress because many lawmakers don’t believe the enforcement provisions would be carried out.”

We will continue to follow Congressional efforts to restructure immigration laws.

Follow Kemberlee Kaye on Twitter

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:

Comments

Ess good bell, mon. Ess kepin me hermanos coming here vote democrat live like king make all free for us. Bueno. Muy Bueno.

The southern border is NOT going to be secured because doing so would put a stop to the flow of illegal drugs.

Thank you for this informative piece. I’m very concerned that the president is choosing who determines if the border is secure. I’m sure Janet Napolitano would love to serve on this board, to remind us all the border is “as secure as its ever been.”

If memory serves, Rand Paul suggested having the border governors or Congress itself, make this determination, which would have a chance of giving us an accurate assessment of border conditions.

    Separation of powers. Congress already has an oversight role. The commission is intended to force named high-level individuals to go on the record, but there is no power to directly supervise execution.

Border issues are important, including the improved double-layer fencing where appropriate – which isn’t everywhere, despite the cries of some. Along populated areas like San Diego, fencing makes a big difference. But along remote rural stretches, the fence would either be breached or sufficient patrols required that if they are there, there is no real need to spend over $1 billion a mile on fencing.

BUT equally important are e-Verify to stop the use of fake or false SSNs, and visa tracking. At least 40% of illegals got here on a legal visa and just stayed. We are the only industrialized nation that has no tracking of visa holders whatsoever.

When a program is named by the government, you can be certain its reality is the opposite of the name, at least 90% of the time (100% if a dem program).

buckeyeminuteman | January 23, 2015 at 11:46 am

Border security? John McCain doesn’t like the sound of that!

With this GOP, I’ll bet the title ‘Secure Our Borders First Act of 2015’ is every bit as accurate as the title ‘Affordable Care Act’.

The only way to secure our border is to pursue these criminals inside the country. First make being an illegal alien a felony with 3 years in prison as the penalty. Make providing aid, including government benefits, employment and sanctuaries felonies with 1 year in prison for each illegal the penalty. Then assign the 15,000 FBI agents assigned to ObamaCare to pursue illegals.

We can allow first time offender illegals to plead guilty and accept deportation in exchange for a suspended sentence. If they return and are captured they will go directly to prison.

This bill is a joke. The border needs 2,000 miles of fencing. Interior enforcement needs mandatory E-Verify. Interior enforcement needs agents arresting overstays, not checking their fingerprints as they leave. It needs ending the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty. This bill fails every test.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend