Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

But what did you evolve into?

But what did you evolve into?

If being an Obamabot is the end result of evolution, we would have been better off staying knuckle-dragging troglodytes.

From reader, student and author @BlakeSeitz, taken in a parking garage at the University of Georgia:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The next step in this evolution process involves “useful idiot” DNA.

This is exactly why Democrats are by no means “the party of science.” They think evolution is a constant physical advancement of a species. It’s not – it is Natural Selection. Some traits help people survive and others get lost in time because all that matters is whether one survives to pass on their genes.
If anything, listening closely to God and following His will (“be fruitful and multiply”, raising your kids well, etc) would imply a higher level of evolution. I mean, the Guy gave us a playbook (The Bible, etc.) – survival depends on how well we execute it..

Isn’t “survival of the fittest” a definition? You survived, you must be one of the fittest. Congratulate any cockroaches you meet today!

In the Spanish Flu Epidemic of 1918, it was the young and healthy adults who died at the highest rate. Thinking is that it was some form of auto-immune disease, and those with strong immune systems had those systems turned on themselves.

Looks more to me like like libs are in a state of devolution or maybe that should be devil-lution

Our constitution put God and citizens above the powerful. It established “negative liberties” to keep a “survival of the fittest thugs” from evolving and alienating our God given rights.

Only with eternal vigilance can we stop a devolution into the “thugocracy” style government we see in Chicago. An evolved animal may learn to deceive and stalk his prey, and then mercilessly devour him. That seems to be the nature of politics today. If “evolution” wins, we lose the republic.

Our government was designed to constrain the (corrupt) nature of man. (as I see it)

theduchessofkitty | February 10, 2012 at 10:47 am

“But what did you evolve into?”

A moron! That’s what!

(I’m sorry, but whoever that dude is really asked for it!)

Evolved from mush in the primordial ooze to skulls full of mush.

Evolution is measured over eons and eons, whereas it is simply the genetic mutation of Obamabotulism in play with this bumper sticker. Obamabotulism disallows regeneration at a rate sufficient to maintain breeding populations. This mutation is decidedly negative and will not enhance the natural selectivity of its victims among unmutated peers competing for the same resources.

    LukeHandCool in reply to Henry Hawkins. | February 10, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    Gaaawd you’re sexy when you’re talkin’ science stuff.

      Henry Hawkins in reply to LukeHandCool. | February 10, 2012 at 8:44 pm

      Science is my main avocation and had I to do it all over again, I’d have become a physicist. From about 1995-2005 I had a website devoted to scientific skepticism and critical thinking, including a message board with over 5500 registered users. It was an awesome experience for a while, but got to be too much work. In the 1980s I did some James O’Keefe type undercover stuff to debunk cultural myths like crop circles, bigfoot, ‘real’ UFOs, and the like. I joined MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) for the insider view of how well they actually investigated sightings (not very). In the early 1980s recruited six students at NC State’s School of Engineering (think Big Bang Theory cast) to help me create a crop circle in rural south Wake County NC. They also helped me build and launch hoax UFOs to gage witness reactions and usually baseless assumptions. I wrote some of these up for skeptical mags like Skeptical Inquirer, Magonia (UK), and Swift.

      I still have my set of fake, strap-on big foot, um, feet, replete with dermal swirls etched in and other details bigfooters claim are not hoaxable. Heh, heh, heh.

      Oh dear, you get hot when I talk science and I said ‘strap-on’.

        LukeHandCool in reply to Henry Hawkins. | February 10, 2012 at 9:19 pm

        Hey, wait a minute! What kind of guy do you think I am? And why are my earlobes throbbing? Why the tingling sensations throughout my body?

        If I could be 18 again, I’d be serious about school and get a doctorate and become a professor … either of biology, botany, or geography. What interests me most is island biogeography.

        I had a botany class once with a professor who was close to retiring. I was the top student and he invited me to his office and tried to talk me into a teaching career in botany.

        I always loved botany and horticulture … and I gave it some thought.

        The deciding factor? Girls. I thought, “No girl is going to be attracted to a botanist.”

        The End

I’m gonna take issue with this whole issue of evolution in that we have been “devolving” since the LBJ administration with the results of a dumbed down public, excess political correctness, out-of-control public dole etc.

We are now suffering the results of rampant liberalism that nearly dictates our every move, utterance and the nearly complete negating of, “the pursuit of happiness.”

Another four years of O’bammy should complete the process…

Evolution is not necessarily “progress” or “advancement” as liberals like think.

It’s merely better adaptation to the organism’s environment.

If that environment is crap, well …

    Exactly. “Progress” is an entirely ambiguous concept. We should have demanded they qualify their ambition. Unfortunately, but predictably, their liberal policies have been principal sponsors of progressive corruption.

    It’s paradoxical that these “evolved” simian derivatives would embrace principles which are antithetical to evolutionary fitness. That’s something else we failed to demand. A definition of their fitness function. Their effort to denigrate individual dignity and devalue human life would suggest they accept a degenerative function.

    It’s telling that they embrace a perspective which formed the foundation of America’s original sin (i.e. denigration of individual dignity). On the other hand, who in their right mind would not vote for dreams of physical, material, and ego instant gratification through redistributive and retributive change, but also through fraudulent and opportunistic exploitation? They must bow and support their mortal gods.

    Well, that is the outcome of lower simian derivatives submitting to their alphas (or mortal gods). It would behoove people who still recognize their dignity to reject the simian derivatives’ effort to extort compliance through exploitation of emotional appeals.

The before the rising tide which Obama speaks of sinks my raft, I have taken matters into my own hands and as he is so fond of saying “…if you want change then make me do it!”

Well, I have taken him up on that challenge and thus launched a website, o-bam.com, that features my treatment of his logo. I think it speaks to the prevailing sentiment and is my way of trying to get my Obama stimulus.

I hope that you get a laugh out of it and that it helps to balm the current morass we seem to be mired in. If you like it, please pass the word along.

If evolution trumps Jesus, then why believe in income redistribution at all? Wouldn’t survival of the fittest mean that it’s much more “evolved” to let the strong survive and the weak starve?

[…] Bill Jacobson: If being an Obamabot is the end result of evolution, we would have been better off staying knuckle-dragging troglodytes. […]

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend