Image 01 Image 03

Santa Claws: Hillary has a list, and she’s checking it twice

Santa Claws: Hillary has a list, and she’s checking it twice

Who’s been naughty and who’s been nice (to her)

Is there anyone who has not been in a coma for 30 years who is surprised that Hillary Clinton maintained a Hit List of those who betrayed her 2008 campaign?

Via Politico, Hillary’s Hit List:

Almost six years later, most Clinton aides can still rattle off the names of traitors and the favors that had been done for them, then provide details of just how each of the guilty had gone on to betray the Clintons—as if it all had happened just a few hours before. The data project ensured that the acts of the sinners and saints would never be forgotten.

There was a special circle of Clinton hell reserved for people who had endorsed Obama or stayed on the fence after Bill and Hillary had raised money for them, appointed them to a political post or written a recommendation to ice their kid’s application to an elite school. On one early draft of the hit list, each Democratic member of Congress was assigned a numerical grade from 1 to 7, with the most helpful to Hillary earning 1s and the most treacherous drawing 7s. The set of 7s included Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), as well as Reps. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Baron Hill (D-Ind.) and Rob Andrews (D-N.J.).

Yet even a 7 didn’t seem strong enough to quantify the betrayal of some onetime allies.

We are all but bit players in the Clinton drama, a drama that catches even the unsuspecting in its grasp:

(Featured Image: Hillary 2008 Concession Speech)


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Old news. She had a hit list in the 90s in her White House basement operations. One of the innumerable forgotten scandals.

    Neo in reply to raven. | January 14, 2014 at 2:20 am

    MSNBC gave a glimpse of what an Hiliary Clinton presidency would be like by declaring the news of her “enemies list” as .. sexist.

    After 5 years of endless “racist” claims under our Affirmative Action President, does America really want 4 to 8 years of endless “sexist” claims ?

      Musson in reply to Neo. | January 14, 2014 at 1:50 pm

      It would only be sexist if we called it a Bitch list.

      I remember when Nixon had a list and the Media thought it was worth commenting on.

I bet Bill has another kind of list, a 1-10 list.

    NeoConScum in reply to Sally Paradise. | January 13, 2014 at 5:06 pm

    Yep, Sally, Bubba prefers no higher than 1’s. In Hilly’s case, 0-Zeros.

    The sickest female co-dependent coupled with a bottomless appetite(Like her Bubba)of brazen ambition. And it looks like a large part of our female population thinks she “Deserves this”. Her “Turn”, as it were.

    How about ALL Clintons Go AWAY.

MouseTheLuckyDog | January 13, 2014 at 4:23 pm

Let me see if I understand this correctly, Hillary had a hit list of people who she had helped out who turned against her in 2008.

Is this really big news? I mean I don’t have a Christmas card list that includes people I helped who turned on me later. Is this really any surprise?

Look I think you can find many, many, many ( to paraphrase Judge Nelson that’s three many’s ) things to indict Hillary with. I don’t think you have to grasp at straws.

Now that I’m done defending Hillary I think I will take a good long very hot shower with lots of soap. Come to think of it I will take two.

1. Instapundit calls it an enemies list.

2. Having remarked—sheesh, it’s coming up on nine years ago—that Hillary reminds me of Nixon, I agree.

3. Politico, of course, is a fearless nonpartisan outlet, speaking truth to power and letting the chips fall where they may. For the sake of argument, assume the opposite. Yeah, yeah, that’s almost impossible to imagine, but bear with me.

The question then arises, who put this hit piece out there? (Someone who indeed is getting Ready for Hillary…)

4. Elizabeth Warren, or the people who are/were behind Elizabeth Warren? (I know Betty’s not running, but maybe she’ll change her mind if the country really needs her… :roll:)

5. For that matter, might this be a tit for tat? Did Betty bow out because Hillary let Betty know what Hillary knows about Betty?

    Henry Hawkins in reply to gs. | January 13, 2014 at 5:33 pm

    It was the Washington Post, I believe, that published a story last month critical of Hillary Clinton, an untimely story, and I remember a few of us speculating why that would be, who they might be helping to clear the decks for… hmmm.

    I think Bill Clinton plans to run in 2016.

So Vince Foster was an “8”?

    Henry Hawkins in reply to snopercod. | January 13, 2014 at 5:34 pm

    Deep 6.

    malclave in reply to snopercod. | January 13, 2014 at 8:25 pm

    Did Christopher Stevens go all the way to 11?

    Wonder why the Fort Marcy Park question never gained traction; the FBI gathered grass around the park bench, [and with perfect weather conditions] there was absolutely no microscopic blood particles on the grass … meaning the shooting did not happen on the park bench.

      Radegunda in reply to walls. | January 13, 2014 at 11:27 pm

      No bullet found. No dirt on his shoes, but blond hair and multicolored carpet fibers on his suit. Body stretched out with arms neatly at the sides. No fingerprints on the “suicide note,” which read like a defense of the Clintons and was found in 17 pieces in his briefcase after not one piece was found on the first search. Signature piece was missing. Multiple top document experts independently pronounced it bad forgery. Etc. etc.

      There were so many facts arguing against the “depressed man shoots himself in Fort Marcy Park” theory and very little arguing for it. But virtually the whole political and journalistic establishment, including most Republicans, decided it was best to let “suicide” be the only acceptable conclusion, and to call any dissenters crazy.

“The question then arises, who put this hit piece out there?”

Its also possible this is intended by the campaign – get it out now so when the primaries roll around this is “old news, move on”

She looks so old. I wonder if the electorate will accept an old lady as their leader.

The first question to be asked when reading any article about Hillary! Clinton is: How does this benefit Hillary! Clinton?

In this instance, the article lets it be known that Hillary! does have an enemies list, and if you are a Dem or a Clinton sycophant who thinks you might be on the list, you’d better get in line or you’ll be marginalized. And the way to get into the Hillary! good graces again is to raise funds. Hillary! is all about the money right now. That’s why she’s on the lecture circuit. And why her friend George Soros is co-chair of her finance organization. And why she flies on aircraft courtesy of corporate donors.

thinking tat the enemies list is actually about enemies is a distraction. It’s about those who need to bring the money.

The real story, if anyone wants to report on it, is that Professor Jacobson and his ilk…

Well, let her tell it-

Of course Hillary has an enemies list. She’s not a giving kind of person. Anyone with an ounce of sensitivity just has to look and listen to her and they’ll feel nothing – nothing that communicates empathy or understanding. She’ll always mouthing off – performing to get what she wants. And when she doesn’t get, she gets angry. mean, and hateful. She hates the ones who didn’t give. She’s a totally self-centered b—h. Who got what she deserved with Bill Clinton.

Human memory has a good/bad safety, I think.

We forget how really horrible these people (Ol’ Walleyes and Ball-less Bill) actually are (aided by things like Ball-less Bill being named “Father Of the Year” and other cultural aberrations).

But Bill was…and I think likely still is…an active sexual predator who…with the connivance of Ol’ Walleyes…destroyed the lives of his sexual prey who threatened exposure.

As I’ve said before, Hill-larry’s main achievement has been decades of enabling really bad men, most recently Pres. ScamWOW.

    Radegunda in reply to Ragspierre. | January 13, 2014 at 11:34 pm

    They were extremely lucky to be sitting on top of the tech boom — and to provoke the election of a Republican Congress, which restrained them somewhat. And ol’ Bill, crooked as he is, was always smarter and more pragmatic and not quite as radical as Obama.

    But still, it is worrying how the awfulness of Obama has unfairly burnished the Clinton image.

She’s a political succubus, involving not sex (((shudder)), but our very souls.

I see that Hill is all ready for the primary – weight loss, face, tummy and boobs (can’t tell about her tocus) tightened up with some pretty good plastic surgery and a nice new wig (obviously styled by Bill’s hair dresser) to hide her thin hair. Loosing the jowls helped her shed twenty years.

I doubt that she will ever smile again (notice the open mouth instead) – but she was never a smiler anyway. It is obvious to me that a great deal of her campaign financing will be spent in maintaining this amazing repair.

Dear Reporters(well…alleged Reporters):

Are any of you MSM Gutless Toadies & Lapdogs up to asking the Craven APPETITE, Mrs.Clinton, something along these lines:”Your husband’s sexual escapades, dalliances and affairs number in the hundreds and quite likely thousands. A Healthy Wife would have thrown his a** out 30-years ago(minimum)and found a non-betrayed life of her own. Why didn’t you??”

How about you fearless, hard-charging female members of the Mainstream Media? How about MSMs of either sex growing ‘a set’ and staying on this?! H.R.Clinton is a pathological, hugely co-dependent and bottomlessly ambitious B’Yotch. Not remotely any sign of strength of character, much less a set of whatcha’call leadership Balls.

*NOTE* Betsy Wright, Bubba’s Arkansas Chief-of-Staff and “Bimbo Eruption” Extinguisher responded to Dick Morris’s comment that their boss’s escapades could fill a file cabinet with: “Correction…They would fill a warehouse!”

How about Babes of the Woman’s Lib Movement??? Uh-Huh. Riiight. Sure.

Hillary hasn’t got a chance. I’m placing my bet on Elizabeth Warren. She doesn’t frighten democrats.

Be funny IF the GOP picks Cruz, who then tries to use the “Indian war call” as part of his campaign to garner votes.

If Mitt Romney couldn’t win. And, it’s a given that Obama was very weak. Then how can any of the GOP’s current front runners run against a woman who is way more popular than Hillary?