‘Death to IDF’: Glastonbury Music Festival Spirals Into Antisemitic Rally
“Because sometimes you’ve got to get your message across with violence because that is the only language that some people speak, unfortunately.”
Anyone who has watched the famous British music festival Glastonbury over the years knew this would happen. I used to love watching the music festival, especially when in London to cover Wimbledon.
I stopped a few years ago.
British rap duo Bob Vylan and Northern Irish rap group Kneecap sealed the fall of Glastonbury.
Antisemitism and full-blown leftism have infected Glastonbury.
Palestinian flags everywhere. Singers shouting genocidal slogans, promoting the destruction of Jews and Israel.
The terrorists that these antisemites promote *LITERALLY* invaded a music festival, slaughtered hundreds, and kidnapped hundreds more. In all, terrorists murdered thousands on October 7.
The terrorists still have hostages.
Nuremberg Rally 1935.
Glastonbury 2025. pic.twitter.com/QbcULcryKd
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) June 29, 2025
— Guramit Singh (@Guramitsingh01) June 28, 2025
Bob Vylan
No, I’m not talking about Bob Dylan, the influential Jewish singer and songwriter.
While “Bob Vylan” hijacks Bob Dylan’s name to incite violence against Israelis…
Here’s the real Bob Dylan — standing at the Western Wall, celebrating his son’s Bar Mitzvah in Jerusalem, the eternal capital of the Jewish people. 🇮🇱✡️ pic.twitter.com/U2Bz2ftiXA
— Jews Fight Back 🇺🇸🇮🇱 (@JewsFightBack) June 29, 2025
No, it’s about an antisemitic rap duo who shouted:
“Death, death to the IDF!”
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”
“Free, free Palestine!”
Then the lead singer said:
“Because sometimes you’ve got to get your message across with violence because that is the only language that some people speak, unfortunately.”
"Because sometimes you've got to get your message across with violence because that is the only language that some people speak, unfortunately."
Punk duo Bob Vylan used their Glastonbury set to deliver a powerful message against the genocide in Gaza, declaring that they're not… pic.twitter.com/9zg3RW34sM
— Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) June 29, 2025
Singer Bob Vylan chants “DEATH TO THE IDF” at Britain’s largest music festival Glastonbury and then performs his new song “HEARD YOU WANT YOUR COUNTRY BACK? HAH, SHUT THE FUCK UP” which I guess is just supposed to be gloating over white demographic decline? pic.twitter.com/MNuq6Q7h5x
— Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 (@DrewPavlou) June 29, 2025
A music festival #Nova23 7/10 saw the brutal slaughter of hundreds of young people by genocidal Islamist barbarians
At a music festival today #Glastonbury2025 #UK there were calls to a rousing cheering crowd for the genocide of a whole people.
Glastonbury25=Nuremberg Rallies… pic.twitter.com/GqXVYj8Fhf
— Irish Jewish Voice (@Irishchutzpah) June 28, 2025
I don’t really need to say more about these people, do I? They’ve said enough.
Kneecap
Kneecap performed after Bob Vylan.
The Northern Ireland rap group has already landed in hot water in America and the UK (remember, Northern Ireland is a part of the UK) due to their loud and proud support for Hamas and Hezbollah.
The lead singer, Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, known as Mo Chara, faces terrorism charges in the UK for supposedly displaying the Hezbollah flag at a concert.
Due to Kneecap’s former troubles, the BBC didn’t air their set live.
Kneecap did not stray from their antisemitism at Glastonbury. One singer wore a shirt that said, “We are all Palestine action.” Another wore that stupid Palestinian scarf (I don’t have the time to look up the spelling.)
The group continued the “Death to the IDF” chant.
The lead singer told the crowd, “I don’t have to lecture you people. Israel are war criminals!”
The group also chanted “F*ck Keir Starmer.” They also encouraged their fans to riot in the Westminster courts due to the terrorism charges.
Chara tried to downplay it though: “A disclaimer: no riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.”
Oh, then there’s also “The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.”
Kneecap leads a “F—- Keir Starmer”chant during the group’s #Glastonbury set. pic.twitter.com/xBV54uQero
— Variety (@Variety) June 28, 2025
Zombie hatred cult chanting for Kneecap at the Glastonbury death festival.
A bunch of maladjusted adolescents in their 20s and 30s.
They think they are righteous and wonderful, of course, not a sad set of hateful losers. pic.twitter.com/gIRTSU8Int
— habibi (@habibi_uk) June 28, 2025
No Bob Vylan in the US?
The US already revoked Kneecap’s ability to come to America.
Now the State Department might aim at Bob Vylan. From The Daily Wire:
A senior State Department official told The Daily Wire that it is “already looking at revocation” of their visas ahead of a roughly twenty-city tour through the United States, with performances planned in several major cities, including Washington, D.C.
“As a reminder, under the Trump Administration, the U.S. government will not issue visas to any foreigner who supports terrorists,” the senior official said.
Bob Vylan and Kneecap have both crossed the line. You’re not allowed to incite violence. You’re not allowed to call for the deaths of people.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Rap =/= music
Bach is music, Frank Sinatra is music, the Beatles is music.
Rap is the equivalent of the opening scene in 2001; A Space Odyssey except with instruments inserted.
It’s noise, it’s violence, it’s misogyny. It glorifies crime and black culture.
You should expect nothing less.
It’s the antithesis of anything worthy and beautiful and I’m tired of pretending that it’s not.
It’s noise, it’s violence, it’s misogyny. It glorifies crime and black culture.
Which explains perfectly why that crap gets promoted.
Crime and black culture? Typo? Crime IS the new black entitlement.
For the down-ticker, look up the Karmelo Anthony stabbing of Austin Metcalfe. The reduced bail. The grifting of 500 grand and now dear sweet innocent oppressed Karmelo demanding a public defender. A bailed person went over state lines to hide, yet gets away with it.
Black entitlement.
following that case and the murderers side is pushing the racism issue while the victims are begging for that not to be the issue
and we all know why
the threat of violence works over and over for the blmplo culture to impose that on the civility of humans
To destroycommunism: I am cynical enough to think the easy bail and the loose-y-goose-y travel restrictions is because local
tribal chieftains“reverends” and “commyooniteh leadahz” have made it clear that Frisco will burn unless the above-mentioned things, and a thrown trial, don’t take place.Now that dear sweet angelic Karmelo has been charged with Murder-One by the grand jury, the prosecutors will do their level best to get – at minimum – a mistrial, or will throw the case so hard the jury returns a verdict of not guilty.
He was indicted for first degree murder I believe. Be interesting to see what happens.
Watch body cams videos. I think I’ve seen two pale-skinned people blame racism for their legal troubles. Both were obviously drunk, one was obviously Eastern European or Russian.
But even getting a ticket for parking in the middle of the street is “racism” for blacks. Stopped because you shoplifted and store security got your plates — “racism”. Attacked a cop because you’re drunk and stupid — your arrest is because “racism”.
Even black cops are “racist” if they’re enforcing the law against someone whose mind is in the ghetto.
Take away Bitches and Ho’s and you got nothing.
I did recently add Beastie Boys “Sure Shot” to my play list as it was the opening song for season 2 of “Patriot,” a must see TV series.
Rap is the fetid excretion of a deadly toxic culture.
I knew a very nice black woman about my age when I resided in Johnson City TN. We discussed music. Her term for rap was “n1663r noise”.
Go back 70 years. We still had The Duke and The Count. We had Nat Cole, Johnny Hartman, Billy Eckstine. We had The Delta Rhythm Boys (amazing!), The Platters, Ella Fitzgerald, Lena Horne, Nancy Wilson, and so many others.
We also had musicians I didn’t know were black, but who did amazing music. Eddie Heywood (Canadian Sunset), and Tommy Edwards (It’s All in the Game. set to “Melody in A major”, written by Charles Dawes, a vice president) come to mind.
Now, I don’t think a black artist doing music could even get a second look from a C-list agent.
Thought experiment: If a black dude started recording rap but eschewed the loud clothing, bling jewelry, violent rivalry, and scandalous public life, would his performance name be “Plain Brown Rapper”?
One thing I meant to add: take a look at pictures of the above-cited musicians. Well-dressed, groomed to the max; nothing wild or in-your-face. This is especially true of The Delta Rhythm Boys. None were slobs, at least not in public. Even Ella, heaven bless her, was a “woman of size” and yet still and an elegance and grace about her that is not seen in anyone today.
The Spinners, the O’Jays, the Temptations, Al Green, Barry White. All classy acts that I remember from the 70s. And they’re just a short list of great black acts.
How many children were conceived to the music of Barry White?!?
;-{)}}}
Even back in those Bad Old Days of Segregation(r), we listened to black artists and didn’t give it a second thought. Blacks listened to Frank Sinatra, Perry Como, and Dinah Shore and didn’t give it a second thought. One neighbor of ours had a part time housekeeper who ironed to the classical music on KFAC.
It was a different time. Yes, there was formal segregation but I think race relations were actually BETTER back then.
Bill Withers
Jazz is one of the greatest contributions of black culture to all others.
They took a hesitant whitebread form (ragtime) and gave it energy, confidence, and over a century more of staying power.
For fun, search out versions of the old standard “Moonglow” on the web. It’s old enough to be from just after the Civil War era — it was originally ragtime, but now is always played in swing. Make sure you listen to the authentic ragtime ones, not the swing versions performed by bands with names like “Ragtime Riverboat Rats.” In ragtime, the notes come down ON the beats, as in Joplin’s “The Entertainer.” The vast difference in appeal that a little syncopation makes is surprising. Blacks invented that.
There is no reason to tolerate this. If he speaks violence, then you should learn his language.
All you have to do is use an argument that will convince singers and artists. The Holocaust card won’t do it. I mean it’s great internally to Judaism but it doesn’t work externally, because everybody has a Holocaust card and all the Palestinians have to do is present themselves as more oppressed by Jews than oppressing of Jews. Indeed the latter is presented as a fully justified voice of the powerless.
The right argument is that Israel behaves morally and the Palestinians behave immorally. Can you think of examples? It’s embedded in Judaism so they’re all over.
I don’t think Palestinian supporters care about arguments. That would be an intellectual activity. I think they are simply responding emotionally to photographs from Palestine. Then, like lemmings, they submerge themselves into the mob and indulge in the cathartic screaming into the void. Oh, and they get to tell themselves they are morally superior for being part of the mob. It’s not meant to make sense.
Hardin will never forgive the Jews for the Holocaust. He has to be more circumspect in his Jew hatred, and that chafes at his “soul”.
Your feeble and threadbare argument appears to be aimed at yourself.
How about Jews don’t rape and slaughter unarmed music festival attendees
Upvoted, but I’d have to niggle about “Palestinians behave immorally.” Certainly, their terrorists do, and many Palestinians support them. But there is a segment of their society that does not.
Additionally, the morality of Israel and the IDF is on display regularly for anyone to see here online. People who think they hate Israel (meaning people who have been told to hate Israel) simply will not bother to seek out this information. Just look at its recent action against Iran – the IDF/IAF warned citizens in certain neighborhoods of Tehran to evacuate prior to Israeli attacks. Israel considered the safety of large numbers of Iranians while potentially jeopardizing their own personnel and the mission. Who else does this?
Actions have consequences. The USA is under zero obligation to allow entry to non Citizens nor to allow non Citizens to remain in the USA when they espouse terrorism. (Caveat – with very limited exceptions under narrow circumstances that ain’t universal in application)
Past time to end the permissive environment for these sorts of terroristic, USA hating, commie loving, terrorist embracing goons. By all means support terrorists, bash the USA, act a fool if you wish…but do it from your own Nation and don’t act as if you are entitled to come here or remain here as a guest if you do.
Maybe they should try being grandfathered in as Biden “refugees…..”
Maybe they should have a bounty on their heads. Every deportation gets the hunter a nice tidy sum.
I heard from a friend and former bounty hunter that his old partner/boss just tried to recruit him at $1k per illegal alien with a deportation warrant, being paid by ICE.
Better yet require a US Citizen as a financial sponsor. Let them post $100K bond as surety for the behavior of the Alien they sponsor. Same for employers requesting work visa approval or Univ requesting student visa approvals. When/if the terms are violated even for something as simple as not returning ICE phone call or missing an appointment with immigration officials then they revoke the visa, seize the bond and turn loose bounty hunters to find and bring the Alien in for deportation. At $100K each that’s plenty of motivation. Require the Alien to agree to the same sort conditions as a pretrial defendant out on bond mist do as a condition of underwriting the bond. One Alien per Citizen, no billionaires sponsoring hundreds or thousands, no NGO, just Citizens, employers and Univ.
Shameful trash
Young, ignorant, probably high as kites, and being a Hamashole is no way to go througy life.
It will be interesting to see their faces when they find out music is verboten in Islamic “utopias.”
Every time I see an article like this I think of the admonition “Stock up. Arm up”.
.
This is especially true for Jews. But, with so many of them favoring gun confiscation or control, they won’t.
You’re confusing Marxists with Jewish ancestors with actual Jews.
All of us get lumped together quite a bit. I was raised pretend-Jewish, which meant I was around sniveling hand-wringers who saw antisemitism in more than black find racism. Along with other factors I grew disgusted and walked away from the entire thing, with ONE friend left from those days. He is the “thinking leftist” I have alluded to a time or two on here.
The easiest way for vile, European leftist dhimmis and American Dhimmi-crats to gain currency and plaudits is to slander and vilify Israel and Israeli Jews, while praising genocidal, Arab Islamofascists/Muslim terrorists and absurdly casting them as alleged victims.
This is a mass display of malignant narcissism and lemming groupthink. The underlying psychology at work is similar to that present in Europe, in the 1920’s and 1930’s, in the run-up to WWII and the Holocaust.
Chances are that a Federal Judge in NY will issue an injunction requiring USCIS to issue visas to these thugs.
If Kamala were president, she would probably invite both groups to the WH.
There is no chance at all of that. This is firmly settled law. Foreigners of course have the freedom of speech wherever they are, but the US constitution only protects their speech if they are in the USA. If they are punished, e.g. by being denied visas, for things they said outside the USA they have no recourse to US courts.
However foreigners who are already in the USA are protected and can’t be punished for their speech, e.g. by cancellation of their visas.
You are correct, no foreigner in the USA is going to be ‘punished’ solely based on speech. Revocation of permission to remain in the USA is not a punishment it is an administrative action, no fines issued, no prison terms, no lawful property seized… just an order to leave and assistance in leaving if required. Heck even a green card holder can have their ‘permanent’ legal status revoked very easily in the first few years after issuance if they associate with terrorism or embrace terrorism.
Nobody is going to go to prison or be fined solely based upon content of speech. There’s no property liberty interest involved in being granted permission to enter or remain in the USA and that permission being revoked at a later date. Inconvenience? Sure. Disruptive? Yep. Disappointing? Absolutely….but telling a guest to leave isn’t a punishment.
You are wrong. It doesn’t matter what form the government action takes, if it is taken because of someone’s protected speech it is unconstitutional. The government cannot punish someone in any way whatsoever for their protected speech. Not even by merely cutting off a government grant, let alone by revoking a visa.
Nice caveat ‘protected speech’. Sure protected speech isn’t gonna result in a revocation Of course espousing terrorism is one thing that is supposed to be an automatic disqualification from being granted permission to enter or remain in the USA. Can also apply to green card holder within five years of grant. Exposing terrorism is definitely NOT protected speech. Lots of speech isn’t protected.
Then there’s the plenary powers of the Executive to deport pretty much any Alien they wish so long as the AG, in their sole discretion, finds them to be a national security risk. The Sec State has similar powers. Neither are justiciable under the statutes.
Now a long term green card holder with a current FB post offering support for Hamas as one off and he’s had a green card for two decades? He’s in a better position to fight b/c he’s well past the five or even ten year window to be removed under an inadmissible criteria. However, the AG could remove him if, at his sole discretion, he found him to be a security threat and ordered it.
No one has a property right or liberty interest right to a visa. Revoking a visa is not a high hurdle at all. Even a green card can be revoked without much difficulty despite the protests of true believers in Judicial Supremacy or that the 1A is an impenetrable shield. It’s simply not so, no more than the 2A allows an average NYC resident to exercise their right to ‘keep and bear arms’ without gov’t permission. Ask Eugene Debs all about whether some unprotected speech can result in prison or punishment.
It’s not a “nice caveat”. Espousing terrorism is protected speech. Yes, it’s automatic disqualification from being granted permission to enter, but it isn’t and can’t be a disqualification from remaining, if the person would otherwise be allowed to remain.
No, it can’t. Any statute that says so is automatically invalid, so the courts will interpret statutes so as not to say that. Exposing terrorism is definitely NOT protected speech. You meant to write “espousing”, of course. And yes, it is.
Wrong. Very little speech is not protected; there is a small and well-settled list of “exceptions”, and no new ones are likely to be discovered. And it is a hard and fast rule, long-settled and not subject to dispute, that “mere advocacy”, no matter of what, has the highest level of protection.
Except when forbidden by the constitution. No statute can override the constitution, and it is unconstitutional to take any government action against someone, no matter how discretionary, in retaliation for exercising their constitutional rights. Even government grants, which are the height of discretionary since the government doesn’t have to make them in the first place, can’t be cut off for such a reason.
The decision that allowed that was horrible and evil, and has since been completely repudiated, along with the “falsely shouting ‘fire’ in a theater” throwaway line that came from it. Debs’s imprisonment was completely illegal and could not happen today.
Milhouse,
The 1A is simply not IMO the impenetrable shield you claim it to be. The.executive does not have to give a reason to revoke a visa IMO b/c it is a voluntary grant of permission not a right being extinguished. Same as a guest in your home, if you invite them to dinner but they offend you in some way you can compelling them to leave. There’s nothing much for an Art 3 court to adjudicate in revoking an average visa. It isn’t a right, there’s no property interest, no liberty interest, sending them home doesn’t punish or imprison them. If the Executive can grant they can revoke.
You are incorrect. Visas can be cancelled for all sorts of reasons, and it is NOT a punishment, but the revocation of a privilege.
You are incorrect. It doesn’t matter what form the government action takes, if it is taken because of someone’s protected speech it is unconstitutional. The government cannot punish someone in any way whatsoever for their protected speech. Not even by merely cutting off a government grant, let alone by revoking a visa.
No chance of a decision surviving appeals courts. Given what lower courts have already tried I am surprised by your continued faith in them.
Trusting the courts to do right is a nice Poly-Anna viewpoint, but is based on as much reality as “the policeman is your friend”.
All visas are provisional. They come with rules and responsibilities that control the behavior of the visa holder. They may have a right to challenge the government’s claim that they have violated the rules, but if it’s determined the rules have been violated, out they go. By accepting the visa, the foreigner agrees to the restrictions, even to the point of surrendering certain rights he might have here otherwise. They either accept the limits to their rights, or they can stay home.
It doesn’t matter that they’re provisional. The rules cannot include a waiver of one’s constitutional rights.
Are you arguing that a foreign national granted permission to enter the USA on some sort of visa can lawfully purchase, own, keep and bear ‘arms’ in NYC?
Please point us to the examples where this is currently occurring so we may review and observe this new found respect for Constitutional rights in NYC.
FWIW the ‘rules’ often require waiver of one’s Constitutional rights. Sign a military enlistment contract, then violate Article 88 by using ‘contemptuous words’ towards officials and see how fast the 1A is pushed aside in the stampede to try, convict and punish you.
Chief, as you well know the 2nd amendment has for a long time been treated as a second class right, and although the Supreme Court has asserted that it isn’t, in practice it is still treated that way and the Court has chosen to allow this to continue at least for “another term or two”, as Kavanaugh put it recently.
The only excuse I’ve heard for excluding aliens (legal or illegal) from the RKBA is the reference to “the people”; it is asserted that only citizens are “the people”, or even that only adult citizens are “the people”, and therefore the 2A only protects them. The problem with that argument is that it would also have to apply to the 4A, and to the peaceful assembly and petition clauses in the 1A, and no one wants to argue that!
The case for aliens’ RKBA is in fact making its way through the courts right now, as is the case for that of non-violent felons. We shall see eventually how that works out.
Democrats in particular, who insist that illegal aliens overall are no more likely than citizens to commit violent crimes, and thus that they pose no danger to the public, will find it hard to argue at the same time that they are so dangerous that public safety requires that they be disarmed! They can’t have it both ways!
In any case, you can’t use breaches of the 2A to argue for similar breaches of the rest of the constitution. Even if the courts were to let the government get away with it, it would be wrong; and they’re not likely to do that.
Also, it is a well-established principle that no generally available government benefit may be conditioned on the waiver of any constitutional right.
That is why public housing authorities have been told by the courts that the 2A applies in their buildings, and they cannot bar tenants from keeping arms in their homes.
Military discipline is a whole nother ball of wax. SCOTUS ruled in 1986 that the military’s need to “foster instinctive obedience, unity, commitment, and esprit de corps” overrides the first amendment.
Bear in mind that military service is not a government benefit; nor has it always been voluntary. So a member does not waive his constitutional rights; if he did then how could it apply to someone who was forcibly conscripted, and didn’t waive anything? Rather, military service simply overrides members’ rights.
Members of the military are a special category apart from the rest of society… just as aliens on a visa are a group apart. The usual rules don’t apply to these categories IMO.
As for 2A you bet. When those who push the idea that aliens can’t be removed get NYC to comply with the 2A .. I will take their constitutional arguments re deportation seriously but not before.
Wrong. Foreigners in the US are here at the pleasure of the US via the Dept of State. They can be thrown out for just about any reason including supporting a designated terror group or calling for the death of people. Stop your lying on this subject.
You are wrong. Any government action whatsoever against a person for their protected speech is by definition unconstitutional. Any action, including revoking a privilege they would otherwise have. Even including revoking a government grant. And certainly revoking a visa.
Stunning. Music festival attendees lionizing the massacre of attendees of a music festival. There are no words.
Ditto, and they PAID to attend.
How many of that crowd sincerely hold those beliefs, and how many are joining the crowd because it’s the latest trend? “Gee, mom… all the other kids are doing it…!”
Doesn’t matter. Their presence gives the rhetoric support.
I agree, but, my question still stands.
Why on earth not? I call for the deaths of every member of Hamas, Fatah, Islamic Jihad, and all the other groups, and my conscience is fine with it. Certainly the law in the USA is fine with it. And the law in the USA is also fine with calling for the deaths of all Jews, all black people, all gay people, etc. Someone who says these things while within the USA is fully protected by the first amendment; he can’t even have his visa canceled. But foreigners speaking in a foreign country aren’t protected by US law, and there’s no requirement to give them visas.
You will be arrested for uttering terroristic threats. Do it on the phone and its federal. Do you know anything about the law? I had a next door neighbor threaten to kill me ie “calling for my death”. I made a police report, got a restraining order and went after him. Guess what? He ended up in jail thinking about the error of his ways.
No, you cannot be arrested for it, and if you are then you can sue the police and they will not have qualified immunity. Calling for someone’s death is absolutely protected speech, and this is firmly established law and beyond any question or dispute.
If you are now telling the truth about what you did then you are a vicious criminal, and this person would have every right to retaliate against you. Somehow I don’t think that’s what happened, though. I think you are misrepresenting what happened in order to lie about the law.
headline we didnt and wont read:
idf/israelis attack concert goers and took hostages while r ap n the men and women
It feels like A Clockwork Orange,
black is the new orange
the blmplo tribe is not just some abstract theme
its ruling the western world and has the usa quaking in its boots
hide from it but it rules the
schools
msm
businesses
affirmaction solidified the white slef destruction in the name of fairness equality>>equity but it of course was just another short term “fix” to get the whites through the night
now the sea of destruction is washing over us
and the lifeguard is no wheres in sight
Britain has long since passed the tipping point of foreign-born residents. Wikipedia says 14% (2018 estimate); I’ve seen estimates as high as 20%. It is, by definition, a conquered country.
It’s not so much the percentage as it is the fact Britain’s “authorities” have laid (lain?) down and shown their bellies. They arrest people for tweets, or things overheard between to people sitting at a tea shop table.
By and large, the heritage British are a bunch of cowards.
There is a reason they were disarmed.
It is hard to erase the peasant mentality. Even during the revolutionary war about 1/3 of the colonists were loyal to England, and they remined so to the point of the 1812 skirmish.
I agree. Everu so-often I will see some news story out of the UK, and if any “man on the street interviews” are done, many of those interviewed have this tone of voice and body language like they were whipped puppies. Like they would touch their forelocks if royalty passes by. It’s pathetic.
A lot of that is seen here in the form of “the [government department] said it, it must be true”. “Why would [alleged authority] lie?”
Why don’t these people go to Gaza if they really want to help?
Maybe their “music” will be well received and used as background during the filming of their beheadings.
they are omars back up singers
Open borders leftists have tilted the demographics in britain and EU. Pull on that thread long enough and it all comes unravelled?
Ireland is a problem. They were a problem during ww2 with the neutrality and they are a problem now with their anti-Israel rhetoric.
In Ireland’s case, hatred for England remains so strong that they automatically support anything England is against. They keep the past alive, so it almost seems impossible for Ireland to face the future. By now, it is a self-imposed injury.
Another sad, aimless people.
I’ve generally enjoyed the Irish people I’ve met in the states. I’ve liked then much more than the typical Boston Irish which have been a pestilence on Boston and Massachusetts. Funny that the Irish irish seem to have a similar opinion much as many African Africans dislike black Americans. Despite that it’s time to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. They can hate the English all they want but that shouldn’t translate into pro-Gazan support and Israeli hatred.
BTW: If you don’t like my comment about the Boston Irish – too bad. Not sorry.
This is probably the only way they can sell music, appeal to a bunch of Jew haters. Their latest cut, GENOCIDE, will be a smash hit!
There is a story here in the back ground that was very positive.
A black female rapper refused to be there because should would not bend the knee to the Pali-mob. I’m not totally familiar with her, but I think she’s one of the potty mouth ones adults stop listening to around the age of 28.
I was hoping Leslie or Beegee would cover it.
name her
b/c I dont see that in the news
tia
The link is below. It would do well to read because she was pretty blunt about it.
Banks.
Azealia or something like that. I thought I saw it in Beegee or Leslie twitter feeds. Her response was VERY refreshing.
1- I won’t wear that f****ng Hijab
2- I’m not your hashtag bitch thinking your solving world problems by jumping on the bandwagon.
I was reading her stuff and have some genuine respect for her positions. She has also previously refused to say Black Lives Matter (and she’s black) because she refuses to let her music platform be corrupted for these causes.
While she was initially making it about not corrupting her platform for non-art, she did spew out a lot of common sense.
I will look again at the twitter feed and try and find it. The Banks profiles of black rappers I found his am were all garbage and not the same woman.
“This change was absolutely not as a result of overcrowding fears; the artist was simply no longer able to make this performance. She is still playing her Woodsies set.”
PinkPantheress has cancelled one of her two sets.
https://x.com/azealiaslacewig
She very much did tell them to FOXTROT OSCAR.
She’s not a conservative by any means… she’s a fan of that ahole in TX that killed the white kid at the track meet. So I’m not making her a saint of free thinking by any means.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2025/06/26/rapper-azealia-banks-pulls-out-of-u-k-music-festival-under-pressure-to-support-palestine/
OMG, how Dunning-Kreuger is the post right after that.
“-5²” with no grouping operators does not mean “(-5)²” — it means “-(5²)”.
A is the correct answer — zero.
The post after that where? I followed the link and couldn’t see anything on the page that you could have been referring to.
Looks like the Dept of State just pulled their visa’s so no US tour. It’s nice to have an Administration that actually does something.
Good.