Image 01 Image 03

FDA Waited 15 Months to Investigate Complaints About Baby Formula Plant

FDA Waited 15 Months to Investigate Complaints About Baby Formula Plant

“Had [the] FDA initiated the Abbott facility inspection sooner, [the] FDA may have identified the issues at the Abbott facility and recommended that Abbott recall products sooner.”

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) discovered the FDA waited 15 months to respond to a complaint about the conditions at an Abbott Nutrition facility.

Those conditions led to a nationwide formula shortage in 2022.

The whistleblower claimed employees cut corners:

For instance, according to the complaint, the employee reported observing events that were understated or inaccurately described “to limit or avoid oversight” and then “failing to maintain accurate maintenance records.”

After several samples of a batch of infant formula were found to contain microorganisms, or “micros,” the whistleblower claims that the plant performed a time code removal, in which formula produced around the same time as the contaminated samples was discarded, but formula produced outside of those time codes was released to be sold without additional testing to make sure it was safe for consumption.

In 2020, the complaint says, product wasn’t recalled from the market even after management became aware of a problem with the integrity of the packaging, an issue that the whistleblower said should have caused the manufacturer to take the product off shelves and conduct more testing.

The tainted formula caused the death of two infants, and several landed in the hospital.

The OIG also found that the FDA doesn’t have policies to identify problems with the formula.

From the report:

FDA had inadequate policies and procedures or lacked policies and procedures to identify risks to infant formula and respond effectively through its complaint, inspection, and recall processes. For example, FDA had not developed an organizational structure or assigned responsibilities to handle whistleblower complaints in an efficient and effective manner and took more than 15 months to address a February 2021 Abbott facility whistleblower complaint. In addition, FDA did not escalate an October 2021 whistleblower complaint to senior leadership, resulting in a nearly 4-month delay before senior leadership was aware of the complaint. We also found that FDA did not have policies and procedures to establish timeframes for the initiation of mission-critical inspections, which contributed to one inspection being initiated 102 days after a whistleblower complaint was received. Further, FDA did not have sufficient policies and procedures on how to initiate an infant formula recall under its FDA-required recall authority.

The FDA received two complaints from one whistleblower. A second whistleblower sent one in April 2022 with different information.

The first whistleblower sent the complaint to the Department of Labor, which then sent it to the FDA’s whistleblower inbox.

Despite having a dedicated inbox, the OIG said the “FDA did not have adequate policies and procedures for identifying and investigating whistleblower complaints received” in the box.

This is insanity:

We also found that, with regard to whistleblower complaints, FDA did not develop an organizational structure or assign responsibilities to enable the organization to operate in an efficient and effective manner. According to FDA officials, in February 2021, FDA did not have a permanent NCCC [National Consumer Complaint Coordinator], and the NCCC position was covered by other individuals. When there is not a permanent NCCC, FDA assigns the NCCC’s duties to other individuals to maintain the continuity of operations. The NCCC plays an important role in: (1) identifying and accounting for whistleblower complaints by monitoring email inboxes for whistleblower complaints, (2) assigning whistleblower complaints to the appropriate district office or center, and (3) recording receipt and followup activities for all whistleblower complaints. FDA provided documentation showing that the NCCC position was vacant from January 5, 2020, through July 31, 2021, and was filled on August 1, 2021. The individuals covering the NCCC’s duties in February 2021 had other responsibilities and did not identify the February 2021 whistleblower complaint when DOL sent it. FDA stated that an individual covering the NCCC’s responsibilities inadvertently archived the February 2021 whistleblower complaint and did not forward it to ORA for investigation. FDA identified the February 2021 whistleblower complaint and forwarded the complaint to ORA [Office of Regulatory Affairs] in June 2022 following a search prompted by a press inquiry about the whistleblower complaint.

Before July 26, 2021, the FDA had no instructions or procedures to send whistleblower complaints to senior leadership.

The agency dropped the “unwritten policy” and said it would treat the complaints like consumer complaints.

Guys, it gets worse.

The whistleblower sent hard copies of the complaints directly to seven FDA employees in October 2021.

Yes, SEVEN employees.

The whistleblower also sent the hardcopies to “certain ORA district directors, ORA district staff, and the FDA Medical Director for Infant Formula and Medical Foods.”

Yes, the whistleblower sent hard copies to the FDA Medical Director for Infant Formula and Medical Foods.

I’m fuming.

Senior leadership blamed the lack of mailroom staff due to COVID.

Um, that doesn’t excuse the lack of action on the emails.

A proper investigation of the facility showed “unsanitary conditions, a leaky roof, lax safety practices and multiple strains of a bacteria that can be deadly to infants.”

The plant shut down for months, causing a national shortage.

“Had [the] FDA initiated the Abbott facility inspection sooner, [the] FDA may have identified the issues at the Abbott facility and recommended that Abbott recall products sooner,” said the report.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:
,

Comments


 
 0 
 
 4
TargaGTS | June 18, 2024 at 7:39 pm

Think about how the media would have covered this story during an election year if that election year were 1992, 2004 or 2020. Since it’s happening in an election where a Democrat is standing for reelection, they’ve decided to smother the story in its crib (no pun intended). A google search returns few hits since this story broke several days ago. CBS (maybe the only broadcaster to cover it), printed an article on their ‘Moneywatch’ section of their website with the title: ‘FDA “inadvertently archived” complaint about Abbott infant formula plant, audit says’


 
 0 
 
 1
gonzotx | June 18, 2024 at 8:13 pm

Murders

Sue them into oblivion

When President Trump gets back in, he has to clean this nasty country


 
 0 
 
 1
henrybowman | June 18, 2024 at 8:46 pm

Just don’t sell a rifle you don’t need anymore to your neighbor.
Then you’ll see how fast the government can jump.

This is all bureaucratic nonsense. You don’t need “well developed policies and procedures and assigned responsibilities” to look at a complaint about baby food and say, “This is awful! We’d better do check into it!”

That people cited the alleged absence of those policies etc. means the bureaucrats were looking for excuses. Fire them all!


 
 0 
 
 0
E Howard Hunt | June 19, 2024 at 6:13 am

Those two dead babies won’t be able to die from the upcoming mandatory bird flu vaccine.


 
 1 
 
 1
Lucifer Morningstar | June 19, 2024 at 8:21 am

I’m shocked! Shocked I tell you that we are now finding out the FDA is just another government administration that has completely failed to do the job it was tasked to do.

No, not really. If people haven’t realized by now that the whole alphabet soup mess that calls itself the “Federal Government” has failed and no longer provides any useful service or protections to the citizens of this country I don’t know what two say. The FAA had the Boeing debacle. The FDOT had the East Palestine train wreck. So no, it isn’t a shock at all that we now find out that the FDA knew (or should have known) months in advance there were serious problems at the Abbott manufacturing facility that would necessitate a shutdown of the facility and a massive recall of infant formula. Just your federal government working for you . . . or not.


 
 0 
 
 2
Dolce Far Niente | June 19, 2024 at 10:48 am

What is not mentioned is that any food-processing facility gets regular inspections from STATE inspectors: timing and department vary with the states.

Clearly, these inspections were not happening or were perfunctory. Did the whistle-blowers not speak to or contact their state regulators?

The FDA is certainly culpable in not responding to information received, but there are people at the local level who were directly responsible for allowing Abbott to continue to process under unsanitary conditions.

Guess they aren’t called “F–ing Drug Addicts” for nothing


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | June 19, 2024 at 11:27 am

of course there were policies

they do this when they are caught

OH MY WE DIDNT HAVE ANY LAWS /REGS

WELLLL ITS NOT OUR FAULT

but dont you worry our little children

we will now write MORE REGS/LAWS

SQUEEZING THE LIFE OUT OF AMERICA

with their ineptitude

the military is dei


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | June 19, 2024 at 11:31 am

if there wasnt a buffer between the politicians and the companies

WHATS THAT BUFFER??

THE MEDIA

IF THE WHISTLEBLOWERS WERE CONFIDENT IN THE MEDIA

THEY COULD GO THERE AND EXPOSE ANY AND ALLLLL of these criminal acts

but the msm is beholden to the lefty

and the lefty has been in charge for decades


 
 0 
 
 0
retiredcantbefired | June 19, 2024 at 11:57 am

Looks like the FDA was too busy arranging its next payoff from a pharmaceutical company…

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.