Poor Juan. In many ways, he’s like an abused spouse. He keeps going back to the left, no matter how much they savage him, because he craves their love.
Juan still wishes he was back at NPR despite how they treated him. I know Ailes was thinking he’d seen the light when he gave him a gig after that, and he’s far from the worst of his hires, but it was a mistake.
UhOh! Don’t say ‘monkeys’ or they’ll deflect the entire argument and call you RACIST! Say ‘primates’.
As to the standard Lib BS stance “just a fringe element”…
“It was difficult, if not disingenuous, for the Tea Party groups to try to disown the behavior. They had organized the rally, and under their model of self-policing, they were responsible for the behavior of people who were there. And after saying for months that anybody could be a Tea Party leader, they could not suddenly dismiss as faux Tea Partiers those protesters who made them look bad.”
–Kate Zernike, New York Times
I think I understand where “monkey” came from, given that monkeys are famous for throwing their crap, but she should avoided that one.
One very basic rule is never give your opponent an opening. That was an unforced error on Michelle’s part. One of her bad habits is occasionally getting too emotionally invested while she’s speaking, especially off the cuff. Stay calm, stay focused.
Good job on the “no evidence” admission, but instead of becoming …ahhh… passionate, she should have hammered said admission during her time left. Alas, that ending made her come across as a shrill name-caller.
calm and focused only works playing chess. Puleezzze…give me a friggin’break. Malkin called Juan out for LYING just like she should have. If a man had reacted similarly you would have been singing his praises. But since it was a woman, it must be because she’s too emotional.
Everybody is pointing out Malkin’s final words, where she takes Juan to the woodshed behind the school. I am more impressed by the nonverbal clues – watch her while he is talking from around 4:30 – 4:45 on the clip.
“marxists, poo flinging monkeys”…LMAO!! “Show me the evidence or retract it.” “Lie”…my goodness, the lady is FEARLESS. Could see her and Palin on a ticket together. Bam!
Comments
Poor Juan. In many ways, he’s like an abused spouse. He keeps going back to the left, no matter how much they savage him, because he craves their love.
Michelle = 90# of Breitbart.
Cassius Clay is to Sonny Liston as Michelle Malkin is to:
A) Juan Williams
B) The Media’s OWS Narrative
C) The Media’s Tea Party Narrative
D) All The Above
I saw a doco from Joe Fraziers P O V .. In it he was clear that Cassius Clay was not an honorable man by any measure.
Oh & he is a Muslim . And a scaredy cat .
Malkin shoots a hole in Juan.
I wonder how long Juan’s balls will be hurting.
Balls…?
LOL–literally
Dunno’, but for sure ‘they’ are dimpled.
Crazy conservative nutjobs!
Any lefty will tell you that lawn jockeys’ fragile white porcelain balls shatter when they are knocked over.
Just so some lefty lawn troll doesn’t project at me:
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2010/10/21/juan-williams-should-have-been-fired-a-long-time-ago/
Wow. How do they get away with that? That’s disturbing.
he would have to have some first.
Juan still wishes he was back at NPR despite how they treated him. I know Ailes was thinking he’d seen the light when he gave him a gig after that, and he’s far from the worst of his hires, but it was a mistake.
UhOh! Don’t say ‘monkeys’ or they’ll deflect the entire argument and call you RACIST! Say ‘primates’.
As to the standard Lib BS stance “just a fringe element”…
“It was difficult, if not disingenuous, for the Tea Party groups to try to disown the behavior. They had organized the rally, and under their model of self-policing, they were responsible for the behavior of people who were there. And after saying for months that anybody could be a Tea Party leader, they could not suddenly dismiss as faux Tea Partiers those protesters who made them look bad.”
–Kate Zernike, New York Times
I think I understand where “monkey” came from, given that monkeys are famous for throwing their crap, but she should avoided that one.
One very basic rule is never give your opponent an opening. That was an unforced error on Michelle’s part. One of her bad habits is occasionally getting too emotionally invested while she’s speaking, especially off the cuff. Stay calm, stay focused.
Good job on the “no evidence” admission, but instead of becoming …ahhh… passionate, she should have hammered said admission during her time left. Alas, that ending made her come across as a shrill name-caller.
calm and focused only works playing chess. Puleezzze…give me a friggin’break. Malkin called Juan out for LYING just like she should have. If a man had reacted similarly you would have been singing his praises. But since it was a woman, it must be because she’s too emotional.
So that’s why I saw Juan Williams’ pants on the back of my milk carton this morning.
#pantsed
Bloody Aussie bloke. 🙂
And that goes for bingbing, and that damn gregoryno6.
=D
Juan Williams – it’s what’s for dinner.
Juan Williams has played the race card before in regards to the Tea Party. It didn’t work then, and it doesn’t work now.
Glad Malkin took him to task over it.
SLAAAAAAMM !! Michele slammed that liberal lovin 2-faced hypocrite moron Williams on the ground, and I loved every second of it.!!
Why do the mediaite videos you link never work for me? What are they using that I might not have installed?
If, like me, you can’t see the mediaite video, you can catch it here
Everybody is pointing out Malkin’s final words, where she takes Juan to the woodshed behind the school. I am more impressed by the nonverbal clues – watch her while he is talking from around 4:30 – 4:45 on the clip.
Man, I never want to get her that pissed at me!
“marxists, poo flinging monkeys”…LMAO!! “Show me the evidence or retract it.” “Lie”…my goodness, the lady is FEARLESS. Could see her and Palin on a ticket together. Bam!