Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Fake fake fake fake

Fake fake fake fake

Fake:

Real:

Fake fake fake fake, but a real problem, don’t you think?  People still think Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her backyard.

Elsewhere:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

But the fake is closer to the truth when it comes to buying elections.

Who castrated Ann Coulter?

I nominate this for headline of the year. Who knew? Perhaps, RuPaul?

I think R-money should be his new name.

The example of fake/real reminds us:
You can’t spell Romney without m-o-n-e-y

The love of money is the root of all evil. Or in Ann Coulter’s case The love of Romney is the root of all evil.

Successful businessman? Check. Governed in a liberal Northeastern environment? Check. Governed an entity with a population in excess of 6 million people? Check.

All right, then. If they want to check all the boxes Romney checks, only with a more successful businessman in a more liberal environment with an even larger population, I think it’s time Romney supporters trade in their lightweight for a truly successful businesman, Michael Bloomberg, because if being a successful business man is the main thing, shouldn’t they go with the guy who’s been 100 times MORE successful?

My guess is their actual political philosophies aren’t that far apart either. So, if you back Romney, go for the Real Thing, and write in “Michael Bloomberg”.

    I left out the fact that Bloomberg’s been re-elected TWICE, something Romney’s never been even once. So why settle? Vote for the electable one, the 100 times more successful one. Write in “Michael Bloomberg”.

      ldwaddell in reply to OCBill. | February 6, 2012 at 5:42 pm

      You need to notify Ann Coulter, but she may not be as favorable toward Bloomberg as she is toward Mitt since Bloomberg only wants to control what you eat, Mitt wants to control everything.

    Uncle Samuel in reply to OCBill. | February 6, 2012 at 6:45 pm

    Bloomberg?

    Do you mean Michael – liberal, immoral, gun control, jail a SEAL and a woman who try to check their guns in good faith – Bloomberg?

    Michael – Occupy Wall Street host, costing the NYC of millions of taxpayer funds – Bloomberg?

    That Bloomberg would not get my vote any more than Romney or Obama.

BannedbytheGuardian | February 6, 2012 at 5:24 pm

The Fatwa against Russia & China.

This is good news .A Fatwa against 1.5 billion people . Between them they cover 20 % of the earth’s land mass . Not to mention having sizable muslim populations themselves .

Way to go guys.

Let the fun begin.

Fake fake fake fake, but a real problem, don’t you think?

As CBS news might have it, Professor, “fake, but accurate.”

    listingstarboard in reply to Samuel Keck. | February 6, 2012 at 5:45 pm

    Wait until the liberals start photoshopping pictures of dogs strapped to the roof of a car–that incident is going to truly harm Romney.

      There’s a Facebook page, “I Ride Inside” that’s an anti-Romney site that has over 20,000 “likes”. People are posting photos of their dogs seat-belted or car seated. They’re collecting money, and I think it’s going to animal shelters.

      Like most others who post here, Romney is not anywhere near the top of my list to be the Repub nominee. And, I agree, the lamestream media is going to have great fun deconstructing him if he wins it. It’s going to be brutal. But, the fact is Gingrich is no better. That same “media” would also tear the Newtster a new one too. And, the fact also is –if we’re being honest with ourselves here– Gingrich has even more personal baggage than Mittens, and would suffer through even an even more sustained and withering assault from the media than Mittens. And, the last fact is it really doesn’t matter who the Repub nominee is because they will all get that treatment.

        The ‘dislike’ button: the perfect way to oppose someone without actually having to defend your position or open yourself to scrutiny.

        It’s easy to rack up dislikes here by speaking realistically about the prospects of Gingrich.

        Congratulation on racking up the dislikes, G Joubert. I wonder if anyone who disagrees with you will actually attempt a rebuttal.

I think Mitt really wants R-money, or he may just want power and R-money is just a means to an end. Vote Mitt R-money, or else.

It may have been photoshopped but the message is accurate.

We should forward this to Levin:

To: Republican Conference
From: Newt Gingrich, Economic Recovery Group
Date: July 14, 1981

What Each Member Can Do to Help the Reagan Tax Cut

http://www.shsu.edu/~bfd001/EconoclastsSite/Images/Pages/Documents.html#6

I made a spoof ad/video response to Romney’s attack on Gingrich’s Reagan associations. Tell me what you think:

[link deleted by admin]

    ldwaddell in reply to OTIS the hand. | February 6, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    I didn’t know Mitt Romney isn’t mentioned in the Book of Mormon. Are you sure he isn’t in there under another name like God or something.

    William A. Jacobson in reply to OTIS the hand. | February 6, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    What I think is that I’m not interested in this blog becoming a place to make fun of Romney’s religion. It’s a free country, so go elsewhere if that’s what you want to do.

“•I have to admit, I don’t know if this is a real or fake comment…”

I vote sarcasm.

You can’t spell “Romney” without “R” “Money!”

The flag is improperly displayed; the stars should be in the upper left, not in the upper right.

Yes, I know President “Gutsy Call” Obama is a noble and saintly man of peace who uses unmanned drones only to assassinate America’s foes in unprecedented numbers after wrestling with his conscience for anything up to … 10 seconds.

The latest The New Republic cover…

http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/tnrcover_20120216_0.png

p.3 “cover photograph enhancement by J. Heroun”

huskers-for-palin | February 6, 2012 at 7:29 pm

The snarky comment in the lower left corner. “Did Sarah Palin Ruin the VP Hunt?”.

The title should read: “Did the GOP Establishment ruin the VP process?

Hey Eliza Gray….get bent!!!

More Fake: The great wonderful Progress in Detroit (make that “New Orleans and Los Angeles”) shown at halftime in the Chrysler commercial (make that “Obama campaign ad”).

    They had to film in L.A. And New Orleans because due to recent bedget cuts, the Detroit police couldn’t guarantee the safety of the film crew.

      jdkchem in reply to OCBill. | February 7, 2012 at 9:38 am

      Obviously if the Republicans had passed Obamao’s jobs bill he could have filmed his campaign commercial in Detroit.

Wow. That Mitt Romney comment you posted is clearly tongue-in-cheek. It has to be unless Mars has invaded us and Pod People are taking over.

    Joy in reply to Sparky. | February 6, 2012 at 9:30 pm

    You mean you haven’t noticed the RINOPODS?

    They’re everywhere!

    Warning, warning, take cover….this is not a drill!

Here’s why the Chinese shrug at the Super Bwlad: 1. They call the anguage she spoke “Chinglish”; 2. They want to excel and take jobs from us, it’s a point of pride for them that almost all our goods are made in China cuz that means Chinese jobs and a chance at the Chinese version f te American dream that is sold on tv.

Here’s an ad for a job in China. Read the details carefully.

“our photograph studio(in nanning city) needs some foreign girls(female
model is better) to take pictures for wedding photo advertisements,and for
car exhibition,and activities and so on.it is a long term needing. but u
can do the part-time job.
 
our name is “Dingshang vision studio ”
 
add:DongGe Road NO.29,Ronghe center park,NO.12thbuilding,0506 room.
 
tel:15977788304,jimmy,email:[email protected]

need:
1\foreign girls(female model is better)
2\age:18~28 is better
3\speak english and white is better
4\hight:160-175cm is better
5\not too fat and too thin

if you want to do this job,ring and come to our workshop,prepare your
resume,interview and talk clearly, it is near the sunshine 100 building.
thank you very much!”

I’m a big Newt fan but the more I hear about what an evil Bastard Romney is the more I am begining to wonder if maybe he isn’t the guy to tear obama a new and larger rectum and he works the same way obama does ….his hands are clean while he sends his Flying Monkeys out to wreak havoc …* SHRUG * …what do ya think Professor

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to Aggie95. | February 6, 2012 at 11:07 pm

    he works the same way obama does ….his hands are clean while he sends his Flying Monkeys out to wreak havoc …

    1) His Flying Monkeys seem to be pretty exclusively targeted on Republicans, and the area around Democrats seems to be a no-fly zone.
    2) His Flying Monkey Circus is largely made up of MSM Journo-List 2.0 types. From the moment he gets the nomination [*A-A-ACK*], they will be bringing down fire on his position only.

    His history is of trying to run against Democrats from the Left. Not gonna work against “Teh Won”.

    Subotai Bahadur

    Jack Long in reply to Aggie95. | February 7, 2012 at 2:58 am

    “I am begining to wonder if maybe he isn’t the guy to tear obama a new and larger rectum”

    I see it as exactly opposite.

    Romney and the GOP are “run don’t walk”ing into an Obama left jab. The problem is Bain.

    I think Romney will be attacked for leveraging his risks against the US taxpayers.

    Specifically, I think Bain does leveraged buyouts. They use investors’ money and loan it to the bought out company. That loan goes as debt onto the bought out company’s books, which then uses the debt to lower its tax burden. Bain extracts some profits from the new bottom line and uses the carried interest tax loophole to pay at a %15 tax rate.

    The taxpayers get shafted by the debt write off and by the loophole during profit extraction.

    The entire “rich don’t pay their fair share” meme has Romney as the prototype.

    JMO.

TeaPartyPatriot4ever | February 6, 2012 at 11:16 pm

Romney and his policies, are liberal to the core. So in fact, he, Romney, is exactly like Obama in almost every aspect. More so than Hillary is. In fact, Obama, Hillary, and Romney are the exactly same political liberal socialist animal, with the exact same liberal policies and agenda-Obamacare, Romneycare, and Hillarycare. ie; each of them created their force mandated State Socialized Medicine program- all of their own liberal socialist making. And of all the politicians running for the Republican Party Nomination, only Speaker Newt Gingrich stopped it.

Romney said publically on the record, that he was and is, an independent progressive Republican, who disliked and did not support Reagan and Reagan conservative policies, political and economic. In other words he is liberal Republican Party establishment RINO elitist.. and that is NOT like President Ronald Reagan, period.

So Romney’s so called pretentious, disingenuous and disgustingly absurd attempt to portray and paint himself in the light of President Ronald Reagan, is without a doubt, the most egregious and outrageous disgusting display of hypocrisy and fraud, I have ever seen in anyone, let alone in this Political Republican party race.

Romney is not only a liberal politician, but he is truly a political pariah.. He runs his politics, like he ran Bain Capital.

Romney and his lies, makes me, and every true patriotic Reagan Conservative in America, want to puke from the disgusting stink of hypocrisy and propagandist lies, that Mr Romney reeks of.

Our host, no fan of Mitt Romney to put it mildly, has conscientiously pointed out that a hit on Romney is based on a photoshopped image which OWS would love.

Butt out, lefties. We will deal with our schmucks and we don’t need socialist propaganda to do it. That was the tone I expected in the comments, and I was utterly wrong. A Romney hatefest erupted without a mention of the photoshopping. Some commenters picked up the fake image’s class-warfare rhetoric and ran with it.

My reaction: good grief, Obama’s reelection chances should creep up another notch.

And so, on Intrade, they have.

    Darkstar58 in reply to gs. | February 7, 2012 at 2:32 am

    So let me get this straight – we are supposed to attack the Left when we agree they nailed something?

    I mean, if they had photo-shopped it to say like “I kill babies” then yeah. But as is…

    The first problem for Romney will always be the fact that so many on all sides see him as a silver-spooned, say anything, empty suit out for himself above all else.

    That we learned he is an extreme Liberal now playing Conservative on Campaign is the reason “dont like/trust” turned into “not-Romney” – but a lot of the questioning started first with the used car-salesman hollowness that phony image captures well.

      So let me get this straight – we are supposed to attack the Left when we agree they nailed something?

      “Even the Left agrees with us, so full speed ahead!”

      Jeezis.

      If my sleazoid adversaries started supporting my actions, hopefully I’d have the presence of mind to pause and take a hard look at what I was doing.

      (In no way is the foregoing meant as pro-Romney.)

        Darkstar58 in reply to gs. | February 7, 2012 at 2:40 pm

        No you buffoon.

        Its a simple case of “funny joke. Fits what many believe…”

        What I won’t do is attack people solely for having fun based off an observation many happen to believe.

        What you apparently want is something similar to what the Left does to us each and every-time there is an Image of Obama or Michele which doesn’t portray them as infallible.

        Case in point – this:
        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2084579/Is-cartoon-comparing-Michelle-Obama-Marie-Antoinette-racist.html

        Apparently you feel they were right to yell racism and hate-speech and disrespect and on and on; otherwise they would be showing a sense of humor and deeper understanding. God forbid that happen! Instead we should always fight with each-other, each time any of us make an observational joke; right?

        Really, yours is the only irrational stance here. Get a sense of humor! Get a sense of awareness! Get a life…

I would also like to say, and maybe its just me but, that “real” image disturbs me as much as the “fake” one does.

In fact, I would personally be hard pressed to label the correct spelling one as “real” – its about as phony as “real” gets and screams “pitiful photo opp” like nothing since, well, I guess the “here’s some money” photo-opp he staged earlier in the campaign.

I vote for changing “real” to “original” to stay honest

The more I get to know Rmoney the more likely I will be pulling a third party lever come November if he is the nominee. The problem with the establishment is that they ignorantly assume that I will play along.

[…] nevermind, apparently this is a doctored image. […]

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend