Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Would Seals and Crofts be allowed to sing Unborn Child on campus?

Would Seals and Crofts be allowed to sing Unborn Child on campus?

As frequently reported at College Insurrection, pro-life students on campus regularly are accosted by faculty and other students, their displays torn down, their speakers shouted-down, and their requests to be treated as any other student group denied.

(language warning)

I wonder if Seals and Crofts would be allowed to sing Unborn Child on campus?

On campus, nothing is more threatening than images like this:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:

Comments

“Would Seals and Crofts be allowed to sing Unborn Child on campus?”

World renowned physician Kermit Gosnell, could answer that one.

I’ve always found Graham Parker’s “You Can’t Be Too Strong” to be much more disturbing than “Unborn Child“.

Did they tear it out, with talons of steel
And give you a shot, so that you wouldn’t feel
And wash it away, as if it wasn’t real

    Neo in reply to Neo. | April 21, 2013 at 4:44 pm

    The doctor gets nervous,
    completing the service
    He’s all rubber gloves and no head
    Yes, he fumbles the light switch,
    it’s just another minor hitch
    Wishes to God he was dead

    But you can’t be too strong

Ah ha, another excellent reason to ban “hate speech!” Well, one might ask, what defines “hate speech,” and those in control would answer: “Any statement we deem to be hateful!” See the answer is simple, just ban guns and hateful speech will be banned! See how easy that was?

Actually, in practice, speech I dislike is hateful, you better shut up and not interrupt me again!

./sarc off/on hopefully.

For the “young’ens,” Seals and Crofts were wildly for a pair singing folks song incorporating a guitar and mandolin, in the early 1970’s. Both of them were Sikhs.
Their music career ended abruptly with the release of the vinyl album Unborn Child in 1974, the years after “Roe v Wade”. Radio stations would not play it on air.

    Neo in reply to Neo. | April 21, 2013 at 4:37 pm

    should have been “wildly popular”

    BannedbytheGuardian in reply to Neo. | April 22, 2013 at 12:36 am

    They were not Sikhs at all. Sikh is a variation of Hindhu that were in the 70s anything but peaceful & indeed in conflict with Prime Minister Indira Ghandi almost splitting India apart.

    Seals & Croft were Baha’ai. This is a philosophy of non violence more than a religion . In fact it is offered here as an alternative to scripture in schools. In 40 years I have never worked out what they do – every time I tried I got too bored .

    Seals & Crofts are indeed great exponents of whatever it is they do.:)

I don’t want to see the victims of torture and murder from abortion clinics or anywhere else. I much prefer to see images of new life developing in the mother’s womb. People need to understand that a human life evolves (i.e. chaotic process) from conception to grave. They need to understand that elective abortion of a human life is premeditated murder, which is a crime committed against an individual, society, and humanity.

Women, and men, need to understand that liberty is only suitable for individuals capable of self-moderating behavior. Decent women, and men, should not tolerate a behavior which is purely dysfunctional and corrupt.

Women, and men, do have a choice. It is not elective abortion or premeditated murder of an innocent human life without cause or due process.

I’m surprised that the anti-war crowd, and others who support human and civil rights, have not joined with the pro-life crowd in common cause. In principle, they are fighting for the same cause of preserving human dignity and life.

Thank you for exposing the Left’s jihad on helpless children. It is hard to witness the pictures and to read the testimonies of abortionists but the evil of abortion but it must brought to the light.

    I don’t think the graphic images portraying the consequences of abortion will help. Extreme signals, including visuals, tend to saturate the senses, and mind, respectively. I think we would be better served to remind people that a human life develops from conception to grave. The only criterion which can justify elective abortion is terminating a life before the emergence of consciousness, which can be reasonably correlated with neural activity, and which happens to be the standard for establishing death.

    For Jews and Christians, and others who claim a faith in God’s direction recorded in the Torah:

    And the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and He breathed into his nostrils the soul of life, and man became a living soul.

    there is a divine standard to distinguish between inert biological matter and a “living soul”.

    I would focus on the equal protection status afforded to all people subject to the jurisdiction of The Constitution (i.e. We the People). Our national charter records that our unalienable Right to Life is granted from “creation.” Our Constitution records that our rights cannot be deprived without cause and due process.

    People should also note that liberty is not only suitable but enduring to individuals capable of self-moderating behavior.

Fascinating show on John Stossel and the Education Blob…

http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2013/04/john-stossel-education-blob.html

[…] college campuses today, given the intolerance for pro-life displays in colleges and universities, Legal Insurrection, April […]

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend