Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 05:15pm 54 Comments
Some interesting doings:
- He may not have stolen the whole election, but he may have stolen Indiana.
- Via Sarah Palin, looks like Fast & Furious was purely political, to make the case for gun control, the smoking gun.
- I know that people are sick of me posting stuff about Newt, but he’s crushing Romney in new polling from CNN in Iowa, SC, and Florida, and only 9 points behind in NH.
- How good was Newt’s speech at the Republican Jewish Coalition today? Pass the popcorn.
- With all due respect, does anyone care who John McCain endorses? What we all care about is who Meghan McCain endorses.
- Obama really, really does not want that pipeline built, he’ll veto payroll tax deal if it’s included.
- Colonel Potter has died. R.I.P. I’ll always remember him more from Dragnet.
- What else?
- Breaking: Judge says Boston can kick out Occupy campers, it’s not speech it’s “a hostile act, an assertion of possession against the rights of another. The act of occupation, this court has determined as a matter of law, is not speech. Nor is it immune from criminal prosecution for trespass or other crimes.” Of course, the wimpy Boston pols have no plans to actually do anything, according to the article.
Two new ads out. Perry’s play for the evangelical vote is heavy-handed, and making an issue of gays in the military versus prayer in school is mixing apples and oranges, unless of course you consider being gay a religion. Romney’s ad seems a bit too coy — we get it, you have a great marriage and Newt burned through two of them — but if you are suggesting that makes Newt unfit or you more fit, then show guts and come right out and say it, hopefully to Newt’s face on stage on Decembe3r 15.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
The “Indiana issue” is a problem for Hiliary and the Democrats to sort out. Once the Democratic Party convention picked Obama, he is the nominee. Whatever happened in the primary is a problem for the party to work out.
Yes, the PUMAs should be hopping mad, again.
they had them on voter fraud in Houston then the warehouse burned down.
“he may have stolen Indiana.”
Good news here is there’s a bunch of Indiana D’s that may well go to prison over this.
I’m not tired of you posting about Newt – he’s what’s making news right now –
I AM tired of the line “I’m so and so and I approved this message.” It’s tired, it had its place back in the day, but it wastes time in a :30 second spot and … ehhhh, won’t rant, just wish they’d stop it. Come up with something more creative, and unique to the candidate.
I thought there was some law on books now that requires them to state they approve the ad.
didn’t this start about 2000 or so due to a fake ad?
my memory is real fuzzy on that, just something thats in the back of my mind.
It was part of the BiPartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (aka McCain-Feingold).
One aspect of the McCain-Feingold Law is a rule known as the “stand by your ad” provision. This rule requires candidates to directly acknowledge that they approve of their campaign advertisements, resulting in the ubiquitous proclamation, “I’m [candidate’s name], and I approve this message.”
Hmmm…so do I have this right? Because Newt lived a wreck of a personal life until he was past 55, it’s out of bounds for Romney to put up what is referred to in politics as a “soft bio” spot of the sort used almost universally by candidates for just about everything? He can’t tout himself as a family man because one of his rivals is not? It’s only acceptable for him to mention his wife admiringly in an ad if he’s willing to denounce Newt’s philandering?
What nonsense. Do you really think that, if he could, Newt wouldn’t make the same spot? But of course, he can’t.
A religious person (Mitt) who attacks a man who openly admits he made mistakes but has sense found his strength of faith and grown as an individual (Newt) will not help himself.
If Romney were to do such an add, and it is perceived as an attempt to say “I’m really righteous, he isn’t,” Mitt will be the one hurt.
Everyone already knows both candidates background anyway (Romney has been running 6 years now, and his family values are pointed out by other quite often) There is really no need to do such a bio, and the possible negative it could bring about on him from the faith community probably isnt worth the risk.
If he gets the nomination, he’ll do one then.
Regarding the Oil Sands Pipeline – I hope that the Republicans DO attach a demand for quick approval to the Payroll Tax Holiday legislation and then call Obama’s bluff. It frames it perfectly for the Republicans to call Obama out on caring more about a couple of field mice and flowers than about American jobs and prosperity. Obama WILL sign it, because he’ll have to after all his ranting about Republicans being miserly for not passing it, lest he be openly called a hypocrite.
Regarding the Boston Court decisions – It’s nice to see a Judge using the proper “Adverse Possession” language against the Occu-Idiots. That’s really what this is: an adverse possession of (usually) public lands against the holder of record (the State). The Occupiers are holding the land Openly, Exclusively, Notoriously, Hostilely(in full violation of the owner’s express wishes) and attempting to get the Continuous requirement. It’s high time that the courts start treating the Occu-Idiots as trespassers.
Apples vs. oranges – they are both fruit.
Attaching that condition to the bill would require major “cojones” something a bit scarce these days among the leadership, methinks, but like you, I would love to see them call his bluff!
Perry’s ad is about tolerance. Gays can serve openly in the military but kids can’t openly celebrate Christmas at school. Christmas trees are called now holiday trees.
I think I’d by just as upset if secularists insisted on calling menorahs Holiday Candle holders.
Secularists love to preach tolerance while they co-opt traditions of faith(s) re-brand them and ridicule the faithful for standing up for their faith.
Ask Catholics if Obama hasn’t been at war with them as Democrats try to force Unions on Faculty at Catholic Schools, Abortion on Catholic Charity Hospitals, and Gay adoption on Catholic Charity Social Services in parishes all over the country. These “political” issues go to the heart of catholic liturgy of natural law. Even Newt seems to have missed out on when life begins in the liturgy.
To many people the war on traditional Faith(s) is a very real one.
The ad is targeted at a specific group in Iowa but it also re-enforces in action what Perry said at C-PAC…
“Our party cannot be all things to all people. It can’t be. Our loudest opponents on the left are never going to like us so let’s stop trying to curry favor with them.” – Rick Perry
Conservatives are for freedom and Gov. Perry is speaking up about the hypocrisy of the “Tolerant” Left enacted through Obama’s policies and federal priorities that divide this country.
If this ad strikes a nerve all to the good.
Gov. Perry has brought lots of conservative issues to the national table in this primary and has done it bluntly letting the chips fall where they may.
Social Security = Ponzi Scheme for younger americans
Global Warming Scam
Obama placing Israel in Danger
Border Security and federal failure
American Energy Security
Obama is a Socialist who is wrecking the economy
Wall ST. – Washington Corruption
Part-Time Citizen Legislature
zero foreign aid negotiation start
He’s taken heat for every blunt statement he’s made but he’ll keep making them.
We don’t live in a “Theocracy” in Texas with Perry as our governor but he’s been fair and conservative. He’s been a consistent leader.
Perry’s ad is not at all about tolerance. He is suggesting that it is wrong that gays can serve openly in the military. In what world is that tolerance?
And he’s also wrong about schoolchildren not being able to celebrate Christmas or pray openly in school. Beyond an anecdotal case here and there, in which the courts roundly rebuked schools for doing exactly that, no child has been prevented from openly praying or celebrating a religious holiday.
I consider myself a secularist, and I would agree that those who try to re-brand a Chirstmas Tree as a “holiday tree” or expunge Christmas from public life are misguided. Most people I know who consider themselves secularists don’t try to do that, Christmas has a legitimate right to be apart of civic life, religious aspects and all, because it is an important part of our heritage. I believe you’re confusing secularists, who think the government should discount their religious preferences when making decisions, with what I would call “theocratic Atheists”, who want to expunge any sign of religion from public life.
Religious artifacts & literature brought to patients were banned at Walter Reed Hospital in memo last week until folks raised hell. (Catholic Priests would’ve been prevented from offering communion to the sick)
It is a problem. The left can’t have it both ways which is to say act on tolerance for some but not others.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t be vigilant, but to argue the militant atheists are anywhere near winning is ridiculous, and that’s exactly what Rick Perry seems to be arguing with his false statement about schoolchildren. When the militant atheists do prevail, it is always for a short time and always quickly rebuked. I see this issue as a thin, dark line. If you’re on the proper side of it, all is good, but the moment you cross over, I see a huge problem. The only exception to my statement that the militant atheists aren’t winning is when it comes to valedictorian/salutatorian addresses at graduation. But that’s a small battle to fight, important as it is.
Where in the ad did Perry say militant atheists?
He said kids can’t openly celebrate christmas in schools or openly pray.
School districts across the country who are afraid of being sued have either banned or controlled how kids celebrate christmas in schools & judges have banned invocations at graduation. Newt mentioned it in the last debate.
Today on CNN when Wolf Blitzer asked him about the ad Perry used the example of Catholic Charities and their battle with the Obama Administration.
He also said Being VP isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit which cracked me up…But then I’m a Texan.
“The director of a national cemetery in Texas is feeling the pressure after families said they were told they could not mention God or Jesus during funerals….
“I can’t even imagine not being able to pray how I want at a funeral,” said protester Lauren Martin. “I mean, who’s to think that some families wouldn’t be able to at a funeral?”
Oscasio came under fire in May after a Houston pastor claimed she asked him to edit the words “Jesus Christ” out of his Memorial Day prayer service”
You’re evidencing, not refuting, Awing1’s case with stories like this (wherein Awing1 said “Beyond an anecdotal case here and there…”). There are isolated cases here and there, and in such a large country, they seem frequent, but there is no ongoing, overwhelming atheist putsch afoot.
Year by year, I personally don’t see any difference in the number or locations of Christmas decorations, creche scenes, and the like. If anything, there are more and they’re going up sooner every year (business marketing).
There is a general assumption that if a person is an atheist, they must be a liberal. Untrue. Folks would be surprised at how many conservative atheists and secularists are out there. They’re under the radar because they are mostly quiet about it and don’t go about proselytizing about it. It is the very few proselytizing, activist atheists that get media coverage, but they are not representative of atheists or secularists in the main.
I didn’t say atheists were all liberal…many are libertarian.
Most religious folks see this as a socialist tactic.
Religion is always the target of Marxist/Socialism.
“…Beyond an anecdotal case here and there, in which the courts roundly rebuked schools for doing exactly that, no child has been prevented from openly praying or celebrating a religious holiday…”Awing:
The American Center of Law and Justice founder, Jay Sekulow has argued for students at the Supreme Court level:
Mar. 19, 2007 | Filed in: Free Speech | Content Type: Docket Blog Post | Relevance 0.42
Supreme Court Called On to Protect Free Speech Rights of Students
Mar. 19, 2007 | Filed in: ACLJ | Content Type: Media Mention | Relevance 0.33
Bloomberg News – Supreme Court Case May Limit Free Speech Rights for Students
May. 6, 2011 | Filed in: Free Speech | Content Type: Law & Justice File | Relevance 0.3
Student Initiated Free Speech
Mar. 18, 2007 | Filed in: ACLJ | Content Type: Media Mention | Relevance 0.29
New York Times – Free Speech Case Divides President Bush & Religious Right
Apr. 2, 2007 | Filed in: ACLJ | Content Type: Radio Show | Relevance 0.27
Free Speech & Easter
Aug. 6, 2009 | Filed in: Free Speech | Content Type: Radio Show | Relevance 0.27
Attack on Free Speech
American children ARE BEING Prevented from exercising their free religous speech unless they have the ability to access legal aid and make the schools give them back their speech rights. How many children(CHILDREN)have the maturity and fortitude to stand up to a school administration for their rights? These cases are not anecdotal but actual cases some of which have been argued before the Supreme Court.
Just thought you might want to see the most recent attack on Christmas and Christians, which you don’t think is happening in schools:
The Fort Worth Texas school district has banned Christmas from the classroom,
“Classroom time should be reserved for learning and the district doesn’t want to alienate non-Christian students.”
“We have students and parents who don’t see Santa Claus as the icon for this time of year, so we have to be concerned about what their feelings are,””
The attacks on Christianity are very real.
Where exactly is the attack on Christians here? That they wont be explicitly endorsing Christmas? No one is banned from doing anything here, outside of distracting the class. They can talk about Christmas, trade present all they want, so long as it doesn’t disturb instruction.
While I disagree with the policy of not officially endorsing Christmas, I do not see failing to celebrate it in official instruction as an attack. Can you honestly say it is?
Awing this has been going on for a long time even if you aren’t that aware of it…doesn’t mean it’s not happening.
It’s like the global warming thingy…starts out small and before y’know it becomes dominant in the culture and the politics. It happens with a lot of trends.
There is none so blind as he who will not see.
Liberty Council has made its mission to defend students who have been harrassed and prevented from exercising their free speech rights. Cases:
workingclass artist said:
“Gov. Perry has brought lots of conservative issues to the national table in this primary and has done it bluntly letting the chips fall where they may.”
“Social Security = Ponzi Scheme for younger americans”
Patently false. SS will be fixed and modified.
“Global Warming Scam”
A recent convert??
“Obama placing Israel in Danger”
Following the crowd…
“Border Security and federal failure”
Whatta joke.. Just went by Home Depot today and there more of ’em than ever. I’ll agree on the federal failure aspect.
“American Energy Security”
This ain’t going to come from Texas and the US’s energy supplies and independence will occur within the next ten years without Perry’s input simply due to technology advances.
“Obama is a Socialist who is wrecking the economy”
Following the crowd
“Wall ST. – Washington Corruption”
Better look into Perry’s role and performance in TX. He’s one slippery critter. Junk bonds to finance toll roads etc.
Following the crowd..
“Part-Time Citizen Legislature”
Whatta joke… They can cause as much damage in half the time it takes the pros in DC.
“zero foreign aid negotiation start”
Big talk but never will happen…
“He’s taken heat for every blunt statement he’s made but he’ll keep making them.”
Yep and he deserves all the heat!
“We don’t live in a “Theocracy” in Texas with Perry as our governor but he’s been fair and conservative. He’s been a consistent leader.”
What rock are you living under??? Texas loses billions every year to gaming operations in neighboring states. Over 2.5 million visits to Vegas by TX residents annually. All because the born again Christian talaban lobby.
So artist guy… How long have you been on the Perry payroll???
I’m not on the payroll…I’m a voter.
Galveston is trying to have gambling again so we’ll see.
Until then there’s always bingo in church basements.
When are you going to vote with your feet Grumpy One?
“Social Security = Ponzi Scheme for younger americans”
Patently false. SS will be fixed and modified.
If you actually believe SS will be fixed in a way other than raising payroll taxes, I have a slightly used bridge for sale in NYC.
Until then, SS = income redistribution from younger, less affluent workers to retired and more affluent geezers.
When LBJ moved SS into the general fund so that congress could dip into it the trouble started as to it’s sustainability. This would have to be the first thing accomplished with regards to reform.
I like the option of choice to younger folks as to management of their account as well.
I like that Gov. Perry is upfront about the “forbidden” topics like AGW & SS reform. Perry along with Libertarian Ron Paul, And Cain’s emphasis on Tax Reform is forcing the narrative. Let the chips fall where they may. It is a response to the times. Hopefully it helps build a stronger platform.
When you have to revert to personal insults in debate, it reflects more on your integrity or lack of it than that of working class artist. If I wasn’t such a good Christian, I would ask you “What is your psychiatric diagnosis and why aren’t you taking your meds”? But I won’t ask you that.
Governor Perry is a winner, if you don’t like Texas and our Governor there are lots of places to move to. Las Vegas, Nevada whom you mentioned has the highest home foreclosure, highest bankruptcy rate, highest unemployment rate in this nation but your dollars would be welcome there to gamble away.
The real question to be answered is why has Obama gotten more money from Wall Street than all the GOP candidate combined ? Surely, it not because they want to be taxed to death. Is it all a shakedown by Obama ? If so, is it illegal ? .. or should it be illegal ?
When I was in school we celebrated/discussed Hanukkah & Christmas. The teachers had decorations in the class room and the kids had a party and exchanged gifts & candy. We lit a menorah each day during Hanukkah and had a christmas tree. We had different guests visit to explain the traditions starting with a Rabbi. A Catholic Priest taught about St. Nick. A Lutheran Priest taught about the Tannenbaum. A Preacher (usually baptist) told the Christmas Story. This was in a public school during the 60’s & 70’s.
It was also a way for teachers to talk about our constitution and the protection of religions. It’s how I learned about Maryland being founded by Catholics.
This was in the “bible belt” Texas, the land of Southern Baptists.
By the time I was in highschool it had changed a lot.
It’s one reason why I put my child in Catholic School & in Catholic School she learned as I did about different faiths/traditions during this season with different speakers. She learned tolerance & respect of the faith of others.
You seem to be missing the larger point WCA, I don’t want to force a school to celebrate Christmas any more than I want to prevent a school from doing so. If the school is interfering with the right of a student to celebrate a religious holiday, then I have a problem, as that would appear to violate the first and fourteenth amendments. But requiring a school to celebrate Christmas just doesn’t make sense. If the local community wants this to be done, they can vote for new board members in their school board elections.
Forcing Christmas is just as bad as preventing it.
Gov.Perry explained his position. He said to Wolf Blitzer that the constitution means freedom of religion not from religion and that the left has tried to drive people of faith from the public square and in certain cases has targeted Churches like Catholics & their charitable organizations. He also said speaking as a veteran of the Air Force that Obama has used the military as a political tool and this has taken a toll. He made the earlier argument of Obama telegraphing to our enemies troop withdrawal to appease his political base and sees this as irresponsible.
He said the repeal of DADT particularly during military engagement of two wars was a political ploy to appease Obama’s base and could effect unit cohesion. (Disruption in Unit cohesion is the same argument preventing women from fighting in combat zones)
Given that lawsuits by Gay Organizations have been launched in Boston to sue for partner benefits & changes on bases; It looks like a long and expensive battle is ahead that could cause division and rancor as people take sides. There is pushback from Military chaplains as the Pentagon scrambles to form coherent policy.
In Gov. Perry’s opinion DADT was a compromise that worked and kept the social politics from overwhelming the armed forces as a disruption that could affect unit cohesion. He’s just stating the other side of the argument. Blitzer didn’t like it but Perry didn’t back down either. When Blitzer read recent comments from some senior military personnel supporting Obama’s repeal Gov. Perry countered with the fact that he talks to a lot of people in the military as well and that they are not in agreement. Big Media wants the public to think this is a settled issue and it’s not.
The bottom line is that this isn’t a settled issue and there is conservative pushback. To Perry Obama’s timing & methods are an issue.
Another example of politicizing the Military by the Obama Administration…
“Sen. Susan Collins on Wednesday blasted the Defense Department for classifying the Fort Hood massacre as workplace violence and suggested political correctness is being placed above the security of the nation’s Armed Forces at home.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/06/military-growing-terrorist-target-lawmakers-warn/#ixzz1fxZ5BgqY
Obama has done this with Law Enforcement Agencies too as seen in recent e-mails from DOJ regarding Fast & Furious and using it to forward Gun Control legislation.
There are always two sides to each argument and Gov. Perry is emphatically stating his conservative argument.
Some folks will agree with him & some folks won’t, But like Social Security Reform he’s put it on the table.
Classifying Ft Hood as workplace violence is a slap in the face.
Perry announced Veterans for Perry today in SC. Veteran groups were part of the effort to recruit Perry during the summer.
Newt might still be making the best argument for conservatives, and he has a clear lead. Bolton seems pretty good.
But for some balance on the Newt/Beck interview, here is part of Beck’s response to the Obama and Newt claims to be kinda like Teddy Roosevelt.
Taking the senate seems more and more vital.
“Taking the senate seems more and more vital”
Agree completely….Newt says he is like Teddy Roosevelt without mentioning that TR’s beliefs were what I have always felt became the beginning of the Progressive movement that has led us to where we are now….Newt has one other thing in common with Teddy….an enormous ego.
If Newt becomes President John Bolton is going to have to take extra vitamins to stay strong enough to rein him in when he gets another urge to sit on that famous Pelosi bench.
Apropos of none of the above, off and on throughout this 70th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, I’ve been roaming through YouTube looking at relevant videos. I love this one — a movie newsreel seen in theaters across the country in the dark days of 1942. Not primarily war footage or even war news. It’s the Marine Corps Band (and in part, an orchestra).
If you want to spend only a few minutes, skip to the 7 minute mark where the band marches to “Semper Fidelis.” Always makes me want to grab a rifle and march with them.
JEB: I was Army, but . . . hoo-RAH!
They’re still at it! Not surprisingly. Here’s the West Coast Marine Band at the 2007 Rose Ball hoopla. In this video, they march to “Semper Fidelis” at the outset.
I changed my mind. I don’t want to march with a rifle. I’d pay good money to stand in for the Drum Major for ten minutes.
“I know that people are sick of me posting stuff about Newt, but he’s crushing Romney in new polling from CNN in Iowa, SC, and Florida, and only 9 points behind in NH.”
Am I the first to note that this rapid surge in Newt Gingrich’s popularity came immediately on the heels of Professor Jacobson’s endorsement?
Who’ll run the blog when he’s made Attorney General?
Prof— you’ve got to start posting what’s going down here in Washington State.
Taxpayers (2/3 landslide) voted to get the state out of the liquor business- which as a state and tribal owned monopoly.
Unions are now suing like crazy to overturn the vote.
The voter initiative was largely funded by Costco. The lawsuits to overturn are 100% funded by unions.
“What we all care about is who Meghan McCain endorses.”
Whoa! Wait a second! Like, okay . . . soooooo did you miss this maybe? Huh?
Like, you know, if she like thinks that Michelle Bachmann is “more smarter than Sarah Palin,” then how is that, like, not an endorsement?
Like, dude . . . get with it! See, you gotta be able to pick up on the stuff that is all nuanced out!
Meghan McCain is less dumber than a rock. Well, most rocks.
while it may have some appeal to a small slice of the electorate, can perry truly believe that pining for the days when open discrimination against gay citizens was socially acceptable is the path to the whitehouse?
This Administration is at least as rotten as that of Richard Nixon.
I come away with a different take than you, Prof, on both ads.
Perry seems to me to be saying that openness is the issue. We’re an open society when it comes to gays but not to even such a small matter as saying “Merry Christmas” which isn’t even particularly Christian. Or praying, which also isn’t particularly Christian. The right to be who you are extends to every area of life but religion.
As for the Romney ad, if it’s a shot at Gingrich, it’s also a shot at Reagan who was divorced and changed political parties. I think it’s an appeal to Romney’s personal steadiness against the charges that he flip flops and follows what is politically convenient.
[…] William A. Jacobson, Legal Insurrection […]
Since energy usage has become the equivalent of harlotry, murder & adultery, energy users are being threatened with the lake of fire by Adam, Eve & the Lord Jesus Christ. I am now married to Anders Behring Breivik 09/20/2011 by the Lord Jesus Christ. I already have children, grandchildren & great grandchildren. Thank you for reading.
GOD IS NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, BUT THAT ALL MIGHT BELIEVE ON HIS NAME-JESUS.Repent & be baptized! Jesus said, “I am God there is none besides me.” “I am the Way, the Truth & the Life. No man comes to the Father except by me.” “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” “As many as received Him to them He gave the power to become the sons of God the Father even to those who believe on His name.” Jesus’ healing ministry began with adult baptism.
A New Agenda: We the people need no gas & no electric to have a man child with the spouses of our youth around the world. We shall build homes without electric, without gas, without roofs that exceed 7 & 1/2 feet, & with incinerators to burn garbage, burn dung, burn urine, & burn blood rags so that the entire sisterhood has a man child with the husbands of their youth.
TAKE MY CONFESSION WITH YOU. I have smoked cigars for 11 years & have no lungs, liver & kidneys at 45 years old. I continue to live through the Lord Jesus Christ as I received the Holy Spirit at 4 years old & was baptized as an adult in 1997. I continue to read my Bible& now use burned dung, urine, blood rags & tobacco butts to make meat offerings to eat. The Old Testament says that burned dung, urine, & blood rags were a part of the laws of Moses. Yes, it was in 2001 while I was driving to Florida that I was talking to the saints in heaven & Isaiah said, “You know that 70 years from now the sun will be dimmed in the sky” Oh, I said, “I don’t know.” I went back over the Old Testament& it said, “The sun shall be dimmed in the sky” & “I shall make them eat the grass of the field.” & “all these things shall come to pass” before theLord Jesus Christ returns.
4 years ago I was stamping my feet at work over the excessive electric usage & complaining that I didn’t have a husband & children to God the Father. I prayed, kneeling at my bed as to adopting children. Then while I was at work I adopted over 500 children in Swahili (I was born with a spot-was a reject in Hebrew) to find out what day it was. I had been taught prophesy at Wheaton Evangelical Free Church in 1979 & 1980. We went back & forth in time while Governor Blagovich was verifying. We came up with 17 years of darkened sun before July 29, 2081.
July 29, 2081-the rapture of believers in Christ Jesus-all those who received the Holy Spirit-at the trumpet sound in heaven-1st the dead & then the living ascended to heaven in a twinkling of an eye
July 29, 2081-2088-the Great Tribulation-God’s wrath is poured out on the earth, Judgment of the Believers in Christ Jesus & the Marriage Supper of the Lamb in heaven
2088-3057-the Reign of Christ Jesus-(the Bible stated “1000 years” & in actuality it was 969 years)
3057-3059-the Devil is loosed out of the pit –(the Bible stated “a time & a half” & in actuality it was 1 & three fourths years)-the battle of Armageddon-the nations are drawn together for the last battle in the Valley of Megiddo-the Lord Jesus comes down of a white horse with the words, “King of Kings, Lord of Lords” written on His thigh & a sword comes out of His mouth to destroy all who are in the battle. The bible says that the blood runs a “horses’ bridle high” & birds feed on the bodies.
3059-the old heavens& the old earth pass away & the new heavens & new earth are created by the Lord Jesus Christ-at this point in time the Lord Jesus says,“Depart from me I never knew you.” to all who died in the battle of Armageddon, to those who took the mark of the beast in their right hand or forehead during the tribulation, to all who died during our time without receiving the Holy Spirit, & to all those who died during the flood of Noah’s day in wickedness. Jesus says, “In this world you shall have trouble, but I have overcome the world.”
Jesus says, “If we confess our sins He is faithful & just to forgive us our sins & to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Sincerely through Lord Jesus Christ & Wishing You A Merry Christmas, Allison Grace Karalus
Bye bye, take it elsewhere.