Trump: “The Deal with Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete”
Text and terms will not be released until after in-person signing at the end of the week.
Donald Trump announced an agreement with Iran has been reached.
“The Deal with Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all!” President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/RdSwyEdEtO
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 14, 2026
The text of the agreement will not be released until it is signed. So we don’t really know what’s in it. Hopefully it doesn’t look anything like the leaks and reporting, because if it does, it’s a historic sellout. It can’t be that bad. We’ll see.
Vice President Vance told Fox News that he plans to be at the signing ceremony in Geneva, and it's possible that President Trump will attend. pic.twitter.com/mvZQw7bDp6
— Trey Yingst (@TreyYingst) June 14, 2026
Senator Graham: "I am somewhat concerned that Iran’s view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming". https://t.co/iUfasPQbym
— Amichai Stein (@AmichaiStein1) June 14, 2026
In other words, we are in for five days of spin and exaggeration from both sides before we even see the thing. https://t.co/NZWatRtmCE
— laurence norman (@laurnorman) June 14, 2026
🇮🇷🇺🇸 Mehr: This is the US-Iran MOU
1- Permanent and immediate cessation of war on all fronts, including Lebanon
2- The US commitment to non-interference in Iran's internal affairs and respect for the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
3- Complete lifting of the naval…
— Amichai Stein (@AmichaiStein1) June 14, 2026
🚨Trump is starting to do damage control…Trump told the New York Times that if Iran does not ultimately reach a final nuclear deal with the US, he will renew military attacks against Tehran or turn the US into the "overseer of the Middle East" in exchange for 20% of the region's…
— Raylan Givens (@JewishWarrior13) June 14, 2026
Trump tells NYT:
– Deal with Iran reached despite Netanyahu's objections
– Strikes will resume if a nuclear accord isn't reached
– Strait of Hormuz will be “permanently toll-free” pic.twitter.com/vzdfR5k72z— Faytuks News (@Faytuks) June 14, 2026
Netanyahu informed Trump that Israel will not pull IDF forces from Lebanon and does not consider itself bound by the Lebanon clause in the U.S.-Iran agreement.
– Maariv
— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) June 14, 2026
OK, if it's such a great deal, don't brag about it —publish it. Don't send out "senior administration official" Vance and "highly placed diplomat" Witkoff to anonymously spin it. Publish it. In full, with annexes if any. https://t.co/EiGHdHD395
— Gary Weiss (@gary_weiss) June 14, 2026
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
The Democrats and GOP establishment types heads will explode if Trump succeeds in stopping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and opens the oil corridor from the Gulf States.
No matter how hard they try they just can’t seem to derail Trump and pro American policies.
They were open before this war began
Yes the straits were open – at the whim of a government hostile to the United States, and actively and aggressively hostile to all its neighbors in the middle east. They could (and did) disrupt world trade.
Now they are going to be under the control of those with a commercial interest in keeping them open.
That’s quite a difference.
Now you can argue that the process is not complete, that Iran will attempt to close the straits again, that they will still secretly fund aggression, that they will still attempt to develop nuclear weapons and all of that is true, but essentially they will be doing all of it vastly weakened.
So all Iran has to do to get a weak US gov is threaten the waterways.
DRILL BABY DRILL!!!!!
Nobody believes there is a deal
Including Trump, but he wants them to behave till midterm, highly unlikely
Does history record any time when Islamists have actually honored an agreement?
Precisely. See the entry on “taqiyya,” in the book describing Islamofascists’/Muslim terrorists’ tactical ploys and feints, in dealing with non-Muslim “infidels.”
Better still
https://youtu.be/QuxipzVtqz0?si=k7U10YNm0hFT1b2f
We had a deal with Morocco in the Barbary Coast period that seems to have been honored by them at least for a while.
The Islamic doctrine of taqiyya allows Muslims to feign agreement to accords with non-Muslims, out of self-preservation, until such time as Muslims regain their strength and regain tactical advantage.
That’s precisely what’s happening, here, and it’s what’s happened every single time the greasy Iranian terrorist regime has signed an agreement, during its nearly fifty-year history.
Still have it in fact, one of the longest lasting agreements ever, reached in 1786.
Every Muslim is not like every other Muslim. Attempting to put every Muslim into a single category’ is a foolish as trying to put every ‘Christian’ in a single category. Its tribalism.
Israel and Hezbollah were not parties to the negotiations and cannot be bound since they are not signatories. If it’s such a great deal, let us see it. Otherwise it feels a lot like capitulation to Iran, to me. I’m sure the leopard has changed its spots. /s
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I’m in the same situation at home. I am still a real badass and I like to beat up people at the bar, but since mama cut off my beer money, I can’t go to the bar very often.
Not even the sand bar?
(FYI: They don’t have yuengling…) 🙁
Depends: do they have beach volley ball?
The Hezbos will do something at the behest of Iran that the Israelis have to respond to–then the Mullahtards will claim “the deal” was violated.
its worse than that. all they have to do is threaten the shipping lane and dems win in the next election.
Threaten with what? I don’t think Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, et al, are going to just sit by and allow Iran to become a force in the area again. Their economies have been impacted but Iran’s nonsense too. In the past they lacked both the consensus and the firepower to do anything. It required the hitting of the US. The power balance has shifted in their favor now, especially since there will be no nuclear black mail.
The terms of the deal, as stated, are totally irrelevant. Iran could promise to do X, Y and Z — it’s all performative, theatrical and self-serving. The Iranian Islamofascist/Muslim terrorist regime has demonstrated and proven, innumerable times over its wretched inception in 1979, that it is a manifestly deceitful, mendacious, untrustworthy and unrepentant bad faith actor.
The Iranian regime is playing for time and money, running out the clock on #47’s term. the U.A.E. is primed to release $20 billion of frozen Iranian assets, even before the main issues are negotiated. That’s not chump change. And, protecting Hezb’allah from justified Israeli reprisals against its incessant attacks on northern Israel should have been a non-starter, but, is somehow included in this framework, from the Iranian perspective.
I wrote about this on another thread. From everything that has come out so far, and there isn’t much, this is a bad deal. Not as bad as Barry’s deal, but bad, My scorecard:
Big Winner: Iran. Keeps missile programs. Keep proxies. Strait opened. No US interference. Drives a wedge between US and Israel. Keeps goverment,
Winner: Pakistan Turkey and Qatar to differing extents because of their facilitation of deal.
Winner: Iran proxies. With Israel defanged upon penalty of trouble with US they keep control where they are and rearm.
Loser :Lebanon and Yemen – Still saddled with Iranian proxies,
Loser: US – what did we get out of this whole exercise for the billions spent?
Loser GOP/Trump Deal trashes brand, Who is a great deal maker now? Midterms are now at high risk.
Loser: Gulf states – They got droned for hosting US bases and some of their oil infrastructure was destroyed. They will rethink their position,
Big Loser: Iranian dissidents – 40k+ got killed off and they are no closer to
overthrowing the mullahs.
Big Loser: Israel – Nothing changes, They will still be a target but US will strongarm them to not respond. This is a degeneration of their status quo.
Obviously my scorecard is likely to change as the deal is completed and revealed.
I should have added that the US consumer ends up NEUTRAL, The deal should result in lower energy costs and therefore lower inflation but that is balanced by the damage already done and the damage that will be done if the democrats take congress in the midterms.
US consumers will continue to be vulnerable to attacks by Iran and its proxies.
As the price of oil goes so does inflation in the US.
I would add Taiwan as a loser. China sees our weakness.
I would agree with that. Good observation.
Most Americans don’t understand how much or economy and military is dependent on Taiwan at present. Microchips. This could change in the future as manufacturing comes back to the US, but at present we are very vulnerable. Just as we are vulnerable to products outsourced to China at present, especially medicines and health supplies.
To put things in perspective – UK’s Starmer likes the deal – RUN!!!
Euros can’t wait to start pouring $$ into Iran.
Isn’t that always the case.
“Obviously my scorecard is likely to change as the deal is completed and revealed.”
Obviously. Because we don’t know what’s in the deal.
My prediction: this so-called deal blows up in 48 hours, Wednesday at the latest. Israel will be blamed.
That is a reasonable prediction. They’ve already been accused of potentially sabotaging the deal by Trump and the head loser at the UN.
The reports can’t be accurate. Otherwise we’re taking a time machine to this January and it costs $25 billion dollars. I don’t think he’s dumb enough to settle for that.
Once signed it will be dead in 48 hours.
it’s totally dead in Nov.
It just seems we are back to wear we were pre war
Except for the oil pipe lines being built to pump and not need the boats anymore, at least not as many , and OPEC is breaking up
We aren’t a slave to the ME regarding the oil prices
Trump is used to negotiating real estate deals in good faith.
Iran is used to lying to get what they want.
These two characteristics are incompatible.
Iran will say whatever they need to say to get Trump to back off. Once he’s out of office, or hamstrung by the opposition, Iran will ignore everything they’ve promised because they are permitted to deceive unbelievers.
Trump’s military advisors know this. Will he listen to them, or is his desire to get a “deal” — no matter how bad — his only priority?
Time will tell.
I would add Taiwan as a loser. China sees our weakness.
Sorry for the accidental repost.
Can’t trust any mullah but a DEAD mullah.
“we have to sign it to find out what’s in it”
deja vu all over again.
Trump is desperate for a way out of this mess and he will sign almost anything knowing it cannot be enforced. 60 days to negotiate the disposal of their nuclear “Dust”? We know what that means, they will hide half of it and mix the other half with sand. They will not honor their end of this deal and Trump will decline to do anything about it. Iran didn’t win like the Dems and msm claim, but Trump didn’t accomplish what he wanted either.
Israel is not happy and will defend itself to the end
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/israel-iran-agreement/2026/06/15/id/1259673/
IMO I don’t see this MOA turning into a long-standing agreement. For whatever reason Trump allowed the neocon,.corporatist establishment to talk him into not destroying Iranian infrastructure to force a better deal, compel the surrender of the regime or motivate to populace to overthrow the regime.
Again my opinion but we’re already gonna bear the negative aspects of the conflict through the mid terms. It would have been wiser to add the positive aspects of a better deal, an unconditional surrender, the populace rising up and overthrowing the regime or even just blowing the heck of the place, turning it into slag and sailing off to OUR hemisphere and letting the Nations with far more direct interests deal with the future. It isn’t as if we couldn’t hit the nuke sites again if necessary, maybe even using tac nukes to seal it tight.
tac nukes will never be an option IMO. Too close to Russia. Too precedent setting in this day and age, We use them in Iran essentially gives permission for China to use them in Taiwan and Russia in Ukraine as well as Inda/Pakistan on each other in their disputed territory,
I can see us hitting the sites again. In fact I would have been happy if that is all we did was slag those sites. That is one of the few things that potentially threatens us and it is something Israel would have difficulty doing.
The key difference is the ‘aggressor’ Nations want to capture the other more/less mostly intact not nuke it. Then there’s the issue that these Nations could use a tac nuke of they choose and we’d do …what exactly? Launch our own at them? Risk a no kidding nuclear Armageddon over some other Nation? If they hit the USA or a major US installation overseas then yeah but I don’t see the USA risking a nuclear war over use of a tac nuke in Ukraine. The FR might but I doubt it. If a tit for tat keeps going things spin sideways very fast with nukes. IMO the nuclear umbrella for our ‘allies’ is mostly reduced post cold war to a big threat of unknown proportion and nobody, yet anyway, really wants to peek behind the curtain, but if they did I suspect they’d see there’s no ‘wizard’ …especially in a different administration.
I hope we wouldn’t die for Europe. They aren’t worth.
While I’m a big fan of Japan I can’t see us dying for them or Korea or Taiwan,
I don’t think we would die for Israel either nor should we.
The one exception to all this if if an adversary nukes a US base causing a lot of deaths, We have to protect our own people otherwise what’s the point of it all.
Leave a Comment