Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Cypriot banks see first ripples of bailout tsunami

Cypriot banks see first ripples of bailout tsunami

Earlier this week, I noted that the banks in Cyprus will be opening Thursday, once the regular people had time to embrace the levy and understand all the awesome goodness in the new bailout plan.

Shockingly, the Cypriots are still not down with the political solution to the banking crisis.  Guards are now being posted in front of banks, in anticipation of Thursday’s return to business:

Cyprus reopens its banks on Thursday while limiting withdrawals, banning cheques and curbing the use of Cypriot credit cards abroad, among measures imposed to avert a bank run after it agreed a tough rescue deal with international lenders.

The Central Bank said banks would open their doors at midday (6 a.m. EST) on Thursday after nearly two weeks when Cypriots could only get cash through limited ATM withdrawals.

A central bank official said Cypriots would be allowed to withdraw no more than 300 euros ($380) a day.

This action indicates that Cypriot authorities are deeply concerned about a fiscal emergency.

Meanwhile, Germany’s Der Spiegel has a report that not every affected depositor is taking a hit (hat-tip, W.C. Varones). Actually, this news may explain the need for guards to protect the banks from “the little people”.

The Mediterranean island’s Central Bank is coming under investigation for allowing two firms to engage in “capital flight”.

Most of all, though, the central bank head has been harshly criticized due to the suspicious capital flight from Laiki and the Bank of Cyprus, the two institutions that have been hit hardest by the Cypriot banking crisis. There are indications that large sums flowed out of the two banks just before the first bailout package was signed in the early morning hours of March 16. At the end of January, some 40 percent of all savings held in Cypriot accounts were on the books of those two banks. Since then, however, much of it has been transferred elsewhere, despite orders from the central bank that accounts at the two institutions be frozen.
 
‘Special Payments’
The central bank now stands accused of not doing enough to control the movement of capital. Transfers for humanitarian aid were permitted which, while certainly an acceptable exception, opened a loophole for abuse. Many are also furious that the bank allowed “special payments,” the definition of which was never adequately established.
The Cypriot central bank has defended itself by saying that it was impossible to completely prevent all transactions, despite the account freeze. Much of the money was withdrawn from overseas, where Cyprus had no authority. Branches of Cypriot banks in non-euro-zone countries such as Russia and Britain do not answer to the European Central Bank. Their liquidity is controlled by central banks in those countries.
Such a defense is nothing less than a voluntary admission of impotence. Holders of smaller savings accounts have been unable to access much of their money for almost two weeks, companies have been unable to pay their suppliers and across the country people are concerned that their salaries will not arrive on schedule on the first of the month. Meanwhile, rich businesspeople and those with connections overseas have been able to transfer their money into foreign accounts.

In fact, the first ripples of this fiscal tsunami are being reported in the Financial Times by a Laiki client, one of the “regular” citizens:

On Monday, EU officials pronounced Cyprus saved after the country agreed terms with international lenders on a €10bn bailout.

On Tuesday morning, Elena Antoniou, a Cypriot interior designer, fired her staff.

“I told them, ‘Guys, three months of part-time and then we’re closing’,” Ms Antoniou recalled. Her firm had been working on a 3,000 sq m project at the insurance arm of Laiki, the country’s second-largest bank. But, as a condition of the bailout, Laiki is now in liquidation.

Ms Antoniou’s contractor on the project was a Laiki customer. With his accounts at the bank frozen, he has let go of all but six of his 25 staff. “He called me this morning and said, ‘I’m terrified. I’m ruined’,” she said.

And the once the first wave hits Cyprus, there will be no telling how far it travels.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Some people wonder what kind of cheap grace Warren Buffet thinks he’s buying by going along with the Obama/progressive/Trotskyite program.

“Special payments” is the answer.

They’ll tell you it could never happen here.

They lie.

stevewhitemd | March 28, 2013 at 9:01 am

Is anyone at all surprised that some favored few were given a quiet warning that bank controls were going to be implemented, and thus they’d better move their money while they could?

Anyone at all? Anyone? Bueller?

Anyone at all want to bet on how many Russian ‘customers’ of these two banks were able to get their money out?

Of course Cyprus (and the EU) needs to close the banks, clean up the mess, use depositor insurance to pay off the small holders, and let the larger holders fend for themselves. They’ll eventually get around to doing that but note the contrast between there and the FDIC here: when we do this the first thing anyone hears about it is when you drive by the bank and it has a new name, and the FDIC issues a five line press announcement.

This situation has been horribly mis-managed from the start and all parties are to blame, including the ordinary schmos in Cyprus. But now the rest of us are going to pay.

    Correct. We have our own version of “ordinary schmos in Cyprus,” they sent Barack Obama to the White House, twice. Having done so a second time with four years exposure in front of them makes them more “marks” and fools than schmos and is probably unfair to the world’s schmos.

“Special Payments”? It’s not a tax, it’s a depositor fee!

Anyone remember Steve Martin’s routine about “Fred’s Bank”? I’m beginning to think that saving at Fred’s bank is more secure than “FIRST NATIONAL SAVINGS AND LOAN”

Keating Five Redux? hmmmmmm……

    Midwest Rhino in reply to Paul. | March 28, 2013 at 11:31 am

    Keating Five is right, though I guess it goes back to letting the private bankers call themselves “Federal Reserve” and give them control of interest rates, another deal snuck in Christmas eve (well, Dec 23rd, 1913).

    And how did the S&L fiasco grow so big?

    One night in 1980, Representative Fernand St Germain (D-Rhode Island), whose $10,000-to-$20,000-a-year restaurant and bar tab was paid for by the S&L industry’s chief lobbyist, proposed raising federal insurance on S&L savings accounts from $40,000 to $100,000- even though the average size of an S&L account was $6,000. He waited until after midnight, when only eleven representatives were still on the floor of the House; they approved his proposal unanimously.
    But St Germain was just getting warmed up. In 1982, he cosponsored a bill that removed all controls on what S&Ls could charge for interest and released them from their century-old reliance on home mortgages.

    I think Long Term Capital was the next major heist by the rich of the plebs. Leveraged 300:1 made for great income and the drinks were flowing at the elite cocktail parties. when that collapsed, it was again up to Joe the Plumber to bail them out. And when NY and NJ lean on DC for Big Sandy money, they get an extra $40 billion in pork.

    The die has been cast … Obama threw around $90 billion of green money to his friends, yet most think Cyprus is an aberration. But it should be a wake up call to just how brash the politicians really are when it comes to protecting their billionaire cartels. Private assets are “fair game”, and we may need another revolution.

      Midwest Rhino in reply to Midwest Rhino. | March 28, 2013 at 1:24 pm

      just got around to reading the rest of my link, which I forgot to link. I fear so many con men confiscated so many billions long ago, that they now own the system, which is why our world is so Orwellian.

      Probably the worst part of the S&L bailout is the message it sends to high-flying con men. It says, “Plunder all you want. As long as your political connections are solid, you’ll get to keep the money and probably won’t suffer more than a slap on the wrist.” (Charles Keating only went to jail because his abuses were so extreme; he was the exception, not the rule.)
      The authors of the best book on the S&L scandal, Inside Job, conclude that, rather than a lot of mindless blundering, there was “some kind of network…a purposeful and coordinated system of fraud. At each step of our investigation our suspicions grew because, of the dozens of savings and loans we investigated, we never once examined a thrift-no matter how random the choice- without finding someone there we already knew from another failed S&L.”

      http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Corporate_Welfare/S%26L_Bailout.html

KM from Detroit | March 28, 2013 at 9:38 am

On Monday, EU officials pronounced Cyprus saved after the country agreed terms with international lenders on a €10bn bailout.

I love this–it brings to mind images of a board room full of business-suited guys and one poor sod with his beanie cap in his hands, with the others nodding seriously while one holds out his hand in expectation of deliverance of the single coin the lone man has in his possession.

“Awful nice bank you got there; be a shame if something happened to it.”

Cyprus is a microcosm of what’s to come. It was depressing to hear Charles Krauthammer mock the situation because of the modest size of Cypriot banking in relationship to Apple. He’s usually smarter than that, but then, he is a Beltway insider.

With all due respect to lawyers and our laws—and very little remains—why is anyone be surprised that truckloads of capital are permitted to flee out the back door of banks while armed guards are posted out front to prevent others from withdrawing a wallet full of bills? It’s all perfectly “legal.”

In our otherwise indecipherable laws, the sub-sections and clauses that provide exemptions and waivers for politicians, insiders, and their friends are always crystal clear.

In a more perfect world Barack Obama would suffocate in a monstrous pile of paper composed of his worthless laws and paper currency, Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner would drown in a big bucket of ink.

Once again the ‘market’ sails into the weekend on winds of unknown origin and bolstered by media talking heads desperatly grasping at any positive news however small. Now the newsspeak media is trying to talk down the price of the only true store of wealth…GOLD. In a time of unbelievable upheaval in the financial engineering of the world the only reason gold prices are suppressed is to allow central banks to stock up at these levels.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend