Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

60 Minutes confirms Benghazi is a real scandal, and you’ve been lied to (Update)

60 Minutes confirms Benghazi is a real scandal, and you’ve been lied to (Update)

Update 11-8-2013: 60 Minutes backs off Benghazi witness story.

————————-

60 Minutes had an absolutely devastating report on the Obama administration’s failure to protect Ambassador Chris Stevens and other Americans in Benghazi.

I’ll post the video when available (update – available and added), but the heart of the report is that there were clear and unequivocal warnings which were ignored, and the Obama administration lied about these warnings after the attack.

Hillary and Obama blamed a video and stood by the caskets perpetuating that lie.

And remember how almost all of the media obsessed with Mitt Romney’s statement over Benghazi, and colluded to ask Romney gotcha questions while downplaying and obfuscating what really happened.

60 Minutes said its investigation took almost a year.

(Transcript here)

https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/394603707167686656
https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/394603520760221696
https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/394604224753184768

https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/394605510110240768
https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/394604389018501120
https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/394604922814992384
https://twitter.com/kesgardner/status/394600965166215168
https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/394602427212902400


https://twitter.com/ChrisDoyle1962/status/394603791355346944

Watch these videos, and consider the cold hearts that blamed a video for political purposes when they knew it was not true:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

I went to Denver in defense of Hillary Clinton and now I will go to the wall in defense of Ambassador Stevens and three other other brave, honest, and forsaken Americans against her.

    shepalutes in reply to betty. | October 28, 2013 at 8:50 pm

    Not trying to be mean, but when you defend someone, you should do more research because when one person stands behind another it sends a message. If I am not sure, I will not defend either point. This is what makes my words worth listening to. when I accept another persons words or actions it says a lot about me. It is very important to be sure of the FACTs in any situation. This is why one of the 10 commandments says that you should not bear false witness against your neighbor. This goes both ways. I do hope that you have learned a great lesson. There are a lot of sheepeople that would follow someone just because others stand beside them.

      Jesus forgave us while we were yet sinners and we were carrying all kinds of falsehoods within our beings. HOW can we not forgive others who were blinded by the false beauty that Evil can present? I don’t personally feel it’s up to me to say that someone else was bearing “false witness”….It’s up to God. Now, what is up to us to watch and see what kinds of fruit grow from this life. It’s great to turn things around when you are going from the dark to the light. It’s not always easy. However, love will light the way when we really do try. We are Brothers and Sisters and together we stand in love no matter what passed before. Once we stand for the TRUTH, we are united in love. God Bless!

    flobow in reply to betty. | October 28, 2013 at 11:26 pm

    I can understand WHY people blindly followed Obama. His promises sounded really good. However, they failed to study his background and learn about the individual. Had they done that, they wouldn’t have drank the “koolaid” so quickly and become sheeplets. The Bible says they are dressed as sheep but inside are wolves. It further says by their fruit you will know them. NOW that the TRUTH is known, you are free from criticism. It’s up to you what will YOU do now that you know the truth? THAT is what counts!

I’ve wondered if and when the media would turn against Obama. Hopefully, this is just the beginning. And Hillary too? What a bonus!

    Yujin in reply to MrE. | October 27, 2013 at 10:46 pm

    I think they are mostly looking to hurt Hillary. Watch for Lizzie Warren coming up on the left.

      Musson in reply to Yujin. | October 28, 2013 at 7:50 am

      I believe there is a bigger player than Warren behind this. I just don’t know who it is or what their agenda is.

      Sixty Minutes did not finally decide to report the news because they suddenly rediscovered jounalistic integrity.

        VetHusbandFather in reply to Musson. | October 28, 2013 at 11:36 am

        Didn’t a Clinton insider say early on that she had info that would clear her and pin this all on President Obama? Maybe the Clintons are behind this report, and they are just waiting until the primaries to drop the bomb on Obama and his faction of the Democrats.

        IrateNate in reply to Musson. | October 28, 2013 at 8:06 pm

        amen to that!

        Yujin in reply to Musson. | October 28, 2013 at 8:12 pm

        George Soros or a stand-in is behind it probably.

        Warren is the piece.

      First Shirt in reply to Yujin. | October 28, 2013 at 9:54 am

      Madam Clinton could not be hurt enough for her to receive her just rewards. We Americans simply must wake up to the fact that each political party is infested with traitorous, immoral people who have no interest in the citizens.

    Diggs in reply to MrE. | October 27, 2013 at 10:54 pm

    No chance of the turning against Hillary. This is battlefield preparation. When the “phony Benghazi scandal” comes around in 2016, it will be very old news. That’s why they are doing show now. This gives Hillary cover to say two things. One, it’s old news and she’s already answered all the questions that needed to be asked. And two, the people voted in 2014, and they felt that Benghazi was old news. There isn’t a snowball’s chance in Hell that 60 Minutes would do a story they thought would hurt a Clinton, and there isn’t any reason to believe they wouldn’t do a show specifically to help her.

      I agree, they are trying to get the bad news out now. Still, hammer her with it.

      As for Liz Warren, her Faux-a-hoax-ass act will not play outside of Massachusetts.

        LibraryGryffon in reply to EBL. | October 28, 2013 at 8:43 am

        I wouldn’t count on that. Warren seems to be popular with academics everywhere, and therefore probably with anyone with pretensions towards being a member of the “elite”, and the “right sort”.

          I have to agree with LG on Warren; I think she has a lot of support from and credibility with the progressives in the Democrat party. They do not see her fraud and they love the “inspiration” she dishes out and see her as “informed and outspoken.”

      Paul in reply to Diggs. | October 28, 2013 at 1:59 pm

      Don’t forget, the timeline from Watergate break-in to Nixon resignation was almost three years.

    flobow in reply to MrE. | October 28, 2013 at 11:31 pm

    After all the harm the media has done and knowing what overall motivates them I can’t help but wonder WHY now?? What’s up?? Why do they tell the truth NOW when it was there all along? I’m glad they have just not sure WHY they have told the truth now. I just pray they continue to do so!

“Watch these videos, and consider the cold hearts that blamed a video for political purposes…”

That was one thing. Looking the survivors in the eye, embracing them, and promising them justice was quite another thing.

They lied to them, looking them in the eyes, in the presence of the very coffins that bore the remains of those they had betrayed.

    Jeannie in reply to Ragspierre. | October 27, 2013 at 9:57 pm

    I think that all the American People should know what happened in Benghazi on 9/11 The Benghazi scandal has always been at the forefront and on the American Peoples mind since it happened.It was so horrific that it never goes away.What they did to Christopher Stevens alone should tell the American People about how horrible it had to be for them to be in a fight for 7 or 8 hours.Here is what they did to our Ambassador Stevens.https://www.facebook.com/angel.white.7165331/posts/10202198139901911

      That facebook page isn’t working today, but if it is the bloody body picture with the cattle prod … that has been debunked. That picture appeared on the Internet about 5 YEARS before the Bengazi attack. All reports (including from a doctor who was there) say his body arrived at the hospital with no external wounds and died from smoke inhalation. Don’t believe anything on the Internet without checking it out.

[email protected]! I missed it (did catch the great report on the Met).

Thanks for the info. Hope you can provide a longer commentary and maybe a link when you get it?

Watching the link now. Confusion. Misinformation. Partisanship. 3 for 3 so far.

[…] Here’s a related tweet from “60 Minutes”, H/T to Legal Insurrection: […]

I wish something would come of this.

Well, as Hillary opined “What does it matter now?” /sarc

So what if the media turn against their anointed one?
The great O got hisself re-elected, and he sure as God made little green apples, doesn’t care one itty bit about anything else except, those paid vacations traveling on AF1, golfing, keeping Obamacare alive and making it to that prepaid mansion in Hawaii.

He’s got his and it’s been apparent from the beginning of his administration, all he cares about is what he sees in the mirror each morning.

The only thing that will keep the impeachment fairy away, if the Rs take the Senate in ’14, will be the knowledge that Joe Biden would take over.

The pick for Veep was a masterwork so it had to be Jarrett calling that shot. O is so politically inept, he would’ve never thought of it on his own.

    Juba Doobai! in reply to Miles. | October 27, 2013 at 10:06 pm

    Better Biden than Obama. Joe is a liar and a plagiarist; however, he lacks Obama’s visceral hatred for America. Impeach the bastard.

    concernedpatriot in reply to Miles. | October 30, 2013 at 5:02 pm

    Impeachment and conviction would be very hard to achieve given the constitutional standard and to do so without being able to prove guilt of treason, bribery or other “high crimes and misdemeanors” would set a very dangerous precedent to our system of justice. I applaud the investigative journalism of “60 Minutes” and do not hold it against them for not stating the obvious. Given O’s political connections, power and his ability to secure an “innocent” verdict regardless of the obvious truth they would open themselves up to slander and libel charges. I ask you to consider it was your father, son, husband, brother or your sister, mother, daughter or wife who was slain at Benghazi. Consider also that it is a fact that we knew a militant attack was imminent and requested help for fear for our lives and the lives of others at that mission. You know that requests for help were denied even when you sent reports of seeing signs of the enemy’s coming attack. You know that EVEN WHEN THE ATTACK STARTED a nearby military unit was told NOT to render assistance and try to save your dad’s life. Now making bad decisions and experiencing denial and refusing to acknowledge signs of such a horrific event coming is a somewhat believable psychological event. But upon the unspeakable happening and given not hours, but days to find out what happened (which was no secret to anyone not under the control of the propagandizing government controlled media – Al Qaeda flew their flags and published their plans online in advance) O chose to lie about what happened and also lie about not knowing who did it and lie about holding whoever did responsible. Consider that in the weeks, months, in fact the year that followed he (or they) continued to lie about knowing who did it and about planning to “get the bad guys and hold them accountable”. Instead you find out that they knew all along continued to cover it up and never considered holding anyone responsible. I’m sorry folks but there is only one logical answer for why he would lie about it and try to keep us from finding out the truth. Those who are responsible for such heinous acts know that they punishments are severe and certainly don’t want to be held accountable under our law ALWAYS are the ones trying to make sure noone finds out the truth. I’m not sure I understand why Barry himself has not been investigated for his possible involvement in the planning of the attack and indeed murder of these people. Why not Hillary as well. It usually rings true that liars have something to hide. While involvement could easily meet the requirements of “treason” simply covering it up amounts to aiding and abetting doesn’t it? That should meet the requirements of “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Can we not demand by petition that these investigation take place and are given adequate as well as fair and unbiased attention? Well, if it were my father, brother, son or husband I would not give up until those responsible receive just punishment! For those of you still reading and have similar suspicions and feelings regarding proper justice in this matter, consider that those who were so emotionally attached due to a close relationship may be under a very powerful thumb. I know it sounds crazy, but if you feel that you wouldn’t be able to resist doing everything you could to make these investigations happen and bring justice to those responsible then please do it for those who would, but might not be able to for fear of their own lives.

Did you listen to her parse her words:
“we’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men, we’ve seen rage and violence directed at American Embassys over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

She can’t honestly believe that will save her soul, can she?

I live in the middle of a cornfield in friggin Hoosierland and I knew a video had nothing to do with this the first day.

Glad to see 60 MInutes finally catch on, but these same folks were looking the other way so they could get Obamugabe re-elected.

The ex-Greene Beret guy saying they KNEW this attack was coming, had received notification of two previous attacks, knew Benghazi was next.

Yet DOD and the SD ignored him.

It’s almost like this was a deliberate set-up. Payback for OBL, like the 30 Seals killed in the Afghanistan helicopter crash?

Actually, I was not impressed with this at all. I know we have come to expect nothing from the MSM, but perhaps we shouldn’t tout this as revealing. The only new information there was from the British interviewee, and he just published a book. I don’t see how this could have taken a full year of research and investigation.

Furthermore, they went out of their way to avoid putting any serious blame on the administration. They mentioned the administration claiming it was spontaneous attack based on a video, but they did not show clips of Clinton, Rice or Obama doing that. They said the administration went with that lie for a week, though Obama perpetuated it about 3 weeks later at the UN. They did not mention that the administration actually decreased the security forces in Libya that summer. They did not mention anything about forces in Europe that could have deployed or fighter jets or gun ships that could have supported them. They did not mention that, according to Congress, American survivors are being prohibited from speaking.

They left out so much that is already public information for those who care to know. It is so sad that we consider this a good report.

    raven in reply to WTell. | October 27, 2013 at 8:41 pm

    I agree. It is sad. We’re so conditioned to expect nothing, and yet pine so desperately for MSM affirmation, that we hail these middling efforts. These kinds of reports actually do more to provide official closure than serve as useful investigative work. We can now all consider the matter closed. I mean, “60 Minutes” has had its say.

    wyntre in reply to WTell. | October 27, 2013 at 8:45 pm

    I know what you mean. Of course anyone who has been paying attention knows far more than was reported in the CBS piece. Point is, Lofo’s DON’T know anything about it and so I consider the segment a plus because it will, hopefully, reach some of those people

    sybilll in reply to WTell. | October 27, 2013 at 9:36 pm

    ~Sigh. I didn’t look at it from that angle until you pointed it out. Which makes the cynic in me also question that 60 minutes ran this opposite the lead-up to the World Series, and against football. Intentional? Duh.

    concernedpatriot in reply to WTell. | October 30, 2013 at 5:22 pm

    This is very true, but many who had a weaker interest and happened to hear this much for the first time may start to open their eyes. These actions and inactions you mentioned ARE fact and ARE criminal and ARE being tolerated by the american people. I am so ashamed right now… I feel I am trapped in Sodom and Gamora without the resources to escape. We as a nation continue to celebrate our leader and this is what we are celebrating. How in the name of what is good and humane have we not removed this evil from office yet? I can only remind myself not to underestimate the power of power politics and of the elite and those with greater resources. Maybe it’s not the american people, maybe he continues the art of the association he had such a long flousishing relationship with that has been investigated 11 times by the FBI and CIA for voter fraud. Let’s please choose to take a stand and call for a complete investigation into the impeachable and imprisonable criminal actions carried out directly by this lying, thieving autocrat!

I get the sinking feeling Hillary’s fingerprints are all over this. Is this how she is going to try to explain Benghazi away most likely blaming Obama or others. She will never blame herself; although she should be held responsible.

    Juba Doobai! in reply to Ike1. | October 27, 2013 at 10:09 pm

    The buck stops at Obama’s desk. He could have made Hillary pay the price, and he did not because she is as much an MB groupie as he.

    Sanddog in reply to Ike1. | October 27, 2013 at 10:33 pm

    Hillary has a lot to answer for and I for on think she’d look just divine in an orange jumpsuit but never forget for a moment that Barack is ultimately responsible for every word that comes out of the mouths of his appointees. If Obama didn’t know from the beginning that there were problems in Benghazi, if he didn’t know from the first moment this was a terrorist attack, he’s too incompetent to remain in office.

A Racist youtube… will haunt Obama & Hillary forever.

From a Fox story:

Quoting the ex-Green Beret:

“He said Al Qaeda tried to kill a British ambassador in Benghazi three months before the attack on the anniversary of 9/11. He added that the terror group said online that it would attack the Red Cross, the British, then the Americans in Benghazi.

“They made good on two out of the three promises,” the guard said. “It was a matter of time till captured the third one. … [Washington] knew we monitored it. We included that in our reports to both State Department and” the Department of Defense.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/27/report-first-western-eyewitness-in-benghazi-to-go-public-gives-account-attack/

Thinking about the Saturday Night Card Game: is this not enough reason to hate Barack Obama?

The most valuable thing I’ve learned is: never trust the mainstream media again. They will give their spin and narrative to suit their own purposes, regardless of the truth.

The first thing I thought when I saw this story was “What’s their angle? What is 60 Minutes up to? Do they have a candidate they prefer over Hillary Clinton?” There is no real “reporting” anymore, and I certainly wouldn’t expect it from CBS. There’s a reason they are advancing this story, and it has nothing to do with integrity.

Stand Up Speak Out | October 27, 2013 at 9:58 pm

Obama’s entire administration should be held responsible, including Hillary. But even if they aren’t, we can rest assured that God will hold them 100% accountable. And Americans will not forget. RIP warriors.

    God is going to toss the lot of them into the lake of fire unless they’re saved. I don’t think there are any “extra-crispy” sections reserved for especially offensive lost people. It’s hard to improve upon burning for eternity.

    I don’t hold out much hope that many in this bunch would entertain a sincere prayer of belief, least of all the biig names. If they could, we’d see a different administration.

“What difference at this point does it make?”
– Hillary Clinton 2013

Viewer feedback site at CBS:
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/feedback/fb_news_form.shtml

If you are so inclined. I feel it is important to encourage these wayward tikes when they have some good behavior. This 60 Minutes piece was a good one.

What gets me: Stevens was a career bureaucrat, UC Berkeley and UC Hastings grad, and gay. I can’t imagine he could have been more proud than to work for Clinton at State under the Hussein administration. He is one of them and this is what he gets; safety concerns completely ignored, left to be murdered by feral islamists with no honest gratitude nor accountability for his loved ones. This is how statists regard their own; and their sycophants are surprised someone like myself want absolutely nothing to do with them.

Though one is ecstatic to see a bit of true journalism in the MSM, CBS specifically, they revealed nothing new, so why now? Did Obama call out for a distraction? Are the Obamacare problems so deep and unresolvable that a Benghazi scandal is preferable? No, something else is up.

I think we just saw the opening shot in the Sink Hillary for 2016 war. I wonder how widespread in the media this is, if my premise is correct. If the rest – NBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. – start going all Watergate on her, it means someone else’s presidential hopes are being served. No way this is a simple adherence to journalistic practice – everything they do is political. So who are they helping? Warren? Cuomo?

    My thought exactly. What’s their real angle here? Distracting us from some ugly IRS revelations, so that Hillary can be the villain instead of Barack? Thanks, CBS, but we’ll get our news elsewhere.

So why then are CBS White House correspondents still lobbing softball questions at all the press conferences?

>>>>> Wow. State Department refused to allow security guards to carry guns at the US mission in Benghazi. (h/t @60Minutes)

— Ken Gardner (@kesgardner) October 27, 2013<<<<<<<

So this was another mass murder in a "GUN FREE ZONE" allowed to happen by the President and the Secretary of State……
When does the trial start?
Why isn't Obama parading victims families in front of news conferences like he did after the Connecticut killings, which I don't believe actually happened. ( You Tube search on Connecticut Fraud Killings ).

Oh Yeah, and “What difference at this point could it possibly make?” asked Hillary……..

I have it on good authority that the families of the patriots that died at Benghazi, are still deceased.

Murder, by commission, or omission, has no statute of limitations.

There are certain things a politician can do which make them unfit for public life. Standing in front of the coffins of a man who lost his life and lying to his loved ones in an effort to deflect blame is one of them.

Both Hillary and Obama have committed a long list of sins for which most people would have rightfully been driven from public office in shame. They regularly do things that no decent person would ever contemplate doing.

It says something about how sick our society has become that they continue to have any sort of support at all.

Regardless of the delay and the motives behind this piece, we should be grateful. (Methinks a Kennedy has been expressing the desire for a presidential run to his powerful pals, so Hillary has to be removed from competition. Or Sharyl Attkisson’s diligence inspired others to top her.) Bottom line: A trusted lefty source detonated a shocking story into complacent living rooms tonight. Unlike Republicans’ doomed attempts to reach the apathetic or hostile left and center-left and causing ears to slam shut, Lara Logan, “Morgan Jones” et al. will have succeeded in shocking some consciences.

Obama and Hillary are exposed as filthy liars. Were either of them ever under oath when testifying about events of that night?

(Obama was also exposed yesterday, claiming he had no idea that Merkel’s phone was tapped and would have stopped it had he known. Records to the contrary were released today. Have we ever had such a shameless and clumsy liar in the White House? And I don’t count Bill Clinton, who lied to keep from being publicly humiliated, quite a different category of offense.)

Maybe now that CBS has broken the taboo against reporting that might reflect negatively on Beloved Leader, others in the MSM will follow their lead, like the groupthinking gutless pack they are.

CBS should not be above criticism, but their Sheryl Atkisson was the only MSM reporter actually covering it at the time.

The big question for all the networks and coastal papers is why they just fell down for the obvious lie about the video? It’s one thing to slant coverage, but quite another to allow an outrageous and transparent cover-up to stand.

I believe the MSM outlets all understood that Obama was an empty suit and a failed President at that point, and the only way they could help him get reelected was to help cover up all the problems – from the failed stimulus to the usurping of powers to the impending collapse of 404Care to Fast & Furious to the Arab Spring to Benghazi, to name a few. And so they almost never asked a tough question and whenever a somewhat tough question just had to be asked they accepted the White House answer without follow-up.

Now, with Obama safely ensconced for a second term, and PPACA crumbling around them, the media are attempting to salvage their reputations by reporting on thses things as if they have been investigating all along and this is the first information ready to reveal. Baloney.

    MarlaHughes in reply to Estragon. | October 28, 2013 at 10:52 am

    But don’t forget CBS heads were perfectly willing to throw Sharyl Attkisson under the bus so Crowley could make Romney look ridiculous when voters were paying attention.
    I’m VERY suspicious of this report and it’s motivation.

Four men died, Obama lied.

Here’s the question nobody seems to be asking: What were our people doing in Benghazi in the first place?

I’m guessing it had something to do with clandestine arms shipments to Syria.

[…] What? Better late than never? Not good enough. I will admit Lara Logan is an excellent reporter; I wonder how long she’s been fighting CBS to get this on the notoriously liberal 60 Minutes. Link contains the 16-minute video, tweets during and after the show aired tonight plus videos of Hillary/Obama meeting the caskets at Andrews AFB and ‘blame the anti-Muslim film maker’ talking pointshttp://.  https://legalinsurrection.com/2013/10/60-minutes-confirms-benghazi-is-a-real-scandal-and-youve-been-l… […]

Check out this youtube video about Benghazi, Obama and Hillary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eLqYr4u67CI#!

The other scandal is why the House is slow-walking this ‘investigation’.

Notice how nobody is going to jail over Benghazi? IRS?

Its almost like the hearings are for show to provide cover for the Corrupt Bastards Club that make up the House and Senate.

    First Shirt in reply to gettimothy. | October 28, 2013 at 10:03 am

    Boy, you said a mouthful! We confirm scandal after scandal, illegal actions by the handfuls, unconstitutional actions too numerous to count; yet nobody is ever indicted, tried, convicted, and imprisoned. Nobody. Never.

    Voter fraud and intimidation during the last two elections. Did any of the Black Panthers who hovered around the entrance to the polling stations, threatening voters, get hammered? No.

    Bus loads of people went from poll to poll to yet another poll and voted over and over again. Any action on that? No.

    Now, I wonder why there might be such a push to eliminate the requirement to provide identification to vote. . .

[…] 60 Minutes confirms Benghazi is a real scandal, and you’ve been lied to […]

Perhaps I didn’t watch the report carefully…..were the names Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or Susan Rice mentioned?

Or did the report simply pretend that there is no such place as DC and no such people in charge, beyond mentions of “State Department”?

No blame, no shame.

BUT Lara Logan neglected to mention the blatant failure of Obama & Hillary Clinton to do anything to protect Ambassador Stevens & Navy Seals all the while blaming the attack on a ridiculous youtube video.

It’s great that 60 Minutes reported about Benghazi BUT it’s unfortunate that Lara Logan neglected to mention the blatant failure of Obama & Hillary Clinton to do anything about protecting Ambassador Stevens & Navy Seals all the while blaming the attack on a ridiculous youtube video.

Did it really take this long for 60 Minutes to produce this or is the timing designed to move the headlines away from Obamacare.

    davod in reply to davod. | October 28, 2013 at 11:12 am

    The next part will concentrate on the Republican controlled Congress not providing additional funds required to improve security.

There was nothing in the 60 Minutes report that they could not have reported a year ago. This story was carefully timed. Next year, when Hillary commences her official run for her coronation as President, if anyone brings up Benghazi, the response will be:

“This is just the same old baseless right wing attack. Benghazi was fully reported last year. Move along there is nothing to see.”

[…] 60 Minutes confirms Benghazi is a real scandal, and you’ve been lied to […]

[…] 60 Minutes confirms Benghazi is a real scandal, and you’ve been lied to […]

Two names never uttered throughout this whole report: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. And the latter will probably be our next president. God help us.

To those who cry “God help us!” at the prospect of Hillary Rodham Clinton becoming our next POTUS, I can only say that I share the same sentiment. It should be shouted everywhere that the Beghazi attack shows that neither BHO nor HRC was ever qualified to pick up the phone at 3:00 AM.

[…] William Jacobson published an outstanding post on this last night. […]

Why didn’t CBS do its job on this story over a year ago? Why now? All this slobbering over a single story 60 Minutes should have been covering long ago is baffling. Sure, we needed 60 Minutes to confirm Benghazi was a real scandal. Fucking. LOL.

When can we expect a hard hitting expose on Obamacare–a month or two after the 2014 election and after the employer mandate kicks in and throws the health of 20 or 30 million more people into the jaws of bureaucratic and political whim?

The IRS continues to screw Dear Leader’s political enemies with impunity. Have we seen a 60 Minutes story to lend credence to that bit of empiricism?

What difference at this point does it make? The cool hipster imbeciles have already elected The Cool Guy and they get their news from a Trotskyite dildo on the Comedy Channel, not 60 Minutes.

It’s never to late to demand JUSTICE. WHEN are Americans going to take a stand against Obama and his croonies including Clinton? There are more waking up and seeing the truth. Both Benghazi and Obamacare not to mention a host of other incidents are finally proving the Republicans to truly be RIGHT. WHEN will Americans stand up against tyranny and say collectively, “This is not what America began as and we wont take it anymore!” I hope it’s sooner than later. While you consider this, please watch: http://youtube.com/NwCmOact0uU It will explain a lot of what modern day America is facing.

    deelynn53 in reply to flobow. | October 29, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    Flobow, the link you shared is not available. I completely agree with your comment & wanted to view the youtube video you recommended. Can you share link again to make sure it was the correct one?

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend