Susan Rice has served with “honor and distinction” too
Another “Benghazi talking points” problem?
Video via Patterico
Why is Rice always put out front to go out on a limb for this administration?
Some might even construe the abusive treatment of Rice to by White House to be, well, misogynistic. http://t.co/R4YTFJ66km
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) June 3, 2014
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Misogynistic AND racist . . .
It looks like my “up” got registered as both down and up.
Sure she has.
If by “honor and distinction” you mean “deceit and dishonor.”
Sure he served with honor and distinction — right up until the moment he deserted.
Susan Rice’s definitive statements on Sunday talk shows are as rock solid as
the stock market–unemployment numbers–Global Warming– the sands of the Sahara.Rice has the distinction because she’s the highest ranking person willing to bald faced lie. Not just twist the truth, but unequivocally LIE about what is happening.
Stand by for her to get appointed to some cushy ‘for life’ job at the end of the Obama administration.
A slight disagreement with your comment. Barrack Obama is the highest ranking person in this country wiling to bald face lie.
Meanwhile – the MSM is like Pinoccio’s girlfriend screaming out in the throws of passion, “Lie to me! Lie to me!!”
“Why is Rice always put out front to go out on a limb for this administration?”
Gender and tint, not to mention her skills at reading carefully crafted leftist talking points and sounding like she really believes them. In short, look for her to get a job reading the nightly news on TV when she leaves this administration.
I don’t think it has anything to do with ‘gender or tint’. It’s just BO’s way of giving us the finger. No other reason to pick the face of the Benghazi lie for this. Not like she was the only one in town.
This^^
It’s not complicated.
Nice line for her resume: Designated White House Liar
She’s too enthusiastic of a liar, not bright enough for doublespeak, and not “elite” enough for the Georgetown thinkers…
Hence, she has no place in the Clinton III Administration.
Someone should tell her.
I don’t know, I think she was also played pretty well by Hillary, using her to do what should have been Hillary’s dirty work on the Sunday shows following Benghazi. It’s like woman-on-woman crime. That was a classic Clinton move. I think Hillary played Susan well — she’s no doubt ‘likeable enough’.
They had Rice start the latest narrative: the newfound “sacred duty” of “no man left behind.” Barry and Hill have since chimed in … a Benghazi trio deja vu.
By using a woman named Rice they’re hoping to stick Bush with the blame.
She will read and adamantly defend whatever is written in the talking points. The woman has no sense of shame or honor, and little political ambition, which makes her the ideal go-to spox when they will need someone who can keep a straight face through anything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQfyMndk4Ac
In which a Valley Girl from State pisses on the Berghdal troopers.
Heh! Benghazi 2.0. Good…!!! So… It just keeps getting better and better.
I think Susan Rice is a love sick fool, she is smitten with Obama and will humiliate and degrade herself if he asks.
One would think Madeline Albright or Hillary Clinton would try to talk some sense into her. Has anyone ever seen someone throw away a promising career so thoroughly and then come back and do it again?
I guess talking head politician is more qualified to address his service distinction that his ACTUAL platoon members who were physically present in his trail of slime…one who even called him a friend before desertion.
One could say the same thing about Benedict Arnold who was our finest combat commander up until the day he went over to Britain.
I unsersatnd the idea of “taking one for the team” – but twice?
Doing a great job, Brownie, er, Susey.
I don’t know why Obama, at this point, doesn’t just have her go on all the talk-shows and just say, “Whatever.”
I understand that she shall receive her 20 pieces of silver.
You whom may not understand the reference… who cares.