Image 01 Image 03



What’s in a name?

We’re not supposed to talk about her.

It’s now supposedly sexist to talk about how the rock star of the Democratic Party pawed a young female intern under his control. Wait, wasn’t it supposed to be sexist to defend such conduct, not to criticize it?

And what would we call a sister who, for political power, sided with the Paw man as he pawed his way through others sisters under his control?

How does that person wage a campaign based on the War on Women, the centerpiece of modern Democratic Party political strategy?

No wonder it hurts so bad.

Via Mark Finkelstein at Newsbusters:

(Featured Image source: Bill Clinton testimony regarding Monica Lewinsky)


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Doesn’t Mika make less than half of Joe’s pay? You go gurl.
And Clinton was impeached over lying, not the sex.

    n.n in reply to 4fun. | February 18, 2014 at 8:30 pm

    While Democrats were impeached by a fictional narrative.

    Estragon in reply to 4fun. | February 19, 2014 at 2:32 am

    And he did not contest disbarment over the perjury, either.

    Midwest Rhino in reply to 4fun. | February 19, 2014 at 5:39 am

    Wasn’t Chinagate the real Billary impeachable offense?

    Maybe perjury was easier, or Monica sucked all the air out of the impeachment room, since lying about that woman and the dress was better news. That way the LIV would always believe Bill (with Hillary) was impeached for sex, instead of for being a traitor and selling military secrets to China.


were narratives die in a blue dress.

Nothing like physical evidence.

    Estragon in reply to Ragspierre. | February 19, 2014 at 2:33 am

    Had she not saved the dress at Tripp’s suggestion, to this day the Clinton people would be describing her as a crazy lying stalker slut.

      Ragspierre in reply to Estragon. | February 19, 2014 at 9:06 am

      OH, yah! She was well on her way to being crushed to powder.

      Remember when you think of Hill-larry: her main achievement in life has been decades of successfully enabling really bad men.

DINORightMarie | February 18, 2014 at 8:54 pm

Well, who died and made Mika the speech police?!

And, frankly, who cares what she says?

It’s all about what the Republicans are saying, and how they are NOT emphasizing that Clinton was impeached for lying under oath – and was caught because of his “bimbo eruptions” that Hillary helped cover up.

What is so hard about that?

If you want to keep talking about Bill and Monica, get used to hearing the words “Madam President”.

Bill’s approval rating went UP during the scandal and impeachment. Why on earth would you want to try it again??

    BannedbytheGuardian in reply to myiq2xu. | February 18, 2014 at 10:54 pm

    Nah . The tide has turned & now he is a creep . Now if it were to have been with a young man intern , Hillary could be President .

    She would be the epitome of tolerance .

Monica’s mom after the President Clinton scandal broke:

“Honestly honey, you could do better…”

I guess Hillary’s ploy with “I was a bad wife. Bill’s behavior? My fault.” can translate to ‘stand by your man’. Be the understanding wife – secure the male vote. But her aggression with “What difference does it make?” in the context of loss of life is so much more telling.

Hillary and Obama share with Bill Clinton the kind of character that thrives on ‘hurt for gain’.

Bill Clinton is out jogging around in some of the seedier areas of Washington D.C. He notices a good looking prostitute.

She sees him and calls out, “Fifty dollars!”
He’s tempted, but the price is a little high so he calls back, “Five!”

She’s disgusted and turns away while Bill continues his jog. A few days later, he finds himself jogging in the same area and as luck would have it, the prostitute is still there. But she won’t come down on her price. “Fifty!” she shouts.

Bill answers her, “Five!” No sale.

About a week later, Hillary has decided that she wants to get into shape so she demands to go jogging with Bill. They get to the seedy part of town and the same prostitute is still there.

She eyes Bill and Hillary together and yells, “See what you get for five dollars!”

BannedbytheGuardian | February 18, 2014 at 10:56 pm

At 20 Monica would still have 6 years left on her parent’s health insurance .

She was a Child I’m a tellin ya,

On the bright side, if Bill is first husband he likely will not turn up at a state dinner wearing a $12,000 dress.

The main reason is that the dems already have the cross dressing vote tied up, otherwise…….

Calling Hillary an enabler is an insult to simple, ordinary, garden-variety, run-of-the-mill enablers the world over.

Maybe Hillary didn’t work in the ticket-sales booth at the entrance, but she was the veterinarian, the animal keeper, the smiling concessions-stand girl and the curator at Bill’s Heavy Petting Zoo, where the fences served to keep the animal out and about and the female visitors in.

Maybe Hillary didn’t work in the advertising office for Bill’s Heavy Petting Zoo, but once the visitors were in, she saw that they were treated like animals if they didn’t keep quiet.

Mika, like her father, is a complete disgrace.

She might make a decent sweeper at the zoo, if they could keep her from flinging the elephants’ poo at the guests.

Don’t blame the elephant when the sweeper throws its poo at you.

Oh the brilliance of Rand Paul! How are the Dems going to go after Palin now when their queen, their cankled goddess was actively engaged in the war on women?

Blather on about $150K the GOP allegedly spent on her campaign outfits? Answer: Michelle’s $12K dress and both Clinton’s serial abuse of women. The legal term for Hillary is “accomplice”.

Carp about Palin on abortion and Down syndrome babies? Answer: Hillary’s what difference does it make and Bill’s various sexual assaults with Hillary as accomplice after the fact. Also, ask this: is support for abortion sufficient recompense for sexual assault? If they say yes, let’s talk to all the rapists in jail and see where they stand on abortion.

Rage about anything dealing with women, and the Dems have NOTHING! Rand Paul cut them off at the knees and they can’t answer.

She must be looking for a date with Bill.
Dumb Blonds should be insulted.

Hillary more than enabled Bill Clinton’s personal war on women. For a time in the White House she was in charge of investigating and harassing the women who said they were abused by her husband.

She knew the women were telling the truth. The same way she knew the truth when on the Today Show she blamed the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy for the rumors about Monica Lewinsky.

Christopher Hitchens, who was a hard leftist on everything except the Iraq war, concluded that Bill Clinton was guilty of raping Juanita Broaddrick.

A chapter in Hitchens’ book NO ONE LEFT TO LIE TO is titled IS THERE A RAPIST IN THE OVAL OFFICE?

Hitchens concludes the chapter this way:

“What are the chances that three socially and personally respectable women, all three of them political supporters of Mr. Clinton and none of them known to each other, would confect or invent almost identical experience which they did not desire to make public. And how possible would it be for a network of anti-Clinton rumor-mongers to create, let alone ventilate, such a coincidence? The odds that any of these ladies is lying seem to me to approach zero; their reasons for reticence are all perfectly intelligible.”

After covering up for her husband, harassing the women he abused, Hillary is just as guilty as he is.

I don’t disagree. Bill and Hillary both behaved despicably towards his victims and certainly unethically and in some cases illegally.

And it should matter. It really should.

But it doesn’t. As the courtroom objection goes, that question has been “asked and answered.”

The public saw all the evidence. It couldn’t be escaped. And by their reactions, decided it wasn’t worth removing the President over, and held trying against the honest Republicans fighting for law and decency.

It is even less likely to gain traction now with Billy more popular than ever and viewed as some sort of elder statesman, although I’ve yet to meet anyone who could describe a single act of statesmanship from him before or after leaving office.

Maybe another round of “we wuz right, dammit” would make some of us feel better. But the object isn’t to soothe our old wounds by reopening the scabs, it is (or should be) to beat Hillary for the sake of the nation. And to that end, it seems more effective to run against her than him.

Look on the bright side: if we take the high road, maybe Cosmic Justice will rain down and he will have a massive heart attack on top of some twenty year old in the middle of the campaign, and we won’t have to say a word to remind anyone.

This “Morning Joe “girl/woman/feminist causality is so afraid of what Bill’s actions mean to the Hillary house–of-cards-narrative that she is in complete denial about the events.

If ‘Monica-izing’ happened to her daughter would she be so ‘hot’ for the guy who did it and the woman who enabled him for political ends?

Mika, here’s little Sesame Street game for you my kids used to play thirty years ago. Sing along, now, then, see if you can figure it out. Ready? Okay, Mika, here we go.

“One of these things is not like the the others/one of these things does’t belong.”

Kery Kennedy
Jenny Sanford
Hilda Spitzer
Hillary Clinton

It’s okay, Mika, take your time.