Apologies to Wikipedia:
Whereas the reign of
Marcus AureliusGeorge W. Bush had been marked by almost continuous warfare, that ofCommodusObama was comparatively peaceful in the military sense but was marked by political strife and the increasingly arbitrary and capricious behaviour of theemperorpresident himself. In the view ofDio CassiusMark Steyn, a contemporary observer, his accession marked the descent “from a kingdom of gold to one of rust and iron”—a famous comment which has led some historians, notablyEdward Gibbonanyone familiar with the Constitution, to takeCommodus’ reignObama’s presidency as the beginning of the decline of theRoman EmpireAmerican republic….Unlike the precedingEmperors Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aureliuspresidents Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Reagan, he seems to have had little interest in the business of administration and tended throughout hisreignpresidency to leave the practical running of the state to a succession of favourites, beginning at this time withSaoterusAxelrod, afreedmanspinmeister fromNicomediaChicago who had become hischamberlainhenchman.Dissatisfaction with this state of affairs would lead to a series ofconspiraciesTea Party protests andattempted coupselections, which in turn eventually provokedCommodusObama to take charge of affairs, which he did in an increasingly dictatorial manner. Nevertheless, thoughthe senatorial orderhis political foes came tohatedislike and fear him, the evidence suggests that he remained popular with thearmy47 percent of citizens who paid no income taxes andthe common peoplethose who believe in free lunches for much of his reign, not least because of his lavish shows of largesse (recordedon his coinagerepeatedly in his own boastful speeches) and because he staged and took part in spectaculargladiatorial combatsfundraisers and softball interviews.”
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY