Image 01 Image 03

Newsom’s Effort to Flip Five Red Seats May Fall Short of his Expectations

Newsom’s Effort to Flip Five Red Seats May Fall Short of his Expectations

“District by district, the picture emerging is one of Republican resilience — and in some cases, a surprising Democratic collapse in races Newsom’s allies had hoped to turn.”

In response to Texas’s mid-decade redistricting plan, which was intended to net Republicans five additional House seats in the 2026 midterms, California Democrats unveiled a new congressional map of their own designed to flip five currently Republican-held districts blue. The Golden State currently has 52 congressional districts, with Democrats controlling 43 and Republicans just nine. The hope was that the new map would reduce Republican representation in Congress to just four districts or less than 8% of California’s congressional delegation.

Yet while California is undeniably a deep-blue state, President Trump still won nearly 40% of the vote there in 2024. This raises questions about whether such an aggressive partisan redraw accurately reflects the state’s political landscape.

The redraw targeted the following five Republican-held districts: District 1 (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), District 3 (Rep. Kevin Kiley), District 22 (Rep. David Valadao), District 41 (Rep. Ken Calvert), and District 48 (Rep. Darrell Issa).

Unfortunately for California Gov. Gavin Newsom, the results might fall short of his expectations. Citing early returns from Tuesday’s primaries, RealClearPolitics‘ Susan Crabtree made the case that “California voters appear to have poured cold water on at least some of those plans.”

“District by district,” she said, “the picture emerging is one of Republican resilience – and in some cases, a surprising Democratic collapse in races Newsom’s allies had hoped to turn.”

She reviewed the latest developments in each district affected by the new map.

In the newly redrawn CA-06, Rep. Kevin Kiley, who announced in March that he was switching his political affiliation from Republican to independent (but would continue to caucus with the GOP), strongly opposes gerrymandering on both sides of the political aisle.

Crabtree reported that Kiley outperformed expectations in his primary and will likely advance to the general election. Republican Michael Stansfield is currently in second place, while Democrat Dick Pan trails. She noted that, “it could wind up a clean Democratic shutout.”

On Thursday, Kiley told ABC News, “We are not going to let self-serving politicians take away the area’s representation. We’re fighting back against Newsom’s gerrymander in California, and then we’ll end this plague on our democracy nationwide.”

Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, who currently represents CA-48, is retiring. Crabtree explained:

San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond, a popular longtime Republican and former Navy pilot, jumped into the race with strong party backing.

In Tuesday’s primary, Desmond emerged with a more than 20-point lead ahead of Democratic San Diego City Councilwoman Marni von Wilpert.

The other Democrat in the race, Ammar Campa-Najjar, a Naval reservist, former Obama Labor Department official, and grandson of a Palestinian, has amassed only 9.7% of the vote so far. He was backed by San Diego Rep. Sara Jacobs’ billionaire grandfather, Qualcomm founder Irwin Jacobs, who poured at least $800,000 into the race.

It marked the fourth election loss in row after members of the Jacobs family bankrolled two prior runs for Congress and another failed campaign for mayor of Chula Vista.

In CA-22, with 54% of the vote counted, incumbent Republican Rep. David Valadao was in first place with 44.5%. Crabtree noted:

His two challengers split the Democratic vote with progressive Randy Villegas holding second place at roughly 29.8% of the vote, while Assemblywoman Dr. Jasmeet Bains trailed at 25.7%. If Villegas holds on to his second-place finish he could consolidate the Democratic vote to make the fight for control of the seat incredibly competitive.

Yet, it’s unclear whether the Central Valley voters would back such a liberal Democrat against Valadao, a GOP centrist who voted to impeach Trump in 2021, come November.

It remains a competitive district, but Valadao might pull it off.

In the newly drawn CA-40, two Republicans, incumbent Rep. Ken Calvert and former Rep. Young Kim, appear headed for a general-election showdown, ensuring the seat remains in GOP hands.

Finally, Crabtree assessed the situation in CA-40, which she said “Democrats intentionally created as a Republican district,” and said it will likely remain in Republican hands.

Rep. Ken Calvert, a MAGA-aligned incumbent first elected to Congress in 1993 had his old district essentially dissolved by Proposition 50’s gerrymandering. Calvert relocated and ran in the new CA-40, created from a big portion of the one previously held by Rep. Young Kim, a more moderate Republican representing the area since 2021.

Early returns show both Republicans in the top two positions, with Calvert leading Kim 35.9% to 21.3%. Instead of trying to out-MAGA Calvert, Kim could shift left and court Democratic crossover voters to try to beat Calvert in the general, but it will be difficult.

Due to the sudden death of longtime Republican Rep. Doug LaMalfa, who represented CA-01, the story is somewhat murkier. Following LaMalfa’s death, Republican state Assemblyman James Gallagher won a special election with 62.4% of the vote. He defeated Democratic state Sen. Mike McGuire and Democratic candidate Audrey Denney, who “received 18% of the vote.”

According to Crabtree:

As of Thursday night, Gallagher was also leading the Tuesday primary with 46.6% of the vote to McGuire’s 38.4%, with Denney running far behind at 13.1%.

Strickland sees a ready-made line of attack against McGuire, who he said drew a map to benefit himself personally and predicted it would backfire.

“The voters aren’t going to be all excited that he tried to pick his own district,” he said.

Gallagher thanked voters Tuesday night and highlighted McGuire’s role in the gerrymandering process.

While millions of primary ballots remain uncounted, the state’s peculiar vote-counting process grinds on. We’ve seen the initial strength of Republican candidates Steve Hilton and Spencer Pratt narrow as additional votes are tallied. Still, the early returns from the five new districts indicate that several GOP candidates targeted by Democrats remain well-positioned heading into November, and that Newsom’s bid to turn five red seats blue may be tougher than he expected.


Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on LinkedIn.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 3
Mauiobserver | June 7, 2026 at 8:56 pm

That is the best news of the day. Hopefully the results in November negate the California Dems efforts.


 
 0 
 
 3
retiredcantbefired | June 7, 2026 at 11:23 pm

How can anyone trust election results from California?


 
 0 
 
 8
Olinser | June 7, 2026 at 11:26 pm

In case you missed it, they’ve now officially cheated the 3rd place candidate almost nobody had heard of or liked into 2nd place.

I told everybody they would never allow Pratt to win.

It shocks me just how many people think that Democrats will just follow little things like laws.


 
 0 
 
 2
henrybowman | June 7, 2026 at 11:57 pm

“Ammar Campa-Najjar, a Naval reservist, former Obama Labor Department official, and grandson of a Palestinian… was backed by… Qualcomm founder Irwin Jacobs, who poured at least $800,000 into the race. It marked the fourth election loss in row after members of the Jacobs family bankrolled two prior runs for Congress and another failed campaign for mayor of Chula Vista.”

TL;DR: Billionaire Jew who made his fortune via capitalism has fetish for repeatedly backing Palestinian socialist.

I guess it’s true what they say — you can’t fix schmuck.


 
 0 
 
 1
mailman | June 8, 2026 at 2:06 am

“ CA-06, Rep. Kevin Kiley, who announced in March that he was switching his political affiliation from Republican to independent”

Irrespective of the parties involved, if someone is elected under the banner of political party x and later that person decides to change their affiliation to political party y then seat should remain with political party x until the next election.


     
     0 
     
     2
    Milhouse in reply to mailman. | June 8, 2026 at 2:52 am

    It can’t work like that. Congressmen are elected in their own right. There is no such thing as a party in the constitution. Membership of a party is just like an any other policy a candidate announces, and can change his mind at any time. It’s no different from a candidate being elected after promising to back some stupid measure, and then being educated on the matter and changing their mind. If the voters don’t like it they can vote against the member at the next election, but in the meantime it’s out of their hands, and deliberately so.

    How else could it work? Force the member to resign?! And have someone else serve the term who was never elected?! And how would you even try it without amending the constitution?


 
 0 
 
 4
isfoss | June 8, 2026 at 8:59 am

Ya think? No way Newsom lets those seats slip away. No way. It’s California, remember?


 
 0 
 
 2
destroycommunism | June 8, 2026 at 9:19 am

the kleft wins no matter what gop is in office as their welfare state has grown roots in this country so deep that it would take trumpx25 to root it out and maga also has gop working against them


 
 0 
 
 3
Azathoth | June 8, 2026 at 9:49 am

Of course his cheating will work.

Look at the primaries.

The DNC refuses to let any but a Democrat win.

And no one is stopping them.

Even as they do it openly.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.