Image 01 Image 03

Trustees at Auburn U. Dissolve Faculty Senate and Take Control of Curriculum, Sparking Outrage

Trustees at Auburn U. Dissolve Faculty Senate and Take Control of Curriculum, Sparking Outrage

“Faculty have not simply lost shared governance structures; they have lost their primary mechanism for collective voice.”

The folks at the AAUP are very unhappy about this.

The College Fix reports:

Auburn trustees spark faculty backlash after taking full control of curriculum, dissolving senate

The Auburn University Board of Trustees disbanded the Faculty Senate on Friday and took full authority over the school’s academic matters.

The board unanimously approved the two changes with no debate and will now control “course offerings, curriculum, degree requirements and academic credentials,” according to Inside Higher Ed

This mimics a new Alabama law that limits faculty senates to an advisory-only role, even though the new law doesn’t technically apply to the school as a land-grant institution.

Further, the board is replacing the Faculty Senate with a new group, called the Presidential Academic Advisory Council, which will create “a direct, structured and professionally responsible channel for faculty perspective to the president, provost and senior academic leadership,” according to the Board of Trustees’ memorandum.

The council will include “one elected faculty member from each academic college, selected by a vote of the faculty member’s respective college” and “one faculty member from each academic college appointed by the President.”

The decision has drawn criticism from faculty and the school’s American Association of University Professors chapter.

AAUP Senior Program Officer Mark Criley told Inside Higher Ed the changes represent the “end of shared governance” at Auburn.

“If you’re designing that body and selecting half of its membership, then you’re losing the frank, candid, informed judgment of the faculty,” Criley said.

He also expressed concern that faculty members who ask difficult questions or challenge authority may not be selected to the council.

In a statement, the AAUP chapter wrote, “Faculty are not employees in a corporate structure to be managed through top-down authority.”

“They are experts entrusted with educating students and advancing knowledge, and that work depends on collaboration, shared governance, and strong academic freedom protections,” it wrote.

Auburn educational leadership Professor Lisa Kensler also criticised the changes in an open letter published by The Auburn Plainsman.

“Faculty have not simply lost shared governance structures; they have lost their primary mechanism for collective voice,” she wrote.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

docduracoat | June 9, 2026 at 11:47 am

Good!

The Gentle Grizzly | June 9, 2026 at 2:23 pm

I guess this means that at least sort-of, the adults are back in charge.

henrybowman | June 9, 2026 at 3:24 pm

“Faculty have not simply lost shared governance structures; they have lost their primary mechanism for collective voice,” she wrote.”

They had already lost their minds — a terrible thing to waste.
Looks like Auburn trustees were wise enough to read the handwriting on the wall balance sheet before it turned red.

Why? What re they planning on doing differently with the curriculum? What has the faculty done or planned that they didn’t like? Is this just an organizational change or is it something of real substance?

I hate “reporting” that doesn’t even ask relevant questions.

healthguyfsu | June 9, 2026 at 7:37 pm

A faculty collective voice is a myth. Put 10 of us in a room and we won’t agree on most everything.

drsamherman | June 10, 2026 at 2:11 am

Uhm, the trustees collectively are likely the legal entity that owns the university through Alabama state law. The faculty are employees of the university and subject to its governance whether they want to admit it or not. Whoever signs their paycheck IS their employer, and it isn’t their union.